Ultrasound Achieves 95% Accuracy for Testicular Torsion
A systematic review and meta-analysis found that ultrasound had a high diagnostic accuracy for testicular torsion, with colour Doppler sonography achieved a sensitivity of 95.3% and a specificity of 98.3% in its detection.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 63 studies that included men presenting to secondary or tertiary care with suspected testicular torsion and who subsequently underwent diagnostic assessment with ultrasound.
The analysis included colour Doppler sonography as the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as reference standards.
Of the studies included, 54 (85.7%) assessed colour Doppler sonography, and the others examined spectral Doppler sonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, or alternative ultrasound technologies.
TAKEAWAY:
Across 42 studies involving 4422 participants, colour Doppler sonography demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% CI, 91.4-97.5) and a specificity of 98.3% (95% CI, 96.2-99.3) in detecting testicular torsion.
The positive predictive value was 96.1% (95% CI, 91.4-98.4) and the negative predictive value was 97.9% (95% CI, 96.2-98.9), based on 1358 cases of testicular torsion.
The analysis revealed that younger patient age, non-radiologist user status, and the implementation of point-of-care ultrasound did not have a significant effect on diagnostic accuracy.
IN PRACTICE:
"There is evidence to suggest that ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for TT [testicular torsion] detection. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling," the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Cameron E. Alexander, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, England. It was published online on May 13, 2025, in European Urology Focus .
LIMITATIONS:
Insufficient data reporting prevented the assessment of the effect of several predefined factors on diagnostic accuracy. Although the accuracy has improved over time with modern technology, previous studies demonstrated that junior radiologists were more likely to yield false negative results in a multicentre European study.
DISCLOSURES:
This study did not receive any specific funding. One author reported receiving infrastructure support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and Imperial College Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, research funding from the Urology Foundation, consultation fees from Janssen and Varian, and funding to attend scientific conferences from Janssen and Sonablate Corp.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Million-Dollar Project Aims to Expose Bad Medical Research
Armed with funding, algorithms, and a tip line, this new effort aims to dig corrupt studies out of medical literature before they do real-world harm. A new initiative from the watchdogs behind Retraction Watch is taking aim at flawed or faked medical science research to the tune of nearly $1 million. The Center for Scientific Integrity just launched the Medical Evidence Project, a two-year effort to identify published medical research with a negative effect on health guidelines—and to make sure people actually hear about it. Equipped with a $900,000 grant from Open Philanthropy and a core team of up to five investigators, the project will use forensic metascience tools to identify issues in scientific articles, and report its findings via Retraction Watch, the foremost site for scientific watchdogging. 'We originally set up the Center for Scientific Integrity as a home for Retraction Watch, but we always hoped we would be able to do more in the research accountability space,' said Ivan Oransky, executive director of the Center and co-founder of Retraction Watch, in a post announcing the grant. 'The Medical Evidence Project allows us to support critical analysis and disseminate the findings.' According to Nature, these flawed and falsified documents are vexing because they skew meta-analyses—reviews that combine the findings from multiple studies to draw more statistically robust conclusions. If one or two bunk studies make it into a meta-analysis, they can tip the scales on health policy. In 2009, to name one case, a European guideline recommended the use of beta-blockers during non-cardiac surgery, based on turn-of-the-millennium research that was later called into question. Years later, an independent review suggested that the guidance may have contributed to 10,000 deaths per year in the UK. Led by James Heathers, a science integrity consultant, the team's plan is to build software tools, chase down leads from anonymous whistleblowers, and pay peer reviewers to check their work. They're aiming to identify at least 10 flawed meta-analyses a year. The team is picking its moment wisely. As Gizmodo previously reported, AI-generated junk science is flooding the academic digital ecosystem, showing up in everything from conference proceedings to peer-reviewed journals. A study published in Harvard Kennedy School's Misinformation Review found that two-thirds of sampled papers retrieved through Google Scholar contained signs of GPT-generated text—some even in mainstream scientific outlets. About 14.5% of those bogus studies focused on health. That's particularly alarming because Google Scholar doesn't distinguish between peer-reviewed studies and preprints, student papers, or other less-rigorous work. And once this kind of bycatch gets pulled into meta-analyses or cited by clinicians, it's hard to untangle the consequences. 'If we cannot trust that the research we read is genuine,' one researcher told Gizmodo, 'we risk making decisions based on incorrect information.' We've already seen how nonsense can slip through. In 2021, Springer Nature retracted over 40 papers from its Arabian Journal of Geosciences—studies so incoherent they read like AI-generated Mad Libs. Just last year, the publisher Frontiers had to pull a paper featuring anatomically impossible AI-generated images of rat genitals. We've entered the era of digital fossils, in which AI models trained on web-scraped data are beginning to preserve and propagate nonsense phrases as if they were real scientific terms. For example, earlier this year a group of researchers found a garbled set of words from a 1959 biology paper embedded in the outputs of large language models including OpenAI's GPT-4o. In that climate, the Medical Evidence Project's goal feels more like triage than cleanup. The team is dealing with a deluge of flawed information, hiding in plain sight, and plenty of which can have very real health consequences if taken at face value.
Medscape
2 days ago
- Medscape
Continuing Metformin Reduces PCOS Pregnancy Risks
Continuing metformin throughout the first trimester in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) showed the potential to reduce miscarriage risk (odds ratio [OR], 0.64) and increase clinical pregnancy rates (OR, 1.57) compared with placebo. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 1708 women suggested that stopping metformin at pregnancy confirmation might be less beneficial than continuation through the first trimester. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating metformin started preconception and continued at least until positive pregnancy test compared with placebo or no treatment in women with PCOS. The analysis included 12 trustworthy studies with 1708 participants, with trials conducted across 14 countries spanning five continents, all graded as low to moderate quality evidence. The primary outcome measure focused on miscarriage rate, defined as pregnancy loss prior to 20 completed weeks of gestation, while secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Investigators performed indirect comparisons between treatment groups using the Bucher technique to evaluate clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for metformin treatment continued throughout first trimester vs stopped at a positive pregnancy test. TAKEAWAY: Women receiving preconception metformin continued throughout the first trimester had higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11-2.23), potential reduction in miscarriage (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32-1.25), and possible increase in live birth (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.59-2.61) compared with placebo or no treatment. Participants who stopped metformin once pregnant showed an increased clinical pregnancy rate (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80) but suggested higher miscarriage risk (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.73-2.90) compared with placebo or no treatment. Indirect comparisons consistently favored continuing metformin through first trimester vs stopping at pregnancy confirmation for clinical pregnancy (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.74-1.83), miscarriage (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.17-1.16), and live birth (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.41-3.13). IN PRACTICE: 'Women with PCOS have been shown to have a fivefold increased risk per year of developing insulin resistance and subsequent type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance has been shown to be independently associated with a higher risk of miscarriage. Metformin acts by decreasing gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis and enhancing glucose uptake, all of which in turn reduce insulin resistance,' wrote the authors of the study. SOURCE: The study was led by James Cheshire, PhD, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust in Birmingham, England. It was published online in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . LIMITATIONS: According to the authors, the main limitation was the inherent heterogeneous nature of the study population and the overall low quality of evidence. Women with PCOS have different phenotypes and varying degrees of hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance, which could not be accounted for in the analyses. Additionally, many studies did not subdivide pregnancy outcome data by body mass index (BMI), preventing meaningful analyses in BMI subgroups. The limited outcome data in spontaneously conceiving populations (only 30 women from two studies) make it difficult to extrapolate findings to this group. DISCLOSURES: The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. The study received no external funding.
News24
3 days ago
- News24
Smoking prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa shows the urgent need for effective regulation
A new academic study on smoking rates in Sub-Saharan Africa has given cause for concern and shows the need for an urgent review of existing approaches to tobacco control in the region. Worldwide, more than 1.1 billion people smoked tobacco in 2019, resulting in about 8 million deaths. 1 in 5 adults worldwide are consuming tobacco. Globally, over 22 000 people die from tobacco use or second-hand smoke exposure every day — that equates to one person every 4 seconds. (Ref: The Tobacco Body, 31 May 2019 Publication. While smoking rates have declined globally, progress in less developed regions, including Sub-Saharan Africa, has been slower. Adolescent smoking remains a concern, with a 23.5% lifetime prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa recorded in 2018 and no updated data to date. To address the deficiency in data, Belete H, et al1 searched databases for peer-reviewed observational online studies published from January 2018 to 2023 and calculated the weighted pooled smoking prevalence using meta-regression analysis. A total of 10 310 unique records were screened and 340 studies were included for full-text screening, of which 195 studies were retained for the meta-analysis, amounting to 1,3 million participants. The findings showed overall lifetime smoking prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa at 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1, 13.4%), with 10.8% (CI 4.0%, 19.9%) having smoked in the past year and 5.8% in the past 6 months. Regional disparities in adult smoking rates revealed notable trends: the southern SSA region showed a lifetime prevalence of 37.1%, while South Africa reported a 12-month prevalence of 59.2% and a 6-month prevalence of 19.6%. Namibia's lifetime prevalence stood at 28.9%. This is comparable to the lifetime prevalence in the United States, which is 19% and regularly tracked and monitored through population data. However, the SSA region confronts substantial obstacles, including insufficient healthcare resources, inadequate implementation of tobacco control policies, and the burden of hosting two-thirds of the world's most impoverished populations. As the authors noted: 'these results underscore the growing rates of tobacco use in Sub-Saharan Africa, reinforcing the idea that high smoking prevalence is increasingly concentrated in low-income regions like Sub-Saharan Africa. Without collective action, smoking rates in SSA could rise, triggering serious health and economic issues. The smoking epidemic is shifting toward low-income countries. Without urgent policy action, SSA risks falling short of the WHO's 2025 goal to cut tobacco use by 30%.' 2 They recommend, among others, that countries in the region strengthen their tobacco monitoring systems and adopt innovative strategies for smoking prevention. This lack of comprehensive data collection not only hinders the precise assessment of smoking prevalence but also masks the full scope of smoking-related public health challenges within the SSA region. It is critical to have consistent enforcement of international tobacco control measures to effectively reduce smoking rates in all population groups. Another part of the solution is suggested by research from Australia and New Zealand which compares vaping and smoking trends in the two countries in the context of their different regulatory policies.3 The study shows that between 2016 and 2023, the smoking rate in New Zealand (from 14.5% to 6.8%) fell twice as fast than in Australia (from 12.2% to 8.3%). With a significant decline in the disadvantaged and indigenious populations. Smoking prevalence fell three times faster in New Zealand's lowest socioeconomic group than in the same population in Australia (12% per year vs 4% per year). New Zealand's liberal vaping laws were linked to faster smoking decline compared to Australia. The authors note that the largest smoking reductions in both countries were in young adults, who also reported the highest vaping rates, while youth smoking rates declined in both countries to very low levels. Turning to the contrasting regulatory approaches between the two countries, they argue that Australia has taken a 'highly restrictive precautionary approach to regulating nicotine vaping products by classifying nicotine e-liquid as a prescription-only 'unapproved' medicine since 2011'. Vapers could only buy nicotine e-liquid legally with a doctor's prescription, but this prescription model has resulted in low rates of prescribing, low compliance by vapers and the emergence of a large illicit market controlled by criminal networks, which supplies over 90% of vaping products. 'In contrast, New Zealand has adopted a more risk-proportionate approach. It has endorsed vaping as a tool for smoking cessation and encouraged its use among adults unable to quit smoking through other means.'4 According to Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) New Zealand, there is minimal evidence of a significant illicit market for vaping products in that country. Australia's stringent medical model for vaping has unintentionally nurtured a flourishing and increasingly violent black market. At present, over 90% of vaping products available in Australia are sourced from unlawful channels, devoid of safety regulations and readily accessible to young individuals. Recent reports have revealed that more than 220 vape and tobacco shops across the nation have been targeted in firebombing attacks. The findings of the study suggest that vaping has not served as a gateway to smoking. Instead, it appears to have steered young individuals away from the use of combustible tobacco products. The Australian medical model for vaping serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of regulation for policymakers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Without addressing the black market's proliferation and its accompanying social harms, the intended benefits of strict vaping policies may be overshadowed by their unintended consequences. A more nuanced, evidence-based strategy could be pivotal in achieving the twin goals of public health and safety and may contribute to more rapid progress in reducing smoking prevalence in the region. Insert new reference: Ref: The Tobacco Body, 31 May 2019 Publication. 1. Belete H, et al. Tobacco smoking in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Rev. Feb 2025; 1-13. 2. Belete H, et al. Tobacco smoking in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Rev. Feb 2025; 1-13. 3. Mendelsohn CP et al. Do the differing vaping and smoking trends in Australia and New Zealand reflect different regulatory policies. Addiction, 2025 4. Mendelsohn CP et al. Do the differing vaping and smoking trends in Australia and New Zealand reflect different regulatory policies. Addiction, 2025 About HRiSSA: The Harm Reduction Advocacy in Sub-Saharan Africa society (HRiSSA) is a non-profit organisation dedicated to delivering appropriate, quality patient care supported with the latest scientific evidence based data. The society is administered by harm reduction experts and as such has a latitudinous collaboration across both African and global harm reduction focus groups and research networks. Patient advocacy and Public Health are an integral focus of the Society and to this end, information and resources are made available to patients and their families on all aspects of harm reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa. For more information, please contact : office@ (
