Michael Milken summit rival has unique ties to famed ‘Junk Bond King'
This week's Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills faced a little competition – and it came from someone with an interesting connection to the famed high-profile investment bank that made Michael Milken a Wall Street legend, On The Money has learned.
Milken, now a philanthropist and investor, made history by creating the high yield or junk bond market at Drexel Burnham Lambert back in the 1980s. It's where he earned the moniker 'Junk Bond King.'
Milken and his team were among the most innovative financiers ever. Their so-called junk bonds, or high-yield debt, were used to finance some of the biggest companies when they were in their formative stages and turn them into corporate behemoths.
Advertisement
3 Michael Milken (left) made history by creating the high yield or junk bond market back in the 1980s. It's where he earned the moniker 'Junk Bond King.' Adam Winnick has been quietly making a name for himself in crypto as an investor.
Jack Forbes / NY Post Design
He did have some help along the way. His partner in building Drexel into a powerhouse investment bank was the late Gary Winnick, a former furniture salesman from Roslyn, on Long Island, who moved his family west to work in Drexel's Beverly Hills office and emerged as one of the best junk-bond salesmen in the business.
These days, Winnick's son, 49-year-old Adam Winnick, has been quietly making a name for himself in the burgeoning crypto business as an investor and thought leader. He has a competing conference – the Medici Network — also taking place this week, one that is more intimate than the sprawling Milken Global affair but is attracting its own A-list group of influencers looking for investment insights..
Advertisement
Panels on the underlying blockchain technology, various new crypto related investments and the changing regulatory environment are all featured a few miles from the Milken summit right in Beverly Hills.
Winnick has been hosting the four-day event, which ends Thursday, for the past eight years. It started small but now attracts a couple hundred people, mostly by invite. Full disclosure: I was a panel moderator at Milken, but I also spoke at Medici and can attest to the relevancy of its agenda, particularly as the Trump administration embraces the $3 trillion digital coin business.
Winnick is well aware of the optics of running up against his dad's old partner and his own legacy. I knew Gary Winnick well before he died in 2003. He was a street smart salesman who became an entrepreneur in his post-Drexel life. He was a visionary who took chances. Many worked, some didn't. (He was the chairman of the now-defunct Global Crossing)
3 Milken at his namesake conference on Tuesday.
REUTERS
Advertisement
Gary Winnick also never forgot his New York roots even while doing business in the more passive-aggressive environment of LA. People who worked with him recall his blunt, take-no-prisoners style.
I can see the old man in Adam as I hung out at Medici between sessions at Milken. He also sees parallels between his old man's line of work and his current calling.
Junk bonds aren't controversial these days; they're used seamlessly in corporate financing, but that wasn't always the case. Their controversial nature stemmed from their core utility of helping early stage companies circumvent the big NY banks for financing.
3 Gary Winnick, Milken's former partner, in 2002.
REUTERS
Advertisement
It is why the government took aim at Milken and Drexel, eventually putting the firm out of business and forcing Milken to take a deal where he served jail time for a series of what I would call victimless, non-criminal offenses.
Milken, of course, has since remade his life and career as a thought leader and philanthropist. He was pardoned by President Donald Trump during his first term.
Adam Winnick points out to me that crypto, like high yield, is often vilified in traditional finance circles, and until recently by securities regulators.
'I actually think crypto is much more hated than junk bonds ever were,' he tells me. 'But digital assets are going to be way bigger than the high yield market ever was.'
How does he feel about going up against his dad's old partner and boss with a competing conference?
'It helps to do my event at the same time, but it's total counter programming,' Adam said, before quipping, 'I also serve better food.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Matthew Stafford contract details: Rams finalize new deal with quarterback
Matthew Stafford isn't ready to close the book on his Hollywood career just yet. The Los Angeles Rams quarterback agreed to a new deal at the NFL combine that would keep him in the City of Angels, but terms were never finalized. Advertisement On Monday, those details started to come to light. Stafford inked a deal that will keep him with the Rams next season and beyond, putting an end to all the trade talk that dominated the conversation earlier in the offseason. The trade interest appeared to come mainly from the Las Vegas Raiders and New York Giants. During the combine, it was reported that Tom Brady, part-owner of the Raiders, was recruiting Stafford to join the silver-and-black. Stafford was reportedly seeking $50 million a year, according to NFL Network's Peter Schrager, but ultimately settled for less. The Rams have largely rebuilt their roster by hitting on their limited draft picks in the post-Super Bowl 56-winning years. They came within a few plays of knocking off the eventual Super Bowl champion Eagles in the divisional round on a snowy day in Philadelphia. Advertisement Now they keep Stafford in the fold to make another run in 2025. Here's how much it'll cost the Rams to keep the quarterback in town. Matthew Stafford contract details Stafford agreed to a two-year, $84 million deal, according to NFL Network's Ian Rapoport. It represents an increase from the two-year, $58 million he had left on the previous contract. The quarterback is set to earn $44 million this season. He's already been paid $4 million and the remaining $40 million is fully guaranteed. Stafford would earn $40 million next season if he remains on the Rams' roster at the start of free agency. With the new deal, Stafford is the NFL's 15th highest-paid quarterback in terms of average annual value (AAV), according to OverTheCap. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Matthew Stafford contract details: Rams agree to new deal with QB
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
It's not just Medicaid: Republicans' megabill would sabotage the Affordable Care Act
Though health care policy and future of the Affordable Care Act wasn't one of the defining issues of the 2024 election cycle, it probably should've been. Donald Trump, for example, spent much of the year condemning the popular and effective ACA, and he had plenty of partisan company. Before voters went to the polls, key Senate Republicans opened the door to undermining Obamacare — including future vice president JD Vance, who talked up an idea that would weaken protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions. As Election Day drew closer, House Speaker Mike Johnson publicly endorsed 'massive' changes to federal health care policy, adding, 'No Obamacare'; Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah published an online item that read, 'Kill Obamacare now'; and future Republican Sen. Dave McCormick announced his opposition to an ACA provision that allows young adults to stay on their parents' health insurance plans. Despite the health care law's popularity, the party won big — and it's now following through on its rhetoric. The Washington Post reported: Congressional Republicans are pursuing changes to the Affordable Care Act that would mean 10.7 million fewer Americans using its insurance marketplaces and Medicaid, a huge reduction that some view as a way to accomplish part of the health-care coverage cancellation that failed in 2017. Of course, GOP officials aren't explicitly saying that they're trying to gut the ACA. In fact, the Post's headline is emblematic of the fact that these efforts are unfolding largely out of the spotlight: 'Shhh. Republicans are trying to repeal Obamacare again. Sort of.' But the practical results are the same. Matt Salo, former executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, told the Post, in reference to the Republicans' reconciliation package, 'It is very much like a backdoor repeal and replace. They've been too cute by half by doing it but not calling it that.' Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, describing the real-world effects of the GOP megabill, added, 'They're not calling this ACA repeal and replace, but the coverage losses would be among many of the same people who would have lost their insurance under ACA repeal.' It's not exactly a secret that much of the focus on the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' has been on Medicaid, and for good reason. Despite Trump's promise not to cut the health care program, the GOP legislation would cut roughly $700 billion from Medicaid in the coming years. Just hours ahead of the bill reaching the floor, House leaders added new and punitive Medicaid provisions to shore up support from far-right members. But for health care advocates, the effects on the Affordable Care Act matters, too. Axios had a good report last week noting that the Republicans' package would make it harder for people to sign up for ACA marketplace plans, gut the ACA's Medicaid expansion program, end automatic re-enrollment in ACA plans and shut off provisional ACA subsidies, among other things. A related Rolling Stone report added that the same proposal would also 'place further restrictions on enrollment periods and create new bureaucratic hurdles to obtaining premium tax credits, in ways that experts say will cause many to forgo or lose coverage.' The Post's report noted that the same legislation, if implemented, 'would also delay two Biden-era regulations aimed at easing and streamlining enrollment by helping people more easily transition between Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program and private marketplace plans.' Perhaps most importantly, the Republican plan would end the expanded ACA tax credit subsidies that made coverage far more affordable for consumers throughout the Biden era — a move that would, according Congressional Budget Office estimates, leave roughly 5 million Americans uninsured. With this in mind, NBC News reported that new coalition of health care advocates, called Keep Americans Covered, is launching a new seven-figure ad campaign on the issue. The new commercial features a woman named Jessica, a restaurant manager in Arizona whose daughter has a chronic illness. She says the ACA tax credits 'have been particularly helpful for our family' to affording the coverage they need. 'We need Congress to take action now. It's vital for us,' she says in the ad. 'We need these health care tax credits passed today.' The spot is set to run in Washington, D.C., and 12 states, including Louisiana (House Speaker Mike Johnson's home state), South Dakota (Senate Majority Leader John Thune's home state), Maine (Republican Sen. Susan Collins' home state), Alaska (Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski's home state) and North Carolina (Republican Sen. Thom Tillis' home state). In case this isn't obvious, in the first year of Trump's first term, Republicans also went after the ACA, and the political blowback was enormous: The effort inspired progressive activists to get more engaged, put the GOP on the defensive and pushed the president's approval rating sharply lower. The political damage lingered and did real harm to Republicans in the 2018 midterms. It would probably be wise for Democrats to focus their messaging accordingly. The Republicans' megabill is, for all intents and purposes, an anti-health care bill that would take coverage from millions of American families. This article was originally published on
Business Insider
13 hours ago
- Business Insider
It's hard to say 'no' at work. Etiquette experts told us how to get better at it.
"That's above my pay grade." It's often said as a joke, sure, but it could also be a real response to one of the biggest challenges many workers face on the job: How to say no. Many people have experienced "job creep," where they're gradually given more and more responsibilities, or are otherwise asked to do work they simply don't have time for. Tactfully declining seems like the obvious solution, but it's easier said than done. "People don't know how to say no," etiquette expert Lizzie Post of the Emily Post Institute told Business Insider. "If you talk about the high-level business advice, the people that excel, the super achievers, the A-list CEOs and entrepreneurs, they will all tell you that their day is a thousand nos and one yes," fellow etiquette expert Daniel Post Senning added. "Your capacity to say no is a professional skill as well as a social and personal skill." The experts' book, " Emily Post's Business Etiquette," went on sale May 20 and covers how to politely decline in various business-related situations. They shared with BI some additional tips for doing so. These aren't one-and-done solutions. But they can help you get more comfortable with saying no and setting boundaries at work. It's easier when it's an immediate or shorter-term ask and you can deflect with a fast-approaching deadline for another project. "It's a lot harder when you start to get asked to do much more than the job you were hired for, and the expectation is just that you're going to do it and take it on because the company needs you to," said Post. "I have seen numerous friends go through this where they say, 'I'm all of a sudden doing the job of three people and I still only have the salary I started with.'" In those cases, the best advice is to "really spell it out," Post said. "The only thing you can do is encourage that person to speak up to their employer about it and to talk about it in a real sense of 'I am experiencing burnout' or 'The work quality would really start to diminish,'" she said. "Come prepared to talk about why it's overwhelming and why you don't have enough time to make this happen." Beforehand, consider "doing an honest assessment" of your track record when saying no, Post Senning said. What specifically do you struggle with, and what do you tend to fall back on? What could you do better? When preparing for and actually having the conversation, pay attention to your emotions to keep them in check. "Separating the emotional fight-or-flight response — that's your reaction to the stress of what's happening — from the way that you respond to the person is a really important part of good etiquette," Post Senning said. "The difference between 'No, I can't believe you asked me to do that' and 'I'd like to sit down and talk with you about my workload' is huge." It can help to remind a colleague what's on your plate and explain that you'd only be able to take on a new task if you deprioritized other assignments. Some people might benefit from mentally reframing these conversations. Instead of viewing it as rejecting a colleague's request, you can think of it as setting boundaries to build sustainable work habits. "It's an important professional skill," said Post Senning. "It's an important part of communication, particularly for the benefit of the people around you."
