
Harvard students, faculty defend university against Trump's threat of pulling tax exemption status
"It mustn't lose its tax exemptions," Harvey Mansfield, a retired Harvard professor of over 60 years, told Fox News Digital.
Fox News Digital met with Mansfield at his farm estate in Ipswich, Massachusetts, a rural town outside of Boston. Mansfield, 93, taught political science and political philosophy at Harvard. The author of the book "Dead White Males" first attended Harvard at age 17.
"That would force it to close its doors. That's going much too far. And the whole idea of placing tax exemption as a penalty for misbehavior by universities is, I think, exaggerated and improper," Mansfield said.
Fox News Digital was also able to speak with Kem, a native of Thailand. Kem, who did not disclose his major and last name, heard chatter of Harvard's nonprofit status being revoked.
"I think that this school does a lot of research that benefits the public good. I think any kind of rescinding of its non-profit status would probably do more harm to the American public than any kind of benefit that could happen. I hope the school and the administration come to an amicable settlement and let education proceed without disruption," Kem said.
Harvard filed a suit against the Trump administration over their policy to terminate Harvard's visa program due to "pro-terrorist conduct" at campus protests.
Leading up to Trump's latest restriction on Harvard, many international students did not want to speak with Fox News Digital about the debacle between the school and President Donald Trump.
The Ivy League school became a target of Trump's broader probe into universities' handling of anti-Semitism on campus after several schools were rocked by violent protests in the wake of the October 7 terror attacks on Israel by Hamas.
The Trump administration has frozen $2.2 billion in funding to the university and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status due to the Ivy League school's failure to address antisemitism on campus.
The Department of Education's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism released a statement on May 13, citing recent reporting that "has exposed the Harvard Law Review's (HLR) pattern of endemic race discrimination when evaluating articles for inclusion in its journal."
The findings resulted in the Trump administration cutting an additional $450 million in grants from the university.
Harvard hit back with a lawsuit last month over the funding freeze, saying it was unlawful.
Andrew Hayes, a law student, told Fox News Digital that "there's certainly a lot of political discrimination."
"If we were counting the conservative faculty here, you'd see a lot more of that. You could count them all on one hand out of 150 members. I know from friends who are on the law review that there's a lot of political and racial calculus, and even racial calculus that goes into article selection," the senior added.
Leo Koerner, the president of the college's Republican club, said he does think that Harvard produces more than it takes.
The third-year history major does not think Harvard should be permanently defunded. He said the Ivy League school has administrative bloat that could be minimized to cut costs.
"I think there's a lot of bloat and that comes from the administration and it's a huge amount of deans. There are more administrators and professors than students. It's an insane thing," he said.
"I do think it produces more than it takes properly managed right now that we see a lot of problems. And we see a lot of things that are being taught and things that are not allowed to be taught, people not allowed to speak. Those are the things that Harvard is trying to work on," the junior said.
The Trump administration also shared issues with Harvard's admission policies.
The New York Times reported that Trump is using the Department of Justice to investigate whether Harvard's admissions policies comply with a Supreme Court ruling that ended affirmative action.
Spain native Berné Leon, a teaching fellow at Harvard, said Trump is using every excuse to "attack the university."
"I think that the administration considers that liberal art colleges are something that is in the way to their objectives and I think that because the university has rejected the call to essentially turn over the administration, the capacity to decide what is taught at the university or who they hire — Well, they're going to be trying to find any sort of excuse to make our life difficult in the university," Leon said.
He went on to say, "I do know that some people consider that there has still been some form of affirmative action since the Supreme Court overturned the practice. But, my understanding is that what the university does essentially is looking at the profiles of students beyond their grades, which doesn't account, as far as I know, as affirmative action at all."
"It's simply looking at the students beyond their grades," he added.
Fox News Digital reached out to Deptarment of Education for comment but did not immediately hear back.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Fox & Friends Weekend' Celebrates Gutfeld's Fallon Interview as Start of a New Era: ‘Let's Just All Get Along'
'It seems like he's seeing what happened to Stephen Colbert ... people are exhausted of all the in-fighting,' Rachel Campos-Duffy says 'Fox & Friends Weekend' celebrated Greg Gutfeld's Thursday night appearance on 'The Tonight Show' as the potential start of a new era where everyone can get along. They did so on Saturday morning by lambasting other media outlets for accusing Jimmy Fallon of lobbing 'softball' questions at his fellow TV host. 'One person who's not falling for communism is Greg Gutfeld. He broke the late night barrier on Thursday night and went and took a visit to Jimmy Fallon,' Charlie Hurt said atop the Fox News segment. 'It worked and it was funny because it was two real people just sort of having a conversation and it wasn't any of this stupid ideological nonsense that a lot of the late night shows have gotten into.' More from TheWrap 'Fox & Friends Weekend' Celebrates Gutfeld's Fallon Interview as Start of a New Era: 'Let's Just All Get Along' | Video Kellyanne Conway Wants to Redistrict 'Performative' Jasmine Crockett Out of Her Congressional Seat | Video Bill Maher Compares ICE Agents, Unfavorably, to Child Molesters, Jokes 'America Is United Behind One Thing: Fleeing' | Video Every Renewed, Canceled or Ending TV Show in 2025 'That's why the media has melted down,' co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy then noted. The show went on to display four headlines about the bipartisan NBC sit-down interview — from The Independent, The Daily Beast, Deadline and The Cut. 'It appears that the Left and the media wanted there to be some sort of battle. Like, Jimmy Fallon's going to attack him or Greg's going to attack Jimmy.' 'They were so disappointed,' Griff Jenkins agreed. 'That's why Gutfeld is the king of late night, because he understands what comedy was — funny stories, engaging.' 'It seems like he's seeing what happened to Stephen Colbert,' Campos-Duffy said, referencing the 'Late Show' cancellation. 'This moment, people are exhausted of all the in-fighting. And they're also seeing so many successes from Donald Trump and I think people just want to let it all go.' 'Greg Gutfeld is sort of like that perfect person, along with Jimmy, to sort of showcase that this is maybe a new era, 'Let's all just get along,'' she continued. 'Before 2016, before that very moment, the late night landscape wasn't as political. It was when Trump came in that it changed and became hyper-liberal,' Jenkins noted, to which Campos-Duffy concluded: 'Yep. There was a memo that went out.' The post 'Fox & Friends Weekend' Celebrates Gutfeld's Fallon Interview as Start of a New Era: 'Let's Just All Get Along' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Owner Of A Trump-Themed Burger Joint Is Reportedly Facing Deportation, And The Internet Has Sooo Many Thoughts
If you haven't heard, there is a Donald Trump-themed restaurant in Houston, Texas called "Trump Burger." The popular Texas chain sells hamburgers with the letters "T-R-U-M-P" etched into the buns... Related: They have detailed artwork of Trump hanging on the walls... Oh, AND their menu includes items like the "Melania Crispy Chicken" and the "Barron Crispy Grilled," as well as a promise to "Make Burgers Great Again." Well, the "Trump Burger" has recently gone viral due to its owner being arrested by ICE for allegedly overstaying his visa. Related: Roland Mehrez Beainy, the 28-year-old Houston "Trump Burger" owner, was reportedly arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement for allegedly failing to depart the US last year after arriving in 2019 on a non-immigrant visitor visa from Lebanon. An ICE spokesperson said this in a statement about Beainy's arrest: "Despite false claims to the contrary, Roland Mehrez Beainy does not have any immigration benefits that prevented his arrest or removal from the United States. Beainy is a 28-year-old illegal alien from Lebanon who entered the United States in 2019 as a non-immigrant visitor, but he failed to depart by Feb. 12, 2024, as required under the terms of his admission." "ICE officers arrested him on May 16, 2025, and he was placed into immigration proceedings. On June 13, an immigration judge granted his request for bond while he undergoes his proceedings." "Under the current administration, ICE is committed to restore integrity to our nation's immigration system by holding all individuals accountable who illegally enter the country or overstay the terms of their admission. This is true regardless of what restaurant you own or political beliefs you might have." Related: While awaiting his immigration court hearing set for November, Beainy has denied the charges, telling Chron, a Houston news website: "Ninety percent of the shit they're saying is not true." Obviously, the internet had some thoughts on this one, with multiple people comparing the news to a South Park episode... "South Park Creators rn: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN.." Related: "They really thought it would affect everyone else but themselves," this person wrote. And finally, this person pointed out that Trump doesn't seem to care about his own supporters... What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Ron Wyden Warns Of Backdoor Social Security Privatization: 'It's Clear Trump Was Lying All Along'
As debate over the future of Social Security heats up once again, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) is sounding the alarm over what many see as a renewed effort to privatize the program — this time, through a provision in the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The controversy began last week after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent referred to the Trump administration's new so-called Trump Accounts — a new savings program for children — as a "back door for privatizing Social Security." Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— A Return to an Old Fight Bessent's remarks have reopened a long-standing and politically sensitive issue. Proposals to privatize Social Security — which would shift the system from a government-run program to one based on personal savings accounts — have surfaced in the past, most notably under President George W. Bush. But those ideas have largely been set aside after public pushback. Millions of Americans rely on Social Security as a guaranteed source of income in retirement. Under privatization, individuals would be responsible for managing their own retirement savings, potentially exposing them to market risks and uncertainty. Trump Accounts Draw Scrutiny The program at the center of the latest debate is the Trump Account, a new savings vehicle created under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The account is designed to be opened for any baby born in the U.S., with a potential $1,000 initial deposit from the Treasury. Like an IRA, it allows for post-tax contributions — up to $5,000 a year — and could grow over time. "In a way, it is a back door for privatizing Social Security," Bessent said, speaking at a Breitbart News forum, about the Trump Accounts. This has sparked widespread concern that they are intended as a long-term replacement — not a supplement — to Social Security. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Later that day, Bessent clarified his comments, saying the administration was committed to protecting Social Security. "This is not an either-or question," he wrote in a post on X. "Our administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money." Wyden, Democrats React Swiftly Despite the clarification, Wyden and other top Democrats were quick to push back. "It's clear Trump was lying all along about protecting Social Security," Wyden said in a statement, accusing the president of paving the way for Wall Street interests to profit at the expense of retirees. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called Bessent's remarks "a stunning admission," saying they revealed the administration's true intentions. The Democratic National Committee echoed that view. Spokesperson Tim Hogan accused the Trump administration of scheming to dismantle the program through what he called a "backdoor scam."Social Security's Future Remains Uncertain The backdrop to this renewed debate is Social Security's long-term financial outlook. According to the program's trustees, the trust fund that pays benefits will no longer be able to cover full payments starting in 2034 unless changes are made. Trump, for his part, has repeatedly promised to protect Social Security. On the 2024 campaign trail, and after winning re-election, he said the program would remain untouched, other than possible efforts to make it more efficient. Still, for critics like Wyden, recent developments suggest a different story. "Calling this a five-alarm fire is an understatement," Wyden said. With millions of Americans counting on Social Security to fund their retirement, the debate over its future — and who's telling the truth about it — is far from over. Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Sen. Ron Wyden Warns Of Backdoor Social Security Privatization: 'It's Clear Trump Was Lying All Along' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.