
Edinburgh abortion clinic set for fresh round of harassment from US religious group
An Edinburgh clinic is set to endure a fresh round of anti-abortion harassment from an American religious group despite new laws designed to prevent protests taking place near clinics.
The Texas-based group, 40 Days for Life, announced online that it will hold a series of "prayer vigils" near Chalmers Clinic in September. The activity is expected to last for 40 days and will commence from September 24 with the last "vigil" to take place on November 2.
The organisation, which claims to represent several hundred volunteers in Scotland, announced the campaign just months after The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) bill became law in Scotland, reports The Daily Record.
Under this act, it is illegal for anybody to hold vigils or protests within 200m of any clinic that provides abortion services.
Instructions on the 40 Days for Life website have advised members to gather on Chalmers Street - opposite the front door of the healthcare clinic in September - which would be well within the buffer zone. The Record contacted the branch in Edinburgh to ask the organisation if it was aware this gathering would be illegal.
Mairi Lucas, who is the group's branch head for the capital, proceeded to claim the guidance on the site is "out of date". We then asked Ms Lucas to clarify that the new meeting point for members that outwith the 200m buffer zone, she refused to confirm.
Speaking to our sister publication, Ms Lucas said: "I am not telling you this information."
The instructions on the group's site continue to ask members to attend Chalmers Street.
MSP Monica Lennon described the planned activity as "nothing short of premeditated intimidation".
The Labour representative for Central Scotland said: 'This is nothing short of premeditated intimidation and harassment. Women should not have to pass anti-abortion campaigners on the way to medical appointments.
'Anti-abortion groups are entitled to their beliefs, but they are not above the law.'
Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman added: 'Everyone deserves privacy and respect when attending healthcare appointments. These anti-choice protests outside of sexual health clinics and maternity hospitals do nothing but intimidate and distress patients, nurses and doctors.
'The patients and staff do not make decisions on legislation, that is done by politicians. I'd urge anyone who feels the need to protest against sexual health and abortion care, to do so outside the Scottish Parliament.
'For anyone who is affected by these anti-choice protests, I'd urge you to get in touch with the Scottish Greens or the Scottish Government, so that we can consider how to make these spaces even safer.'
The group has been known to harass women outside healthcare facilities offering abortion services across Scotland in recent years.
Repeatedly targeted clinics include those at the Edinburgh Chalmers Street Clinic, the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Sandyford Clinic and Aberdeen Maternity Hospital.
40 Days for life members have spent up to 12 hours a day standing outside holding rosary beads and clutching signs with wording such as 'We can help you' alongside graphic images of fetuses.
Residents in Glasgow told members of the group to "get lost" after a similar "vigil" was held within view of out-patients at the QEUH in March.
Melanie Long, who received medical care at the hospital's maternity unit after previously suffering a miscarriage, told the Record at the time: "The first thing I saw when I opened the curtains this morning were these protestors. I find it extremely distressing. I thought once the buffer zone law came into place we wouldn't have this issue anymore.
"As someone who has had to access those services in the past, I find it absolutely disgusting that these people are out there judging women. They might say that they're trying to be peaceful but they know exactly what they're doing - it's distressing, harassment and it victimises vulnerable people.
"If they want to push their cause, they should do it in parliament."
Scottish Greens MSP Gillian Mackay, who introduced the Safe Access Zones Bill, has strongly urged the Scottish Government to consider expanding the size of buffer zones.
Chapman said: 'Buffer zones around these clinics were introduced by my Green colleague Gillian Mackay's Safe Access Zone Act to protect patients and staff, and mostly they are successful in doing so. Unfortunately, many people still have no choice but to walk past groups gathering to protest or hold vigils on the cusp of the zones."
40 Days for Life was set up in 2004 by people protesting at an abortion facility in Texas.
The organisation went on to expand its network through the southern states of America before infiltrating to new countries to become a world-wide group.
Its division in Scotland is thought to be spearheaded by activist Rose Docherty, from Bishopbriggs.
Rose previously told the Record that she was recruited by the group through the "pro-life grapevine".
She said: "They found out about me through the pro-life grapevine.
"They just wanted to know if there was anyone in Scotland and I said I'd be willing to do that and I'd be willing to come out."
In February, a 74-year-old woman became the first person in Scotland to be arrested over an alleged breach of the legislation.
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Officers will respond proportionately to reports of anyone breaching Safe Access Zone legislation by engaging with them, explaining the law and encouraging compliance before moving to enforcement if necessary.'
The Record also approached NHS Lothian for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Photos of flooded Texas Hill Country, a region dotted with century-old summer camps
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Inside Iran: Exclusive access to notorious Evin Prison
Iran's notorious Evin Prison was hit by Israeli airstrikes in June, and destroyed its gates, administrative buildings, and health clinic. Iranian officials say nearly 80 people were killed including civilians. NBC's Richard Engel was given extraordinary access to the destruction, and also visited the former U.S. embassy compound covered with anti-American murals and 4, 2025


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Sir Keir Starmer under mounting Labour rebel pressure to scrap two-child benefit cap
Sir Keir Starmer is coming under mounting pressure from within his own Cabinet to scrap the two-child benefit cap, despite Treasury warnings over a lack of funding to ditch the policy. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The demand to remove the cap on benefit payments to families with more than two children comes in the same week that MPs forced the Prime Minister to back down on plans to cut £5 billion from the welfare budget. The climbdown hands Chancellor Rachel Reeves a major headache ahead of the Budget in the autumn. It comes just weeks after a similar £1.25bn U-turn on winter fuel payments and leaves the Chancellor with a £6.25bn hole to fill. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Any move to ditch the two-child cap, which means families can only claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children, would cost the exchequer around £3.5bn, bringing the total expenditure on the welfare policies to £9.75bn, effectively wiping out Ms Reeves's £9.9bn fiscal headroom. Health Secretary Wes Streeting, centre, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer, at the Sir Ludwig Guttman Health & Wellbeing Centre in London, England. Picture: Jack Hill/Getty Image The pressure mounts with the Scottish Government having confirmed it lift the two-child benefit cap on March 2 next year north of the Border – just two weeks before the Holyrood election campaign begins. One UK Cabinet minister acknowledged there was a 'significant cost' to scrapping two-child limit, but added: 'There is also a significant cost in other ways, of a Labour government not taking action to bring down child poverty. And we have to be able to go into the next election having made significant progress on child poverty.' The Cabinet member added: 'Whilst it's hard and the cost is high, it's clear that it is an effective way of supporting families and making sure that fewer children grow up in poverty. And the evidence supports that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The challenge is less do we do it – it's whether we can do it, and what the timing would look like around that.' Leading members of the welfare rebellion have warned the UK government will have to scrap the two-child cap if it is to meet its obligations to cut child poverty rates. Rachael Maskell, Labour MP for York Central, said: "It is imperative that the government scrap the two-child limit and the benefit cap as this will lift 360,000 children out of poverty. But most of all, this will give these children a life of better opportunities, including to their health and wellbeing.' Another rebel warned: 'It definitely needs to go. We cannot seek to trade off poor children against poor disabled people or poor pensioners. We need to have a mission to tackle all poverty. End of.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Reeves warned MPs on Thursday via a broadcast interview there 'is a cost' to the welfare changes voted for in Parliament this week that would be reflected in the Budget, when asked if there would be tax rises. The comments followed Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden insisting 'you can't spend the same money twice'. 'So more money spent on [welfare] means less for some other purpose,' he told the BBC this week. But government sources have said scrapping the two-child cap still 'remains on the table', despite the warnings from the Treasury, as removing the policy remains popular within the Cabinet. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Both Sir Keir and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson have previously signalled the cap will go, with the latter understood to be particularly opposed to the policy. A Whitehall source said: 'It's still being discussed as part of the Child Poverty Taskforce. It's still on the table. This is not something we would have done in government, and it is one of a number of levers that is being looked at to alleviate child poverty." Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said scrapping the two-child cap in Scotland could work out at nearly £3,500 for affected children and could see 20,000 fewer children living in relative poverty. Finance Secretary Shona Robison announced plans to scrap the cap in the 2025/26 Budget. The Scottish Government has said this is the 'fastest' a Scottish social security benefit has ever been delivered. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In other UK government developments, Sir Keir Starmer said he had a good relationship with US President Donald Trump because they both 'care about family'. The Prime Minister told the BBC Radio 4 podcast Political Thinking With Nick Robinson it was 'in the national interest' for the two men to connect. He said: 'We are different people and we've got different political backgrounds and leanings, but we do have a good relationship and that comes from a numbers of places. 'I think I do understand what anchors the president, what he really cares about. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'For both of us, we really care about family and there's a point of connection there.' Sir Keir said yesterday in the interview to mark a year in office he had a 'good personal relationship' with Mr Trump, and revealed the first time they spoke was after the-then presidential candidate was shot at a campaign rally in July last year. Addressing recent political turmoil, Sir Keir said he would always 'carry the can' as leader after coming under fire over a climbdown on welfare reforms and that he would 'always take responsibility' when asked questions. 'When things go well … the leader gets the plaudits, but when things don't go well, it is really important that the leader carries the can – and that's what I will always do,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad