These Are The Cushiest-Looking Sandals We've Ever Seen
After a long, dark winter, spring has finally sprung. It's time to put away the boots and make way for cute flats, chic sneakers and summery sandals. And just in time for warmer weather, HuffPost reader-beloved shoe brand Merrell has released the comfiest- and cushiest-looking sandal we've ever seen in fun new pastel colorways — and best of all, it's a lot more affordable than some of its pricier counterparts.
These bouncy sandals are available in five different color combinations, each one cuter than the last, in sizes 5-11.
They just might be the perfect sporty sandal, offering a pleasing blend of style, comfort and functionality for all your spring and summer adventures. They're made with lightweight and breathable vegan waterproof materials like recycled webbing, microfiber and mesh and feature a velcro hook-and-loop ankle closure that makes it easy to slip them on and off while keeping you stable.
Soft Lycra lining and a cushy foam insole ensure that these sandals are extra supportive and bouncy (one reviewer even called them 'springy') while a durable sticky rubber outsole offers plenty of traction and can help you avoid slips, all while looking absolutely fabulous. (Eagle-eyed shoppers will notice that these sandals look strikingly similar to Sorel's cult-fave Kinetic Impact sandals, which, at $135, are close to double the price.)
Reviewers note that they're great for people with wide feet and high arches and consistently emphasize the shoe's high comfort factor. If you're looking to fill a gap in your warm-weather shoe rotation, then let these Merrell cuties slide on into your closet.
Get them from Amazon for $79.95+ (available in women's sizes 5–11 and in five colorways).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hanky Panky With Naughty AI Still Counts as Cheating, Therapist Says
Sexual relationships with AI chatbots have become all too common — but for some real-life partners, it still feels like cheating when it's happening behind their back. That's the takeaway from a recent HuffPost column in which Marisa Cohen, a licensed marriage and family therapist, affirmed that having intimate encounters with anyone — or anything — without your partner's consent is damaging to the relationship, point-blank. The piece was responding to a post on Reddit, which — though they're often anonymous and an exercise in creative fiction writing — served as an interesting jumping-off point to explore the ethics of the topic. In the post, which has since been deleted but copied in part by HuffPost, a woman described her sense of betrayal when she walked in on her husband of 14 years having phone sex with a talking chatbot that was "very tailored to his desires." "It felt like a knife went through me," the OP wrote, "and I couldn't stop shaking." An interesting wrinkle: the woman and her husband had agreed prior to tying the knot that "emotional cheating" was kosher as long as it wasn't physical. Still, the woman said she was "stung" that her hubby was having such sexual conversations with the chatbot "almost every night" — and even more so when he added that he talked to it for hours about non-sexual subjects too. Were he having those conversations with a human woman, that would technically be within the bounds of their relationship's rules. But for whatever reason, it seemed to bother the OP worse that her spouse was having his affair with a chatbot. "I know he's gonna say it's not a big deal no matter what," she wrote, "and I think this is what will upset me the most." Does the woman have a right to be upset? It depends on the nitty-gritty of her interpretation of her agreement with her husband, which is why ongoing communication is a staple of successful open relationships. That's important, because as Cohen points out, the situation represents a gray area. Is phone sex with an AI crossing the line into the "physical intimacy" with outside partners that they left off the table? It's a head-scratcher, and different reasonable people may well come to different conclusions. "What one partner views as engaging with AI in a completely acceptable way, another may view as cheating," the therapist told HuffPost. "This is something that must be discussed, so that both partners are aware of how the other feels." "People that are involved in emotional cheating are sharing experiences with another (in this case AI) at the expense of sharing these moments, memories, or insights with their partners," Cohen said. "This can create a distance between partners." It's also worth noting that when they first married, there was no way the woman could have expected the "emotional cheating" clause in her relationship — one that sounds pretty suspicious, or at least like a slippery slope — to include an AI chatbot, because such technology was neither widespread nor sophisticated at the time. And even if she had, those boundaries can change — as the OP noted, she'd also been upset when finding out her husband had been whacking it to porn earlier in their marriage. "It is important that both partners want to work on their relationship and that the emotional affair is acknowledged and ended," Cohen told HuffPost. "This becomes more complicated in this case, as the partners may have different beliefs as to whether cheating has occurred." More on chatbot relationships: Women With Body Image Issues Are Asking ChatGPT Something Terrible
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 3 Steps To Take When Dealing With Other People's Annoying Kids, According To A School Psychologist
There's a certain universal experience that transcends age, background and even our best intentions. It's the subtle (or not-so-subtle) cringe, the weary sigh, the fleeting moment of 'Oh, hell no' when faced with the disruptive, disobedient or destructive behavior of someone else's child. Whether it's the out-of-nowhere, ear-piercing shriek in the coffee shop, the relentless toy-banging in the doctor's waiting room or the seemingly endless stream of 'Why?' questions, the feeling that other people's children are annoying is surprisingly common. And if you've ever felt that way, you're definitely not alone. It's not that we're heartless monsters. But there's something about the unbridled enthusiasm, the unfiltered honesty, and the sheer volume of some little humans that can test the patience of even the most even-keeled among us. We may find other people's kids annoying for various reasons, often tied to behavior, expectations or environment. Dr. Matthew Morand, a licensed psychologist, told HuffPost this topic comes up more than people think. His advice? 'Minimize the negative voices in your head.' But how, when you're at your wit's end? Morand's strategy is simple: 'Utilize 'the other shoe' mentality. If I were to count how many times a child has kicked the back of my head on an airplane, I could sue their parents for traumatic brain injury. Most people's responses typically go right for the negative and pass judgment. I ask them, and ask myself, 'Have my children not been the difficult ones?' How can I get angry at that child when I have literally worn the other shoe?' Dr. Kristen Piering, a licensed clinical psychologist, agrees. 'If you're annoyed by a kid out in public, keep in mind that we need kids to experience these places to learn how to engage appropriately in society.' She added, 'Kids are people, too, and can have bad days like anyone else. If they act in a way you find 'annoying,' they may have had a rough day at school or a fight with a friend.' Parents can relate, but what about those of us without kids? Morand says, 'Focus on whether the parent is cognizant of their child's behavior. We can give credit and find a sense of calmness in respecting that parenting is hard, and if that parent is trying to address the behavior, then that is all that really matters.' And sometimes it's not even the kids themselves. It's the parents. The ones who seem blissfully unaware (or just don't care) as their little ones dismantle the local bookstore or treat public spaces as their personal playgrounds (and garbage bins). It's the 'hands-off' approach taken to an extreme, leaving the rest of us to contend with the resulting bedlam. That said, what you see isn't always the whole story. Piering said, 'Not everyone parents the same way, and that's OK. You have no idea what goes on in their home, and something that might seem like an odd parenting choice to you may have come from years of knowing their child and what works best for their child and their family.' So, how do we navigate this minefield of mini-humans without losing our marbles? Perhaps some expert-advised strategies for keeping your sanity intact (even when surrounded by the most lively of children) can help before we pull our hair out. Shira Schwartz, a school psychologist and district administrator, has a three-step rule: 1. Ignore; 2. Redirect; 3. Resist the urge to parent. As for her first rule, Schwartz explains, 'The most annoying behavior is attention-, or, as some like to put it, 'connection-seeking' behavior. When you don't reinforce the behavior, they're far likelier to give up and move onto something or someone else.' Too bad for the 'someone else,' but it does take a village, right? Imagine a park bench where a child repeatedly sings the same off-key song at the top of their lungs, trying to get a rise out of someone. Instead of reacting, a person nearby continues reading their book, seemingly unfazed. Finding no audience, the child soon wanders off to explore the playground. That leads to rule two. Draw the child's attention elsewhere. Whether it's toward something interesting on the other side of the room or giving them a job to do to make them feel important, redirection can be your relief. 'Most kids just want to connect with grown-ups, even grown-ups who aren't theirs,' Schwartz said. Picture yourself at a museum when you spot a restless child pulling on their mom's pant leg. Rather than getting frustrated, the parent directs the child's attention to a mural, asking them to find hidden animals. Excited by the challenge, the child becomes focused and enthusiastic. Later, that same child proudly 'guards' a rope, feeling important. When it comes to resisting the urge to parent (rule 3), it can be a tough one — especially when you know the child is about to go off the rails. But that doesn't mean you have to stay silent. Schwartz points out, 'You're not this kid's parent, but you are still a grown-up with limits and boundaries. It's OK to be direct and say, 'Hey, I don't like that; you need to stop.'' If all else fails, she recommended you close your eyes, take a deep breath and remember you get to leave those little hellions with their lucky parents. Piering is on the same page. 'When they're not your kids, you don't have to go home with them! Kids won't be kids forever and will probably grow out of whatever you happen to find annoying. But even the most annoying of kids still need love, affection and care, and acting displeased or dismissing them won't change their behavior or teach them to act more appropriately.' Remember, our childhoods weren't masterclasses in tranquility, either. We were probably annoying kids, too. So let's offer a sympathetic glance and maybe a well-timed distraction with a shiny object. After all, those little agents of chaos are just preparing for the ultimate test: navigating the world of adulting, which is basically just a giant, slightly more organized tantrum. Before You Give Kids Dark Chocolate, Doctors Want You To Know A Few Things 5 Common Phrases That Financially Shame Kids Joe Jonas Shares Surprising Take On Co-Parenting With Sophie Turner
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
PSA: You Probably Don't Need To Be Weighed At The Doctor's Office
For many struggling with body image, heading to the doctor for a specific health issue or even just a routine checkup is more stressful than it needs to be. Weigh-ins are a standard practice before you see your doctor, but if you've experienced an eating disorder or are self-conscious about your weight, jumping on a scale in the middle of a busy hallway is a tall order. But here's an underdiscussed secret: You really don't have to be weighed every time you go to the doctor. 'It is entirely correct that after age 18, most people do not need to be weighed at the doctor's office,' Jennifer Gaudiani, a Denver-based physician who treats patients with eating disorders, told HuffPost. Of course, there are a handful of exceptions: Weight understandably needs to be tracked when a patient with an eating disorder has specific weight needs in order to treat the disease. If someone comes in and is concerned about unexplained weight loss, that needs to be measured and watched, too. 'And young children need to have weight and height monitored to make sure growth is proceeding properly,' Gaudiani said. 'Pregnant people also need to have weights followed ― although they don't need to have the weights revealed or discussed ― to be sure baby is getting what baby needs.' But outside of exceptions like these, Gaudiani said she's confident that '90%' of weigh-ins taken at medical offices are entirely unnecessary. 'What that means is someone coming in to talk about their depression, digestion, substance use or twisted ankle can find themselves on the other end of a lecture about weight and weight loss,' she said. That sometimes results in weight-conscious patients avoiding health checkups altogether. 'Unnecessary weigh-ins chill patients' willingness to see medical providers, waste everyone's time, fail to address the most important concerns of the patient, and may push individuals into cycles of dieting, maybe some weight loss, then regaining even more,' she said. Given Gaudiani's thoughts on weigh-ins, she was thrilled last month when she saw these 'Please Don't Weigh Me' cards trending on Twitter: The cards, created by eating disorder recovery site read: 'Please don't weigh me unless it's (really) medically necessary,' adding: 'If you really need my weight, please tell me why so that I can give you my informed consent.' The cards were initially free for individuals but now cost $1 each due to demand. There's an option for health care providers to purchase a batch, at $35 per 100 cards. The site also offers 'please don't talk about my child's weight' cards to parents, to kick off important conversations with kids about the often unfair conflation of weight with good health in advance of a checkup. (Children need to be weighed but the card says, 'If you have any questions, ask me when my child is not present.') 'I'm a fan of these cards because it's a starting point where the patient or parent doesn't have to come up with all the words and reasons themselves, but rather has the support of the card as a neutral object to try and advocate for their bodies,' Gaudiani said. Ginny Jones, the founder of created the initial batch of cards back in 2019. In recovery from her eating disorder, Jones had begun asking not to be weighed at doctor's appointments. She soon realized not everyone knew that was an option. Getting health care providers on board with the cards has been great ― 200 providers have ordered anywhere from 100 to 500 cards for their offices, Jones said ― but the responses she's received from individuals has been the most heartening. 'The best feedback I hear from patients is, 'I made my first appointment in years!'' Jones said. 'I'm shocked to hear personally from so many people who are delaying health care because they hate stepping on the scale. I love that these cards give them the confidence to walk back into a health care provider's office.' Gregory Walters, a writer and educator from Vancouver, British Columbia, who was diagnosed with anorexia in his 50s, sees the card as a simple but effective tool to empower patients to advocate for themselves. Being weighed triggers Walters, but in the past, he struggled to discuss it with health care providers. 'Under no circumstances can I know my weight,' he told HuffPost. 'If it's more than I expect, I amp up my eating disorder behaviors. If it's less, it becomes a weird game where I decide to see how much lower I can go.' Walters hasn't weighed himself in more than 10 years. When he spent six weeks in the hospital in 2019 for eating disorder treatment, they did blind weigh-ins around 6 a.m. every Monday. 'We always stood on the scale, facing away from it, which as a method of weighing me was affirming,' he said. 'It told me the doctors and staff understood how traumatizing a number related to one's weight can be.' Before that, he would just close his eyes when stepping on a scale at a doctor's office and say emphatically, 'I don't want to know.' These days, Walters' family doctor has learned about his triggers, but he knows how hard it can be to speak up for yourself. 'It can be challenging for anyone to talk with doctors,' he said. 'Their time can feel limited. As a patient you can feel intimidated due to a perceived imbalance in terms of education and knowledge.' The card 'allows a patient to quickly get a message across without having to stumble and bumble through an extremely uncomfortable conversation,' he said. In an ideal world, it wouldn't be such an uncomfortable conversation. Asking not to be weighed should be as simple as stating, 'I'd prefer not to be weighed today.' Unfortunately, it's not always that easy, according to Gaudiani. If you say you don't want to be weighed and are challenged, Gaudiani said to tell the nurse, 'Thanks for letting me know it's standard, but this is my body, and I'm electing not to be weighed. You may write 'declined' on my note for insurance purposes. I'm happy to discuss it further with my doctor.' If the doctor challenges you, bring up the medical issue that brought you into their office in the first place. 'That might sound like, 'I have a short amount of time with you, and I really need to discuss my back pain, my constipation and my asthma today. Let's focus on that, please,'' Gaudiani said. Since going viral, the cards have received some criticism from people online who think the cards are enabling or will do damage to public health given the obesity epidemic in America. Shana Spence, a registered dietitian nutritionist based in New York, said she thinks weight stigma and a larger trend of fatphobia in the medical field does greater damage to the quality of health care and health outcomes than any card could ever do. 'Fatphobia in the medical field often translates into a lack of diagnosing for ailments,' she said. 'When someone goes in for pain or whatever ailment, it's extremely discouraging to be told to just lose weight or simply ignored altogether. What are those in thinner bodies told for the same ailments?' Spence said there are many instances when people in larger bodies are congratulated on weight loss, no matter how unnatural or unhealthy it is. 'Even a thin or straight-sized person is congratulated on weight loss because we as a society are very weight-centric,' Spence said. A 2012 survey of almost 2,500 U.S. women found that 69% reported feeling stigmatized for their weight by their doctors and 52% endured recurring fat bias. As Spence pointed out, diagnoses are often missed because providers are fixated on the number on the scale rather than the full picture of health. A review of studies published in the journal Obesity Reviews in 2015 showed that health care professionals' negative feelings about fat bodies can lead to misdiagnosis and late or missed diagnoses, negatively impacting patient outcomes. Studies have also shown that this bias makes women and people in larger-sized bodies less likely to seek health care in the first place. The good news is, more weight- and body-neutral doctors seem to be entering the profession. Some doctors have adopted a Health at Every Size, or HAES, approach to public health. HAES-aligned health care providers seek to deemphasize weight loss as a health goal while reducing stigma toward larger bodies in the medical field. Most HAES health care providers believe that the current practice of linking weight to health using body mass index standards is not only biased but unhelpful when it comes to weight loss. (If you're looking for a HAES-informed health care provider in your area, there's an online database that you can search by area or specialty.) A 2017 study out of the University of Pennsylvania found that when people feel shamed because of their weight, they are more likely to avoid exercise and consume more calories to cope with this stress. Spence noted that healthy solutions include encouraging patients to incorporate more fruits, vegetables and fiber-rich foods into their diets, work on strategies to quit smoking and focus on mental health, since stress can contribute to many health problems, including high blood pressure, heart disease, obesity and diabetes. 'There is no need to concentrate on numbers constantly,' she said. At the very least, medical professionals should start asking patients if they want to be told their weight. When Gaudiani consults with fellow medical practitioners who aren't quite on board with radically reduced weight checks, she asks them at least to consider asking for consent. 'A doctor or staff could say, 'Would you be willing for me to check your weight today? I was worried last month when you said you were feeling low energy and having a harder time getting in your meals, and I'd like to follow up,'' Gaudiani said. 'So much of medicine assumes permission to act upon patients' bodies, when in fact we need to be honoring body autonomy and seeking consent much more.' What To Do If Your Doctor Fat Shames You Being Fat Is Not A Moral Failure. Here's How To Teach Your Kids That. Your Body On Alcohol: How It Affects Your Heart, Liver, Weight And Cancer Risk
