'Drug-smuggling cat' caught trying to sneak into prison with heroin backpack
A cat caught sneaking into a prison was attempting to smuggle nearly half a kilogram of cannabis and heroin behind bars in a makeshift backpack. The mischievous moggy was apprehended in Costa Rica as it attempted to gain entry to the Pococi Penitentiary in Pococi by clambering over the facility's fence.
The Costa Rican Ministry of Justice said in a social media post that the would-be drug mule was caught with several packets of drugs, including 236 grams of cannabis and around 68 grams of heroin. Prison guards have said they believe the cat was attempting to smuggle drugs to inmates.
Andress Gutierrez, head of the Panama Penitentiary system, said the cat was found with "a cloth tied around its neck" with packages inserted inside.
The packages contained white powder, leaves and "vegetable matter", he said, with an official statement from the Ministry of Justice adding the cat was discovered as it attempted to vault a barbed wire lined fence. An English translation of the statement read: "An officer stationed at one of the forts spotted the animal in the green zone and immediately raised the alarm."
The statement added that the cat was caught "thanks to the swift actions of the responding officers" and that its packages were removed before they could reach their intended destination.
A video of the captured suspect showed the cat being taken down from its fence perch and carefully handled as officials cut off its makeshift backpack. They later handed the cat over to the National Animal Health Service for an evaluation after the drugs were cut free from its body.
According to local reports, prisoners are known to use animals to transport drugs by luring them with food into their cells after they have been loaded with packages.
Prison officials are now reviewing CCTV footage as they investigate where the cat came from, and where it was likely being lured to while equipped with the drugs. The unusual incident and video of the cat's hijinks sparked a spirited conversation online, with social media users poking fun while condemning prisoners for taking advantage of the cat.
One social media user joked: "How many years cat got." And another quipped: "Hope the judge showed the cat some leniency." One user joked the cat was making a Breaking Bad-style decision.
They said: "He's actually doing this to pay for his veterinarian treatment in America." Others were more outraged and concerned for the cat's welfare, with one person saying: "Poor kitty! I'll bet the intended recipient of its cargo wouldn't have been that careful in removing the drugs!"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
FA imposes eight-week ban on former referee Coote for Klopp comments
Aug 12 (Reuters) - Former Premier League referee David Coote was sanctioned and given an eight-week ban by the Football Association on Tuesday in relation to comments he made about former Liverpool manager Juergen Klopp in a video that went viral last year. Coote had been sacked by English soccer referees' body PGMOL after a video, recorded in July 2020, circulated on social media showing the official allegedly abusing Klopp and after a full investigation, his position was deemed untenable. The 43-year-old was charged by the FA in June and an independent Regulatory Commission has now imposed an eight-week suspension and mandatory face-to-face education programme on him. Coote had admitted the charge. "It was alleged that contrary to FA Rule E3.1 the referee acted in an improper manner and/or used abusive and/or insulting words about Jurgen Klopp in a video that was recorded around July 2020 and appeared on social media in November 2024," the FA said. "It was also alleged that his actions constitute an 'Aggravated Breach', which is defined in FA Rule E3.2, as they included a reference – whether express or implied – to nationality." Europe's soccer governing body also said Coote was banned from any UEFA refereeing activity until June 2026. Coote has apologised for his actions. The Sun also published a video which the newspaper said showed Coote appearing to snort white powder during his time working as a match official at Euro 2024.
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Sex offender boss of doomed Glasgow Willy Wonka Experience back in court
He pleaded guilty last November to hounding a woman PERV IN COURT Sex offender boss of doomed Glasgow Willy Wonka Experience back in court Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE MAN behind the viral Willy Wonka Experience was back in court today for breaching his sex offenders register requirements. Billy Coull, 36, was put on the register for one year after he pleaded guilty at last November to hounding a woman. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The accused fronted a disappointing Willy Wokna-style event Credit: The Mega Agency Coull repeatedly sent explicit pictures and messages to her despite being told to stop between March 26 and July 2 2024. One of the texts stated that sex pest Coull, of the city's Knightswood, was a "wolf" and that she was his "prey." Coull's conduct was amid the fallout of the infamous Willy Wonka Experience ,which he organised in February 2024. Families forked out £35 a ticket earlier for the event at a warehouse in the city's Whiteinch which was described as disastrous, ill-prepared and shoddy. The shamed former charity worker was forced to shut the event down amid claims that the event left children in tears. Coull was also sentenced in November to 120 hours of unpaid work and put under supervision for a year. However, it emerged that Coull breached his sex offenders register notification requirements days later on November 21 2024. Coull was ordered by the sheriff to notify the police that he was on the register within three days of the requirements being imposed. Coull pleaded guilty at Glasgow Sheriff Court in February this year for failing to do this. He appeared at court today before Sheriff Lesley Dowdalls who had previously ordered him to be of good behaviour. Neil Stewart, defending, told the sentencing: "He has been of good behaviour." Prosecutor Abbas Ali then stated: "I can advise that the report is clear." Sheriff Dowdalls admonished Coull of the charge. She said: "I deferred sentence for you to show that you can remain out of trouble and comply with the order. I hear no issues have arisen."
Scotsman
21 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why police must tell Labour to think again over Palestine Action
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Dear Chief Constable, I am writing to you concerning the decision to designate Palestine Action a terrorist organisation and to criminalise support for them. Many organisations, from Amnesty International to the United Nations, have condemned this decision, describing it as a threat to human rights and civil liberties. The UK Government has responded by arguing that it is necessary for national security and public order. I want to try and persuade you that the legislation and the mass arrests to which it has led are as bad for security and public order as they are for our rights. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I base my counsel on over 40 years of studying crowd events and crowd violence. For sure, some crowds are very violent. But it is wrong to suppose that crowds are inherently violent or that individuals are helplessly swept up in the contagion of violence once it starts. A protester is carried away by police officers at a 'Lift The Ban' demonstration in support of the proscribed group Palestine Action (Picture: Henry Nicholls) | AFP via Getty Images The problem with demonising crowds Such views, in the past, have led to highly repressive forms of public order policing – the irony being that such action has validated the argument of some that the state is the enemy and one can only fight fire with fire. In short, the demonisation of crowds leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy whereby indiscriminate police repression leads to the escalation of violence. These insights have led to the development of new forms of public order policing which marginalise those advocating violence by starting from the question 'how can we help crowd members achieve legitimate goals' rather than 'how can we stop crowds causing problems'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Once crowd members see the police as an asset rather than an impediment, they themselves will act to control those amongst them who favour mayhem. After all, crowd members know that if a demonstration turns into a riot, then violence will dominate the headlines and their cause will be silenced. Absence of Seattle-style violence at COP26 Such 'facilitative policing' has developed in leaps and bounds and Police Scotland has had a proud place in its vanguard. In 2021, I was part of the independent advisory group to the policing of the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow. Police Scotland stressed its commitment to human rights policing, to protecting the right to peaceful protest, and to facilitating those who wished to make their concerns about urgent action on the climate emergency heard loudly and clearly. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad For sure, the policing wasn't perfect. There were controversies about how far the police lived up to these principles and whether the deployment of some 10,000 officers was overkill. Nonetheless, even the fiercest critic would accept that what happened was far different from the violence at previous COPs and other summits (Copenhagen, Paris, Hamburg, Seattle). Or again, during Covid, I was involved in advising the police about their approach which was based on working with people rather than coming down heavily upon them. It was encapsulated in the '4Es' policy: if people break the pandemic regulations, start off by 'Engaging' with them, 'Explain' to them why the regulations are important, and 'Encourage' them to comply. Only as a last resort use 'Enforcement'. This approach was highly successful and arguably avoided the riots that happened in countries like France where the police immediately arrested those breaking curfew. Elderly protesters bubbling with joy The power of such approaches is as much long term as short term. If protests are seen as dangerous places where anyone could find themselves in the midst of a fight, then only those willing to countenance violence will attend. But if facilitative policing helps make crowds safer spaces, then families and children will take part and violence will become even more unlikely. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I recall visiting a church group during COP26 where elderly parishioners (who had never before been on a protest before, thinking such things were not for people like them) were bubbling with joy at the sense of community they had experienced. It takes a long time to build up such trust. It can be destroyed in an instant. The arrests around Palestine Action are in grave danger of doing so. This is exacerbated when people are carted away not only for expressing support for the organisation but for objecting to the ban or simply for expressing views which coincide with those of Palestine Action – such as the fact that Gaza should be free and some action must be taken to stop the appalling situation in Palestine. By such logic, anyone who wants the trains to run on time is a fascist sympathiser. When the police arrest over 500 people for holding up placards saying what most of the population believe (that we should take action on Palestine) and when people who are dedicated to the rule of law (such as elderly magistrates) are criminalised, something is plainly going wrong. Making public disorder and terrorism more likely Going back to the times when demonstrations were dangerous places and the police were viewed as the enemy makes public disorder more likely. It also makes crowds more dangerous and unpleasant for officers on the frontline who experience mass antagonism. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Worse still, when the right to seek change through collective protest is undermined, some will become more likely to resort to individualistic acts of terror. Chief Constable, I hope it is clear why this legislation is a deeply retrograde step that is as bad for the rule of law, for the preservation of the public order and for the well-being of your own officers as it is for those who are flabbergasted by a law that lumps together Palestine Action with al-Qaeda and Isis (if, on 9/11, al-Qaeda had limited themselves to spray painting the Twin Towers, we would be living in a very different world). I also hope you will agree that the best way to serve your community and your staff is to join with your fellow Chief Constables and say to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper: 'Think again.'
