logo
US and China hold second day of tariff talks

US and China hold second day of tariff talks

The Advertiser11-05-2025

The US and China have resumed crucial tariff talks that have put the global economy on edge, but it's unclear exactly how much progress negotiators are making behind closed doors.
US President Donald Trump wrote on social media that "great progress" was being made and even suggested a "total reset" was possible as the sides took their seats for the second and final scheduled day of discussions in Geneva on Sunday.
Beijing has yet to comment directly, but its official news agency took a tough approach, saying China will "firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity".
Still, Trump wrote Sunday on social media that "great progress" was being made.
He gave no further details, and officials at the White House also offered little information during and after the opening day of discussions.
The discussions could help stabilise world markets roiled by the US-China stand-off that has ships in port with goods from China unwilling to unload until they get the final word on tariffs.
The discussions have been shrouded in secrecy, and neither side made comments to reporters as they left Saturday.
"Talks should never be a pretext for continued coercion or extortion, and China will firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity," Xinhua said in an editorial.
As with the day before, the delegations left the villa designated for talks after a couple of hours for a lunch break.
Trump last month raised US tariffs on China to a combined 145 per cent, and China retaliated by hitting American imports with a 125 per cent levy.
Tariffs that high essentially amount to the countries' boycotting each other's products, disrupting trade that last year topped $US660 billion ($A1.0 trillion).
Even before talks got underway, Trump suggested on Friday that the US could lower its tariffs on China, saying in a Truth Social post that " 80 per cent Tariff seems right! Up to Scott!" — referring to lead negotiator and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
The talks mark the first time the sides have met face-to-face to discuss the issues.
And though prospects for a breakthrough are slight, even a small drop in tariffs, particularly if taken simultaneously, would help restore some confidence.
"Negotiations to begin de-escalating the growing US–China trade war are badly needed and it's a positive sign that both sides were able to gracefully move beyond their bickering over who had to call first," Jake Werner, director of the East Asia Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said.
The tariff fight with China has been the most intense.
Trump's tariffs on China include a 20 per cent charge meant to pressure Beijing into doing more to stop the flow of the synthetic opioid fentanyl into the United States.
The remaining 125 per cent involve a dispute that dates back to Trump's first term and comes atop tariffs he levied on China back then, which means the total tariffs on some Chinese goods can exceed 145 per cent.
China's trade deficit, which came to a record $US263 billion ($A410 billion) last year, has also been a major target of Trump's complaints.
The US and China have resumed crucial tariff talks that have put the global economy on edge, but it's unclear exactly how much progress negotiators are making behind closed doors.
US President Donald Trump wrote on social media that "great progress" was being made and even suggested a "total reset" was possible as the sides took their seats for the second and final scheduled day of discussions in Geneva on Sunday.
Beijing has yet to comment directly, but its official news agency took a tough approach, saying China will "firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity".
Still, Trump wrote Sunday on social media that "great progress" was being made.
He gave no further details, and officials at the White House also offered little information during and after the opening day of discussions.
The discussions could help stabilise world markets roiled by the US-China stand-off that has ships in port with goods from China unwilling to unload until they get the final word on tariffs.
The discussions have been shrouded in secrecy, and neither side made comments to reporters as they left Saturday.
"Talks should never be a pretext for continued coercion or extortion, and China will firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity," Xinhua said in an editorial.
As with the day before, the delegations left the villa designated for talks after a couple of hours for a lunch break.
Trump last month raised US tariffs on China to a combined 145 per cent, and China retaliated by hitting American imports with a 125 per cent levy.
Tariffs that high essentially amount to the countries' boycotting each other's products, disrupting trade that last year topped $US660 billion ($A1.0 trillion).
Even before talks got underway, Trump suggested on Friday that the US could lower its tariffs on China, saying in a Truth Social post that " 80 per cent Tariff seems right! Up to Scott!" — referring to lead negotiator and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
The talks mark the first time the sides have met face-to-face to discuss the issues.
And though prospects for a breakthrough are slight, even a small drop in tariffs, particularly if taken simultaneously, would help restore some confidence.
"Negotiations to begin de-escalating the growing US–China trade war are badly needed and it's a positive sign that both sides were able to gracefully move beyond their bickering over who had to call first," Jake Werner, director of the East Asia Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said.
The tariff fight with China has been the most intense.
Trump's tariffs on China include a 20 per cent charge meant to pressure Beijing into doing more to stop the flow of the synthetic opioid fentanyl into the United States.
The remaining 125 per cent involve a dispute that dates back to Trump's first term and comes atop tariffs he levied on China back then, which means the total tariffs on some Chinese goods can exceed 145 per cent.
China's trade deficit, which came to a record $US263 billion ($A410 billion) last year, has also been a major target of Trump's complaints.
The US and China have resumed crucial tariff talks that have put the global economy on edge, but it's unclear exactly how much progress negotiators are making behind closed doors.
US President Donald Trump wrote on social media that "great progress" was being made and even suggested a "total reset" was possible as the sides took their seats for the second and final scheduled day of discussions in Geneva on Sunday.
Beijing has yet to comment directly, but its official news agency took a tough approach, saying China will "firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity".
Still, Trump wrote Sunday on social media that "great progress" was being made.
He gave no further details, and officials at the White House also offered little information during and after the opening day of discussions.
The discussions could help stabilise world markets roiled by the US-China stand-off that has ships in port with goods from China unwilling to unload until they get the final word on tariffs.
The discussions have been shrouded in secrecy, and neither side made comments to reporters as they left Saturday.
"Talks should never be a pretext for continued coercion or extortion, and China will firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity," Xinhua said in an editorial.
As with the day before, the delegations left the villa designated for talks after a couple of hours for a lunch break.
Trump last month raised US tariffs on China to a combined 145 per cent, and China retaliated by hitting American imports with a 125 per cent levy.
Tariffs that high essentially amount to the countries' boycotting each other's products, disrupting trade that last year topped $US660 billion ($A1.0 trillion).
Even before talks got underway, Trump suggested on Friday that the US could lower its tariffs on China, saying in a Truth Social post that " 80 per cent Tariff seems right! Up to Scott!" — referring to lead negotiator and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
The talks mark the first time the sides have met face-to-face to discuss the issues.
And though prospects for a breakthrough are slight, even a small drop in tariffs, particularly if taken simultaneously, would help restore some confidence.
"Negotiations to begin de-escalating the growing US–China trade war are badly needed and it's a positive sign that both sides were able to gracefully move beyond their bickering over who had to call first," Jake Werner, director of the East Asia Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said.
The tariff fight with China has been the most intense.
Trump's tariffs on China include a 20 per cent charge meant to pressure Beijing into doing more to stop the flow of the synthetic opioid fentanyl into the United States.
The remaining 125 per cent involve a dispute that dates back to Trump's first term and comes atop tariffs he levied on China back then, which means the total tariffs on some Chinese goods can exceed 145 per cent.
China's trade deficit, which came to a record $US263 billion ($A410 billion) last year, has also been a major target of Trump's complaints.
The US and China have resumed crucial tariff talks that have put the global economy on edge, but it's unclear exactly how much progress negotiators are making behind closed doors.
US President Donald Trump wrote on social media that "great progress" was being made and even suggested a "total reset" was possible as the sides took their seats for the second and final scheduled day of discussions in Geneva on Sunday.
Beijing has yet to comment directly, but its official news agency took a tough approach, saying China will "firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity".
Still, Trump wrote Sunday on social media that "great progress" was being made.
He gave no further details, and officials at the White House also offered little information during and after the opening day of discussions.
The discussions could help stabilise world markets roiled by the US-China stand-off that has ships in port with goods from China unwilling to unload until they get the final word on tariffs.
The discussions have been shrouded in secrecy, and neither side made comments to reporters as they left Saturday.
"Talks should never be a pretext for continued coercion or extortion, and China will firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity," Xinhua said in an editorial.
As with the day before, the delegations left the villa designated for talks after a couple of hours for a lunch break.
Trump last month raised US tariffs on China to a combined 145 per cent, and China retaliated by hitting American imports with a 125 per cent levy.
Tariffs that high essentially amount to the countries' boycotting each other's products, disrupting trade that last year topped $US660 billion ($A1.0 trillion).
Even before talks got underway, Trump suggested on Friday that the US could lower its tariffs on China, saying in a Truth Social post that " 80 per cent Tariff seems right! Up to Scott!" — referring to lead negotiator and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
The talks mark the first time the sides have met face-to-face to discuss the issues.
And though prospects for a breakthrough are slight, even a small drop in tariffs, particularly if taken simultaneously, would help restore some confidence.
"Negotiations to begin de-escalating the growing US–China trade war are badly needed and it's a positive sign that both sides were able to gracefully move beyond their bickering over who had to call first," Jake Werner, director of the East Asia Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said.
The tariff fight with China has been the most intense.
Trump's tariffs on China include a 20 per cent charge meant to pressure Beijing into doing more to stop the flow of the synthetic opioid fentanyl into the United States.
The remaining 125 per cent involve a dispute that dates back to Trump's first term and comes atop tariffs he levied on China back then, which means the total tariffs on some Chinese goods can exceed 145 per cent.
China's trade deficit, which came to a record $US263 billion ($A410 billion) last year, has also been a major target of Trump's complaints.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats take the side of migrants over Americans ‘every day of the week'
Democrats take the side of migrants over Americans ‘every day of the week'

Sky News AU

time25 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Democrats take the side of migrants over Americans ‘every day of the week'

Sky News host James Morrow says the Democratic Party takes the side of migrants over American citizens 'every day of the week'. US President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard to restore order to the riots which have erupted in Los Angeles after ICE agents arrested over 40 people. 'It feels like we are about to see a replay of 2020's summer of love in the US, only with radicals targeting armed ICE agents instead of main street shopkeepers. I'm sure that's going to go really well for them,' Mr Morrow said.

As Albanese plans Trump talks, Jim is worried about his farm
As Albanese plans Trump talks, Jim is worried about his farm

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

As Albanese plans Trump talks, Jim is worried about his farm

Farmers fear Australia will open its borders to beef from Mexico and Canada, as the Albanese government seeks an exemption from Donald Trump's tariffs without buckling to US complaints over its teen social media ban and big tech crackdown. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Trump later this month, sparking warnings from farmers that there must be no compromise on biosecurity to appease the White House, after this masthead revealed on Friday that a biosecurity review could let North American beef into Australia. While US farmers have been permitted to export locally grown beef to Australia since 2019, none has been sent. Instead, the US industry wants access for all the beef in its supply chain, including from stock raised in Mexico and Canada but slaughtered in the US. Biosecurity officials have not approved imports from these countries, and Albanese said on Friday that Australia would not compromise its biosecurity status even as he opened the door to restarting beef exports. 'We'll never loosen any rules regarding our biosecurity,' he told ABC Melbourne. 'If things can be sorted out in a way that protects our biosecurity – of course, we don't just say no.' Loading Agriculture sector representatives were briefed on Friday by government officials. They did not reveal details of how Australia could change its rules to accommodate the US beef supply chain, but said the review would be finalised soon. Industry sources speaking on the condition of anonymity said the only way Albanese could appease the Trump administration, without changing Australia's biosecurity rules, would be if the current review paved the way for all the beef in their supply chain to be sent to Australia. National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said Australia's disease-free status was crucial for the red meat sector, which depends on its clean reputation to export around 75 per cent of its product overseas.

National Guard being deployed to Los Angeles after immigration raids spark violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement
National Guard being deployed to Los Angeles after immigration raids spark violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

National Guard being deployed to Los Angeles after immigration raids spark violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement

The US National Guard is being deployed to Los Angeles after immigration enforcement raids sparked violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement. Federal agents faced off against demonstrators for a second day in a row on Saturday (local time), leading President Donald Trump to order the deployment of the National Guard. Dozens of law enforcement personnel dressed in riot gear engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters in the Paramount area of southeast Los Angeles after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducted raids as part of the Trump administration's pledge to deport record numbers of illegal immigrants. President Trump condemned the action as a 'form of rebellion' as he announced 2,000 National Guard personnel would be deployed for up to 60 days. 'Numerous incidents of violence and disorder have recently occurred and threaten to continue in response to the enforcement of Federal law by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions and supporting the faithful execution of Federal immigration laws,' President Trump said 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' President Trump has placed the National Guard, which is usually a state-based military force, under the command of Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth for the duration of their deployment. 'To carry out this mission, the deployed military personnel may perform those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary to ensure the protection and safety of Federal personnel and property,' the President's order states. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that "1,000 rioters surrounded a federal law enforcement building and assaulted ICE law enforcement officers, slashed tires, defaced buildings, and taxpayer funded property." Footage from the clashes show dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. One protester said the demonstration showed federal officials 'they cannot go to anywhere in this country where our people are, and try to kidnap our workers, our people'. 'They cannot do that without an organised and fierce resistance," said protester Ron Gochez, 44. At least one burnt-out car could be seen among the chaotic scenes, as some demonstrators displayed Mexican flags and others covered their mouths with respiratory masks. The first clashes erupted in LA on Friday night (local time) after ICE officials carried out raids and arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. The raids were carried out at Home Depots in LA, where street vendors and day labourers were picked up, as well as at a garment factory and warehouse. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the administration has come under fire for depriving people of due process rights and several court challenges have been filed as people legally residing in the country – including some with permanent residence – have been caught up weeping immigration crackdown has also caught up. Reuters was unable to verify DHS's accounts. Angelica Salas, executive director of immigrants rights organisation Chirla, said lawyers had not had access to those detained on Friday, which she called "very worrying." However the Trump administration has shown little willingness to deviate from its approach, with Department of Homeland Security head Kristi Noem declaring the protests 'will not stop us or slow us down." In a post on X, US Vice President JD Vance described the protesters as 'insurrectionists'. 'Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers, while one half of America's political leadership has decided that border enforcement is evil. Time to pass President Trump's beautiful bill and further secure the border,' the Vice President stated. The view of the Trump administration is in stark contrast to local officials in California, with LA Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, condemning the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Ms Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." Police Department officers did not take part in the immigration enforcement raids, however they were deployed to quell the civil unrest after, with a spokesperson telling Reuters police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. -With Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store