What gas subsidy cut? Armizan says ministry just cracking down on misuse, tells Wee policy came during his time in Cabinet
PUTRAJAYA, June 1 — Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali has urged Datuk Seri Wee Ka Siong to review the regulations introduced during his tenure in the Cabinet before making public statements on government policies related to Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) subsidies.
The minister of domestic trade and cost of living said no new policies or subsidy cuts have been introduced under the Ops Gasak, after Wee accused the ministry of restricting the use of subsidised LPG to hawkers.
'Its primary focus is to combat illegal decanting, smuggling, and the use of subsidised LPG by medium- and large-scale industries,' Armizan explained in a statement.
'It is inaccurate to claim that all hawkers and food and beverage traders are prohibited from using subsidised LPG cylinders,' he added.
Armizan clarified that Ops Gasak is being carried out under existing laws, including the Control of Supplies Act 1961, the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011, and the Control of Supplies (Amendment) Regulations 2021.
The 2021 amendment, which took effect on October 15, 2021, requires any party using over 42kg of LPG to obtain a Scheduled Controlled Goods Permit.
He noted that this regulation was enforced during the previous administration, in which Wee served as a Cabinet minister.
'Giving him the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he overlooked this regulation as it fell under a different ministry, and his team may not have provided accurate advice before he issued his public statement,' he said.
At present, Armizan said the ministry has not taken legal action, issued compounds, or confiscated goods from F&B traders without the required permit, focusing instead on advocacy and compliance awareness.
Armizan said the ministry is open to receiving complaints and suggestions and has already received proposals from various parties, including DAP leaders.
He added that any proposed improvements, including amendments to the 2021 regulation, would be brought to the Cabinet for consideration.
On Friday, the ministry's director-general of enforcement Datuk Azman Adam explained that the inspection under Ops Gasak is only at the advocacy, review, and notification stage of compliance with the relevant laws and regulations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
40 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Prosecution: Muhyiddin's sedition trial doesn't warrant Federal Court review, trial judge can decide
KUALA LUMPUR, June 4 — The prosecution contends that the sedition case involving former Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin does not involve complex or extraordinary questions of law. In an affidavit responding to Muhyiddin's application to refer legal questions related to the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court, the prosecution, as the respondent, stated that various legal issues concerning provisions of the Federal Constitution and the Act have already been decided by higher courts. Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Razali Che Ani, in the affidavit, said the issue raised regarding a speech or discussion allegedly falling under Clause 43(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution, read together with Section 3(2) and Section 3(3) of the Sedition Act 1948, is a matter of defence. 'This issue can be raised by Muhyiddin during the trial and should be decided by the presiding judge after all the respondent's witnesses (prosecution) have testified,' he said in the affidavit. Razali further stated that the issue is academic as the trial has not yet started, and no evidence has been presented for the court's consideration. He said the prosecution and evidence process for offences under the Act are conducted in accordance with the country's criminal law principles and comply with the Federal Constitution. 'It is not in the interest of justice to refer this case to the Federal Court. Therefore, I request that the applicant's (Muhyiddin's) notice of motion be dismissed,' he said. During today's proceedings, High Court Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin set August 28 for the hearing of Muhyiddin's application to refer legal questions related to the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court. The date was fixed during a case management session attended by Muhyiddin's lawyer, Joshua Tay, and Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Razali Che Ani. On April 4, Muhyiddin, 77, filed an application to refer a question of law regarding the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court to challenge the validity of certain provisions in the Act. He had previously pleaded not guilty to a charge of making seditious remarks while campaigning in conjunction with the Nenggiri state by-election at Dewan Semai Bakti Felda Perasu, between 10.30pm and 11.50pm on August 14, 2024. The alleged seditious remarks concerned his claim that he was not invited by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as Prime Minister following the 15th General Election, despite allegedly having the support of 115 out of 222 members of parliament at that time. He is charged under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, which is punishable under Subsection 4(1) of the same Act with a maximum fine of RM5,000 or a maximum imprisonment of three years, or both if convicted. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Zahid heads to Geneva for UN disaster summit
KUALA LUMPUR, June 4 — Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is leading Malaysia's delegation to the Eighth Session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (GPDRR) in Geneva on June 4 and 5. The Foreign Ministry (MOFA), in a statement today, said Ahmad Zahid is accompanied by senior officials from MOFA, the Deputy Prime Minister's Office and the National Disaster Management Agency. 'The Deputy Prime Minister is scheduled to deliver Malaysia's National Statement at the eighth GPDRR. He will be speaking at a ministerial roundtable session on the topic of 'Safe Schools Now: Protecting Every Child from Disaster and Climate Risk',' it said. 'The Deputy Prime Minister will reiterate Malaysia's continued commitment to disaster management through the launch of the National Disaster Risk Reduction Policy, the implementation of the Safe School Programme and the Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction Programme as well as through the introduction of a Disaster Risk Reduction education programme,' it added. While in Geneva, Ahmad Zahid, who is also the Rural and Regional Development Minister, is also scheduled to meet the United Nations Assistant Secretary-General and Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction, Kamal Kishore. 'The meeting is aimed at exploring potential areas of collaboration between Malaysia and international partners on disaster risk management,' according to the statement. The GPDRR is a platform for assessing progress made by United Nations member states on the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Malaysia is a pioneer member of this network and remains unwavering in its commitment to managing and pre-empting disasters in line with the 2030 National Disaster Risk Reduction Policy. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
High Court dismisses Anwar's bid to refer PM immunity questions to Federal Court, says no constitutional issues
KUALA LUMPUR, June 4 — The High Court here today dismissed Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether the Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain made the ruling after finding that none of the articles of a Federal Constitution (FC) cited by Anwar's legal team give rise to any real, substantial or justiciable question of constitutional law requiring determination by the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the FC or Section 84 of Courts of Judicature Act 1964. 'From a judicial perspective, the proposed questions do not appear to meet the threshold of genuine constitutional controversy,' she said. The Prime Minister filed the application on May 23, seeking the High Court, which is hearing the suit, to refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. — Bernama
