Ingredion Incorporated Declares Quarterly Dividend Of $0.80 Per Share
WESTCHESTER, Ill., May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Today, the board of directors of Ingredion Incorporated (NYSE: INGR) declared a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share on the Company's common stock. The dividend is payable on July 22, 2025, to stockholders of record at the close of business on July 1, 2025.
About Ingredion
Ingredion Incorporated (NYSE: INGR) headquartered in the suburbs of Chicago, is a leading global ingredient solutions provider serving customers in more than 120 countries. With 2024 annual net sales of approximately $7.4 billion, the company turns grains, fruits, vegetables, and other plant-based materials into value-added ingredient solutions for the food, beverage, animal nutrition, brewing and industrial markets. With Ingredion's Idea Labs ® innovation centers around the world and more than 11,000 employees, the company co-creates with customers and fulfills its purpose of bringing the potential of people, nature, and technology together to make life better. Visit ingredion.com for more information and the latest company news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
10 AI Stocks I'd Buy Without Hesitation
Artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an inflection point where early leaders are separating from the pack, creating exceptional investment opportunities across the AI value chain. From semiconductor giants to software innovators, the winners in this space offer compelling multiyear growth stories as AI transforms from experimental technology to business necessity. Smart positioning in quality AI stocks today could deliver strong returns as this technology reshapes every industry over the next decade. The AI revolution is accelerating beyond even optimistic forecasts. Companies successfully harnessing AI are seeing dramatic improvements in productivity and customer outcomes, while those ignoring it risk obsolescence. The total addressable market reaches into the trillions, yet adoption remains early. This creates a rare window for investors to position themselves before the masses recognize AI's full potential. I've analyzed dozens of AI-related companies to identify those with sustainable competitive advantages and clear monetization paths. These 10 stocks offer diversified exposure across infrastructure, software, and applications. Each brings unique strengths to the AI ecosystem, and I'd confidently buy any at current level for long-term holdings. 1. AI chip dominance Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) controls between 70% to 90% of the data center graphics processing unit (GPU) market, making its GPUs the industry standard for training large language models. The investment case rests on CUDA's decade-long ecosystem advantage, creating high switching costs. In Q1 of fiscal 2026, Nvidia reported record revenue of $44.1 billion, with data center revenue reaching $39.1 billion, a 73% increase year over year. Despite a $4.5 billion charge related to unsellable H20 GPUs due to U.S. export restrictions to China, Nvidia's dominance in AI infrastructure remains unchallenged. 2. Extreme ultraviolet monopoly ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML) manufactures the only extreme ultraviolet lithography machines capable of producing cutting-edge semiconductors, giving it the lion's share of the market for this critical technology. The company's substantial backlog provides multiyear revenue visibility, while research and development spending of around 4.3 billion euros annually maintains its technological moat. As AI drives demand for more advanced chips, ASML benefits, regardless of which chipmaker wins, making it a defensive play on AI infrastructure growth. 3. Enterprise AI transformation Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) monetizes AI through proven channels, with Copilot subscriptions already generating billions in annualized revenue just months after launch. The company's advantage lies in distribution: 1.5 billion Office users worldwide and a dominant Azure cloud position enable rapid AI deployment at scale. Microsoft's track record of successfully monetizing new technologies through existing customer relationships reduces execution risk, while AI integration across all products drives pricing power. 4. AI-powered insurance disruptor Lemonade (NYSE: LMND) uses AI throughout insurance operations to slash costs and improve customer experience, with 70% of claims processed instantly without human intervention. The company's loss ratios have improved dramatically as its algorithms learn from expanding data sets, while operational expenses remain a fraction of traditional insurers. As Lemonade scales into auto insurance and other verticals, its AI-first approach creates structural advantages that legacy carriers cannot replicate without rebuilding from scratch. 5. Conversational AI pioneer SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN) provides voice AI technology to major automotive and restaurant brands, with revenue growing over 80% annually and gross margins expanding toward software-industry standards. The company's edge-computing approach processes voice on-device, addressing privacy concerns while reducing latency. Recent customer wins include multiple top 10 automakers and expanding restaurant chains, validating the technology as voice interfaces become standard across industries. 6. AI-powered data analytics Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) leverages two decades of classified government work to build AI platforms now driving over 70% annual commercial revenue growth. The company's Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) enables enterprises to deploy large language models on private data, addressing the security concerns limiting corporate AI adoption. With government contracts providing a stable base of revenue and commercial acceleration, Palantir offers both growth and stability in the emerging AI landscape. 7. AI data center infrastructure Applied Digital (NASDAQ: APLD) operates purpose-built data centers for high-performance computing, with facilities designed specifically for AI workload requirements, including advanced cooling and power density. The company has secured long-term contracts with Tier-1 customers for its entire 400MW capacity, providing predictable revenue growth. As AI compute demand outstrips supply, Applied Digital's specialized facilities command premium pricing, while its 2GW-plus development pipeline positions it for sustained growth. 8. Clean energy for AI Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) develops small modular reactors addressing AI data centers' massive energy requirements, with each reactor designed to provide 15MW to 50MW of clean baseload power. Recent regulatory streamlining and partnerships with data center operators validate the business model as tech companies seek carbon-free energy sources. The company's recycled fuel approach and compact design offer economic advantages over traditional nuclear energy, positioning it to benefit from AI's growing energy demands. 9. AI cloud infrastructure leader CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) specializes in GPU-accelerated cloud computing, offering AI-optimized infrastructure that major AI companies use for training and inference. The company is projected to generate $5 billion in revenue for 2025, with analysts expecting revenue to more than double to $11.6 billion in 2026 -- a 130% growth rate that validates its AI-first strategy. With established relationships serving leading AI labs and better GPU availability than most hyperscalers, CoreWeave has carved out a defensible niche in the fast-growing AI infrastructure market. 10. AI analytics specialist (NYSE: BBAI) applies AI to defense and commercial analytics, with expertise in computer vision and predictive modeling for mission-critical applications. The company reported Q1 2025 revenue of $34.8 million with 5% year-over-year growth and maintains a $385 million backlog, providing long-term revenue visibility. Recent contract wins in supply chain optimization and defense analytics demonstrate the value of specialized AI applications in regulated industries where accuracy and explainability matter most. Building an AI-powered portfolio These 10 stocks represent different layers of the AI ecosystem, from essential infrastructure to specialized applications. While AI investments are inherently volatile, each company demonstrates strong fundamentals, defensible market positions, and clear paths to sustainable growth. The convergence of technological capability, enterprise adoption, and massive addressable markets creates a compelling long-term opportunity for patient investors. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 George Budwell has positions in Lemonade, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Lemonade, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Billionaires Ken Griffin and Israel Englander Are Buying a Beaten-Down Growth Stock -- and It Could Turn $10,000 Into $100,000
Sweetgreen (NYSE: SG) is one of the more disruptive companies in the retail/restaurant industry today. The company has brought a new concept to the fast-casual format as the largest fast-casual salad chain in the U.S. That menu seems to be resonating with customers. Sweetgreen is rapidly adding new locations, and its average restaurant brings in $2.9 million in revenue, a number on par with fast-casual leader Chipotle. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » However, an even greater point of disruption from Sweetgreen may be its Infinite Kitchen, a robotic system to help expedite orders, saving money on labor and improving throughput. Of the 40 restaurants it plans to open this year, 20 will have an Infinite Kitchen. The company has also teased the idea of licensing the new technology, which could open up a new revenue stream. Despite that potential, Sweetgreen has had a forgettable year. Its stock is down 54% year to date through June 4. It has faced several challenges, including the wildfires in Los Angeles, one of its biggest markets and where the company is headquartered, and broader headwinds in the restaurant industry due to concerns about tariffs and other signs of a weakening economy. In its first-quarter earnings report, the company reported a same-store sales decline of 3.1%. It said quarter-to-date comps were down mid-single digits in the second quarter as concerns around tariffs picked up in April, weighing on demand. A fresh opportunity A 54% sell-off is disappointing for existing shareholders of the stock, but it creates an opportunity to scoop up this promising growth stock on the cheap. In fact, two billionaires did just that in the first quarter. Israel Englander's Millennium Management purchased 2.17 million shares of the restaurant stock, adding to a stake it started building in Q1 2023. Similarly, Ken Griffin's Citadel Advisors, which is often considered to be the best-performing hedge fund, added 1.27 million shares of Sweetgreen. Citadel first bought the stock when it went public in the fourth quarter of 2021. Buying the dip on Sweetgreen is risky, especially with an uncertain economy, and declining comparable sales are never a good sign for a restaurant chain. However, management's guidance calls for an improvement in same-store sales over the rest of the year, forecasting flat growth for the year. More importantly, the company's long-term growth opportunities are still significant. Will Sweetgreen be a ten-bagger? After the reset in the stock price, Sweetgreen's market cap has fallen to just $1.8 billion. That means the stock could turn $10,000 to $100,000 if its market cap reached $18 billion, a reasonable goal for a restaurant chain. Despite the weak same-store sales, Sweetgreen continues to aggressively open new stores. It plans to add 40 locations this year, growing the store base by 16%. Over the longer term, CEO Jonathan Neman sees the company growing to at least 1,000 stores, if not several thousand. This should drive the stock higher over the longer term, assuming Sweetgreen can pull off that expansion. In the meantime, the company is delivering strong average unit volumes of $2.9 billion, and its restaurant-level operating margin of 19% is good enough to drive profitability, especially as that margin is likely to increase over time. Investments in the Infinite Kitchen system seemed to have weighed on the bottom line but should spread out over time. Finally, Infinite Kitchen should give the company a competitive advantage in areas like labor and throughput, and the effect of the technology should eventually show in the financial results. Overall, Sweetgreen is the leader in a growing fast-casual category, its restaurants are generating strong traffic, and it has a potential technological advantage in Infinite Kitchen. The stock is risky, but the upside potential is there, especially once the economy improves. The company should return to same-store sales growth when that happens. Should you invest $1,000 in Sweetgreen right now? Before you buy stock in Sweetgreen, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Sweetgreen wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Jeremy Bowman has positions in Chipotle Mexican Grill and Sweetgreen. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool recommends Sweetgreen and recommends the following options: short June 2025 $55 calls on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Microlearning apps promise to make you smarter in just 15 minutes. Do they?
Riding the self-help wave, a new class of microlearning apps promises to make you smarter in just 15 minutes — one bite-sized book summary at a time. Apps such as Wiser, Headway, Blinkist, and Shortform distill thousands of nonfiction titles into quick, digestible audio or text summaries on topics ranging from productivity to psychology. Viral hits such as Atomic Habits and The 5 AM Club are trimmed down to their core takeaways, letting users squeeze in a dose of personal growth while folding laundry or commuting to work. The model is clearly resonating: Blinkist now counts more than 26 million users globally, while Headway boasts over 50 million downloads – evidence that microlearning is no longer a fringe habit, and these users are willing to pay $80 to $200 a year for it. Is AI dulling critical-thinking skills? As tech companies court students, educators weigh the risks For one avid user, Virginia-based podcast host and entrepreneur Mickey Mellen, microlearning apps offer a useful preview of a book before committing to the full read. His podcast, Stacking Knowledge, explores business and biographical books in depth, and he finds these platforms especially helpful for revisiting, recapping, and reinforcing ideas after finishing the original version. Mellen uses the apps for about 30 minutes each week, often to refresh key takeaways ahead of interviewing guest speakers. Still, as the summaries begin to feel increasingly AI-generated, Mellen admits, 'the satisfaction is fading.' Some microlearning apps, such as Blinkist and Headway, are indeed turning to generative AI for various features — Blinkist has recently rolled out an AI feature that turns user-uploaded content into summaries, while Headway has integrated AI-powered features into its advertising products. But for Mellen, that shift blurs the line between what these apps offer and what tools like ChatGPT can already do — and do more interactively. 'I enjoy just talking to the assistant and having a conversation about a book,' Mellen, who occasionally uses the generative AI tool as a substitute for microlearning apps, says. Three money topics to tackle with your teenager as university acceptance letters arrive Mellen's skepticism reflects a larger tension at the core of commercialized microlearning: while the concept is rooted in sound educational theory, some experts argue that its app-based incarnation prioritizes convenience over comprehension. Dr. Adam Dube, associate professor of learning sciences and director of the Technology, Learning, & Cognition (TLC) Lab at McGill University, explains that these apps may be more effective at scratching the itch for productivity than fostering real understanding. When we read, she says, new information enters our working memory and connects with what's already stored in long-term memory. We're not just absorbing words — we're actively drawing on past knowledge to make sense of them. These connections don't always happen instantly; they often emerge a few pages later or during moments of rest, when a memory resurfaces or a detail finally clicks. Microlearning, by contrast, delivers isolated bits of information and disrupts this slow, integrative process, making it harder to engage with ideas in a way that truly stays with readers in the long term. Beyond efficiency, part of these apps' appeal lies in their gamified design — users are nudged to maintain reading streaks, complete curated challenges, and rack up trophies for hitting weekly goals — all tracked and compared against others. But these surface-level incentives, too, are contested by experts. Dube's research shows little evidence that they actually improve learning — gamification only works when it's tied to genuine cognitive effort or a learner's grasp of the material, he explains: 'You're engaging in the learning activity to get the reward, as opposed to understanding the concept.' Parents are staging elaborate 'core memories' they hope their kids will remember. Does it really work that way? Even though microlearning apps position themselves as antidotes to 'doomscrolling' on social media, many adopt features similar to those used by social media platforms, which can also deepen the very habits they promise to disrupt. Dr. Shimi Kang, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist, warns that microlearning apps may not replace doomscrolling so much as add to it — becoming yet another source of distraction in an already fractured digital environment. 'If someone is trying to study and learn a topic and gets distracted by their microlearning app beeping or notifications — studies show it takes at least 23 minutes to refocus on a task after an interruption,' says Kang, who is also an author of several nonfiction self-help titles, including The Tech Solution: Creating Healthy Habits for Kids Growing Up in a Digital World. Constant toggling between tasks doesn't just erode focus, she adds — it triggers a stress response. 'When we have trouble focusing, our nervous system will ask: Why can't you focus? Is there a hurricane? Is there a predator? And it will fire cortisol, the stress hormone, just from switching attention rapidly.' Over time, that cognitive wear-and-tear, she says, can carry real consequences for both mental clarity and overall wellbeing. That said, Kang acknowledges that microlearning isn't without merit. 'When you're only having to focus for, let's say, three to five minutes, it can be more achievable,' she notes. If the content is well-crafted and focused, it can reduce cognitive overload and offer a quick sense of accomplishment — especially for busy users or those who struggle with sustained attention. 'It fits with our understanding of neurodiversity,' she adds, pointing out that people absorb information in different ways — visually, auditorily, or logically. 'As long as the message isn't altered, I welcome any platform that gets good information out there.' Some university professors say AI is here to stay, so students should learn how to use it Like Kang, Todd Cunningham, a professor in the Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, acknowledges the benefits of microlearning apps in certain use-case scenarios — particularly when they supplement, rather than substitute, long-form reading. One proven strategy for boosting comprehension and retention, he explains, is to briefly survey a text to 'get your brain thinking about what you're going to read.' In that sense, microlearning apps can function as a kind of cognitive warm-up. But he cautions that relying solely on summaries can create 'a false sense of learning.' I decided to try one of these apps myself — listening to a summary of Homo Deus by Yuval Noah Harari on Wiser. There was undeniable satisfaction in being served up mini-nuggets of insight: a quick hit of intellectual nourishment. But that satisfaction came with a sense of loss. The experience felt flat — more mechanical than meaningful. Unlike a full audiobook on Audible, it wasn't thoughtfully narrated; instead, a baritone, automated voice delivered dense, jargony ideas with no room for imagination or interpretation. On the page, I often find myself imagining the narrator's tone, personality, even their wardrobe choices. There's the book, and there's my relationship with the book. Here, the latter was compromised. The rich fodder of the page was replaced by a kind of convenient fast-food takeout: efficient, digestible, but ultimately, forgettable.
