Bosses Are Abusing Their Employees in an Archaic, Completely Unforgivable Way
Work is usually a place where you expect the people around you to control their emotions. That doesn't mean our colleagues turn off their feelings when they clock in, obviously—but professionalism involves maintaining a pretty even keel, at least outwardly, particularly when it comes to negative behaviors. We're supposed to understand that, no matter how strong the temptation, we can't give someone the silent treatment, cry in every meeting, or yell at our colleagues.
And yet, for some reason, in some offices, people get away with this.
Often that yeller is the boss. It's unclear exactly why they do this, but one recent study found that it's not because bosses are stressed or burned out—it's because they genuinely think it'll make their employees work faster and harder, and show them who's 'in charge.' One of the researchers summed up the sort of self-reports bosses gave about their behavior like so: 'If my followers have poor performance and I yell at them to increase compliance, then I feel like I achieved something in the short term.'
This is frankly abusive, and not something any workplace should tolerate. It's an abuse of a manager's power over others, and it's simply not how a human should deal with other humans.It also happens to be terrible management, since not only does it diminish the authority of the yeller by making them look out of control, it also creates an environment of fear and stifles people's creativity and initiative (who wants to take risks when there's a yeller nearby?). It will also, understandably, make good employees look for other jobs.
And yet, the power dynamics of the workplace can make people feel that they have no choice but to tolerate being yelled at. This person describes it well:
Recently I made a medium-sized, careless error at work. When my boss's boss confronted me about it, I owned up to my mistake and apologized, but she proceeded to pull me into her office and—no exaggeration—literally scream at me about it for upwards of 15 minutes. My repeated apologies were shouted down, and the topic of her tirade quickly switched from this one error to a litany of attacks on my personal character and complaints about the work environment at large, many of which had nothing to do with me. She was so intense that I actually began to feel physically unsafe.
We somehow managed to wrap up the 'conversation' in a slightly more calm fashion, and she even apologized at the end for being so intense, but it left me wondering: Would it have been OK for me to ask her to calm down, or to ask to reschedule the conversation until she was more levelheaded? In out-of-work life, I'd have no problem asking a friend or loved one to postpone a necessary discussion if I sensed one or both of us was in danger of fully losing our temper, or if the argument gets too heated to proceed respectfully or civilly. In fact, I've always found that to be a very effective technique—but obviously the dynamic with a boss is much different.
Here's another person who feels helpless to push back when their boss yells at them, even after trying to escalate the issue to HR:
I've been in my job for a year and a half, and my boss's aggressive attitude is taking a toll on me. Often she shouts at me (and I do mean shouts) in earshot of other people … I struggle to stand up for myself with her. On the few occasions I have, she has either shouted back to me and asked me if I am 'not up to the stress' of my job or been extra aggressive back and ignored me for several days. … I have gone to HR and spoken to her manager, but they have told me to file a formal grievance, which I am just not able to do. We are a team of two, and practically speaking, if I file a grievance, I will have to leave.
And while yelling is unpleasant for anyone to be subjected to, workplaces may have employees whose personal histories make it particularly difficult to deal with:
My boss can get worked up when things are not going according to plan and will often end up yelling for minutes on end. This usually happens in group settings, and he's not yelling at anyone in particular, just about his frustration in general (although sometimes he'll yell about a person who's not present). I don't enjoy this, but it's also not the worst thing in the world for me to listen to. … Recently, though, one of my co-workers, who is a close friend of mine and a survivor of domestic abuse, confided in me that because of her personal history, his yelling scares her. She's not actually scared that the yelling about frustrations will turn into yelling at her, or that he'll escalate his behavior in any way, but hearing someone yell about even an abstract problem is triggering for her. I think if he knew this he'd make a much stronger effort to find healthier ways to process his emotions, but it's obviously not the kind of thing to lightly encourage her to share with him.
Of course, not all yellers are in positions of authority. But even when the yeller isn't the boss, the complicated dynamics of the workplace can make their colleagues hesitant to push back:
I work in a very small office with an open floor plan. Most of us are friendly enough and get along well, with the exception of Jane. Jane is one of the unhappiest, most negative people I have ever met. She complains almost constantly about anything and everything—and the complaining itself is very loud, often to the point of yelling. … My co-workers and I are getting sick of it, but no one wants to go to HR and no one wants to confront Jane about her behavior out of fear of how she might react. Jane has said she hates being told to 'calm down' and more than one co-worker has expressed concerns about her 'going postal.' I myself dread working with Jane and often lose sleep on nights before we are in the office together.
It's absurd that so many workplaces haven't decided that yelling is unacceptable, just as it would be unacceptable for an employee to come to work drunk or have regular meltdowns in the breakroom. In particular, companies should flag managers who yell as people who need better training and coaching (so they can learn how to get the work they need from their teams without all the emotional chaos). In many cases, those managers also need closer scrutiny to suss out whether they're up to the challenges of the job or not.
And employees who are stuck working for managers who yell need to know it's OK to lay down boundaries—to say, 'I'm not willing to be yelled at, but I'd be glad to talk with you about this later once you're no longer yelling.' In fact, sometimes calmly and matter-of-factly asserting that boundary will defuse the yeller by making them realize they look out of control and even foolish. (Moreover, yellers are often so used to never being called out on their behavior that when someone does push back, it can jar them back into behaving more appropriately.) And because part of the stress of being yelled at can come from feeling trapped, realizing that you have the option of saying 'No, I won't be treated like this,' and leaving can help you regain a sense of agency. You can also go to HR, of course, if your company has decent HR that will actually intervene (or could consider going over the yeller's head if there's management above them that's likely to act).
If that doesn't work, yelling is abusive enough that it's worth actively working on getting out. No one should have to be screamed at to collect a paycheck.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Winners and losers from Broncos 27-7 win over Cardinals
The Denver Broncos came away on the high end of a 27-7 win over the Arizona Cardinals, where wide receiver Troy Franklin finished with two touchdown catches. Alongside Franklin, there were a host of other winners (and two losers) from the game. Let's dive into it! Winner: RB RJ Harvey Harvey looked great, starting on the first two drives for Denver, with the ones sitting out. It can now be safely assumed veteran J.K. Dobbins will be RB1, with Harvey the next featured back. Harvey finished the game with three rushes for 18 yards and one touchdown, his first as a Bronco, and one catch out of the backfield for two yards. Winner: WR Pat Bryant Bryant caught four passes on six targets for a game-high 70 yards. In two games of preseason action, Bryant has now caught six passes for 91 yards. Bryant's most impressive catch against the Cardinals was a shoestring grab in the first half from quarterback Jarrett Stidham. Bryant's big-play ability is an exciting prospect for a developing Broncos offense led by Bo Nix. Winner: TE Evan Engram Engram played on the Broncos' first offensive series, and his first 'official' touch for Denver went for 58 yards. It gave fans a hopeful glimpse into what a weapon the tight end can be. Winner: WR Courtney Jackson Jackson had himself the best night of any Bronco not named Troy Franklin. Jackson made an impact on special teams (three punt returns for 43 yards) and had a variety of creative touches on offense (one rush for 30 yards, two catches for 32 yards). After a strong showing at camp, and his integration on offense, it may be safe to say that Jackson has made a strong case for earning his way onto the 53-man roster. Loser: RB Audric Estime Estime seemed to lose carries to fellow running back Blake Watson. Estime carried the ball nine times for 20 yards, averaging the fewest yards per carry of any back against Arizona, despite the second-most carries of any back Denver put on the field. Estime is looking like he could be cut in favor of Watson or Badie. Loser: TE Caleb Lohner Denver's seventh-round pick in the 2025 NFL draft committed three penalties and looked lost on offense with motions and positioning. Lohner did have one catch for four yards. Despite limited production and frequent mistakes, one has to remember Lohner is new to the game of football, as it is his second year in total, college and professional. Lohner's rare 6-8 size could render him a practice squad candidate as he develops, but it is hard to see him on the 53-man squad at this point. Sean Payton did like him, so it's likely he'll stick around in some capacity. Social: Follow Broncos Wire on Facebook and Twitter/X! Did you know: These 25 celebrities are Broncos fans.


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Anthony Richardson or Daniel Jones? Who should start for Colts at QB?
Anthony Richardson or Daniel Jones? Who should start for the Indianapolis Colts at quarterback this season? Indianapolis Colts' head coach Shane Steichen said he is "very close" to making a decision at quarterback and would like to make that decision "shortly." So who is he going to name as the Colts' Week 1 starter--Anthony Richardson or Daniel Jones? From the outside looking in, the choice seems to be an obvious one: it needs to be Richardson. An emphasis for Richardson this offseason was on becoming more accurate on those short-to-intermediate throws. To help accomplish this, he prioritized his footwork, which is where proper mechanics and accuracy often begin for a quarterback. That offseason work has translated over to the practice field this summer, and we saw it--mostly--on display against the Packers in the preseason game. Michael Pittman also recently mentioned that Richardson has improved at making touch passes--something we also saw against Green Bay on a pair of throws. As Steichen has said, he is looking for consistency at quarterback, and that is an all-encompassing trait that includes day-to-day preparation, command of the offense, and so much more. This goes well beyond who has the higher completion rate. This is the most difficult part to gauge when it comes to evaluating this competition because we see so little of it. But DeForest Buckner praised Richardson for his elevated sense of urgency this offseason. Quenton Nelson spoke highly of Richardson's play as well, while Steichen told ESPN's Jeremy Fowler that he's seen "great strides" from him as a leader as well. Richardson has made real strides this offseason and summer, and the on-field results are coming with it. From the outside perspective, the battle between Richardson and Jones seems to be close. If that's the case, then again, Richardson is the obvious choice for QB1. Beyond the progress he's made, Richardson is by far the higher upside player, and the Colts have also invested a lot into him--both in terms of draft capital and time. The Colts ultimately still have to figure out what they have in Richardson long-term, and learning that only comes by letting him play--and Richardson has earned that opportunity.


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Sixers legend Wilt Chamberlain ranked No. 3 center in NBA history
Wilt Chamberlain is one of the legends in the history of the NBA. The only player to score 100 points in a game and with career averages of 30.1 points and 22.9 rebounds, Chamberlain is one of those players who one had to see to believe. Chamberlain spent 3.5 seasons with the Philadelphia 76ers and averaged 27.6 points and 23.9 rebounds while winning three MVPs and guiding the Sixers to the championship in 1967. The legendary big man was unbelievable and has his No. 13 jersey hanging from the rafters at the Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia. HoopsHype ranked the top 20 centers in the history of the NBA and Chamberlain comes in ranked No. 3 on the list: The most dominant big man offensively in NBA history, though that partially had to do with the level of competition Wilt Chamberlain faced in his era. Still, when you dominate at the level Chamberlain did, who cares who he did it against? Chamberlain did come a little short in the team success department as he was usually better in the regular season than in the playoffs, something that many believe had to do with an unwillingness to get fouled late in close games due to his unreliable free throw. Chamberlain is one of the best players in Sixers history and will always have the respect of the NBA world. The only centers ranked ahead of him were fellow legends Bill Russell and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.