Private schools continue to extract funds from Marion County Schools
FAIRMONT — Marion County Schools will lose $500,000 to charter schools next year.
'Look at last year's number, which was $400,000,' School Superintendent Donna Heston said Monday, referring to next year's charter schools allocation. 'And now you're over a million.'
The Board of Education went through next year's budget, as part of a supersized meeting that included the regular agenda. School treasurer Scott Reider said Marion County School's number of charter school students has grown to 134, more than double from last year's 60 total.
Heston called the loss in funds concerning.
Statewide, the state's education savings account program, the Hope Scholarship, will cost more than $100 million next year. The program cost $52 million this year. The state transfers $4,400 per student away from public schools toward an educational program of a parent's choice under Hope Scholarship. If the student returns to public school, the money does not.
As the West Virginia Department of Education shutters or consolidates schools across the state, school superintendents say the program is partly responsible for the closings, according to West Virginia Watch. Dwindling enrollment numbers are also responsible, since school funding is enrollment based. Marion County Schools has been losing students steadily over the past few years.
Board Member Donna Costello also brought up her concerns that support staff, such as custodial workers and bus drivers, weren't being paid enough compared to teachers and school administrators. The discussion began during a summary of pay equalization for principals in the school system.
Heston was explaining that there were assistant principals in the district who didn't see it as worthwhile to move up to principal if the pay was going to be the same as an assistant principal. She also pointed out pay for principals was not competitive with surrounding counties. While Costello didn't disagree with it, she brought up the equalization was a source of contention for the district's service workers.
'No disrespect intended to our principals, I know they and our assistant principals work hard,' Costello said. 'I just have a hard time wrapping my head around a cook making $23,000 and trying to live on that. I have a hard time wrapping my head around a bus driver currently living on a $500 paycheck with a wife and two kids.'
However, Heston pointed out that salaries are set by the state legislature. Board Member James Saunders asked if the board could perhaps use any excess funds it has to compensate those workers. Heston said the district already does, with a fall and spring stipend. Heston added if there was a pool of excess money in the budget, additional raises for all employees was possible for the board to provide.
Outside of that, however, Heston said the only way for significant changes to service worker pay is to lobby the legislature for it.
PEIA funding also increases next year. However, personnel beyond what the school funding formula provides for are not covered by the state, meaning PEIA for any personnel above that number has to be funded by the school's levy, leaving less money for other needs, Heston said.
Beyond that, the school budget for next year mostly looks the same, holding steady at around $110 million for FY26. Revenue will include $36 million from taxes, with $16 million and $20 million coming from regular taxes and the county's excess levy, respectively. The county will also receive $41 million from the state in school funding.
'We have worked proactively to address things with personnel and to be able to put more money into facilities improvements, so there wasn't anything that too drastically changed,' Heston said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brunswick Democrat announces campaign for Susan Collins' senate seat
Jun. 11—AUGUSTA — David Costello announced on Wednesday that he will seek the Democratic nomination to take on Republican U.S. Sen. Susan Collins next year. Costello, who ran unsuccessfully last year as a Democrat against Independent Gov. Angus King, said he's running to "end the Trump Administration's and Republican Congress's reckless assault on our democracy, environment, and economy." "Senator Collins, aside from expressing concern, has done little to prevent the Trump Administration and her Republican colleagues from undermining our economy, our critical government programs, and our nation's long-standing defense of democracy against authoritarianism and aggression," Costello said in a written statement. Collins chairs the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee and has used her influence to pushback and in some cases reverse unilateral funding and program cuts by the Trump administration, which she has described as "illegal," since it's being done without congressional approval. Collins also has a split record on Trump's most controversial cabinet members. She voted against Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary and Kash Patel as FBI director, but supported Tulsi Gabbard as director of National Intelligence and vaccine-opponent Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Democrats believe Collins is vulnerable this year. She's the only Republican running in a state won by Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 presidential race. But recent polling has shown her approval rating on the rise, Collins has defied the odds before. The 65-year-old Brunswick resident is the third Democrat to formally declare a run against Collins, who is seeking a sixth, six-year term in the Senate. Jordan Wood, a 35-year-old Bristol resident, declared his candidacy in April and has been holding town hall events across the state. Wood is a former chief of staff for U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif, and founder of democracyFIRST, a Democratic Super PAC. Natasha Alcala has also declared a run. She also filed paperwork to challenge King last year, but never qualified for the ballot. Gov. Janet Mills, meanwhile, has been facing pressure from national party leaders to take on Collins, especially after her high-profile clash with President Trump at the White House over transgender student athletes, which has been used to raise money. Mills says she's neither planning to run, nor has she ruled it out. And House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, is also considering a run, though he is currently trying to wrap up the legislative session, which is scheduled to end next Wednesday. Other candidates who have filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission include independent Phillip Rench and Republicans Carmen Calabrese and Daniel Smeriglio. Costello has decades of experience in government, but his candidacy against King, who routinely tops the polls as Maine's most popular politician, never caught traction with Democrats. Costello placed third with about 11% of the vote, behind King, who received 52%, and Republican Demi Kouzounas, who received 36%. "In 2024, I campaigned to strengthen our democracy and bolster the federal government's ability to address such pressing challenges as climate change; lack of affordable housing and health care; economic inequality; and insufficient retirement security," he said. "These are challenges the Trump Administration and Senator Collins and her Republican colleagues are either ignoring, or worse yet, exacerbating." In a news release, Costello said his work experience includes having held a high-level position at US AID, where managed foreign aid in Cambodia, Haiti, Bosnia, Serbia and Kosovo. He has also worked as a senior aide to the Maine Secretary of State, the mayor of Baltimore and the governor of Maryland, as well as Deputy and Acting Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment. Copy the Story Link
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
School choice policies evolved from supporting Black students to subsidizing middle-class families
Originally developed as a tool to help Black children attend better schools, school voucher programs now serve a different purpose. (Drazen via Getty Images) School voucher programs that allow families to use public funds to pay tuition to attend private schools have become increasingly popular. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia currently operate voucher programs. In addition, 15 states have universal private school choice programs that offer vouchers, education savings accounts and tax credit scholarships. Indiana's new state budget funds universal vouchers in the second year. More states are considering school choice and voucher programs as the Trump administration advocates for widespread adoption. School vouchers have a long history in the U.S. The first vouchers were offered in the 1800s to help children in sparsely populated towns in rural Vermont and Maine attend classes in public and private schools in nearby districts. After the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, in which justices ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional, segregationists used vouchers to avoid school integration. More recently, school voucher programs have been pitched as a tool to provide children from low-income families with quality education options. As a scholar who specializes in education policy, law and politics, I can share how current policies have strayed from efforts to support low-income Black children. Research from education history scholars shows that more recent support for school choice was not anchored in an agenda to privatize public schools but rooted in a mission to support Black students. Over time, as school voucher policies grew in popularity, they evolved into subsidies for middle-class families to send their children to private and parochial schools. School choice policies have also expanded to include education savings account programs and vouchers funded by tax credit donations. Vouchers can redirect money from public schools, many of which are serving Black students. States looking to add or expand school choice and voucher programs have adopted language from civil rights activists pushing for equal access to quality education for all children. For example, they contend that school choice is a civil right all families and students should have as U.S. citizens. But school voucher programs can exclude Black students and harm public schools serving Black students in a host of ways, research shows. This impact of voucher programs disproportionately affects schools in predominantly Black communities with lower tax bases to fund public schools. Since the Brown v. Board ruling, school voucher programs have been linked to racial segregation. These programs were at times used to circumvent integration efforts: They allowed white families to transfer their children out of diverse public schools into private schools. In fact, school voucher programs tend to exacerbate both racial and economic segregation, a trend that continues today. For example, private schools that receive voucher funding are not always required to adopt the same antidiscrimination policies as public schools. School voucher programs can also negatively impact the quality of public schools serving Black students. As some of the best and brightest students leave to attend private or parochial ones, public schools in communities serving Black students often face declining enrollments and reduced resources. In cities such as Macon, Georgia, families say that majority Black schools lack resources because so many families use the state's voucher-style program to attend mostly white private schools. Moreover, the cost of attending a private or parochial school can be so expensive that even with a school voucher, Black families still struggle to afford the cost of sending children to these schools. Research from the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank based in Washington, D.C., shows that voucher programs in Ohio result in majority Black school systems such as the Cleveland Metropolitan School District losing millions in education funding. This impact of voucher programs disproportionately affects schools in predominantly Black communities across the U.S. with lower tax bases to fund public schools. Another example is the Marion County School District, a South Carolina system where about 77% of students are Black. Marion County is in the heart of the region of the state known as the 'Corridor of Shame,' known for its inadequate funding and its levels of poor student achievement. The 17 counties along the corridor are predominantly minority communities, with high poverty rates and poor public school funding because of the area's low tax base due to a lack of industry. On average, South Carolina school districts spent an estimated US$18,842 per student during the 2024-25 school year. In Marion County, per-student funding was $16,463 during the 2024-2025 school year. By comparison, in Charleston County, the most affluent in the state, per-student funding was more than $26,000. Rather than focus on school choice and voucher programs that take money away from public schools serving Black students, I argue that policymakers should address systemic inequities in education to ensure that all students have access to a quality education. Establishing restrictions on the use of funds and requiring preferences for low-income Black students could help direct school voucher policies back toward their intent. It would also be beneficial to expand and enforce civil rights laws to prevent discrimination against Black students. These measures would help ensure all students, regardless of background, have access to quality education. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
CBS News
19 hours ago
- CBS News
Bill banning teaching antisemitism vetoed by Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, who says it's actually an attack on educators
Phoenix — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would have personally been responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Hobbs, a Democrat, said Tuesday that the bill, also known as the "Antisemitism in Education Act," wasn't about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. "It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state's Board of Education to report antisemitism. The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with "unlawful discrimination" to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, called the veto "disgraceful," saying on the social media platform X that the legislation was meant to keep "egregious and blatant antisemitic content" out of the classroom. "To suggest that it threatened the speech of most Arizona teachers is disingenuous at best," he added. Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the Holocaust. Under the bill, "those discussions could be deemed 'antisemitic' depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context," she said. The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate. At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. The Anti-Defamation League reported that the U.S. saw the highest number of anti-Semitic incidents reported in 2024 since the organization started keeping records 46 years earlier, CBS Phoenix affiliate KPHO-TV noted. Thirteen organizations, including the Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, signed and sent a letter on Friday to Gov. Hobbs, asking her to veto the bill, KPHO added. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.
