logo
Hawaii State Senator: Did Your Home Insurance Bill Increase? Big Oil Should Pay Up

Hawaii State Senator: Did Your Home Insurance Bill Increase? Big Oil Should Pay Up

Newsweek4 days ago
Imagine getting a letter from your home insurance company explaining that your annual bill was going to be 10 times higher this year, even though you'd never made a claim for damages to your home.
Thousands of American homeowners—including many in my home state of Hawaii—don't need to imagine. Last year, insurers in our state drastically raised rates to reflect the increasing threat of extreme weather disasters and to recoup money they had to pay out after the deadly 2023 Maui wildfires.
But why should everyday people be asked to shoulder these costs, while an industry that actively made the problem worse pays nothing? Giant fossil fuel corporations predicted decades ago that the unchecked burning of their products could lead to out of control weather disasters, creating chaos in insurance markets. Don't they bear some of the responsibility for making this nightmare a reality?
Debris removal at a former apartment building in the Lahaina wildfire impact zone on August 2, 2024, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Debris removal at a former apartment building in the Lahaina wildfire impact zone on August 2, 2024, in Lahaina, Hawaii.Insurers shouldn't push the costs of climate change on to their policyholders while letting the companies causing it off the hook. That's why Hawaii is pursuing a fairer model that other states can emulate: make the fossil fuel industry help pick up the tab. Our state recently passed a first of its kind resolution encouraging insurance companies to take Big Oil to court for climate damages before raising rates on their customers.
Simply put: fossil fuel-driven climate change is creating a nationwide cost-of-living crisis, especially when it comes to housing. Supercharged wildfires in Los Angeles and Maui and unprecedented flooding in the Carolinas from Hurricane Helene have displaced thousands of Americans. When they do get a check from their insurance company, many find that it only covers a fraction of the cost of rebuilding their homes.
Faced with mounting claims, insurance companies are pulling out of entire communities, canceling existing policies, and refusing to issue new policies. Given that insurance is generally required on new mortgages, uninsurable homes are essentially unsellable homes. Mortgage lenders in wildfire-stricken Colorado communities are reporting a rash of home sales falling apart because buyers can't secure insurance.
Experts warn that this growing crisis threatens to infect the broader economy. In a recent Senate hearing, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) warned of an "economic cascade" of consequences for real estate markets, and cited a Freddie Mac chief economist predicting that if left unchecked, the insurance crisis could cause "a 2008-style economic recession."
We're on track for economic disaster, while fossil fuel industry giants who put us in this position keep raking in billions of dollars in profits. Rather than pulling the rug out from under hardworking families and abandoning entire communities, insurance companies should make the fossil fuel industry pay their fair share of the costs.
While they may not seem like the most likely group to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable, insurance companies are already well-practiced in taking bad actors to court for their role in extreme weather disasters. When utilities' unmaintained power lines ignited devastating wildfires in California in 2017 and 2018, insurers successfully forced them to pay up, temporarily reducing the severity of rate increases on homeowners and slowing the trend of insurance companies fleeing the state.
Just like the companies who sparked a blaze, the fossil fuel industry bears responsibility for contributing to the soaring high temperatures and drier atmosphere that turn a routine forest fire into a blazing inferno. Researchers who measure climate change's contribution to extreme weather disasters estimate that companies like Chevron and ExxonMobil are each responsible for nearly $2 trillion in economic losses from extreme heat between 1991 and 2020.
This isn't a surprise to Big Oil—internal documents show their researchers warning as far back as the 1970s that their products would warm the global climate and fuel "potentially catastrophic events." Industry executives were convinced enough to invest in making their own oil wells and pipelines resilient to climate change, while also working for decades to mislead the public about their products' connection to the problem. That deception continues today, with oil and gas majors proudly advertising their commitment to clean energy while they ramp up the production and burning of fossil fuels.
Since 2002, climate change has cost the insurance industry an estimated $600 billion in insured losses, costs that were likely recouped from consumers through higher premiums. The oil and gas industry, which has averaged nearly $3 billion in profit per day, could have covered those losses without breaking a sweat.
As policymakers nationwide grapple with a growing insurance crisis, our first priority should be to protect consumers from extreme rate hikes and stabilize markets for insurers. When you make a mess, you clean up after yourself. It's time for the fossil fuel industry to do the same.
Chris Lee serves as president of the National Caucus of Environmental Legislators, a bi-partisan organization of 1,500 state legislators from all 50 states. He has served in the Hawaii State Legislature since 2008, where he authored the nation's first state laws transitioning utilities to 100 percent renewable energy, directing economy-wide carbon neutrality, and targeting zero-emissions transportation.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Democrats face crossroads in anti-Trump strategy
Senate Democrats face crossroads in anti-Trump strategy

Axios

time23 minutes ago

  • Axios

Senate Democrats face crossroads in anti-Trump strategy

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) will consult with his caucus Tuesday before deciding whether Democrats will go scorched earth against their Republican colleagues during this year's appropriations process. Why it matters: Top Democrats have hinted the party may not play ball with the GOP on the funding proceedings, risking a government shutdown at the end of September. It would be a defiant act of revenge for a minority party that's seething with anger over everything from reconciliation to rescissions. But Democrats have been reluctant to play the shutdown card in the past — and many are on record saying it's irresponsible. Zoom out: This week will present an early test case for this fall's appropriations showdown. GOP leaders plan to bring the MilCon-VA funding bill to the floor for a vote. They'll need Democratic support to move forward and at least seven Democratic votes to break a filibuster. The bill passed committee 26-3, and Schumer said Monday it has "significant reversals to DOGE's horrible cuts." The Senate version of the bill is a higher spending level than the House version, a plus for Democrats. It's possible Democrats support a procedural vote for the measure, under the pretense they aren't guaranteed to support its passage or further appropriations bills. Zoom in: Schumer didn't tip his hand during a speech on the Senate floor Monday. Instead, he unloaded on Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Republicans as being "obedient" to President Trump. "If Leader Thune wants to talk about bipartisanship, he should focus on keeping his side of the street clean first," Schumer said. Schumer last week warned Thune against pursuing additional rescission packages, saying the GOP would be risking a government shutdown. What we're hearing: Clear hints from the White House — and outright promises from House leadership — that they are planning more rescissions are further inflaming Senate Democrats. Trump's Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought raised the temperature last week when he suggested the government funding process should be "less bipartisan." Democrats were outraged by those comments and the attitude behind them — and they put their GOP colleagues on notice. "My Republican colleagues should understand that Russ Vought does not respect their constitutional power over federal spending," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said last week. The bottom line: Democrats are angry with how Trump and Thune have rolled them all year.

Chinese carmaker close to clearing big obstacle to autonomous driving
Chinese carmaker close to clearing big obstacle to autonomous driving

Miami Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Chinese carmaker close to clearing big obstacle to autonomous driving

Autonomous driving is apparently the wave of the future, even if U.S. drivers do not really trust the technology. Assisted driving tech has been around for at least two decades, and Americans seem fine with that. But autonomous driving is in a different lane, and Americans are skeptical. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "Consumers are skeptical of the full self-driving (FSD) technology that undergirds the robotaxi proposition, with 60% considering Tesla's full self-driving 'unsafe,' 77% unwilling to utilize full self-driving technology, and a substantial share (48%) believing full self-driving should be illegal," said the May 2025 edition of the Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report (EVIR). California, frequently at the forefront of many technological innovations, has become a hub for AV testing, but citizens there have demanded heavy guardrails. Nearly 80% of California voters support requiring a human safety operator in self-driving trucks and delivery vehicles, and just 33% of voters express a favorable general impression of autonomous vehicles. Related: Tesla faces its most serious court battle in years But there are levels to autonomous vehicles ranging from 0-5, according to the Society of Automotive Engineers. Level 0 represents no automation, while Level 5 represents full automation with no human intervention at all. The assisted driving systems Americans have been using for 20 years represent Level 1, where the vehicle can assist with steering or acceleration/deceleration but not both at the same time. Level 2 vehicles can control both steering and velocity at the same time. Americans are also pretty familiar with this level. Tesla Full Self Driving is L2 autonomous. But Level 3 is where things get tricky, especially for legal reasons. One Chinese carmaker seems willing to invest in AV tech. Image source: Zhang Congyu/VCG via Getty Images Level 3 is where the true autonomous driving magic occurs. "The transition from SAE level 2+ to level 3 is a significant one. While many level 2+ systems have proven popular and, for the most part, effective, level 3 vehicles mean that, in some situations, eyes can be taken off the road," a new research report from IDTechEx says. The "eyes taken off the road" part is crucial because at that point, the driver is officially no longer in control of the vehicle; the vehicle's software is. So if an accident happens while the "driver" of an L3 or above vehicle is operating, who really is at fault? "Generally, this would result in the accountability of any accident occurring while level 3 is operational falling onto the manufacturer, not the driver. As a result, the overall reliability, defined by both the hardware and software, has to be much greater," the report states. Tesla has been sued multiple times over fatal mistakes that drivers say FSD has made. Each time, Tesla has argued it was the driver's fault. Related: Unprecedented BYD assisted driving offer puts competition on notice If Tesla ever wants to reach L3 autonomous driving, that excuse won't fly anymore. Chinese rival BYD seems more than ready to take on the responsibility. Earlier this month, BYD debuted a smart parking feature that allows the vehicle to achieve Level 4 autonomy. Level 4 autonomy, as defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers, is the second highest available level of autonomy. In layman's terms, BYD vehicles equipped with the highest assisted driving packages will be able to park themselves. But most interestingly, regarding the latest upgrade, BYD promises to pay for any accidents caused by autonomous parking. Rather than going through their insurance companies, BYD drivers using the tech can file a claim with BYD's after-sales team if something goes wrong. Earlier in July, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida heard opening arguments in a lawsuit filed against Tesla by the family of Naibel Benavides, who was killed in 2019 by a runaway Tesla that had FSD engaged. The vehicle, driven by George Brian McGee, sped through a T intersection at 62 miles per hour and T-boned an empty parked car. The parked car's owners were standing outside the vehicle when they were struck. Benavides, 22, was killed in the crash, and her body was found flung about 75 feet from the crash site. Dillon Angulo, her boyfriend, survived the crash but was left with a severe concussion and multiple broken bones. Like other cases involving FSD in the past, Tesla blames the crash on driver error. "The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Tesla's Autopilot technology,'' Tesla said in a statement to Bloomberg. L3+ driving would allow the person who crashed, who reportedly dropped his cellphone and was searching for it on the ground when the crash occurred, to blame Tesla. But Tesla has not reached the level of automation that would make it responsible for a driver who took his eyes off the road. Related: Alphabet's Waymo flexes on Tesla Robotaxi with latest update The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Green Dot to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Results on August 11th
Green Dot to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Results on August 11th

Business Wire

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Green Dot to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Results on August 11th

PROVO, Utah--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Green Dot Corporation (NYSE: GDOT) will host a conference call and earnings webcast to discuss second quarter 2025 financial results on Monday, August 11th, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. ET. A press release with the company's second quarter 2025 financial results will be issued after the market closes on the same day. The live webcast of the call can be accessed from Green Dot's investor relations website at A replay will be available at the same website following the call. About Green Dot Green Dot Corporation (NYSE: GDOT) is a financial technology platform and registered bank holding company that builds banking and payment solutions to create value, retain and reward customers, and accelerate growth for businesses of all sizes. ​For more than two decades, Green Dot has delivered financial tools and services that address the most pressing financial needs of consumers and businesses, and that transform the way people and businesses manage and move money Green Dot delivers a broad spectrum of financial products to consumers and businesses through its portfolio of brands, including: GO2bank, a leading digital and mobile bank account offering simple, secure and useful banking for Americans living paycheck to paycheck; the Green Dot Network ('GDN') of more than 95,000 retail distribution and cash access locations nationwide; Arc by Green Dot, the single-source embedded finance platform combining all of Green Dot's secure banking and money processing capabilities to power businesses at all stages of growth; rapid! wage and disbursements solutions, providing pay card and earned wage access services to more than 6,000 businesses and their employees; and Santa Barbara TPG ('SBTPG'), the company's tax division, which processes approximately 14 million tax refunds annually. Founded in 1999, Green Dot has managed more than 80 million accounts to date both directly and through its partners. Green Dot Bank is a subsidiary of Green Dot Corporation and member of the FDIC. For more information about Green Dot's products and services, please visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store