Scottish MPs panned over up to £3500-a-month taxpayer-funded homes
According to Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority data, Scottish Labour MP for Glasgow East John Grady is spending the most on rent at £3500 a month.
His fellow Scottish Labour colleague, Dunfermline and Dollar MP Graeme Downie, is paying (and expensing) a hefty £3350 a month.
READ MORE: Border checks on fruit and vegetable imports from EU scrapped
Meanwhile, Scottish Labour MP for Bathgate and Linlithgow Kirsteen Sullivan is paying £3250 a month.
Rounding out the top five are Scotland Office minister Kirsty McNeill and SNP MP Kirsty Blackman on £3200 a month.
(Image: Image of John Grady by Colin Mearns, Newsquest)MPs are allowed to expense the costs of a second property to either have a base in their constituency or somewhere to stay when they travel to parliament, if their seat is outside of London. They can also claim up to £230 a night for hotel stays.
But Aditi Jehangir, the chair of Living Rent, hit out at the amounts some are claiming.
The average rent in London for a one-bedroom flat is £1500 according to the City of London, although that can vary depending on which borough.
Although, even for the most prestigious areas in London, including Westminster, the average still sits around £2500 a month.
Properties you can rent in London for £3500 a month include a 'stylish Manhattan-inspired apartment' near Waterloo station.
According to the listing, it offers a "luxurious lifestyle with hotel-like amenities", including a 20-metre swimming pool, private screening room, executive lounge, golf simulator, wine cellar and thermal suite facilities.
It could also secure a 'very spacious' four bedroom apartment in a mansion block close to the O2.
"It's shocking to see Scottish MPs spending so much of taxpayers' money on renting second homes for themselves, while refusing to support rent controls for their constituents,' Jehangir told The National.
(Image: AFP/Getty Images)
'Rents across the UK are skyrocketing to extreme, unaffordable levels, plunging tenants into poverty and pushing us out of our homes.'
She added: 'Rather than fighting for a system that works for everyone, they are happy to claim back thousands of pounds in expenses and fob tenants off with distant promises of new builds instead of reigning in landlords' profits.
'MPs pay lip service to the housing crisis, but when it comes to their own expensive rents, it is taxpayers who foot the bill."
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: 'It is right that the rules around MPs' expenses are set and administered independently by the Parliamentary watchdog Ipsa. All claims have been made in line with Ipsa rules."
The lowest claimants, in terms of rent at least, include Scottish Labour MPs Melanie Ward and Gordon McKee, who claimed £680 and £1365 a month respectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
27 minutes ago
- The National
Over-simplication of complex problems serves to fuel division
What Mr Murphy calls 'distortion' is in fact critique. None of my points were addressed; instead he simply restated his position. This is itself part of the problem: binaries are defended not with engagement but with repetition, as if saying the same thing louder makes it more true. READ MORE: Scottish Government condemns asylum seeker rhetoric amid protests Britain has a long and well-documented history of home-grown homophobia, racism, and misogyny. Pretending otherwise, or suggesting prejudice is uniquely imported, is not 'honesty.' It is the selective construction of an enemy. Murphy claims to value equality and respect, but his framing quietly places suspicion at the feet of migrants, while allowing domestic forms of hate to pass as regrettable but somehow less urgent. This is precisely how far-right narratives gain traction: they present themselves as balanced while tilting the ground toward scapegoating. Jim Taylor's letter then takes this to its next step, invoking the well-worn trope that the 'original' LGB movement has been hijacked by trans people. This is not a neutral observation but a deliberate wedge tactic. Binary politics thrives on driving cracks into coalitions of solidarity, insisting that rights are a zero-sum game. Taylor claims lesbians are 'pilloried' for defending spaces, but omits the decades in which trans people have also fought for safety, dignity, and recognition – and won a modicum too, only to see it stripped away by legal nitpicking that's had more to do with inadequate provision of privacy in intimate public spaces than the sex-offending straw man of invasion. He also overlooks the fact that lesbians' opinions on trans rights are neither monolithic nor clearly antagonistic – with some regarding the claim as itself lesbophobic. Reducing trans lives to a 'piggy-backing' grievance is not protection; it is exclusion dressed up as defence. READ MORE: Duolingo apologises after German app calls JK Rowling 'cruel' This narrowing of debate is no accident. Binary framings like 'real versus fake', 'local versus imported', or 'LGB versus T' create ready-made sides. Once established, they punish anyone who questions the imposed over-simplification. To say 'this is more complex' becomes, in such an atmosphere, complicity or betrayal. That is why far-right and reactionary movements push binaries so hard: they delegitimise nuance itself. It is worth recalling Orwell's warning in 1984: 'Ignorance is Strength.' Today, conspiracy theorists and binary politicians invoke Orwell as if his words justify their rebellion, while embodying the very glorification of ignorance he warned against. Robust processes of inquiry – in science, law, and social policy – are dismissed as elitist, or even communist, while the loudest voices collapse concepts into caricatures: communism equals fascism, feminism equals man-hating, LGBT equals anti-women. This is not serious analysis. It is confusion repackaged as certainty. The irony is that many who shout loudest against immigration or LGBTQI+ equality claim to defend the UK's 'traditional' or 'Christian' values, yet they seem to know little of Christ's teachings – and embody fewer still. They champion crusaders and dragon-slayers as role models, not healers or peacemakers. Their Christianity is cultural shorthand for conquest, not compassion. That, too, is why their rhetoric slides so easily into binary politics: it prizes victory over empathy. Both Messrs Murphy and Taylor seek to cast themselves as guardians of honesty, but the effect of their letters is to narrow horizons, to position migrants and trans people as problems to be managed, and to cast doubt on those who insist on nuance. That is not honesty. It is manipulation through oversimplification. Scotland can do – and has done – better than this. If we want genuine safety and dignity, we must defend nuance and evidence, not abandon them. Ignorance paraded as enlightenment serves only those who thrive on division. Ron Lumiere via email
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh Tour de France agreement delayed as council await details
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A decision on whether to agree to host the start of the Tour de France has had to be delayed by Edinburgh Council, with organisers yet to provide details of the deal. Councillors had been expected to vote at a meeting on Thursday on whether to allow the signing of a host city agreement on its receipt by the council. But in a last-minute move, the item was pulled from the Culture and Communities Committee meeting agenda. A report by officers had recommended that the committee decide that any agreement would be signed on its receipt by the city, whether or not it had been seen by councillors. But it is understood that a decision was made to hold off on asking councillors to consider the report, in order to allow for more time for the agreement to be sent. The SNP group in the council had submitted an amendment to the original item, which if agreed would have seen the city not sign the agreement. Instead, it would see the council go to the Scottish and UK governments to ask for funding for the event, which is set to cost the Capital up to £1.7 million. And both the Green and SNP groups expressed concern that the agreement was delayed, with the report saying it was meant to be signed by July 31. The Green group's amendment would, if agreed, have seen the committee delay making a decision until councillors could view and consider the final agreement. It also would see an amendment added that ensured the advertising at the event was in line with council policies. A discussion on signing the agreement will be made by the same committee, though a special session may need to be held depending on when the agreement is received. Funds have already been approved for the event In June, councillors were told that council group leaders had approved of the city's hosting of the Grand Depart for the men's Tour de France race. But group leaders said they did not approve it, and that in October – when the decision was said to have been made – they were only supportive of council officers exploring it. At a council meeting in June, the city's chief executive said not seeking approval from councillors was 'inappropriate and should not have happened.' In response to questioning by Conservative councillor Phil Doggart, Paul Lawrence said: 'It's the view of senior officers, certainly my view, that that was a mistake, and that that should have happened in that process. 'The report sets out how we are going to remind all colleagues, including myself, actually, that that was inappropriate and should not have happened.' The 2027 edition of the Tour will be the first time that both the men's and women's races have started in the same country besides France. It will also be the first time the race has visited Edinburgh, and the fifth time it has had any of its route inside the UK. Some councillors have objected to the idea of the city hosting the event at all, citing the lack of information from councillors on its impact on and benefits to the Capital. At a full council meeting in June, SNP councillor Kate Campbell said: 'There is very little explanation, really, of why we're making those allocations. 'We've had no reports to councillors, no notes to the committee, about the value we're getting. We really don't know what the benefit to the city is.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Swinney urges Starmer to recall Parliament over ‘genocide' in Gaza
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stressed the need to 'reach immediately a ceasefire in Gaza', as he warned of the 'massive death and destruction that a military operation against Gaza would inevitably cause'. Scottish First Minister John Swinney meanwhile made clear his view that Israel's actions in Gaza 'amount to genocide', adding that 'the ground invasion of Gaza City only intensifies it'. Netanyahu's actions in Gaza amount to genocide, and the ground invasion of Gaza City only intensifies it. The world cannot look away. We need serious and urgent action to put a stop to this. The UK Government must recall Parliament, sanction Israel, and end all arms sales now. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) August 21, 2025 He said: 'This latest action by Israel is an outrageous and unacceptable escalation which must be a further wake-up call to the international community. 'We must see serious action to hold Israel to account for this unjustifiable brutality and inhumanity.' He said the attacks will mean 'more innocent Palestinians are going to die', adding: 'What was already an intolerable level of human suffering will get worse, and we are getting even further away from securing a peace. 'I have made clear our grave concerns that Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide and today's offensive is only going to intensify the suffering we are seeing. It is vital to reach immediately a ceasefire in Gaza and the unconditional release of all hostages, and to avoid the massive death and destruction that a military operation against Gaza would inevitably cause. Simultaneously, the decision by the Israeli authorities to expand… — António Guterres (@antonioguterres) August 21, 2025 'The international community cannot look away from this – there must be a concerted global effort to put a stop to Israel's action, secure a ceasefire and hold (Israeli) Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu and his government to account.' He urged the British Prime Minister to recall MPs to Parliament so action can be taken. Mr Swinney demanded: 'Prime Minister Keir Starmer needs to recall the UK Parliament immediately so the toughest and most severe sanctions available can be imposed on Israel, and all UK arms sales to Israel ended. 'Every ounce of international influence the UK may have must be used towards putting an end to Israel's assault.'
