Leaving Cert history: A tricky paper where students were pushed to think on their feet
Students may have been thrown by questions with narrower focuses on the higher-level history exam, while the reappearance of topics from last year will have upset some, teachers have said.
Stephen Tonge, a history teacher at the Institute of Education, said that students faced a very tricky paper that pushed them to edit together elements of topics under pressure.
'Students who opened section one's documents-based question will be pleased with the topic of the Jarrow March,' said Mr Tonge.
'While document B was perhaps a little longer than you'd like for such a pressurised environment, the first three questions were very approachable.
READ MORE
'At question four, the challenge increases. Being asked to 'argue your case' on the failure of the march is an unusually narrow focus and while students could easily approach it, and it would tax them to write a fully robust answer in order to get the marks.'
Leaving Cert history, higher level: later modern:
Studyclix
subject expert Jamie Dockery, a teacher at Tyndall College in Carlow said that, at first glance, the exam may have looked like a daunting prospect for students.
'Many will have been surprised not to see questions on Charles Stewart Parnell or the Montgomery Bus Boycott,' Mr Dockery said.
'Those who placed all their bets on these topics – undoubtedly a sizeable number – will be bitterly disappointed.'
Mr Tonge said that the most surprising element of the paper was topic five: politics and society in Northern Ireland, 1949-93.
'The questions themselves were not particularly difficult but three of the four questions returned to topics from last year's exam.
Leaving Cert history, higher level, early modern:
'In a curriculum as vast as history, students and teachers often must prioritise some elements over others, and the reappearance of questions on Lord Brookeborough and the Coleraine University Controversy will be an unpleasant surprise.
'If students had thoroughly prepared this case study, they would be fine, but many would not have anticipated a second outing for such comparatively minor elements of the topic,' said Mr Tonge.
There was, however, there was much to be pleased with in the paper, said Mr Dockery.
'The 'movements for reform' section featured an interesting question comparing the successes of Michael Davitt and James Larkin, two reformers with shared ideals but from different eras.
'Éamon de Valera was widely expected to appear on the paper, given that this year marks the 50th anniversary of his death – and 'the long fellow' didn't disappoint. The question was broad, covering his role in the Treaty negotiations, the Civil War, and World War II.
'As with last year's paper, women featured prominently, with questions on Isabella Tod, Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington, Bernadette Devlin, Mary Robinson, Sylvia Meehan, Simone de Beauvoir, and Nadine Gordimer,' said Mr Dockery.
Mr Tonge said that 'Europe and the wider world' topics were also varied and offered the well-prepared candidate the opportunity to do well.
Ordinary
On the ordinary-level paper, Mr Dockery said it had many similarities to the higher-level exam.
'It can often be more predictable and accessible in that its higher-level counterpart – should have been generally well received by students and teachers. Again, the Jarrow March was the focus of the documents-based question,' he said.
'I very much welcome the higher and ordinary-level exam having similar questions, particularly considering that the average senior history groups will have higher and ordinary-level students learning together in the one class.'
Many of the main personalities from Irish History found their way into the exam including O'Connell, Yeats, Davitt, Douglas Hyde, Collins, Cosgrave and de Valera, he said.
'Women were also well represented in the guise of Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington and Countess Markievicz and Maureen O'Hara, among others.
'The 'Europe and the Wider World' topics were also varied and offered the well-prepared candidate the opportunity to do well,' said Mr Dockery.
Leaving Cert history, ordinary level:
Try this one at home:
-Leaving Cert history, section two, topic one:
Ireland: Topic 1 Ireland and the Union, 1815-1870
1. What was the impact of the Great Famine on life in Ireland both during and after the Famine, 1845-1870?
2. What did Young Ireland and Fenianism contribute to Irish nationalism?
3. In what ways did Cardinal Paul Cullen influence political attitudes and religious practices? 4. What developments took place in science and technology, 1815-1870?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Landlords rail against rent control reforms
Pity the Government as they try to juggle the competing interests of tenants and landlords while looking to inject new vigour into a flagging housebuilding programme . Tenants rights groups and Opposition public representatives have been quick to criticise the package of measures announced earlier this week that will from next year ease rules on rent rises on new tenancies in rent pressure zones that will now extend the length of the State. Yes, they have also tried to firm up some tenants' rights, but there is a clear understanding that the changes were driven by the need to encourage investment by private sector landlords. So the landlords are presumably happy? Not a bit of it. READ MORE The Irish Property Owners Association (IPOA) – the landlord industry body – says it has 'grave concerns that the upcoming changes will overwhelmingly harm rental supply and drive private landlords out of the market'. In particular, it is not happy that landlords will be classified by tenancies rather than properties, so they could be seen as having multiple tenancies in a shared house or a building divided into separate living units. The issue here is that anyone with four or more tenancies will be seen as a large landlord and thus barred from 'no fault' evictions. Will rent reform make building apartments viable? Listen | 40:12 The IPOA also warns that property values could slump 40 per cent if they are obliged to sell without ousting tenants – a restriction, it says, undermines landlords' property rights. While the new rules strip out the 2 per cent cap on rent rises, regardless of inflation, this is limited only to new tenancies after the rules come into force next year. That, landlords say, is likely to lead to 'economic evictions' and landlord exits from the market where those rents are significantly below the market rate. IPOA chairwoman Mary Conway, who also, predictably, rails against expanding the rent pressure zone concept State-wide, says: 'The new legislative environment could exacerbate housing insecurity for many vulnerable renters.' Tenants will equally argue that the additional tiering of the rental market will only make their lives more complex and uncertain. And allowing more room to increase rents that are already unaffordable for many hardly seems to be the vote-getter the Government would presumably hope it is. It seems that, in looking to be seen as even-handed, the Government runs the risk of exacerbating issues in a market that is already seen as failing to deliver for either side.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The housing crisis could erode Ireland's middle class to a point of collapse
For all our problems as a country (struggling healthcare system, growing numbers of homeless , absurd cost of living ) there is some cause for pride in our status as one of only a small number of western nations where the far right has so far failed to gain any kind of serious electoral foothold. These people make a lot of noise, certainly – whipping up hysteria about immigration , committing arson and other forms of violent intimidation – but none of it has translated to anything like a coherent or potent political movement. Some of this can probably be accounted for by the obvious lack of political talent among their ranks, although it must be acknowledged that the parties we routinely elect to power in this country are not, themselves, exactly overrun with great and charismatic statesmen. There is also the fact that an Irish far right, unlike its counterparts in other English-speaking countries, is in no position to draw on the usual reservoirs of reactionary nostalgia. No one is going to get elected with a promise to 'make Ireland great again', because the closest thing we have to a cultural memory of a lost imperial grandeur is Italia 90. But if and when the far right does come to gain significant ground in this country, it will be because it has been able to effectively exploit a disaster created by the parties of the coalition government, and compounded over many long years of political inaction. The housing crisis in this country has been so dire for so long that it feels conceptually mistaken to even refer to it as a crisis, as though it were some kind of dangerous inflection point, beyond which lay the risk of potential disaster. The disaster is our everyday reality, and has been for some years now. And that disaster is, primarily, generational. Just 7 per cent of people aged 25-39 own a home. That already appalling statistic is compounded by the fact that rents are climbing faster than at any time over the past two decades, with the national monthly average for newly advertised properties having recently exceeded €2,000. Unsurprisingly, given this situation, according to the most recent figures from the CSO, 41 per cent of those aged 18-34 live at home with their parents. READ MORE [ A key social housing scheme is in danger of falling apart. Why? Opens in new window ] There is no question that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael, who between them have run the Republic since independence, are to blame for this situation. Even if they had the will to address it – and were not ideologically averse to doing so by building social housing, rather than pumping public money in to the bank accounts of landlords – the prospect of any kind of meaningful improvement during the lifetime of this Government would be vanishingly small: the measures necessary to tackle a disaster of this scale involve the kind of long-term planning, in terms of labour and infrastructure, that the Coalition parties have never shown any serious intention to undertake. There are, of course, people who benefit from the ever-increasing value of property, and the entirely dysfunctional rental market. Quite a few of those people are TDs, and many more are in positions of power and influence in the country. But even people who own their own homes, or who otherwise stand to benefit from rising property values, have to live in this society, among other people; they, too, have to live with the social consequences of this disaster. One of these consequences may be that the Coalition's middle-class voter base erodes to the point of collapse. The prospect we face in this country is that of a middle-class incapable of reproducing, from one generation to the next, the social conditions – property ownership in particular – necessary for its own existence. Far-right movements have historically been very effective at profiting from this kind of social crisis, at exploiting widespread fear of status loss. Writing about the fundamental characteristics of fascism, the Italian writer Umberto Eco argued that it always 'springs from individual or social frustration, which explains why one of the characteristics typical of historic Fascist movements was the appeal to the frustrated middle classes, disquieted by some economic crisis or political humiliation, and frightened by social pressure from below.' (And fascism is, among other things, a response to crises created by the inherent instabilities of capitalism. It is no coincidence that the rise of right-wing populism in Europe and the US followed the great financial crisis of 2008, and the long years of recession that came in its wake.) [ Power struggles, resignations and Conor McGregor's toxicity: The fracturing of Ireland's far right Opens in new window ] The far right have precisely one solution to offer to a problem like this housing disaster: blame the immigrants, who are the cause of almost all our social ills, and whose preferential treatment by the Government is at the cost of the impoverishment and indignity of the true – which is to say, native – Irish. As Balakrishnan Rajagopal, the UN's special rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, put it in an interview last year: 'Far-right parties prosper when they can exploit the social gaps that emerge out of underinvestment and inadequate government planning, and when they can blame outsiders.' The irony here, of course, is that placing the blame for the housing crisis on outsiders does the government an unintentional favour, in that it distracts attention away from the actual causes. The scapegoating impulse that drives almost all far-right movements diverts anger about real social problems away from the powerful people at fault, and toward the powerless people in society. It's a profound insult to our national dignity that so many people, in this supposedly wealthy country, no longer feel they have any prospect of owning their own home. It's an even deeper insult that so many have been driven into homelessness – by a lack of social housing, by ever-increasing rents and by the effects of poverty. On its own terms, this is a social disaster that demands an urgent response; the longer it continues to unfold, the deeper the damage will be to our future. In terms of the opportunity it presents to the far right, it may well prove more disastrous still.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish neutrality protest: Hundreds march through Dublin city demanding triple-lock safeguard
About 400 people marched through Dublin city centre on Saturday, demanding the protection of the Republic's neutrality, with some calling for a referendum on the Government's plan to remove the triple lock. Amid heavy downpours, the protesters marched from the Garden of Remembrance chanting: 'Save our neutrality, keep the triple lock!' And 'No to Nato!' Traffic was brought to a halt as the march proceeded down O'Connell Street towards Leinster House. The march organised by Together for Neutrality, a coalition of political parties and civil society organisations, was in opposition to the Government's proposal to remove the triple lock system, described by Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald on Saturday as a 'very dangerous course of action'. READ MORE The Government has repeatedly argued that the triple lock – mandating that overseas deployment of Irish troops must be approved by the Government, Dáil Éireann , and the United Nations – allows permanent members of the UN Security Council, such as Russia and China, to veto the deployment of Irish troops for peacekeeping missions. The Sinn Féin leader said the Government would do better arguing for reform of the UN, 'rather than trying to sidestep it'. She claimed the Government's reasoning is 'just one of the lines that they spin to try and justify what is an unjustifiable attack on the triple lock and on Irish neutrality. If they wish to abolish, damage and undermine Irish neutrality ... put it to a referendum.' Agreeing that UN reform should be pursued rather than removal of the lock, Labour spokesman on defence Duncan Smith said such change would be 'difficult and will be a long way off'. He said no country should be able to veto Irish peacekeeping efforts. 'We're not unaware that we do need a more sophisticated policy, but we don't need to remove the triple lock to do those things,' he said. Mr Smith said mandates can be secured through the UN General Assembly, though he acknowledged these 'may not be legally enforceable'. Protesters, meanwhile, said there was 'no coherent argument' for removing the triple lock, believing a referendum should be called. 'There's a false sense of security in Ireland that this would go to a referendum ... It can just be taken away from us without our say and people don't realise it,' said Kirsten Farrelly, one of the protesters on Saturday. She believes the Government has been 'incredibly sneaky in how they've put this across ... Getting cosier with Nato puts more of a target on our head.' Ms Farrelly added: 'I don't want our country to be involved in any way with the war machine. We could be a leading light in peace and crafting a path where people can see peace in the future and avoid conflict, and what's happening now is, 'might is right'.'
