Trump says Putin 'tired' of war, but possible he doesn't want to make a deal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he hoped Vladimir Putin was going to "be good" and move forward toward ending the war in Ukraine, but conceded it was possible the Russian president doesn't want to make a deal.
"I don't think it's going to be a problem, to be honest with you. I think Putin is tired of it. I think they're all tired of it, but you never know," Trump said in an interview with the Fox News "Fox & Friends" program.
Trump spoke the day after hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders at the White House for talks on his peace efforts, a meeting that followed his summit with Putin in Alaska last Friday.
"We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks ... It's possible that he doesn't want to make a deal," Trump said, adding that Putin faced a "rough situation" if that were not the case.
After Monday's talks, Trump had said that he had called Putin to help set up a one-on-one meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy that would be followed by a trilateral meeting to include himself.
Trump said in the Fox News interview he thought relations between Putin and Zelenskiy might be "a little bit better" or else he would not have pursued their one-on-one meeting.
He also cited his own warm relationship with Putin even as he acknowledged the potential for a deal to fall through.
"I hope President Putin is going to be good, and if he's not, it's going to be a rough situation. And I hope that ...President Zelenskiy will do what he has to do. He has to show some flexibility also," Trump said.
On security guarantees for Ukraine that Kyiv and its allies are seeking as part of any peace settlement, Trump said that while Europe was willing to commit troops in some form, the United States would not, although it could provide other assistance.
"There'll be some form of security. It can't be NATO," he said. "They're willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you could talk about by air."
Asked what assurances he could give that the U.S. troops would not be on the ground defending Ukraine's border, he said: "You have my assurance. You know, I'm president."
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal and Susan HeaveyEditing by Andrew Heavens and Frances Kerry)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 minutes ago
- The Star
Talk of boots on the ground in Ukraine sparks unease in Germany
BERLIN (Reuters) -Allied talk of sending European peacekeeping forces to protect Ukraine as part of a possible peace deal with Russia has sparked a backlash in Germany, a country still scarred by its militaristic Nazi past, even if the prospect remains remote. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has signalled openness to German participation in a possible peacekeeping mission in Ukraine while emphasizing that such a decision would require coordination with European partners and his own coalition. He also noted that any troop deployment would likely require a Bundestag mandate, a challenge for a chancellor whose own appointment was only voted through on the second attempt. Russia is fiercely opposed to any troops from the NATO alliance being deployed and it is far from clear how such a force could work. Alice Weidel, the head of the surging far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) accused Merz's conservatives of war-mongering for even considering the idea of ground troops, slamming it as "dangerous and irresponsible". Even Merz's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul warned sending troops to Ukraine "would probably overwhelm us". There is unease in Germany over troop deployments given its Nazi past and more recent deployments to Afghanistan and Mali that were widely seen as failures. There is also a backlash against spending billions of euros on military aid for Ukraine when Germany's own economy is struggling. Policymakers meanwhile are nervous about overstretching Germany's long-neglected army and being sucked into a direct confrontation with a nuclear power. "Something like this is obviously extremely controversial in Germany," said Marcel Dirsus, Non-Resident Fellow at the Institute for Security Policy at Kiel University, adding that the government would tread very carefully. "There is no point expending political capital on something that might not actually come to pass," he said. It is tricky waters to navigate for Merz, who, after winning elections this year, has pledged to make Germany's conventional armed forces the most powerful in Europe, backed by hundreds of billions of euros in new borrowing. Jens Spahn, the parliamentary leader of Merz's Christian Democratic Union party (CDU), wrote to lawmakers urging them to refrain from publicly speculating about the issue, according to a letter leaked to German media. Merz's popularity has sagged since winning office and the AfD, which has taken Russia-friendly positions and opposes weapons aid to Ukraine, is leading national opinion polls ahead of local elections next year. The AfD posted a mocked up image on X of Merz grinning above five young Germans with the words: "Merz wants to send YOU to Ukraine? We don't!" DIVIDED GERMANY French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer have both spoken in favour of troop deployments in a post-war settlement, but Germans are more wary of the idea. According to a Forsa survey commissioned by RTL/ntv, 49% of Germans would support Germany sending its own soldiers to a European peacekeeping force, but 45% oppose it - compared to much stronger majorities in favour in Britain and France. Scepticism is particularly strong in east Germany, where three states hold elections next year. Sven Schulze, state leader of Merz's CDU in one of those states, Saxony-Anhalt, told Stern magazine the Bundeswehr was barely in a position to deploy troops. It was much more important to build "a strong European security architecture," he said. "Anything else would overwhelm us as a country and also the Bundeswehr." Scepticism is even greater within Merz's junior coalition partner, the Social Democrats, who have traditionally argued more in favour of engagement with Russia. "Germany should stay out of this matter," Ralf Stegner, a lawmaker from the leftist, more pacifist faction of the SPD, told Der Spiegel. "The deployment of German soldiers in the region is also extremely difficult for historical reasons. For some, including Thomas Roewekamp, the CDU head of the parliamentary defence committee, German troops would be needed in the event of a permanent ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. "And to make deterrence credible, we must have military capabilities," he told broadcaster WDR 5's Morgenecho. Asked about the deployment, Merz on Monday said "it is too early today to give a definitive answer". (Reporting by Sarah Marsh, Matthias Williams, Rachel More, Madeline Chambers; editing by Philippa Fletcher)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
S. Korea's Lee intends to retain 'comfort women' pact with Japan: Report
File photo of a former South Korean "comfort woman" Lee Yong-soo holding the hand of a statue symbolising "comfort women" at the Seoul Comfort Women Memorial in Seoul. - Reuters SEOUL: South Korean President Lee Jae-myung said he intended to stick to existing agreements with Japan tied to its colonial rule of the Korean peninsula, including one on the treatment of Korean women forced to work in its military brothels. The legacy of Japan's colonisation from 1910 to 1945 is politically sensitive for both countries, with many surviving "comfort women", a Japanese euphemism for the sex abuse victims, still demanding Tokyo's formal apology and compensation. Lee, whose liberal Democratic Party has opposed the deal, made the comments in an interview with Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper published on Thursday (Aug 21) ahead of his Tokyo summit this week with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. "For South Korean people, that agreement by the previous administration is very difficult to accept, but it is a promise as a nation, so it is undesirable to overturn it," Lee told the paper, referring to the 2015 pact. In that agreement, struck with South Korea's then-conservative government, Japan apologised to the victims and gave 1 billion yen (US$6.8 million) to a fund to help them. The governments agreed the issue would be "irreversibly resolved" if both fulfilled their obligations. The issues around comfort women and forced labour during wartime have regularly been a source of friction between Japan and neighbours South Korea and China. Lee said the victims were a "heartbreaking issue" for South Koreans and urged Japan to acknowledge the truth and continue to talk to them, the paper added. Japan was a "very important country" and he wanted to strengthen economic and security ties with Tokyo, Lee said, as he reiterated the importance of three-way ties with Japan and the United States, the paper said. After the Tokyo summit, Lee will head to Washington to meet US President Donald Trump. Lee's interview touched on security issues, particularly the shared concern with Japan over the nuclear and missile programmess of their neighbour North Korea. Both countries have stepped up security cooperation with key ally the United States in recent years to counter North Korea's threats. Lee said his administration would lay the groundwork to ultimately dismantle North Korea's nuclear weapons programme, through talks with Pyongyang and close cooperation with Washington. "(Our) policy direction is the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula," Lee's office quoted him as saying in the interview. "Phase 1 is a freeze on nuclear weapons and missiles, Phase 2 is reduction, and Phase 3 is denuclearisation." North Korea has so far dismissed Lee's peace overtures as "gibberish" and a "pipedream". - Reuters
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
India test-fires nuclear-capable ballistic missile
NEW DELHI: India said Wednesday (Aug 20) it had successfully test-fired an intermediate-range ballistic missile which, when operational, should be capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to any part of China. The Agni-5 missile was successfully launched in India's eastern Odisha state, with authorities saying it "validated all operational and technical parameters." India and China, the world's two most populous nations, are intense rivals competing for influence across South Asia and relations plummeted in 2020 after a deadly border clash. India is also part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, Australia and Japan, which is seen as a counter to China. India's bitter rival Pakistan has nuclear weapons as well and the two countries came to close to war in May after militants killed 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, an attack New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. But Pakistan denied any involvement. Caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump's tariff war, Delhi and Beijing have moved to mend ties. Last October, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping for the first time in five years at a summit in Russia. Modi is expected to make his first visit to China since 2018 later this month to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) -- a regional security bloc. Ties between New Delhi and Washington, meanwhile, have been strained by Trump's ultimatum that India end its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow as it wages its military offensive in Ukraine. The United States says it will double new import tariffs on India from 25 per cent to 50 per cent by Aug 27 if New Delhi does not switch crude suppliers. The Agni-5 is one of a number of indigenously produced short- and medium-range Indian ballistic missiles aimed at boosting its defence posture against Pakistan, as well as China. - AFP
