Despite Trump's order, a surprising number of DEI programs remain 'active' at colleges and universities
Defending Education, formerly known as Parents Defending Education, is a nationwide grassroots organization that works to "fight indoctrination in classrooms and on campus to promote the reestablishment of a quality, non-political education for all students."
In addition to tracking those DEI offices and programs that are still active, the group's investigation also highlighted that Defending Education uncovered dozens of schools that have taken steps to rebrand or reorganize their DEI efforts, as opposed to shutting them down like others have done.
At least 27 universities, colleges or schools within such institutions have taken steps to do this, according to the investigation. Meanwhile, in "a few cases," schools have moved their online DEI resources behind password-protected web pages, Defending Education also pointed out.
"DEI evangelists at federally funded institutions are hiding race discrimination in an effort to violate federal law and think they won't be found out. But our latest report demonstrates they already have been," said Sarah Parshall Perry, Defending Education Vice President and Legal Fellow, who has extensive legal experience in the higher education realm. "Despite a very clear directive from the White House to end 'DEI' practices, too many institutions of higher education have simply sent their discrimination underground by renaming or reorganizing race-based initiatives and DEI offices."
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is an example of one of the universities that has been accused of attempting to hide their DEI resources.
In response to the accusations, a VUMC spokesperson told Fox News Digital at the time that it was undergoing "a thorough review" of its programs to figure out "where revisions may be required to remain in compliance, including updating information on websites and other public platforms."
However, today, offices such as the Office of Health Equity, the Office of Diversity and Inclusion, and the Office for Diversity Affairs are seemingly still active, according to Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.
The White House blasted some of the nation's premier universities for "egregious illegal behavior," after Harvard refused to comply with Trump administration demands related to ending their DEI programs. Amid Harvard's refusal to comply, the administration revealed this week that it would freeze more than $2 billion in federal funding for the institution.
During a press briefing this week, when asked why federal funding was so available to premier Ivy League institutions like Harvard, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said it was a question President Donald Trump frequently ponders himself.
"It's a question the president has obviously raised in his discussions," Leavitt said. "I think a lot of Americans are wondering why their tax dollars are going to these universities when they are not only indoctrinating our nation's students, but also allowing such egregious illegal behavior to occur."
Perry told Fox News Digital that Defending Education will not stop looking for "discrimination" in higher education, in an effort to make the guarantee of a "colorblind education" for every American student a reality "once and for all."
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment but did not hear back by time of publication.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
20 minutes ago
- Business Insider
'Something's Gotta Break!': Target Stock (NYSE:TGT) Slips, New Boycott May Rise
There are some cracks emerging in the facade of retail giant Target (TGT). Foot traffic is still down even six months after the last boycott hit. Moreover, there could be another boycott brewing that will hit Target ahead of holiday shopping season. The idea left investors cold, and shares slipped nearly 1.5% in Friday afternoon's trading. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Target has had some serious trouble lately with political matters. Around two years ago, during the Biden administration, conservatives took aim at Target. They launched a boycott over Target's sale of LGBTQ-themed merchandise, as well as certain policies about the store's restrooms. The boycott seemed to work, and Target pivoted, changing display policies, bathroom policies, and even later making the move to end diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in accordance with new policies from President Trump. But liberals saw that the boycott plan worked, and launched their own, in protest of the DEI shutdown. Reports noted that foot traffic at Target is down, and falling. In fact, foot traffic fell for the sixth month in a row in year-over-year comparisons. Yet not all the lost foot traffic is attributable to politics. Some believe that Target is '…slipping on retail basics,' like empty cart corrals and understocked, unclean shelves. Another Boycott Brewing? There are also signs that another boycott could be in the works, which might hit Target at the worst possible time: holiday shopping season. Pastor Jamal Harrison Bryant has been working on the notion of getting his flock to stop shopping at Target stores, again over issues of DEI. Bryant took to his pulpit to insist 'Something's gotta break!' in the midst of a sermon about debt, divorce, and drugs, after which he quickly pivoted to taking on Target. While Bryant acknowledges that the momentum is against him—especially given that the Trump Administration is referring to DEI programs as 'illegal DEI'—Bryant believes that a boycott might also serve as a '…way to energize those younger churchgoers that remain,' a number that has been falling off historically since at least 2007. So if Bryant, and those like him, believe they may be able to use a Target boycott to put life back in their churches, then a boycott may indeed be coming. Is Target Stock a Good Buy? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on TGT stock based on 11 Buys, 17 Holds and four Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 27.62% loss in its share price over the past year, the average TGT price target of $103.40 per share implies 0.51% upside potential.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Removing DEI from military schools is a ‘move towards meritocracy': Attorney
Constitutional attorney Mark Smith discusses the Department of Justice's lawsuits alleging use of DEI at military schools on 'Fox Report.'
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Judge blocks Trump administration guidance against DEI programs at schools and colleges
AP — A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the nation's schools and universities. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judges blocked various portions of the Education Department's anti-DEI measures. The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all 'race-based decision-making' or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. It's part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students. The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were 'good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair.' Gallagher, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected the government's argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal. 'It initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished,' Gallagher wrote. Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administration's attack on DEI. 'Threatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administration's war on education, and today the people won,' said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. A statement from the Education Department on Thursday said it was disappointed in the ruling but that 'judicial action enjoining or setting aside this guidance has not stopped our ability to enforce Title VI protections for students at an unprecedented level.' The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. The memo dramatically expanded the government's interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court decision barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding 'race-based preferences' of any kind. 'Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices,' wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the department's Office for Civil Rights. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using 'illegal DEI practices.' Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the government's approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination. The memos drew a wave of backlash from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship. In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing 'unclear and highly subjective' limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to 'choose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution.'
