logo
'Cyber crime ranks as the number one risk in SA, overtaking long-standing issues': expert

'Cyber crime ranks as the number one risk in SA, overtaking long-standing issues': expert

TimesLIVE24-04-2025

Cyber crime now ranks as the number one risk in South Africa, overtaking long-standing issues including load-shedding and political instability.
According to the Allianz Risk Barometer 2025, cyber incidents — including ransomware attacks, data breaches and IT outages — are now the top global business risk, marking their fourth year at the top.
A decade ago, only 12% of global respondents cited cyber crime as a major concern. In 2025, that surged to 38%.
'Cyber is the top risk across North and South America, Europe and Africa, dominating industry concerns from aviation to legal services,' said Allianz.
Cell C suffered a major ransomware attack in December 2024, exposing sensitive customer data such as ID numbers, bank and medical details, and passports, which were later leaked on the dark web. Similarly, the SABS faced a ransomware attack in November 2024. By February 2025, its core systems were still encrypted — marking the third cyberattack on the organisation in five years.
Herman Stroop, lead ISO Specialist at WWISE, a leading ISO standards and systems implementation consultancy, believes both breaches were entirely preventable.
'Neither Cell C nor SABS were ISO/IEC 27001 certified — a globally recognised standard for information security management. This standard isn't just a technical checklist. It's a framework that forces an organisation to understand its vulnerabilities, assess its risks, and apply controls that address these risks in a structured, auditable way,' he said.
The ISO/IEC 27001 standard focuses on confidentiality, integrity and availability — the foundation of modern information security. It requires organisations to conduct ongoing risk assessments, implement policies and technical controls, and continuously monitor and update these defences in response to emerging threats.
According to Stroop, the absence of such a system is often due to a lack of strategic commitment from leadership.
'Cybersecurity is wrongly seen as an IT issue. Top management often fails to view it as a core business risk, resulting in underinvestment in preventive frameworks like ISO/IEC 27001,' he said.
Further Stroop said that poor enforcement of existing regulations is a key challenge in South Africa.
He said while the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia) and Minimum Information Security Standards (Miss) lay out clear expectations for information governance, many organisations either ignore or delay compliance due to a perceived lack of consequences.
'The irony is that prevention is far cheaper than remediation. In many cases, organisations suffer reputational damage, legal liability and operational downtime that far exceed the cost of implementing an ISO-compliant Information Security Management System,' Stroop said.
He believes that Cell C and SABS also provide examples of poor transparency as details about the nature of the attacks and how they were handled remain vague.
'When an organisation isn't ISO-certified, it usually doesn't have the documentation, procedures or incident response plans to respond properly — let alone communicate clearly — during a breach,' said Stroop.
According to the Information Regulator, South Africa sees between 150 and 300 cyberattacks reported each month — and that's just the reported incidents. Many go unreported due to reputational fears or because organisations are not compliant with Popia and fear investigation.
Stroop believes that ISO 27001 should be mandated for public institutions and critical infrastructure operators.
'Without minimum compliance levels, we're just waiting for the next disaster. It's not a matter of if but when.'
However, he notes that some insurance providers are beginning to offer premium reductions for ISO-certified organisations, while major corporate clients now demand ISO 27001 certification from vendors.
'It's becoming a market differentiator. Organisations serious about protecting their data and reputation cannot afford to ignore ISO 27001 any longer,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City loses court case against Cell C over stadium damage
City loses court case against Cell C over stadium damage

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

City loses court case against Cell C over stadium damage

Cape Town stadium. Image: City of Cape Town THE City has lost its court bid to claim damages against Cell C over damage to the Cape Town stadium. The Western Cape High Court ruled that the debt had prescribed, and the claim was dismissed with costs. According to court papers, the issue dates back to 2015 when the City gave Cell C permission to access the stadium to install infrastructure for its customers. Cell C had contracted Huawei to do the installation work. 'On November 18, 2015, the (City) discovered extensive damage to the external façade of the stadium which was caused by a metal panel which had dislodged from gridline 50 on level 6 of the stadium and which fell on or through the façade, damaging the same. "At all material times it was (Cell C's) duty to ensure that the installation was done without any harm or damage to the stadium and inasmuch as the damage was caused by (Huawei), alternatively, the third, alternatively the fourth defendant's action, it remained the duty of (Cell C) to ensure that no damage was done to the stadium and it could not rid itself of this duty by appointing a contractor,' court papers read. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The City's main claim was against Cell C with an alternative claim against Huawei and the other sub-contractors separately, in the event that the court found that they were independent contractors and that Cell C could not be held liable for any of their actions. However, both Cell C and Huawei invoked a special plea of prescription. They argued that the cause of action arose on November 18, 2015 and that the summons instituting the proceedings was served on them after the three year prescription period. 'The (City's) claim would prescribe within a period of three years as it falls within the ambit of section 11(d) of the Prescription Act. In his opening statement counsel for (Cell C) submitted that the (City) sought to impose strict liability on it in terms of its pleaded case. This rendered the actual identity of the defendant / entity who caused the damage irrelevant. Furthermore, Cell C submitted that as the (City) discovered the loss on November 18, 2015 and served its summons on November 21, 2018, (the City's) claim against it had prescribed.' Lawyers for Huawei argued that there were no grounds on which the City could succeed. An ICS service engineer for Huawei testified and that he was responsible for the network provision. The engineer compiled a report on the day of the incident at the stadium. It was recorded that on November 18, 2015 the stadium management stated that the damage was caused by Huawei's contractors as they worked on location. The report contained Huawei's denial that they were responsible for the damage and concluded that there was no conclusive proof in respect of who was responsible for the damage. A City employee testified that while he was aware of a theory that a cherrypicker from another company could have caused the damage, 'no one placed any credibility in the theory'. He said that there was one of four entities (Cell C, Huawei and the other subcontractors) which could be liable for the damage and that he held a meeting with representatives of all four entities on November 18, 2015. However, according to court papers, the employee never asked which contractor replaced the panel and who was responsible for supervising the work on level 6.

MTN and Cell C defend high data prices
MTN and Cell C defend high data prices

The Citizen

time02-06-2025

  • The Citizen

MTN and Cell C defend high data prices

Poor users pay 80 times more than the rich, and cellular companies' explanations are not really convincing … Some are paying around R136 per gigabyte, while others pay around R1.65. Picture: iStock An analysis of cellular companies' data prices shows that prepaid users buying small mobile data bundles pay around R136 per gigabyte (GB), but those who can afford monthly subscription contracts for huge bundles pay as little as R1.65 per GB. It is reasonable to assume that richer consumers are signing monthly contracts and poorer consumers are purchasing the small prepaid bundles – and paying in excess of 8 000% more than the rich. We asked Vodacom, MTN and Cell C if it costs more to 'produce' a small data bundle than a large bundle, even though we knew what the answer would be. The difference in prices charged for small bundles versus large contracts is huge. In the case of MTN, a prepaid customer will have to pay R30 for 220MB worth of data, equal to R136 per GB. A contract customer who can afford R329 per month will get 100GB worth of data, paying R3.29 per GB. ALSO READ: Fibre, cheaper data and weaver birds: Ramaphosa promises innovation Different factors MTN says it is committed to digital inclusion and continues to take active steps to make data more affordable and accessible for all South Africans. 'Our pricing structure reflects a combination of factors, including usage patterns, volume, duration of access, and commercial sustainability,' it says. 'MTN offers a wide range of products tailored to different customer segments, including both prepaid and contract options. Prepaid pricing is often influenced by the short-term nature and smaller volumes of purchases, whereas contract customers commit to higher volumes over longer periods, allowing for discounted rates through economies of scale.' A spokesperson for Cell C offered the same explanation: 'Larger bundles – whether prepaid or postpaid – benefit from economies of scale and lower per-GB costs due to predictable usage and network planning efficiencies. Prepaid products offer flexibility for users with varying needs, but smaller volumes do come with higher proportional costs and fixed costs (per bundle, per customer) increase price points on lower data bundle allocations.' But it's difficult to agree to their argument of economies of scale, because the major, if not only, production cost is the fixed cost of large computers and network equipment. ALSO READ: Data prices likely to remain high, says EFF after spectrum auction ends Is there really a difference in what economists term the marginal cost to produce another GB, whether for a small prepaid user or a wealthier client who signs a 24-month contract? MTN says it has made substantial reductions in prepaid data pricing over recent years and continues to introduce affordable bundles to meet the needs of all consumers. 'Prepaid pricing reflects the flexibility and convenience it offers to customers who need to stay in control of their spending. While prepaid users may be more price-sensitive, they also display a 'need-now' purchase pattern. This pattern caters for convenience offers such as hourly, daily, three days and weekly data bundle to match their immediate needs. Prepaid [has] a variety of offers that are personalised based on customer spend pattern and location.' It says the cost to produce 1GB of data is not a fixed figure. 'It depends on several dynamic factors, including network investments, spectrum availability, infrastructure maintenance and customer usage trends/utilisation. 'Importantly, MTN continues to invest heavily in expanding and upgrading its network to deliver high-quality and affordable connectivity to all customers. 'On the cost differences between prepaid and contract data distribution, the fundamental infrastructure used to deliver data remains the same, but serving smaller, short-term prepaid bundles versus larger contract packages presents different cost and operational dynamics. 'Larger-volume, long-term packages benefit from scale and predictable usage, which often enables more favourable pricing.' ALSO READ: Malatsi takes action to lower smart devices and phone costs in SA Cell C data is cheaper It is noticeable that Cell C's data packages are cheaper than those of MTN and Vodacom, and it admits that there are big differences in prices for small and large users. 'We recognise concerns about pricing differences between prepaid and contract data. While this reflects common industry pricing models globally, we understand the broader social implications in the South African context. 'We continue to explore ways to narrow this gap through targeted promotions, value bundles, and contextual offers to increase affordability without compromising network overhead. Through My Connecta Deals, we provide some of the most competitive, best-value offers on the market, open to all customers, including prepaid customers. 'We have a significant base of prepaid users with exceptionally high average revenue per user [ARPU]. In many cases, this is even higher than our postpaid customers,' says Cell C. 'Prepaid is not only a product for the poor; it's a preference for a payment method by the informed and empowered, offering flexibility, control and value without long-term commitments. 'Customers across income brackets increasingly choose prepaid for its convenience, transparency, and the ability to match spend with lifestyle and usage needs.' Cell C says the cost of delivering 1GB varies and is a function of network utilisation by region, network conditions and input costs like spectrum, site maintenance and international bandwidth. ALSO READ: Capitec aims to disrupt mobile market with data that doesn't expire 'While commercially sensitive, we can assure you that we operate in a highly competitive environment and our pricing reflects a balance between affordability and the substantial investment required by our partners to expand and maintain infrastructure. 'This is particularly in under-served and rural areas where the cost to serve is significantly higher,' it adds. 'There are material differences in cost to serve between larger bundle allocation consumers, who are typically contract customers, and smaller bundle allocation purchasers, who may be prepaid consumers. Prepaid data carries additional fixed per-customer-per-bundle overhead related to payment processing, usage cycles, and less predictable network load. 'These contribute to a net higher unit cost in delivering smaller data allocation bundles. Nonetheless, we are actively working with our network partners to reduce disparities through technology and infrastructure innovation and upgrades,' according to Cell C. ALSO READ: Unhappy with your cellphone service provider? Here's the steps you can take The digital inclusion objective Moneyweb specifically asked the cellular companies about the social and economic impact of affordable data packages, given the need for access to information, education, job advertisements and participation in the economy. 'We agree that data access is a gateway to opportunity, education, and economic participation,' said Cell C. 'Our zero-rated access to educational platforms, job portals and key government services is one way we help bridge this gap.' It said it also continues 'to introduce low-cost bundles and community-driven partnerships to support digital inclusion'. 'We remain committed to ongoing pricing reviews to better support vulnerable communities while ensuring long-term viability and quality service offers. Cell's C's localised deal platform offers regionally tailored packages that aim to bridge the affordability gap and connect more South Africans to digital opportunity, showcasing the best deals by geographic location.' ALSO READ: Your data bundles could soon last longer – if Icasa has its way MTN also says that it recognises that data access is essential for education, employment, and economic participation. 'Hence [our] Bonus Bonanza that offers customers double airtime every time they recharge with R5 and more. This value is available to [the] prepaid customer only. 'Additionally, MTN has embarked on location-based offers to give differential pricing based on location. 'A good example is MTN GigZone that gives prepaid customers uncapped prepaid data service at R5 valid for 24 hours for townships and informal settlements to ensure everyone enjoys the benefit of a modern connected life.' It also said that MTN continues to drive digital inclusion through ongoing price reductions, zero-rated platforms for learning and job-seeking and innovative products like MoMo (its Mobile Money fintech offering). 'We remain committed to connecting the unconnected and ensuring that all South Africans have the opportunity to benefit from the digital economy.' Vodacom did not respond to questions. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

Third successful round for Thuthukani
Third successful round for Thuthukani

The Citizen

time02-06-2025

  • The Citizen

Third successful round for Thuthukani

Thuthukani, Thungela's Enterprise and Supplier Development (ESD) programme, hosted a graduation ceremony for 61 local entrepreneurs from communities surrounding its operations. This marks the third cohort of entrepreneurs to successfully complete the programme since its launch in 2022. Thuthukani is designed to build resilient businesses by offering tailored business skills training, technical enablement, and one-on-one mentorship to entrepreneurs from host communities. The programme is grounded in a detailed gap analysis and enables support in areas such as finance management, marketing, sales, project strategy, leadership, ISO certification, and personal development. The programme is delivered in partnership with business development service provider Raizcorp. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Crown Publications (@crownpublications) Of the 61 entrepreneurs graduating this year, 29 are supplier development beneficiaries – Small Micro and Medium Enterprises (SMMEs) that currently provide goods or services to Thungela, while 32 are enterprise development beneficiaries, comprising SMMEs that are not vendors but have potential for future integration into the mining value chain or in other industries. Notably, 50 of the 61 graduates also achieved technical enablement qualifications with the following accreditations ISO or whichever one, lets share a couple of them, boosting their compliance and competitiveness for procurement opportunities. 'Thuthukani is more than a business development initiative. It is a catalyst for local economic resilience. Each graduate represents a point of impact that causes a ripple effect, creating jobs and opportunities that uplift families and communities. We are proud to support the growth of these entrepreneurs and help them realise their potential – as they contribute to the growth of local economies, said Mpumi Sithole, executive head, corporate affairs at Thungela.' The graduation highlights Thungela's commitment to inclusive socio-economic development and transforming small businesses in in host communities. As the programme grows, its impact continues to spread, with entrepreneurs not only formalising their businesses, but also entering new markets, gaining critical certifications, and becoming active contributors to the regional economy. Julliet Mahlangu a beneficiary of the programme said, 'Before Thuthukani, I lacked the systems and structure to manage and scale my business. The mentorship and technical training helped me implement better financial controls, and I now feel more confident approaching new clients and bidding for contracts.' Breaking news at your fingertips … Follow WITBANK NEWS on our website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or TikTok Chat to us: info@ At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store