Historic three-masted sailing ship to begin new chapter in Northland
The Tui started shedding planks from its hull several years ago, damage that was accelerated by Cyclone Gabrielle in 2023.
Photo:
RNZ / Peter de Graaf
A derelict Northland landmark with a vivid history - it has variously been a restaurant, a shipwreck museum laden with treasure, and the target of a notorious criminal - is about to get a new life as a marine education centre.
The Tui
, a three-masted sailing ship, has been a feature of the Waitangi waterfront since the late Kelly Tarlton bought the historic vessel and used it to house his finds from a lifetime of exploring shipwrecks.
Later it became a popular eatery known as Shippey's, but for the past decade it has been empty, an increasingly sorry sight in the estuary next to Waitangi Bridge.
The tops of its masts have been removed and the hull has started shedding planks, a decline accelerated by Cyclone Gabrielle.
Now, however, the waterfront icon appears to have been saved and is set to embark on a new life.
The Tui in its heyday as Kelly Tarlton's Museum of Shipwrecks in 1976.
Photo:
Archives New Zealand/ G Riethmaier
Kerikeri-based TriOceans marine research institute announced this week that it had started restoring the vessel for use as a community space and marine education facility.
TriOceans describes itself as a "collective of scientists and innovators" focussed on marine mammal science and marine education, weaving together mātauranga Māori and modern scientific methods.
It's just the latest chapter in the ship's long and intriguing history.
Ask when the
Tui
was built and you'll get a range of answers, from 1890 to 1913.
What's not disputed is that it was built for Chelsea Sugar to transport refined sugar from the then- isolated outpost of Birkenhead across the Waitematā Harbour to the docks at Auckland.
It was one of seven purpose-built, kauri-hulled lighters, which are flat-bottomed vessels resembling a barge or scow.
Work has started to bring the Tui back to its former glory.
Photo:
RNZ / Peter de Graaf
The construction of Auckland Harbour Bridge in 1954, however, meant the lighters were no longer needed. The last one was sold in 1961.
Most were converted into pleasure boats or floating homes, but one caught the eye of Kelly Tarlton.
Scuba diving pioneer Kelly Tarlton created The Tui to house the treasures he had found under the sea.
Photo:
Supplied
A scuba diving pioneer, Tarlton was also one of New Zealand's most passionate and successful treasure hunters.
In the early 1960s he moved to Northland's Tutukākā Coast to be close to the spectacular waters of the Poor Knights Islands.
One of the first shipwrecks Tarlton explored was the
Elingamite
, a passenger steamer that sank at the Three Kings Islands in 1902 with a large consignment of gold and coins on board.
The Tasmania
, which went down off Mahia Peninsula in 1897 with a suitcase full of jewels, was the subject of another lucrative expedition.
Eventually Tarlton needed somewhere to display his growing collection of treasures wrestled from the sea.
The Tui
was just what he was looking for.
With typical Tarlton ingenuity and enthusiasm he set about converting an ungainly 30-metre barge into an elegant, three-masted barque.
The kauri masts were salvaged from the
Endeavour II
, a Canadian sailing ship that came to grief on the Parengarenga Bar, near North Cape.
Tarlton's Museum of Shipwrecks was an instant success when the first visitors crossed the gangplank in 1970.
It became a must-see attraction in the Bay of Islands and helped pay for his ongoing ventures.
After Tarlton died in 1985, aged just 47, his wife Rosemary kept his ship of treasures open for another 15 years.
In the year 2000 disaster struck in the unexpected form of kitchenhand Keith Anthony McEwen.
Shortly before 8pm on 8 April, while visitors were still in the museum, staff discovered a glass vault had been plundered of an estimated $300,000 worth of gold, jewellery and coins.
McEwen, then aged 23 and employed in the museum kitchen, vanished around the same time, leaving his clothing and girlfriend behind.
It wasn't long before he was named as the prime suspect.
McEwen was eventually caught and sentenced to 7½ years' jail, but never revealed where he had hidden the treasure.
Police and private investigators made many attempts to find it, even searching his childhood eeling spot near Moerewa.
Years later, an associate claimed McEwen stole the treasure on behalf of a gang and never got a cut, but that story has never been verified.
McEwen disappeared again after he was released in 2005. He spent some time holed up on Kawau Island, then returned to public attention in the most disturbing way possible.
On 10 November, 2006, a Dutch couple sleeping in their van at Haruru Falls were accosted by two men pretending to be police.
The honeymooners were handcuffed at gunpoint, then driven around the Mid North for six hours while the men withdrew money using their bank card.
One of the men subjected the woman to a sexual assault so horrific the details are permanently suppressed by court order.
The two men were arrested on 21 November as a result of what police described as a combination of information from the public, CCTV footage, forensics, and old-fashioned legwork.
The main offender was none other than Keith McEwen.
In February 2007 he admitted two charges of aggravated robbery, two of kidnapping, five of sexual violation, and one each of rape, attempted stupefaction and using the couple's bank card.
He was sentenced to preventive detention, which means he will be released only when he is deemed to no longer be a risk.
McEwen was denied parole for the eighth time
in April last year
.
His accomplice, Christopher Mana Manuel, pleaded guilty to lesser charges the following month.
The Tui, once Kelly Tarlton's Museum of Shipwrecks, has fallen into disrepair since its on-board restaurant closed more than 10 years ago.
Photo:
RNZ / Peter de Graaf
McEwen's heist - and the insurance company's refusal to pay out on a technicality - spelt the end of Tarlton's Museum of Shipwrecks.
Rosemary Tarlton delayed selling the
Tui
until she believed she'd found the right buyers, but by 2003 she was confident her search was complete.
The new owners, a Kerikeri couple, had a vision of transforming the
Tui
into a bar and café they called Brown Sugar, a nod to the ship's beginnings as a sugar lighter.
The restaurant went through a number of incarnations, operators and names, until it eventually became Shippey's, a popular spot on summer evenings for fish and chips on the deck.
Shippey's closed down in 2014 amid a breakdown in the relationship between the boat owners and the business operators.
Plans to reopen the vessel as an eatery were scuppered by the Covid pandemic.
Since then it has deteriorated badly. The most obvious sign of its decline is the planks that have fallen from its port side.
The ship's poor condition has not gone unnoticed by the Northland Regional Council, the local maritime authority.
The Tui at low tide in Waitangi Estuary.
Photo:
RNZ / Peter de Graaf
Harbourmaster Jim Lyle said the
Tui
was regarded as a coastal structure rather than a ship, because it was permanently mounted on blocks.
However, it was still being monitored by the council to ensure debris from its hull did not create a shipping hazard.
Lyle said the
Tui
was originally a flat-bottomed, barge-like vessel.
When it was converted to a museum, Tarlton had steel framing built around it, which was then planked over.
The planks that were falling off were cosmetic in function and not part of the original vessel, he said.
An artist's concept: The TriOceans marine research institute have started work toward turning the old Tui three masted sailing ship into a marine education centre.
Photo:
Supplied/ TriOceans
TriOceans bought the vessel last year, saying the organisation planned to restore the "iconic old sugar boat in line with Kelly Tarlton's original vision".
This week that vision came a step closer to reality with TriOceans announcing on social media it had received funding for the restoration from Foundation North, formerly the ASB Community Trust.
A team from Kerikeri-based Hawke Property Developments had started the job of returning the
Tui
to its former glory.
TriOceans said the location, in the rich waters of the Bay of Islands a stone's throw from the Waitangi Treaty Grounds, was perfect for a marine education centre.
"We aim to make local marine life and conservation education accessible to all, working alongside local kaitiaki, community leaders, and passionate educators to build this iconic ship up to its fullest potential," the organisation said.
It's a fresh chapter in the fascinating story of the
Tui
, offering hope the ship will remain a landmark on the Waitangi waterfront for many years to come.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
19 minutes ago
- RNZ News
ACT leader David Seymour suggested 'bots' drove 'fake submissions' against his Regulatory Standards Bill
ACT leader David Seymour has claimed 99.5 percent of the submissions received on the Regulatory Standards Bill were created using "bots". The Ministry for Regulation received approximately 23,000 submissions regarding a discussion document about the bill in January. In summarising the feedback, it found 88 percent of submitters opposed the proposed regulations, and 0.33 percent supported or partially supported them. But in an interview on this week's episode of 30 with Guyon Espiner , the newly-appointed deputy prime minister claimed most of the opposing submissions weren't valid. "You're smart enough to know that those 23,000 submissions, 99.5 percent of them, were because somebody figured out how to make a bot make fake submissions that inflated the numbers," Seymour said. The figures quoted were "meaningless" and represented nothing more than somebody "running a smart campaign with a bot". When asked what evidence Seymour had that the submissions were fake, he said it's because "we've looked at them. Because we know what the contents of them is". In a subsequent written statement to RNZ, Seymour said he was referring to "online campaigns" that generate "non-representative samples" that don't reflect public opinion. In a statement, Ministry for Regulation deputy chief executive policy Andrew Royle would not address Seymour's claims about bots directly. Royle said the ministry undertook a "robust process" to analyse all of the submissions received. "Our approach was carefully designed to reflect all submissions in the final analysis, noting there were many similar points made across most of the submissions," he said. The ministry's summary shows its process included a "qualitative" analysis of about 1000 individual submissions. Group submissions and submissions over 10,000 words were read separately. The rest were summarised using AI. There was nothing in the report about bots or other interference in the submissions process. Watch the full interview with David Seymour on 30 With Guyon Espiner . Subscribe to the podcast feed now to get every episode of 30 on your phone when it lands: Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Otago Andrew Geddis said the use of the word 'bots' was disparaging. "I think he's using bots in that kind of colloquial sense, which is an incredibly dismissive way to refer to individual New Zealanders taking the time to actually engage with his proposal. "If he means some sort of artificial intelligence, computer-generated filling out of the forms without any human intervention, that would have been reported to him by his officials. There was no such report." ActionStation director Kassie Hartendorp said Seymour was trying to discredit any opposition to his views. "If he presents some evidence that there were bots involved, and there's probably ways to be able to do that, if he presents evidence, then fine. But otherwise, it just seems like an outlandish claim that isn't matching up with reality." Kassie Hartendorp (Ngāti Raukawa, Ngāti Tuwharetoa) is the Director of ActionStation, a community campaigning platform. Photo: Supplied ActionStation and other campaigning organisations from across the political spectrum have previously created templates to help people write submissions. Hartendorp said those tools were not bots and meant make the submissions process more accessible. "The purpose of those submission tools is to be able to make it as clear and simple as possible, so that people, who might not ever have submitted before, or who don't have much time, can be involved with the democratic process." Clerk of the House of Representatives Dr David Wilson said he wasn't able to respond to Seymour's claims as the consultation in January was run by the Ministry for Regulation, but said there are protections in place against 'bots' during a select committee process. Similar claims about the impact of automated software were made during the submissions process on the Treaty Principles Bill in January, which attracted more than 300,000 submissions, but no evidence was found to support any such interference. "Our cybersecurity people were not aware that any of the submissions were made that way, and they do have security in place to alert them to if that was happening," Wilson said.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Act Party leader David Seymour suggested 'bots' drove 'fake submissions' against his Regulatory Standards Bill
ACT Party leader David Seymour claimed 99.5 percent of the submissions received on the Regulatory Standards Bill were created using "bots". The Ministry for Regulation received approximately 23,000 submissions regarding a discussion document about the bill in January. In summarising the feedback, it found 88 percent of submitters opposed the proposed regulations, and 0.33 percent supported or partially supported them. But in an interview on this week's episode of 30 with Guyon Espiner , the newly-appointed deputy prime minister claimed most of the opposing submissions weren't valid. "You're smart enough to know that those 23,000 submissions, 99.5 percent of them, were because somebody figured out how to make a bot make fake submissions that inflated the numbers," Seymour said. The figures quoted were "meaningless" and represented nothing more than somebody "running a smart campaign with a bot". When asked what evidence Seymour had that the submissions were fake, he said it's because "we've looked at them. Because we know what the contents of them is". In a subsequent written statement to RNZ, Seymour said he was referring to "online campaigns" that generate "non-representative samples" that don't reflect public opinion. In a statement, Ministry for Regulation deputy chief executive policy Andrew Royle would not address Seymour's claims about bots directly. Royle said the ministry undertook a "robust process" to analyse all of the submissions received. "Our approach was carefully designed to reflect all submissions in the final analysis, noting there were many similar points made across most of the submissions," he said. The ministry's summary shows its process included a "qualitative" analysis of about 1000 individual submissions. Group submissions and submissions over 10,000 words were read separately. The rest were summarised using AI. There was nothing in the report about bots or other interference in the submissions process. Watch the full interview with David Seymour on 30 With Guyon Espiner . Subscribe to the podcast feed now to get every episode of 30 on your phone when it lands: On Spotify On iHeartRadio On Apple podcasts Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Otago Andrew Geddis said the use of the word 'bots' was disparaging. "I think he's using bots in that kind of colloquial sense, which is an incredibly dismissive way to refer to individual New Zealanders taking the time to actually engage with his proposal. "If he means some sort of artificial intelligence, computer-generated filling out of the forms without any human intervention, that would have been reported to him by his officials. There was no such report." ActionStation director Kassie Hartendorp said Seymour was trying to discredit any opposition to his views. "If he presents some evidence that there were bots involved, and there's probably ways to be able to do that, if he presents evidence, then fine. But otherwise, it just seems like an outlandish claim that isn't matching up with reality." Kassie Hartendorp (Ngāti Raukawa, Ngāti Tuwharetoa) is the Director of ActionStation, a community campaigning platform. Photo: Supplied ActionStation and other campaigning organisations from across the political spectrum have previously created templates to help people write submissions. Hartendorp said those tools were not bots and meant make the submissions process more accessible. "The purpose of those submission tools is to be able to make it as clear and simple as possible, so that people, who might not ever have submitted before, or who don't have much time, can be involved with the democratic process." Clerk of the House of Representatives Dr David Wilson said he wasn't able to respond to Seymour's claims as the consultation in January was run by the Ministry for Regulation, but said there are protections in place against 'bots' during a select committee process. Similar claims about the impact of automated software were made during the submissions process on the Treaty Principles Bill in January, which attracted more than 300,000 submissions, but no evidence was found to support any such interference. "Our cybersecurity people were not aware that any of the submissions were made that way, and they do have security in place to alert them to if that was happening," Wilson said.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Fatal Kaikōura boat capsizing: Petrol fumes killed five passengers
Five people died and six were rescued after a boat they were on capsized in 2022. Photo: Stuff / Chris Skelton The deaths of five people in a boat capsize off the Kaikōura coast was caused by exposure to petrol fumes while they were trapped under the hull, a coroner has found. The Nature Photography Society of New Zealand members were two hours into a bird-watching excursion when the boat was hit by a whale and capsized in September 2022. The skipper and five other passengers survived. On Wednesday, coroner Alexandra Cunninghame publicly released findings into the deaths of Catherine Margaret Haddock, 65 and Susan Jane Cade, 63 of Lower Hutt, Diana Ruby Stewart, 68, Peter Charles Hockley, 76 and Maureen Pierre, 75 of Christchurch. All five were found within the air pocket under the upturned boat. The six survivors were either thrown into open water or managed to swim out from under the hull. The Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC) had earlier found that the five passengers who died were trapped under the hull and flaws in the vessel's fuel system, which had not been identified when it was surveyed, allowed fuel to leak into the air pocket. Forensic pathologist Dr Hannah Elstub determined that the cause of death in each case was the result of petrol toxicity in a confined space. Sounds could be heard from under the vessel until around 17 minutes after the capsize. The coroner found exposure to as little as .14 litres of petrol in a confined space with the same dimensions as the air pocket under the boat could result in confusion, loss of consciousness and sudden death. The people who died were wearing inflatable life jackets which might have prevented them from being able to escape from under the upturned vessel and they all showed symptoms of petrol exposure consistent with inhalation and absorption of fumes. The TAIC made a number of recommendations relating to the maintenance and surveying of fuel lines, the use of inflatable lifejackets and the emergency response. The boat capsize highlighted failings in the emergency call system because the skipper had been able to call police, but the TAIC inquiry found the 111 system had caused "unnecessary delays". When police tried to give paramedics the accident's co-ordinates, a second fragmented tech system called CARD would not accept it because the sea was outside usual ambulance range and instead produced an error message. The TAIC chief commissioner David Clarke said while it was unlikely that any of these issues contributed to the outcome of the tragedy in this case, in other circumstances similar delays could be critical. "No action has been taken to address this safety issue," he said. Maritime New Zealand decided against prosecuting any individuals, organisations or businesses after an investigation into the tragedy. Cunninghame did not make any further recommendations in her findings. She said those relating to the emergency response were outside the scope of a coroner's enquiry, because the TAIC investigation concluded that a swifter response would not have resulted in a different outcome because of the short time frame in which the atmosphere under the vessel was survivable. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
