Bill Clinton says he wondered if Trump administration might try to ban his latest book
'I was actually trying to think if there was some reason they could think of to ban it,' the ex-commander in chief said during an interview alongside Patterson Tuesday on 'The Daily Show.'
Clinton's comment came in response to a question from host Jordan Klepper on if he knew when the book, 'The First Gentleman,' was 'going to be banned by the Trump administration.'
'It wouldn't be the White House, but in certain counties, they may all of a sudden,' best-selling scribe Patterson, a vocal critic of book bans, told Klepper.
'They don't need a reason,' Patterson, 78, added.
'One person goes in [and says] 'I don't like the book.' And, 'OK, we'll ban it,'' he said. 'So it'll probably be banned in a couple of counties.'
Patterson was one of nearly two dozen authors who donated millions to the free expression organization PEN America in 2023 to push back against book banning efforts. A year earlier, more than 1,500 individual titles were removed from K-12 schools across the country, according to PEN America.
'I don't like it. It's a bad deal,' Clinton, 78, said of book bans.
'Maya Angelou, who read the inaugural poem at my first inauguration — wrote it, and read it and was a great human being — the first thing the White House did was to ban her book, 'I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,'' Clinton recalled.
Angelou's 1969 autobiography was reportedly one of nearly 400 books that was pulled from the U.S. Naval Academy library in April as part of an effort to remove titles containing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) content.
Calling it a 'magnificent book,' Clinton reflected on Angelou's personal story about a child who 'loses the ability to speak for a couple of years because she was abused, and then she blooms.'
'I couldn't figure out why that was a problem,' Clinton said.
'I don't like book banning,' the 42nd president added.
'I wasn't ever for banning books that were full of things they said about me that weren't true,' Clinton said.
'It never occurred to me that I should stop you from reading them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hillary Clinton: Israel missed biggest opportunity for Hamas deal after 12 Day War
Every day Israel fails to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, its standing in the region and around the world erodes, and its long-term security is undermined, Clinton warned. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu missed the biggest opportunity for a deal with Hamas after the Iran war, former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton argued in an interview on the 'Raging Moderates' podcast released on Friday. 'Israel established such dominance – intelligence dominance, military dominance, controlled the air over Iran, was able to destroy important infrastructure of their military industrial complex, had the addresses of some of the leaders in the nuclear program – and then the US came in and added to that dominance with our unique capability. After that, it seemed to me, Netanyahu should proclaim victory. Take the W,' she explained. Describing Hamas as a death cult that is on its knees, she elaborated that with Iran, 'We have clearly sent a message – very forcefully – that we will not allow it to become a nuclear weapons power.' If she had been in Netanyahu's position, she said, she would have laid out 'a plan for a ceasefire on a fast track, whether or not Hamas agrees,' she began, arguing that the terrorist group has no interest in agreeing to a ceasefire, because the war perpetuates their narrative. 'I'm going to begin talking with our Arab neighbors about what we can do to put together some kind of security/redevelopment program; I'm going to demand that the Palestinian Authority reform itself in order to be a partner with Israel in doing anything about governing the day after Gaza.' Even if doing so costs Netanyahu politically, Clinton said she would appeal directly to the Israeli public with her vision for Israel's future – normalization with Saudi Arabia, supporting the Lebanese government to subdue Hezbollah, and working to ensure 'we get the right regime in Syria.' She argued that, by doing so, he could be re-elected – although 'Israel needs new leadership,' she added quickly. Gaza crisis erodes Israel's standing and security Clinton argued that by not addressing Gaza's humanitarian crisis - as a strong supporter of Israel, she added – it is 'undermining Israel's position in the world and it is putting Israelis and Jews at risk around the world.' 'This is not the usual suffering that comes from active warfare. Israel has other options,' which she said, other military and political leadership has proposed. 'There are other options that would continue to protect Israel but move it out of this quagmire that it has gotten itself into.' Netanyahu is a prisoner of the most extreme elements within Israeli society, and therefore, he is unable to get pragmatic again, which is what he used to be able to do,' the former presidential candidate said. Every day Israel fails to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, its standing in the region and around the world erodes, and its long-term security is undermined, Clinton warned.
USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Trump-Putin summit: What to know about Putin's past meetings with US leaders
President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are slated to meet for a highly anticipated one-on-one in Alaska on Friday, Aug. 15 in a rare bilateral meeting on American soil at a time of heightened tensions. Putin will be the first elected Russian leader to visit Alaska for the summit, land that the United States purchased from Moscow for $7.2 million in 1867, according to the National Archives. If everything goes according to plan, this trip will mark Putin's eighth visit to the U.S. during his presidency, a role he has held for 20 years across two separate terms. Trump is hosting the meeting to try to push Moscow into a peace deal with Ukraine. The war, sparked by Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, nears the 3 1/2-year mark and stands as the largest conflict in Europe since World War II. More: Trump-Putin summit spotlights Alaska's strategic importance, vulnerability The leaders of the U.S. and Russia have met many times over the decades since the USSR dissolved, charting ups and downs in a complex relationship between the two nations, which has swung from periods of deep tension and distrust, to times of détente and cooperation. Putin's meetings with U.S. presidents: Dozens of talks with Bush, Clinton Since taking office in 1999, and again in 2012 after a brief four-year interlude when ally Dmitry Medvedev held the job, Putin has met with every U.S. president, according to U.S. State Department archives. In total, Putin has held dozens of official and unofficial meetings with American presidents over the years. Some presidents had more frequent interactions with the Russian leader than others. Although former President Bill Clinton's second term in office only briefly overlapped with Putin's initial tenure, the pair met several times in 2000 and had previously met when Putin was vice president under former Russian President Boris Yeltsin. Clinton delivered an address in the Russian State Duma in June 2000, recounting the more than half dozen times he visited the country, twice before he became president and five times while in office. Clinton developed a particularly close relationship with Yeltsin, the country's first democratically elected leader after the fall of the Soviet Union. President George W. Bush met with Putin at least a dozen times over his two terms, including a 2007 trip to the family home in Maine. As tensions ratcheted up, Putin's meetings with U.S. presidents dropped Since Russia illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, the relationship between Putin and the West has been increasingly strained, and the longtime Russian leader has met less frequently with U.S. presidents in the years since. An American president has not traveled to Russia for an official state visit for more than a decade. Former President Barack Obama's September 2013 trip to St. Petersburg is the last such visit, which initially included a stop in Moscow to meet with Putin. Obama cancelled the one-on-one roughly a month prior, citing a lack of progress on talks surrounding arms control, trade, security and human rights, as well as Russia's decision at the time to grant temporary asylum to American whistleblower Edward Snowden. Putin attended the United Nations General Assembly in September 2015, where he held talks with Obama, who sharply criticized Putin over the conflict in eastern Ukraine and Syria. Former President Joe Biden met with the Russian president just once in his term, in Geneva in June 2021. During Trump's first term, he held one bilateral meeting with Putin in Finland in July 2018. In a press conference after the closed-door talk, Trump appeared to publicly reject U.S. intelligence community findings of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and to accept Putin's denial of the interference. The pair have met briefly and informally several times since, such as on the sidelines of global leader summits, and have held several disclosed phone conversations. The Aug. 15 meeting will be the first in-person session between the two world leaders since Trump returned to the White House in January. Contributing: Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
There is a robot in Washington that signs the president's name
Say a piece of correspondence — a letter to a state official, or a birthday card for a not-so-close political ally — needed the president's John Hancock, Shock explains. A letter would get typed up on Clinton's azure blue White House stationery. Then Shock, or occasionally an intern ('Obviously a trusted intern') would walk the letter over to what was then called the Old Executive Office Building, where the president's staff secretary kept guard over the autopen machine. The contraption, roughly the size of a drafting table, had its own room. Shock would choose from one of three Clinton signatures, taking care to vary which signature was used for repeat presidential letter-getters. A staffer would position the letter, then fire up the machine. 'You had to press both of your knees on the lever, almost like a spinning wheel,' Shock says. A mechanical arm appeared, holding Clinton's preferred autograph utensil: a Sharpie. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up B-i-l-l-C-l-i-n-t-o-n — dot the i, dot the other i, cross the t. Advertisement During the George H.W. Bush presidency, Jim Cicconi, a deputy chief of staff, was in charge of the autopen — the only person in the West Wing with permission to use it 'for all matters,' according to a 1989 memo. 'Everything had to go through me,' Cicconi says. Bush mainly used the device to sign personalized correspondence, like birthday greetings and Christmas cards. Yes to books Bush wrote or biographies about him; no to magazine covers. And the 41st president always wanted to sign commissions, legislation and executive orders himself. Advertisement Much of Cicconi's responsibility was in the maintenance. The pens — hand, auto, or otherwise — can't be ordinary; the National Archives insists the ink be of archival quality so they don't fade. Matrices — grooved pieces of plexiglass that controlled the pen's movements — were closely monitored for wear and tear; a shaky signature was the sign that one needed to be replaced. What did it feel like, to have pen power? Cicconi: 'If you made a mistake, there was a real sense you'd get in trouble.' Shock: 'It seems like it would have been a lark. The reality is it was a lot of pressure.' The pen, after all, 'could write checks or declare war,' he added. You might have heard of the autopen recently. 'With the exception of the RIGGED PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2020, THE AUTOPEN IS THE BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!' President Donald Trump Several inanimate objects have drawn Donald Trump's ire over the years: showerheads ('You know I have this gorgeous head of hair — when I take a shower, I want water to pour down on me'), paper straws ('These things don't work'), LED lights ('The light's no good — I always look orange'). But perhaps no artifact has attracted his ire like the autopen. Specifically, Joe Biden's autopen. It has been a Trump bugbear since March, when an arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation issued a report, 'The Autopen Presidency,' suggesting Biden relied extensively on an autopen for his presidential proclamations. Those proclamations included preemptive pardons for people whom Trump and his allies had cast as villains, such as Anthony S. Fauci and the members of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol (which concluded, in its final report, that Trump 'purposely disseminated false allegations of fraud related to the 2020 Presidential election to aid his effort to overturn the election and for purposes of soliciting contributions'). Advertisement Trump Related : The White House Counsel's office has just begun reviewing tens of thousands of emails about clemency decisions Biden signed via autopen in the final weeks of his administration. Senate Republicans have promised to launch an investigation, and House Republicans already have; Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky), the House Oversight Committee chair, subpoenaed senior officials of Biden's administration to ask about who authorized the use of the autopen. Comer signed those subpoena notices with a digital signature, NBC News reported, a common practice among federal lawmakers, who also often have autopens. So, all that's happening. But let's talk more about the president's autopen, because you probably have a bunch more questions about it. Advertisement Such as: Can we see it? 'We used to say the autopen was second-most guarded thing in the White House, save for the president,' Shock says. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) spoke during the Senate Judiciary hearing 'Unfit to Serve: How the Biden Cover-Up Endangered America and Undermined the Constitution' in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, on June 18. ERIC LEE/NYT What we do know is that today's autopens are much smaller than their predecessors, closer to the size of a toaster oven. And unlike the matrices that directed the mechanical stylus of Clinton's autopen, many of today's machines scribble digitally preprogrammed signatures with their robotic arms. So, we haven't seen the Trump autopen. We asked the White House if they'd share a photo with us; none was provided, but an official confirmed that it's in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. 'I never use it,' Trump told reporters in March. 'I mean, we may use it, as an example, to send some young person a letter, because it's nice.' Right, so, letters are the main reason presidential administrations have depended on autopens for the past eight decades. Harry Truman is thought to be the first president to use a modern autopen. John F. Kennedy's dependence on the autopen inspired a book, 'The Robot That Helped to Make a President,' though his administration was loath to admit its use. (He had several different programmed signatures: 'John F. Kennedy' for business, 'Jack Kennedy' for pleasure.) His successor, however, had no such qualms: Lyndon B. Johnson allowed the National Enquirer to feature his autopen for a 1968 article titled 'The Robot That Sits In For the President.' It almost seems as if autopens should have nicknames. Do they? Shock: 'It did not, that I know of.' (Unless 'the pen' counts.) Cicconi: 'Not that I ever heard.' Drat. But also, it makes sense that officials wouldn't try to personify the autopen, since it's supposed be an extension of the president. Advertisement Here's a fun autopen fact: In Shock's day, if, say, the president was on Air Force One while his autopen was signing a letter in his name back at the White House, 'FROM ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE' would be added to the heading — 'just to note that he wasn't in the facility that day and no one's trying to pull anything or sign it in his absence,' says the former aide. 'It had to reflect where he was, even if it was getting autopenned.' Another question: Can the autopen sign bigger-ticket documents? Can a president use it to sign a bill into law? Yes, according to 2005 guidance from George W. Bush's Department of Justice, which states that the commander in chief 'need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves,' but could ask a 'subordinate' to sign a bill 'for example by autopen.' (Barack Obama was the first president to do this, using sign legislation an autopen to extended the Patriot Act, which was set to expire while he was in France at the G8 summit in 2011. Biden used his autopen to sign legislation in 2024 to extend funds for the Federal Aviation Administration for a week as Congress finalized passage of its longer-term funding bill.) Related : But also — maybe he can't, according to Tom Graves, a former Republican congressman from Georgia. In 2011, Graves cautioned that Obama was setting a 'dangerous precedent' and pointed to legal opinions that cut against the Justice Department's guidance. He's been watching the current autopen fracas unfold with amusement from his lobbying firm on Capitol Hill. Advertisement 'It's funny — I've received notes, handwritten notes, from people, about my calling it to question in the very beginning and appreciation for that,' says the former lawmaker. He still thinks how and when an autopen is used is 'a really important topic to get to the bottom and to resolve,' whether through congressional or judicial action. He thinks the questions about Biden's alleged use of the autopen for proclamations (such as pardons) are worthwhile. 'I personally don't think there's a problem with the actual signer activating the autopen,' Graves says. 'But I do think there's a responsibility to read the document and sign off on the document. Assigning it to someone else — that's the questionable area here.' Damilic Corp. president Bob Olding anchored a sheet of paper as the Atlantic Plus, the Signascript tabletop model autopen, produced a signature at their Rockville, Md., office, in June 2011. Manuel Balce Ceneta/Associated Press Canadian entrepreneur Matthew Gibson has been watching the present autopen controversy with interest from his perch on Lake Erie's Pelee Island. Two decades ago, Gibson teamed up with author Margaret Atwood to design the LongPen, a product that allowed the author to virtually attend book signings and remotely render her signature in real time. It captures a 'biometric' signature, with all of the pressure and cadence of real-time penmanship, imparting a humanity the autopen lacks. 'With the autopen, there's a disconnect between intention and action,' Gibson says. 'Using this would dispel any dialogue that's happening right now — it wouldn't be a discussion.' (He says he's written to a few U.S. lawmakers about his product, though he won't say to whom.) The people least impressed by autopens may be the collectors. 'They have little to no value,' says Sandra Palomino, the director of historical manuscripts at Heritage Auctions, of autopenned signatures, adding that they aren't typically auctioned off as stand-alone items. But there is one autopen-like device historians consider valuable. On the third floor of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History, up the escalator from Clara Barton's Red Cross wagon and down the hall from Grover Cleveland's inauguration overcoat, sits Thomas Jefferson's polygraph — a sort of proto-autopen. It's a polished wooden box, roughly the size and shape of a backgammon board, with a pair of arachnid-like mechanical arms, each attached to a pen nib. Jefferson used it to make copies of his writings; as he wrote with one pen, the mechanical arm would render an exact copy on a second sheet of paper. It is a deeply unsexy artifact in a display case full of them, tucked in a corner beside Bill Clinton's 2001 presidential budget and a washing machine patent signed by Andrew Jackson. No tourists pause to look at as they rush toward Abraham Lincoln's top hat. But its significance was not lost on Jefferson — who, in a letter penned during his own presidency, called the contraption the 'finest invention of the present age.'
