Zohran Mamdani's NYC could look like Sadiq Khan's far-left London
I recently returned to my native London for the first time in more than two decades. What I found wasn't the inclusive, cosmopolitan capital I had known and loved but a city so altered in tone and appearance that I scarcely recognized it. Over the course of a fortnight in June, neighborhood after neighborhood left me feeling not just like a visitor, but like a stranger in my own birthplace. At times, I felt more as though I was in Dubai rather than London.
Mayor Sadiq Khan — a Muslim of Pakistani heritage — has aggressively pursued a pro-immigration agenda during his last eight years. Kahn's London offers housing and social services that are a magnet for the record number of illegal immigrants flooding into Britain. Kahn was reelected for a third term in May 2024.
Advertisement
5 Many of my friends and former neighbors in New York — where I lived for 27 years — are anxious about the city's future if it elects as mayor a self-proclaimed Muslim socialist, says author Patricia Posner.
This isn't about race or immigration alone. Nor is it nostalgia for some imagined golden era. I'm the daughter of first-generation Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe and grew up in multicultural London during the 1950s and '60s. My childhood circle included Afro-Caribbean and Persian friends. Our high street bustled with South Asian-owned shops and takeaways run by newly arrived strivers from former British colonies. My father's kosher tailor shop stood proudly on Brick Lane, even as the East End transformed from a Jewish enclave into a Bangladeshi stronghold. These shifts felt organic —imperfect, yes, but cohesive. There was a sense of shared direction. The antisemitic bullying I experienced at school came exclusively from native-born white Britons — not immigrants.
This time, the transformation felt fundamentally different.
Advertisement
What struck me wasn't just the arrival of new communities but the visible dominance in many neighborhoods of conservative Middle Eastern and Muslim cultural norms. It wasn't just demographic change but a palpable shift in the very atmosphere of public life.
In shops, pharmacies, cafés, and on the Tube, I repeatedly encountered women in full niqab and men in traditional thawbs. What was missing was the gradual integration I remembered from my youth. I saw no sign these communities were blending into the broader civic culture — or even being encouraged to. What I saw wasn't diversity but cultural segregation. Not integration, but parallel societies.
5 London Mayor Sadiq Khan speaks to the media ahead of the open Iftar in Trafalgar Square on April 08, 2024 in London, England.
Getty Images
Advertisement
Some have suggested my timing — arriving during Eid al-Adha — might have skewed my impression. Perhaps. But while that might explain the Rolls-Royces and Lamborghinis with Emirati plates outside Mayfair hotels, it doesn't explain the sense of dislocation I felt in ordinary boroughs, far from the luxury districts.
I wore my Star of David necklace every day, as I always do. Given the alarming rise in antisemitic incidents in Britain since Oct. 7, I was prepared to feel uneasy. I avoided the large pro-Hamas marches that openly call for the expulsion of Jews from the UK.
I was warned about no-go zones governed by informal sharia norms, where Western faces are unwelcome. Even so, in public spaces, when someone spotted my necklace, I noticed sidelong glances, whispered comments, the occasional nudge. It was subtle — but unmistakable.
5 A woman walks past as a man believed to be an asylum seeker stands outside of a hotel in protest at the condition of his accommodation, in London, Britain, June 2, 2023.
REUTERS
Advertisement
At the Wallace Collection museum in upscale Marylebone, I struck a conversation with a small group of fellow Brits who were there admiring the art. When I happened to mention that I was Jewish, things took an awkward turn.
'I hope that doesn't make anyone uncomfortable,' I joked. What followed was a long, brittle pause — then a few polite smiles and the obligatory, 'Of course not.' But the silence said far more than the words.
This is not the London I left in 1978, when I moved to the United States. Nor is it the city I returned to often in the '80s and '90s for extended family visits. Back then, London had become a truly global capital — vibrant, polyglot, and mostly harmonious. I never lived in a bubble.
5 Zohran Mamdani rides the subway following a campaigning stop in NYC on April 1.
REUTERS
While I now live in Miami, I've followed UK news closely and stayed in touch with friends and relatives. I knew London had changed. What I did not expect was how alienated and unwelcome I felt in the city that raised me.
To express these concerns is to risk accusations of bigotry or reactionary nostalgia. But acknowledging what many Britons — of all backgrounds — quietly feel is not an act of prejudice. It's an act of candor. I write this not to stoke division but to urge honest dialogue.
The promise of a pluralistic society isn't that we live side-by-side in self-contained silos but that we build a common life together.
Advertisement
5 People on the water in blue pedaloes on the Serpentine in Hyde Park in Londonon July 30.
In Pictures via Getty Images
A Zohran Mamdani New York will not be transformed overnight. But if Mamdani moves to double down on sanctuary policies for undocumented migrants while driving out the tax base needed to fund his socialist ambitions, the city I love could soon follow London's path.
London's diversity once made me proud. I still believe in its potential. But I say this with sorrow, not anger: London no longer feels like home. It has been taken over.
Advertisement
Is New York next?
Patricia Posner is the executive director of Antisemitism Watch.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of U.S. soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus," the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find non-government funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost," Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. "It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day." John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were cancelled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard," she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump claims Howard Stern's SiriusXM show ‘went down' after the shock jock endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016
President Trump claimed Howard Stern's longtime SiriusXM show 'went down' because the legendary radio host endorsed Hillary Clinton before the 2016 presidential election. Trump was fielding questions from reporters inside the Oval Office when he was briefed on the reported uncertainty surrounding the 71-year-old and his titular show. 'Howard Stern is a name I haven't heard – I used to do his show, we used to have fun – but I haven't heard that name in a long time,' Trump said Wednesday in the White House. 5 President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on Aug. 6, 2025. REUTERS 'What happened? He got terminated?' he asked. Real America's Voice correspondent Brian Glenn, who brought up the topic with the president, claimed Stern and SiriusXM were parting ways over salary disagreements. 'You know when he went down? When he endorsed Hillary Clinton,' Trump said. 'He lost his audience. People said, 'Give me a break.' 'He went down when he endorsed Hillary Clinton,' the 79-year-old commander in chief emphasized. The longtime shock jock's future on the air remains uncertain as his five-year, $500 million contract with SiriusXM winds down. 5 Howard Stern attends the 2025 North Shore Animal League America Celebration of Rescue at Tribeca 360 in New York City on June 12, 2025. Getty Images Stern, who made a surprise episode of his famed show on Tuesday morning, would be open to a short-term contract at the right price, but is also considering retiring, the US Sun reported. The host promised he would be returning to his regular schedule on Sept. 2. with no indication of if and when he is leaving. 'We'll be back on the air live. I've been refueling, so to speak,' Stern told his listeners. The second reiteration of Stern's legendary show began in 2006 and was renewed by SiriusXM in 2020. At it's height, it drew 20 million daily listeners. 5 Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Beth Ostrosky and Howard Stern sit courtside at the Washington Wizards – New York Knicks game on Nov. 4, 2005. WireImage 5 Howard Stern interviews Donald Trump during a radio show on 1994. MediaPunch via Getty Images Trump and Stern are former friends, having attended each other's weddings and the two-time president being a frequent guest on the radio show. Their relationship went south following the radio host's endorsement of Hillary Clinton for the White House in 2016. In June 2022, Stern said he wanted to run for president if Trump was the GOP nominee in 2024. 5 Howard Stern interviews Paul Simon during an episode of 'The Howard Stern Show' on Sept. 22, 2023. The Howard Stern Show 'I'll beat his ass,' Stern told his listeners at the time. During the lead up to the Nov. 5, 2024, general election, Stern was one of the rare media personalities to get an interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, who was the Democratic presidential nominee. Trump fumed at Stern after the episode aired, claiming he gave Harris softball questions. 'BETA MALE Howard Stern made a fool of himself on his low rated radio show when he 'interviewed' Lyin' Kamala Harris, and hit her with so many SOFTBALL questions that even she was embarrassed,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'He looked like a real fool, working so hard to make a totally incompetent and ill-equipped person look as good as possible, which wasn't very good,' he added. Stern endorsed Harris, claiming he would vote for a wall before Trump. 'I don't even understand how this election is close,' Stern told Harris. 'Why do my fellow Americans want this kind of chaos overseas?'
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
European stocks set for broadly higher open amid more tariff news; BOE and earnings ahead
Shomos Uddin | Moment | Getty Images Good morning from London, and welcome to CNBC's live blog covering all the action and business news in European financial markets on Thursday. Futures data from IG suggests a broadly positive open for European indexes, with London's FTSE 100 seen opening flat, France's CAC 40 up 0.13% and Germany's DAX up 0.3%, and Italy's FTSE MIB 0.33% higher. Global markets continue to keep an eye on the tariff landscape this week after U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday implemented an additional 25% tariff on India, days after he already imposed a 25% levy on the country. "I find that the Government of India is currently directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil," Trump said in an executive order. India said it is "extremely unfortunate that the U.S. should choose to impose additional tariffs ... for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," according to a statement, adding that its imports are based on "market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." The president also signaled on Tuesday that he will announce new tariffs on semiconductors and chips as soon as next week. The Bank of England on May 9, 2024, in London. Carl Court | Getty Images News | Getty Images It's another busy day of earnings Thursday, with Siemens , Deutsche Telekom , Allianz , Zurich Insurance , Merck , Moeller Maersk , Swisscom , Henkel, Rheinmetall and Uniper all due to report. Data releases include French and German trade balances. The Bank of England will be publishing its latest monetary policy decision, with the central bank expected to cut interest rates from 4.25% to 4%. — Holly Ellyatt
