'Good American Family' co-showrunners on navigating different perspective in Natalia Grace adoption scandal show
Starring Ellen Pompeo as Kristine Barnett, the new show, Good American Family (premiering on Disney+ in Canada March 19), is based on the real-life story of a U.S. family who believed the young girl they adopted, Natalia Grace, was actually an adult trying harm then. Also starring Mark Duplass, Imogen Faith Reid, Dulé Hill, Christina Hendricks and Sarayu Blue, the series shows "darker shades" of Grey's Anatomy alum Pompeo.
Speaking to Yahoo Canada, co-showrunners and executive producers, Katie Robbins and Sarah Sutherland, talked about collaborating with Pompeo, who also serves as an executive producer. In addition to crafting the show to reflect all the different perspectives on this adoption scandal.
Hi, is this Mrs. Barnett?
I see you were on the path to adopting.
We have a little girl here.
She is 7 and she has dwarfism, and what's her name?
Natalia, Natalia Grace.
I tell you, Grace, that is beautiful.
How many articles I read, I think I was still not prepared for the emotional rollercoaster that I went on still.
Um, I'd love to know when you're tackling a story where there are so many different perspectives, and we're not necessarily going to get to like the most definitive.
An answer at the end for for the audience to have.
What do you think about just in terms of really being reflective of all the different stories, perspectives, ideas that everyone kind of had that was involved?
When I first, um, dug into this, um, This story, it was, it was back in 2020 and and Hulu had said we think we might want to do a show about this.
Do you like, what do you think?
I, it, it was before it was quite as like ubiquitous in the popular consciousness as it is now.
And so I have the sort of a, a cleaner slate in terms of going in and reading articles about, um, about the, the different parties involved.
And I was so struck by the fact that like, you would read one article from one person, where one person was being interviewed and you'd be like, OK, I understand what this story is.
And then you'd go and read an article or see a television interview where one of the other parties involved was being interviewed.
You'd be like, Wait, wait, no, my perception of that was entirely wrong.
Like, this is the version of, of events.
And so, in, in crafting it, I really wanted to, um, try to, to retain that sense, that sort of like, um, shifting understanding of things, because it felt so, like, kind of familiar to.
To the way that we exist now, which is that we tend to read a headline and make a snap judgment about something and not ask a lot of questions.
And that that seems like a, a fairly insidious way of moving through the world, because in doing that, we lose, um, any sense of nuance and empathy and, and curiosity.
Um, and so we wanted to structure this in a way that it would take the audience on a journey, um, where they got to kind of grapple with their own biases.
Um, and And come out on the other end with a different understanding of things than where they started at the beginning.
Because Ellen's also taking on a role as an executive producer here, um, what is she like as a collaborator and what makes her an effective collaborator?
She's incredible, and it's, it's, it's amazing to be both a titan of television and also a great time.
We love being around her, whether it's talking about the character, and we talked a lot about the character, um, and we were always on the same page and asking.
Questions with the same kind of care, which is nice, you know, it's, we were very fortunate in that regard.
Um, but yeah, I can't say enough good things as her as a collaborator.
And because she's done this so long, she knows how to do everybody's job.
Genuinely.
Watching her is like watching an athlete and an artist, and, you know, a magician all at once, and she brings that very much to the producing side of the show, and this, you know, this show was challenging to produce.
Both from a creative perspective, but also, you know, we're all trying to make television as efficiently as possible right now.
And I think that she, um, was a really wonderful part of that process and just making sure we landed it in a way that, that, um, let, you know, led, uh, us to be proud.
Having Ellen lead this series, I think is interesting because I think for a lot of us, like, because she was on Grace for so long, I have like an inherent trust when I See her on screen somehow.
It's like, yeah, I would trust you to do surgery on me if you needed to still.
Um, do you think that helps in a story like this where you have to kind of have a certain level of like feeling for her character to really kind of believe her position that I think, you know, as we see in the, in the show does seem extreme as kind of like an assumption at the beginning.
Absolutely.
You know, I think that the an audience's experience with the show is gonna depend so much on how much exposure they've already had to the story.
Um, but if you're somebody who comes in with a specific understanding of of who Christine is, but then you see Ellen playing her, um, you are, I think, more inclined to lean in and, and empathize and, and care about her because she is such a beloved figure.
Um, and so it was really exciting to like start the journey with her there and then to see these other, like, Darker shades of Ellen Pompeo than we've seen before, but absolutely, like, you know, she is like an icon.
Um, and, and everybody knows her and loves her.
And and so absolutely we use that to our advantage.
Imogen as Natalia, I think is like such an incredible, um, person to cast here.
What made Imogen such a great choice to kind of step into that role.
Yeah, she's so incredible and it's been amazing getting to hear everybody, um, Respond as positively to her as we have.
Um, it was an international search and the show was actually contingent on casting her, finding somebody who could play this role, who could do justice to not only multiple ages, but multiple ages from multiple points of view.
As soon as everybody saw her, she was just obvious that she was the right choice.
Um, and we couldn't be, we couldn't be more grateful.
I mean, to get to see somebody at this part of their career who is so destined to be a star.
Um, take on such an incredibly challenging role as her first role, and she just shows up.
I don't know if you've met her yet, and she's as cool as a cucumber, it's, it's incredible.
Um, we're obsessed and just very grateful, kind of a lifetime achievement to get to work with her at this point.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Tyrant
41 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Marvel's EYES OF WAKANDA Animated Will Feature Iron Fist, But Not The Netflix Version — GeekTyrant
Marvel Studios is bringing back the Iron Fist character, but before you start thinking this could be a 'Finn Jones Redemption Arc', the Iron Fist showing up in the Eyes of Wakanda anmated series isn't that version of the character. During a panel at the Annecy Animation Festival, director Todd Harris dropped the news while talking about his upcoming animated series. When asked about guest appearances, Harris casually revealed: 'There will be an Iron Fist in here, and not the Iron Fist you expect.' So what does that mean? Are we getting an alternate timeline version? A legacy Iron Fist? A new character entirely who picks up the mantle? It's all speculation for now, but Harris made it clear that Eyes of Wakanda isn't about rehashing what we've already seen: 'It was never my goal to make 'another one,' my goal was to make something new.' The series is set to premiere August 6, 2025 on Disney+, and it's shaping up to be something fresh. The show will consist of four 30-minute episodes, each a standalone story set in different time periods. In the series, Wakandan agents venture out into the wider world to retrieve powerful artifacts stolen from their homeland. Harris described the series as 'mostly a spy story,' one that explores how Wakandan operatives interact with the world while trying to reconcile what they experience with their 'nationalist agenda.' According to Variety, the first episode screened at Annecy was well-received, with early reactions pointing to a strong sense of cultural authenticity, something that's often promised, rarely delivered, and hugely appreciated when it lands right. As for Iron Fist's broader MCU future, fans are still holding out hope. With Daredevil: Born Again now confirmed to bring back Krysten Ritter's Jessica Jones in Season 2, it's only natural to wonder if Finn Jones might get another shot too. The actor has made it clear he's more than ready for a comeback. He previously said: 'I'm very aware of the critiques of the character and my role in it. My response to that is, 'Give me a f*cking chance, man. I'm here and I'm ready, and I wanna prove people wrong.'' Personally, I think he had his chance and it just didn't work. The question is, will Eyes of Wakanda pave the way for a new Iron Fist in the MCU's multiversal toybox? Or will it be a one-time cameo with a fresh take? Either way, it sounds like Marvel fans should prepare for surprises.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Disney says these images show how Midjourney steals its characters
Disney and NBCUniversal sued the AI company Midjourney, alleging copyright infringement. The lawsuit claims the tech creates unauthorized copies of works ranging from Star Wars to The Simpsons. Hollywood has been cautious about AI, fearing its misuse, but investors see cost-cutting potential. Hollywood is taking aim at the AI image generator Midjourney. On Wednesday, Disney and NBCUniversal's movie studios sued Midjourney, alleging its product ripped off their famous characters in properties ranging from Star Wars to The Simpsons. The media companies use colorful language in their 110-page copyright infringement lawsuit. They argue that Midjourney's tech amounts to a "virtual vending machine, generating endless unauthorized copies of Disney's and Universal's copyrighted works." They call Midjourney "the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism." Midjourney didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Many news media companies, including Business Insider's parent Axel Springer, have struck deals with AI companies to help train their models. The film and TV industry, however, has been slower to follow because of worries that the nascent tech will be used to replace their IP and talent. AI has also been a battleground between Hollywood companies and the industry's labor unions. Despite this, investors have poured money into AI companies that are aimed at Hollywood. These startups see the opportunity to use the tech to cut time and costs for making filmed entertainment. This new lawsuit could throw a wrench in some of those plans. Of particular note, Disney and Universal included examples of images created by Midjourney's tools in their suit, side by side with the original source material, to show how close Midjourney's versions are to their characters. The suit describes how when a user gave it a prompt like "Chewbacca, screenshot from movie," Midjourney generated images copying the movie companies' famous characters. According to the suit, a user doesn't have to request a specific Disney character for Midjourney to create one that copies its copyrighted work, giving the example of the prompt "Superhero fight scene" that produced an image that resembled Disney's Spider-Man. Below are some examples they share in the lawsuit. What do you think?


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Disney, NBCUniversal sue AI creator Midjourney in copyright dispute
Tuesday's lawsuit marked the first AI-related infringement suit taken on by a Hollywood giant. File Photo by Activedia/Pixabay June 11 (UPI) -- Disney and NBCUniversal have joined legal teams in a lawsuit against AI image maker Midjourney over multiple claims of copyright infringement. The lawsuit filed Tuesday in California's U.S. central district claimed that Midjourney, a generative artificial intelligence startup, utilized and distributed proprietary AI-generated characters from NBCU and Disney productions such as the Simpsons, Star Wars, Toy Story, Shrek and others. It marked the first AI-related infringement lawsuit taken on by a Hollywood giant. "This is an extremely significant development," IP lawyer Chad Hummel told Wired. Meanwhile, Universal and Disney have petitioned for a jury trial and argue it risks upending "the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright law." The two plaintiffs claimed that Midjourney's own website displayed "hundreds, if not thousands, of images generated by its Image Service at the request of its subscribers" they believed infringed on their copyrighted works. "Midjourney's bootlegging business model and defiance of U.S copyright law are not only an attack on Disney, Universal, and the hard-working creative community that brings the magic of movies to life, but are also a broader threat to the American motion picture industry," the complaint continued. The joint suit further says that San Francisco-based Midjourney allegedly ignored prior legal requests to cease and desist and included dozens of examples in the complaint, calling Midjourney a "bottomless pit of plagiarism." In 2023, Midjourney reported more than $200 million in revenue and in 2024 took in an additional $100 million on top of it to beat the prior year. "Midjourney, which has attracted millions of subscribers and made $300 million last year alone, is focused on its own bottom line and ignored Plaintiffs' demands," according to court documents. The two movie studios seek an unspecified amount in monetary damages, and further requested injunctive relief in order to prevent Midjourney from any future copyright violations.