logo
The EU's growing list of online platforms under investigation

The EU's growing list of online platforms under investigation

Euronews4 days ago
The list of online platforms suspected of breaching the EU's rules keeps growing. The latest to join the list: Temu.
The European Commission says that under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) the Chinese e-commerce platform doesn't properly assess risks arising from illegal products sold on its website, including baby toys and small electronics.
'The Commission has adopted a preliminary decision under the Digital Services Act legislation when it comes to TEMU, where we have announced to that online marketplace that according to us it is in breach of the DSA when it comes to risks on the marketplace relating to the selling and dissemination of illegal products,' Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told Euronews.
"The DSA is one of our tools to protect consumers across Europe. To protect them from what, when it comes to online marketplaces? Illegal products that are sold online. Algorithmic content that is thrown at you and that you don't even determine if you want to see it or not. When it comes, for example, to advertisement or gamification of certain systems on these online platforms. These are risks that we need to mitigate. To protect our consumers online," he added.
Not only Temu
The probe comes amid broader concerns that some online marketplaces allow the sale of goods that would not meet EU safety or regulatory standards if sold in physical stores.
So far, including Temu, the Commission has opened 14 proceedings against 10 online platforms. Each case focuses on different aspects of compliance, ranging from product safety to content moderation and the protection of minors.
The ongoing proceedings include X, which has been issued with preliminary findings over its compliance with obligations concerning the 'dissemination and amplification of illegal content.'
There are also ongoing procedures against Tik Tok concerning, among other things, its risk management of addictive design and harmful content. Also under the spot is the protection of minors, on which preliminary findings have been reached, and election integrity. The TikTok Lite case was closed after TikTok offered commitments.
The Commission found AliExpress (AliExpress) was not taking enough measures to counter illegal products. The Chinese company finally offered commitments and the Commission issued preliminary findings on other grievences.
And according to an ongoing file, Meta's services Instagram and Facebook are also under scrutiny in cases related to the protection of minors, as well as on election integrity.
Finally, there is a case open for the websites Stripchat, Pornhub, XNXX, Xvideos related to the protection of minors.
Consumer Groups Call for Action
The wave of investigations comes amid growing pressure from consumer protection groups, who argue that the DSA must be backed by real enforcement to have meaningful impact.
'The preliminary findings of the European Commission on Temu is a positive first step for European consumers. Last year, the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) launched a complaint against TEMU because they are not doing enough to protect consumers against illegal and unsafe products that can be bought through their website,' Agustín Reyna, director general of European Consumer Organisation BEUC, told Euronews.
'What is at the stake is the safety of consumers. Because when consumers buy something online, they expect it to be safe. They don't wonder whether there are illegal chemicals being used in the production of these goods, or whether a certain product or household appliance might explode, or that a kid might choke with a toy. They expect the product to be safe, regardless of how cheap it might be, but they expect it to be safe. What we have identified with our members of all the national consumer organisations -that they have conducted mystery shopping exercises, testing over these products through Temu - is that you can buy and be exposed to a significant amount of illegal products. And the company today is not doing enough to protect consumers,' he added.
According to the consumer organisation, the challenge now is to try to make the law work in practise. The legislation has been in place for nearly a year and a half, but so far none of the Commission probes have been wrapped up and no sanctions have been imposed yet.
But with these platforms becoming very popular with Europeans the topic is urgent. 'Just to give you an idea, every year the number of parcels that enter into the EU through TEMU doubles. So we're talking about a significant number of products that enter the EU which are not compliant. And consumers do not know about that,' concluded the Director of BEUC.
France Moves to Regulate Ultra Fast Fashion
The investigation into Temu also comes at a time when EU member states are stepping up efforts to rein in ultra-fast fashion — a business model many experts say fuels overconsumption, environmental harm, and the exploitation of legal grey zones.
In May 2024, France proposed groundbreaking legislation targeting ultra-fast fashion platforms. The French government explicitly named companies like TEMU and Shein as examples of platforms disrupting sustainability efforts, using aggressive social media marketing and gamified shopping to encourage impulse buying and throwaway culture.
While the French proposal is still under negotiation, it reflects a growing consensus that ultra fast fashion — especially when delivered through unregulated online platforms — poses not just consumer safety risks, but also serious environmental and social concerns.
It seems that a European Response is needed to a global problem. The convergence of issues — from illegal product sales to environmental destruction — has prompted calls for a more unified EU response. Experts say that relying on fragmented national enforcement is no longer viable in the face of global platforms that operate across borders, largely unchecked.
As the Director General of BEUC put it, 'Europe can't win this battle one country at a time.' The Digital Services Act is a start. But for many, it's just the beginning.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariffs: EU Commission to suspend retaliation by another six months
Tariffs: EU Commission to suspend retaliation by another six months

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

Tariffs: EU Commission to suspend retaliation by another six months

The European Commission will suspend on Tuesday a package of trade countermeasures targeting €93 billions' worth of American goods which was scheduled to take effect on 7 August, as it continues to negotiate a joint statement formalising the agreement struck by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump on 27 July. 'The EU continues to work with the US to finalise a joint statement, as agreed on 27 July,' EU spokesperson Olof Gill said, adding: 'With these objectives in mind, the Commission will take the necessary steps to suspend by six months the EU's countermeasures against the US, which were due to enter into force on 7 August.' In line with the agreement reached, the US reduced its tariff rate to 15% last Thursday. Gill said the step gained the EU immediate tariff relief, 'a first important foundation is laid for restoring clarity to EU companies exporting to the US". The trade dispute is not over However the trade dispute between the EU and the US is not over, as both sides still need to negotiate certain points of the agreement that have led to differing interpretations. Furthermore, the US Executive Order of July 31 does not provide relief to the EU automotive industry as expected (it remains subject to 25% tariffs), nor does it exempt strategic sectors such as aircraft. As negotiations continue, the Commission should postpone through urgency procedure the retaliation package it adopted against the US tariffs. It consists in two lists of products that were worth respectively €21 billion and €72 billion and were merged on 24 July after EU member states adopted them, targeting US products such as soyabean, cars, aircraft and Bourbon Whiskey.

Lyft and Baidu to launch robotaxis in Europe next year
Lyft and Baidu to launch robotaxis in Europe next year

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Lyft and Baidu to launch robotaxis in Europe next year

American rideshare company Lyft said it is partnering with Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) firm Baidu to bring robotaxis to Europe next year. The partnership will see Baidu's sixth-generation Apollo Go autonomous vehicles (AVs) available for rides on the Lyft app in Germany and the United Kingdom 'pending regulatory approval,' Lyft said Monday in a press release. Baidu plans to scale up its fleet to 'thousands of vehicles' throughout Europe in the coming years, it said in a post on the social media platform X. The announcement comes days after Lyft announced it had acquired the taxi app FREENOW from BMW and Mercedes Benz for approximately $200 million (€172.8 million), expanding its operations to 180 cities across nine countries in Europe. Lyft, which has had very little presence in Europe so far, said it will prioritise Germany and the UK due in part to FREENOW's existing presence in these countries as well as their 'deep relationships with local regulators and taxi operators'. For Baidu, it's the latest in a series of partnerships to expand its reach outside China. Last month, Baidu partnered with Uber to bring its autonomous cars to markets outside of the United States and China, focusing specifically on the Middle East in cities like Dubai and Abu Dhabi as well as Asia. 'Buckle up! Your driverless ride is on its way,' Baidu said Monday.

Dutch group sues FIFA over transfer regulations after Diarra ruling
Dutch group sues FIFA over transfer regulations after Diarra ruling

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Dutch group sues FIFA over transfer regulations after Diarra ruling

A Dutch foundation representing footballers has launched a class action lawsuit against FIFA and five football associations, alleging that transfer regulations unlawfully reduced players' earnings for over two decades. Justice for Players, the group behind the legal challenge, announced on Monday that professional male and female footballers who played for clubs within the European Union or the United Kingdom since 2002 are eligible to join the lawsuit. The action targets FIFA alongside the football federations of the Netherlands, France, Germany, Belgium and Denmark. According to the foundation, FIFA's rules on contract terminations and player transfers violated EU laws on competition and free movement of labour, a claim strengthened by a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) last year. "Preliminary estimates indicate that the number of affected footballers may comprise approximately 100,000 players," the foundation said in a statement. 'All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA regulations," its Chair Lucia Melcherts added. "The past and even current system unduly favours FIFA who has far too much unilateral power. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily," she explained. The legal case is rooted in the ECJ's ruling in the case of former Real Madrid, Arsenal and Chelsea player, Lassana Diarra, who joined Lokomotiv Moscow in 2013 before terminating his contract early due to alleged wage disputes. FIFA and the Court of Arbitration for Sport sided with the club and ordered Diarra to pay €10.5 million in compensation. Diarra argued that FIFA's rules had made it difficult for him to find a new club, as any new employer would have been liable for the fee. The ECJ ruled that such regulations contradicted EU competition laws. Some commentators have compared the judgment to the Jean-Marc Bosman ruling of 1995, which ended transfer fees for players whose contracts ended in the EU. The Diarra ruling has not yet led to systemic changes in the global football transfer market, which is worth more than €8.6 billion annually. Justice for Players cited economic analysis from consulting firm Compass Lexecon, which estimates that affected players earned on average 8% less over the course of their careers due to the contested regulations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store