logo
What if Cadillac gave us a high-performance hot hatch of their own?

What if Cadillac gave us a high-performance hot hatch of their own?

Yahoo04-03-2025

Although the "hot hatch" is a distinctly European invention–perfectly combining the practicality of a functional daily driver with the thrilling performance spark of a performance car–hot hatchbacks are the most logical choice of personal transportation for many car enthusiasts across the globe.
It's not even just the usual suspects that occupy this market segment anymore. Although the Volkswagen GTI, Golf R, MINI Cooper S, and Cooper JCW, are still as relevant and on top of their game as ever, we've seen a resurgence of hot hatchback availability through the likes of Toyota's GR Corolla, Hyundai's Ioniq 5 N, and the somewhat recent addition of Honda's Civic Type R to the North American market.
In international markets, luxury brands have even entered the hot hatch segment, often offering multiple levels of performance within model lineups. For example, Audi sells the S3 and RS3 as "Sportbacks," Mercedes-AMG offers the A35 and A45 hatchbacks, and BMW offers the M135.
Though these models are highly coveted by global car enthusiasts, North America seems to only receive four-door sedan variants of them, other than some rare Canadian-market exceptions, such as the Mercedes-AMG A35 Hatch and C43 Estate.Despite the cries of passionate enthusiasts and frugal adrenaline junkies alike, North America tends to get the short end of the stick when it comes to hot hatchbacks. Thankfully, we are at least granted the Volkswagen GTI and Golf R, Toyota GR Corolla, and the Honda Civic Type R, but we are missing out on an entire performance class of hot hatches that offer far superior power and handling, combined with more luxurious amenities.
Sure, we have access to many of these models in the form of four-door sedans, sometimes marketed as "four-door coupés" like the Mercedes-AMG CLA45 and the BMW M235 xDrive Gran Coupe, but somehow we are deprived of more practical, and perhaps better looking, traditional hatchback body styles that offer the same performance with enhanced functionality.
Cadillac has shown the world that it can make a more exciting sport sedan than what the Germans are currently offering. All-wheel drive, rapid-shifting automatic transmissions, and turbocharging be damned. Cadillac is the only manufacturer that will still sell you a brand new, rear-wheel drive executive sedan with a 6-speed manual transmission and a supercharged, 6.2-liter V8 engine under the hood as the CT5-V Blackwing.
The somewhat less mighty but equally plucky CT4-V Blackwing even gives the BMW M3 a serious run for its money, offering the holy pairing of a manual transmission with rear-wheel drive. By enhancing its reputation for supreme visceral performance engagement, Cadillac has regained mainstream cultural relevance outside of the Escalade model, and the brand's "malaise era" is long gone.Distilling the exciting thrill of Cadillac's Blackwing models into a smaller, somewhat more affordable package could help boost Cadillac's performance reputation even further, while simultaneously making the brand more accessible to younger buyers. Throw in an optional manual transmission, a power figure of around 400 from a turbocharged four-cylinder engine, a trick all-wheel drive system, and a few bells and whistles, and I'd surely be sold.
If priced under $60,000, this hypothetical "CT3-V Blackwing" hot hatch could compete, price-wise, with the likes of the Toyota GR Supra and the Ford Mustang GT. Although it would offer a notably different style of vehicle, its performance wouldn't be too far off, and it would surely be the superior daily driver.
Despite our love for hot hatches here at Autoblog, there is obviously a credible reason for North America's general lack of high-performance, premium-brand hot hatch offerings. That's because for whatever reason, many North American buyers prefer the look of a more traditional, three-box style four-door sedan.
A "Sportback" or "Fastback" variant of the model could help to broaden the hypothetical CT3-V Blackwing's appeal by offering a more traditional shape without compromising too much functionality. It's no guarantee that the "Fastback" variant would be the better seller, however. Take a look at the Audi RS6 Avant, for example, which gained massive popularity in North America over the RS7 Sportback, thanks to its "forbidden fruit" status for so many years prior.
Perhaps the RS6 Avant lesson could be applied here, meaning Cadillac could benefit from German rivals' reluctance to offer their high-performance hatches stateside. The CT3-V Blackwing, in hatchback guise, would be the only offering of its kind within its class, meaning it should theoretically win over almost every enthusiast who has been begging for something like this.
It would certainly be interesting to see how a brand like Cadillac pulls off a product like this. Perhaps as a spiritual successor to the beloved cult classic, the Chevrolet Cobalt SS, the CT3-V Blackwing could prove to the world that Cadillac can make a fantastic performance car other than a fast and exciting executive saloon.
Would you like to see Cadillac expand its petrol-powered performance lineup alongside its trendy EV lineup, or do you think its efforts should be focused solely on electrification? Could you be persuaded to buy the hypothetical CT3-V Blackwing at the right price, or would you scoff and instead head to a German dealership? Let us know how you feel in the comments–we love to hear from you!
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates
Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates

-- Goldman Sachs has lowered its Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) vehicle delivery and EPS estimates, citing "weaker monthly datapoints in key regions" such as China, the US, and Europe, along with concerning consumer survey data. The investment bank now anticipates a more challenging environment for the electric vehicle manufacturer. According to Goldman Sachs, U.S. deliveries through May are "tracking down mid teens yoy," based on data from Wards and Motor Intelligence. European registration data for April is said to show a "50% yoy decline," with May data indicating a "mid 20% range yoy decline." In China, the bank said that while April and May data suggest a low single digit sequential increase, it represents a "20% yoy decrease" compared to the same period last year. Consequently, Goldman Sachs now projects Q2 2025 deliveries to be 365,000 units, a notable reduction from their previous estimate of 410,000 and "below Visible Alpha Consensus Data at 417K." They believe Q2 deliveries could range between 335,000 and 395,000 depending on June's performance and "the degree of incentives Tesla utilizes." Consumer survey data from Morning Consult and HundredX, analyzed by Goldman Sachs with their Data Works team, indicates "weak" sentiment for Tesla in North America and Europe, while being "stronger in China." This suggests "demand/brand issues may be contributing to weakness in the US and European markets," said Goldman Sachs. The believe the decline in China could stem from "competition and product cycle timing." Reflecting these trends, Goldman Sachs has revised its delivery assumptions for 2025, 2026, and 2027 to 1.575 million, 1.865 million, and 2.15 million units, respectively, down from prior estimates. Despite the downward revisions, Goldman Sachs maintains a Neutral rating on Tesla shares, lowering their 12-month price target for the stock to $285 from $295. Related articles Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates Shopify, Citi named signature picks at Wells Fargo Goldman Sachs lowers MYR Group, raises MasTec Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

2025 Toyota 4Runner Limited Test: New Dog, Some New Tricks
2025 Toyota 4Runner Limited Test: New Dog, Some New Tricks

Car and Driver

time3 hours ago

  • Car and Driver

2025 Toyota 4Runner Limited Test: New Dog, Some New Tricks

The existence of the Toyota 4Runner is up there with other universal constants, like the speed of light in a vacuum. It exists beyond time and space. When we all become dust in the wind, the 4Runner will still be there, offering up its anachronistic blend of truck-adjacent versatility for whatever buyers still wander about the wasteland. After an impressive 15-year run, the sun has set on the fifth-gen model. The new 2025 4Runner brings some much-needed improvements to the table, but the general formula remains the same—not always to positive effect. That's particularly true in a trim like this Limited that presumably will spend most of its days on pavement. Exterior and Interior The fifth-generation 4Runner's design wasn't bad by any stretch, but looking at it for so long got a little tiring. Since everybody likes their SUVs as macho as humanly possible, the new 4Runner's style leans heavy on the chunk. Even in our test example's mall-crawler Limited spec, the 4Runner has an imposing silhouette. The edges are a little more rounded off than on its Land Cruiser sibling, but it's clear the two are cut from the same rectilinear cloth. View Interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Inside, the 4Runner finally gets a cabin that was designed with modern tech in mind. The Limited sports a honkin' 14.0-inch touchscreen that dominates the dashboard, but there remains a healthy assortment of physical switchgear to manipulate. The controls are big and chunky enough to be used with gloves on. In fact, everything in here has a kind of low-polygon vibe to it, something Toyota has been relying on in recently revised models to good effect. The 4Runner is a little tall, but our model came wearing power running boards, a $1005 option that made ingress and egress a little easier, even if deployment isn't very quick. Ours also had the $1330 optional third row; these jump seats are best left to children, but they will hold adults in a pinch, both literally and figuratively. Things feeling a little cramped in the back? Don't worry, the rear window still rolls down, giving the wayback some much needed breeze. Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver View Interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver New Powertrain The 4Runner's powertrain was also modernized, though it doesn't always feel that way. Toyota's 4.0-liter V-6 is finally free to cash its Social Security checks on a Fort Lauderdale beach. In its place is a turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder producing 278 horsepower and 317 pound-feet of torque, and an available hybrid boosts output even further but can't be combined with the third row of seats. Our three-row Limited was thus equipped with the base engine, which produces a note that lands somewhere between "coarse" and "unpalatable," though its pronounced turbo whistle is kinda fun. The eight-speed automatic may have more gears than its predecessor, but it feels no smoother. HIGHS: Modern interior, beefy looks and the capability to match, roll-down rear glass still rocks. With the base engine, motivation is ho-hum. At the test track, this 5111-pound SUV needs an unimpressive 7.5 seconds to reach 60 mph; from a 5-mph roll, it takes 8.2 seconds. Breaking into triple digit club requires 20.2 seconds. The brakes are decent, taking 170 feet to stop from 70 mph, but the pedal is squishy and builds little confidence in around-town driving. It feels like the first couple inches of pedal movement are for display purposes only. After that, you need to apply so much pressure that you might wonder if you forgot to option power brakes. View Exterior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver On-Road Driving We've taken the 4Runner off-road alongside its fancier Land Cruiser relative, and while it remains eminently capable in the dirt, the new 4Runner also remains a task to daily drive. It is large, it is heavy, and it is ponderous. While the new model does steer better than its predecessor, the steering still feels a smidge lazy. Ride quality over pockmarked pavement is mediocre at best. Even though our test example has adaptive dampers, it still suffered pronounced body-on-frame jiggle; its softest Comfort mode doesn't quell the jiggling but does allow it to wallow more. There are also two different Sport modes, both of which are uncomfortable and make precisely zero sense on a truck-based SUV. Real-deal pickup trucks with empty beds and passive dampers handle better than this thing. Unsurprisingly, the 4Runner doesn't exhibit a lot of grip, orbiting around our skidpad with 0.74 g of stick. The 20-inch Dunlop Grandtrek PT5A all-season tires might not produce a ton of grip, but they do loudly clomp over expansion joints and potholes. When the wind picks up, it slaps against the 4Runner's many flat surfaces, also contributing to the in-cabin din that seems noisier than the 69 decibels we recorded inside at 70 mph. LOWS: Uncomfortable ride, ungainly handling, rough-around-the-edges powertrain. During the fifth-gen 4Runner's extremely long life, it enjoyed a spot all to itself in the lineup. But now that the Land Cruiser has been redesigned as a smaller but no less versatile unit, there's some overlap. The $58,850 Limited is the fanciest nonhybrid 4Runner trim on offer, and our test truck tacked on a few options, bringing its total to $62,875. Its pre-options price is in line with the $58,150 base Land Cruiser 1958, and our as-tested price isn't far from the fancier Land Cruiser's $62,920 window sticker. View Exterior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver If you're willing to throw a few more dollars at your monthly car note, you do get a bit more from the Land Cruiser. A hybrid is standard there, whereas it's an extra-cost option on the 4Runner Limited and other trims. The LC might be a bit less capable off-road in certain aspects, given it can't be had in the 4Runner's available TRD Pro and Trailhunter setups, but that trade-off results in a bit more on-road placidity. Neither would be considered a bargain, though. As has been the case in the past, attempts to tame the Toyota 4Runner's rough-and-tumble nature with on-road-oriented trims like the Limited have done little to make this body-on-frame SUV feel less out of place in the Target parking lot. In that sense, the 2025 model is much like its forebears. But at least you know what you're getting into. VERDICT: A truck-based SUV that doesn't stray far from its past. Specifications Specifications 2025 Toyota 4Runner Limited 4WD Vehicle Type: front-engine, rear/4-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE Base/As Tested: $58,850/$62,875 Options: third-row seating, $1330; power running boards, $1005; gloss-black roof-rail cross bars, $420; Tow Tech package (trailer reverse assist, interior rearview mirror display), $400; LED liftgate light, $200; accessory-ready LED lantern, $160; retractable black cargo cover, $135; 4Runner carpeted cargo mat, $130; TRD panel air filter, $90; bright-chrome wheel locks, $90; towing-ball mount, $65 ENGINE turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, port and direct fuel injection Displacement: 146 in3, 2393 cm3 Power: 278 hp @ 6000 rpm Torque: 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: control arms/live axle Brakes, F/R: 13.4-in vented disc/13.2-in vented disc Tires: Dunlop Grandtrek PT5A 265/55R-20 113V M+S DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 112.2 in Length: 194.9 in Width: 77.9 in Height: 73.1 in Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 56/44/36 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 84/45/12 ft3 Curb Weight: 5111 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 7.5 sec 1/4-Mile: 15.7 sec @ 90 mph 100 mph: 20.2 sec Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 8.2 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.9 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 5.2 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 115 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 170 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.74 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY Observed: 18 mpg EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/City/Highway: 21/20/24 mpg C/D TESTING EXPLAINED Reviewed by Andrew Krok Managing Editor, Reviews Cars are Andrew Krok's jam, along with boysenberry. After graduating with a degree in English from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2009, Andrew cut his teeth writing freelance magazine features, and now he has a decade of full-time review experience under his belt. A Chicagoan by birth, he has been a Detroit resident since 2015. Maybe one day he'll do something about that half-finished engineering degree.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store