Inside Japan's secret death chambers where the very worst criminals are executed
Inside what looks like a normal, grey office block, lie the secretive execution rooms where Japan's most notorious criminals are taken to be hanged.
The country's use of the death penalty has come into the sportlight again after it carried out its first execution since 2022, of a serial killer who promised to help vulnerable girls and women kill themselves, but then raped and dismembered them, keeping their body parts in cold storage.
'Twitter killer' Takahiro Shiraishi, so-called because of the method he used to first contact his victims, is reported to have spent his last moments at Tokyo Detention House in Katsushika City.
From the outside, the building looks unassuming. But deep within its walls lies a chamber with a glass wall where criminals are taken to be hanged – with only an hour or two of notice.
In 2010, media were given a rare opportunity to see one of the country's few remaining execution rooms, where the country's worst criminals are put to death.
The sterile wood paneled room with garish blue curtains (Credits: JIJI PRESS/AFP via Getty Images)
Tokyo Detention House looks like any grey office building (Credits: Toshifumi Kitamura/AFP)
Inside the nondescript building, which is surrounded by a low wire fence, criminals on death row are taken to a morbidly empty room.
They then stand facing a viewing platform separated by a window, and are made to stand in the middle of a red square. The square marks out a trap door which will give way beneath their feet, sending them plunging down to be hanged.
Medics then confirm their death and wipe the body down in a last sterile act.
Prisoners are often told of their fate only hours before their execution, meaning families and lawyers are often left in the dark until after the execution has taken place.
Before being led to their fate, convicts pass a small gold statue of Kannon, a Buddhist goddess associated with mercy.
Witnesses of the hangings have told of their horror as they watch officers pull the mechanical levers to drop prisoners, blindfolded and hooded to muffle their screams, through the floor into a chamber below.
View from the platform into execution room (Photo credits: JIJI PRESS/AFP via Getty Images)
Despite several years without executions, human rights campaigners feared executions were making a comeback after 21-year-old Yuki Endo, who murdered the parents of a girl after she rejected him, was sentenced to death in January 2024.
Yuki was just 19 when he stabbed the girl's parents, attacked and injured her sister with a machete and burned the house down, making him the first person in Japan to be given death penalty for a crime committed between the ages of 18 and 19, the MailOnline reported.
The most recent executed prisoner before last week was Tomohiro Kato in 2022, who killed seven people in 2008 by driving a truck into a crowd at the Akihabara shopping district.
Why are Japan's executions so secretive?
Japan's death penalty law requires that the executions must follow 'utmost secrecy', according to the Death Penalty Information Centre.
This extends to the convicts themselves, who typically find out about their execution on the morning it takes place, a local newspaper wrote, citing lawyer Yoshikuni Noguchi who once witnessed an execution.
After the announcement, the convict is moved to a special room and monitored by security officers.
Where the hooded and blindfolded convict will hang (Credits: JIJI PRESS/AFP via Getty Images)
Families are supposed to be told about the execution, but according to the UN and campaigners this isn't always the case.
Lawyer Noguchi recounted an execution, describing in detail how with one pull of the lever, the body of the inmate was dropped through the hatch.
He had to grab the rope to stop it from shaking.
The experience impacted him deeply, with those around him saying he looked pale.
He later resigned from his role as a prison officer.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Up Next
Previous Page
Next Page
One of the most infamous convicts executed at Tokyo Detention House is cult leader Shoko Asahara, 63, real name Chizuo Matsumoto.
After founding the Aum Shinrikyo cult in 1984, he attracted loyal supporters into his bizarre ideology and world of rituals, such as drinking bathwater and wearing electrical caps for synchronised brain waves.
But behind the scenes, the cult was stockpiling weapons, and on March 20, 1995, Asahara and his worshippers released sarin nerve gas into the busy Tokyo subway.
The attack killed 13 people.
Asahara was eventually convicted of having killed 27 people in 13 murders and other assaults and kidnappings during six years of trying to build his twisted, alternative empire.
Following his failed appeals for his release, the mass murderer was hanged on July 6, 2018 with six other cult members.
Amnesty International feared that the appointment of Fumio Kishida as Japan's Prime Minister in 2021 showed the country's 'lack of respect for right to life'.
Critics of capital punishment like Amnesty argue that death penalty is unacceptable, saying it denies human rights and it is irreversible and mistakes can happen.
Amnesty also claimed it does little to deter crime and it is used in countries with problematic human rights record like China, Iran and Saudi Arabia.
A version of this article was published in March 2024.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
Arrow MORE: Will a 'mega-quake' strike next week after a Japanese manga predicts 'great disaster'?
Arrow MORE: Disturbing documentary about 'most evil reality show ever' now streaming on BBC
Arrow MORE: Mystery of 600-year-old Japanese mummified 'dragon' solved
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
14 minutes ago
- New Statesman
The rebuilding of Tommy Robinson
Photo by Benjamin Cremel/ AFP It's never occurred to me to feel nostalgic or grateful for Tommy Robinson's English Defence League. The EDL was self-evidently drawn from a school, or squadron, of politics we're rightly inoculated against, one born of the bottle and the baggie, in which protester and hooligan form one brawling silhouette. And then there was the documented plot to blow up mosques brewed up by an EDL member, the correspondence between EDL activists and the Norwegian mass-murderer Anders Breivik, and the convictions handed round after 100-man post-match pile-ups. Nope, I've always thought, I'm pretty content to see the back of them. So it's refreshing to see its reputation disinfected, laundered and aired by Robinson courtesy of the YouTube channel Triggernometry. The interview is one of a series Robinson has given to sympathetic listeners in recent days and weeks, from the former GB News hack Dan Wootton to someone called Liam Tuffs (the latter is a 'close friend of Tommy Robinson' and runs a 'no-holds-barred podcast channel'.) Robinson's appearance is the same on each: intense, suntanned and scowling. But Triggernometry is by far his biggest coup. Released on Monday (10 August), the video has already achieved 1.3 million views, and is one of the channel's most popular in its seven years online (not far behind Stephen Fry, a previous guest). If he ever truly went away, Tommy is back. And speaking here, Robinson attempts to give the EDL credit for prompting police action on the Pakistani grooming gangs in the early 2010s. Of course, this does look past the work of Sara Rowbotham, the NHS worker who raised dozens of referrals about sexual grooming in Rochdale while Robinson was keeping his good works to the terraces. And, when discussing police cover-ups of the same, he doesn't mention Margaret Oliver, the policewoman and whistleblower who has helped to expose the incompetence of her colleagues at Greater Manchester Police. But this is typical of an interview that benefits Robinson far more than it does politics or the public record. Watching Triggernometry is a strange experience. You can get past the two hosts, neither of them naturals, the anuran Konstantin Kisin, and the mostly mute and uncomfortable-looking Francis Foster. But more bizarrely, the videos are broken up by Kisin's presenting of paid sponsorship for various products tailored for a mainstream-questioning audience: VPNs, medical hypnosis treatments and saffron supplements (apparently it's the best thing for a good night's sleep). But, you must keep reminding yourself, this is the mainstream now. Kisin and Foster are – at a considerable push – our Robin Day or Russell Harty. With their help, Robinson is reaching a far larger audience, and with far less scrutiny, than his Lacoste-shirted, air-chopping younger self did with Jeremy Paxman in 2011. The chummy Triggernometry conversation with Robinson amounts to a stream of euphemism. The tone is established with the seventh word of Kisin's introduction, 'mate'. From then, Robinson is barely interrupted or opposed. A football hooligan firm is remembered as 'young men finding their identity'. Robinson's own brawling is only nudged and winked at by our hosts, a juvenile folly like scrumping or knock knock run. ('Five hundred years ago, the country would be desperate for people like you,' says Kisin at one point. 'You're a warrior.') The conversation is framed by Robinson alone. He roams freely through his twisted woodland of self-justifying anecdotes, spinning and yarning. Kisin and Foster follow patiently a few paces behind. It's left to Robinson to bring up his own criminal convictions. Thinking back to 2014, he remembers having 'a refreshing moment in jail at the time, thinking about my life, where's it heading, what's going on'. From a timeline of Robinson's convictions, this would appear to be an 18-month stretch for mortgage fraud which he called 'a complete stitch-up' at the time, so it was good he hunkered down for some soul-searching while inside. At other moments, HMP Belmarsh sounds rather like Robben Island: 'If you worry about consequence, you're never going to bring about change,' Robinson says, reflecting on another conviction for entering America on a false passport in the early 2010s. Alongside reputation management, the interview allows Robinson to relive freely the autobiography he has traded off since the late 2000s. The Luton of his birth is to be found just off the M1, and somewhere between Sodom and Gomorrah, a place of gang rapes, ethnic apartheid and chronic, stirring violence. (Writing for the New Statesman last summer, Robinson's working-class contemporary in Luton, Thomas Peak, questioned several aspects of Robinson's account.) The EDL was formed as a defensive measure, as Robinson watched the escalating outrage perpetrated by Muslim gangs. His textual study of the Koran (begun, pace this account, during another spell in solitary) has convinced Robinson that doctrinal Islam is the cause of these tensions and is incompatible with Western democracy. Though he closes the interview by distancing himself from those calling for mass remigration, at one point Robinson says 'well over a million' Muslims 'need to leave'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It's fierce stuff, and the comments beneath the video are full of support for this 'hero'. But forget his account of Luton – even Robinson's campaigning life is being contested, and looks very different when described by critical familiars. In a new memoir, the semi-retired alt-right activist Lauren Southern alleges Robinson spent his supporters' money on himself, with 'tens of thousands of these donations being pulled out of ATMs to pay for hookers, blow, and new flat-screen TVs', and that in 2018 Robinson flew her to Romania to introduce her to Andrew Tate, who later sexually assaulted her, accusations Robinson described as 'insanity'. Tommy Robinson's nature was already a matter of criminal record. As were his shapeshifting powers: he's previously been Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, Andrew McMaster, Paul Harris and Wayne King. This reappearance in public life in the guise of the vindicated prophet is a depressing reassertion of various political continuities, some as old as the financial crash. Starmer's England stinks of 2013. The sick and helpless are being reclassified as welfare queens (they only need help to wash below the waist after all). Islam has been re-identified as the enemy within. Populism leads the polls, and far-right protesters line the streets. Their leader and their parasite, the great England-hating patriot, is back with them. But the decision to front Robinson on a channel like this is evidence of a more novel phenomenon: marketing 'broken Britain' to an American audience. Almost a year ago, Robinson appeared on the Jordan Peterson Podcast, achieving 2.7 million views. Peterson had spoken sympathetically of Robinson's imprisonment as early as 2018. Steve Bannon has called him a 'hero' on his podcast (in front of his guest, a silent Liz Truss). On 2 January this year, while he was still in prison (this time on a case relating to contempt of court) Elon Musk's pinned tweet read 'Free Tommy Robinson!' A man who trades on his humble Irish-immigrant roots has become a transatlantic media starlet. As have the Triggernometry hosts. Triggernometry's very first video in 2018 featured the lads in a high-minded back-and-forth with the Financial Times foreign affairs writer Gideon Rachman. During the Tommy Robinson interview, Konstantin Kisin reads out some advertising copy for gold and silver investments with Wyoming-based Augusta Precious Metals, directed at 'helping Americans move wealth… into self-directed IRAs'. This is political broadcasting in 2025. England is simmering, and the whole world is watching the men boiling the pot. At the close of the interview, Robinson was given time to advertise his forthcoming rally on 13 September, at which he expects 'half a million to a million people'. Given the unsteady scenes outside migrant hotels across the country, should a fraction of that turn out, England can expect to see the menace of the EDL resurrected along with their leader. But perhaps don't expect as much brawling: after all, he's got mates in the media now. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shock new twist after man was arrested in Sydney Airport gun horror
A man who allegedly tried to grab an Australian Federal Police officer's firearm during a dramatic arrest at Sydney Airport was re-arrested hours later. The man, 41, from Victoria was reportedly detained again by NSW Police officers at Central Station on Thursday, 2GB reported. NSW Police were contacted for further comment. The alleged incident came a day after AFP officers responded to a request for assistance from an airline about a man allegedly acting suspiciously at a check-in counter in the T2 domestic terminal early Wednesday. Two officers wrestled the man to the ground before the gun was accidentally fired during the struggle, with the bullet lodging in a wall 1m in a nearby airport cafe. Police later revealed the man had been told to leave the airport the previous day after another more minor incident. They added that it was very lucky that no one was hurt or killed during the incident. The man was filmed shouting expletives as officers pinned him to the floor. He was later charged with obstructing a Commonwealth official and creating a disturbance at an airport. The man was bailed to appear in Downing Centre Local Court on September 1. He is banned from entering the airport as part of his strict bail conditions. He faces a $3,300 fine and up to two years behind bars if convicted. AFP Acting Commander Scott Raven confirmed that the man was known to police. 'We had dealt with him yesterday in relation to a number of things about his behaviour and he left the airport,' he told reporters on Wednesday. 'Today his behaviour at the check-in counter was inconsistent with the way that we expect all members of the public to behave at a check-in counter. 'Not acting professionally, not acting respectfully, and also just acting in a way that led to their suspicion that the airline staff called us immediately 'I thank the airlines for doing that, and that was why we were able to act quite swiftly and actually apprehend this man.' Commander Raven added the man's alleged behaviour threatened the safety of the public, staff and police.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
What is Guan Yin Citta Dharma Door, the Buddhist group at the centre of an alleged spy case in Australia?
A controversial Buddhist organisation, at the centre of an alleged Chinese espionage case in Australia, has raised concerns about Beijing keeping tabs on Chinese diaspora overseas. Guan Yin Citta Dharma Door is an international Buddhist organisation with multiple chapters in Australia. This month, a Chinese-born woman was charged with reckless foreign interference, accused of spying on the group's Australian branches and its members on behalf of the Chinese Communist party's intelligence organs. Australian police have said the investigation is ongoing and more people could be charged. Guan Yin Citta practises Mahayana Buddhism, the most common type of Buddhism in China. But the organisation is controversial. News reports have detailed unusual and fringe beliefs the group promotes, and the history of its late founder, Master Jun Hong Lu, who died in 2021. It has been banned in China, and people warned to steer clear of it. The organisation claims to have 10 million members worldwide, with 5 million in China, but the Chinese government says it is just 50,000. State media has accused it of being a cult with 'evil theories', and officials have vowed to crack down on it with 'an iron fist'. In 2016, a Henan province follower was jailed for five years for printing 100,000 copies of an 'unauthorised' Guan Yin Citta journal. Before his death, Lu had been banned from entering China. It has been criticised by Buddhist groups in China, Hong Kong and Malaysia for allegedly distorting teachings, and Master Lu of abusing Buddhist scriptures and mantras and 'using the illusion of supernatural powers to mislead believers', according to a 2015 letter by 16 Malaysian Buddhist groups. Nevertheless, Guan Yin Citta is legal in Australia, and while the controversies around the organisation muddy the waters a little, allegations of surveillance support claims about the CCP's intolerance of religious groups outside its direct control. Sign up: AU Breaking News email John Fitzgerald, a historian of China, says that under the increasingly authoritarian rule of Xi Jinping, all things that could threaten the party in any way are seen as equivalent. 'There's almost no calibration any longer,' Fitzgerald told the Guardian. 'Anything that threatens the august and unrivalled authority of the party, no matter how trivial, is treated as a grave threat.' Fitzgerald says the CCP looks at religion as a cultural signifier of ethnicity, something that has to be managed inside both China and diaspora communities who could influence the domestic population. Under the strict political rule of the Communist party, China is officially an atheist state. The government officially recognises Buddhism, along with Catholicism, Islam, Protestantism and Taoism, but the practise of those religions is strictly policed. Buddhism, Taoism and some folk religions are generally treated less harshly than Islam and Christianity, analysts have noted, but believers across all religions have faced repression and persecution by the CCP – most notably the Muslim population in Xinjiang, and Tibetan Buddhists. 'The CCP leaders know that it is not easy to completely eradicate these religions out of China. (There are even CCP members who are secretly following these religions),' says Julie Yu-Wen Chen, a professor of Chinese Studies at the University of Helsinki. 'The best strategy is to sinicise them to make them suitable for the Chinese society and then to control and monitor the practices on the ground.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The CCP will often use suitably sinicised practises for its soft diplomacy. Much of it is driven by China's state administration for religious affairs, and the Buddhist Association of China, which seek to work with Buddhists globally in pursuit of the CCP's goals, often hosting international Buddhism conferences and making targeted foreign investments through Xi's flagship overseas investment regime, the belt and road initiative. 'They recognise religion as subversive,' Fitzgerald says. 'They're not going to allow that subversion to happen in China or anything like that. But they will take full advantage of it in any other community.' As China's security apparatus expands, reaching across the world with extraterritorial security laws, extensive espionage and infiltration networks, and rising rates of transnational repression, it has become an unavoidable national security issue for other countries like Australia. Religious groups and practitioners, dissidents, lawyers and journalists are among those frequently targeted. Foreign interference has affected bilateral relations. Last week Australia joined other nations in condemning China's persecution of exiled Hong Kong pro-democracy activists. Meanwhile, across the world, Uyghurs have been harassed, surveilled and deported en masse to Xinjiang, and nations reacted with alarm to revelations of a network of secret overseas Chinese police stations. 'There's far greater awareness now in Australia of the implications of this thing for national security,' Fitzgerald says. Additional research by Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
