logo
'The Trump effect is real': Conservative Santa Feans tout early months of second term

'The Trump effect is real': Conservative Santa Feans tout early months of second term

Yahoo01-06-2025

Freddie Lopez, a native Santa Fean, feels the best is still to come for President Donald Trump's second term — despite the flurry of executive orders already issued in the early days of his presidency.
'Amazement' was how Lopez characterized his assessment of Round 2 for Trump.
He thought 'everything went down the drain so quickly' under President Joe Biden, Lopez said, so Trump had to act fast in the face of what he called 'misinformation' and 'disinformation' from the mainstream media and Democratic officials.
'Our nation's border is sealed again,' he said, adding he believes Trump is off to a flying start.
Lopez and other conservatives in heavily Democratic Santa Fe — and across the state — are heartened by federal policies that have roiled their neighbors, and they are baffled by progressives' protests against what they see as a necessary course change — the cuts, the tariffs and the hardline immigration policy. They hope the 'Trump effect' will help buoy a Republican Party that long has had little power, both locally and statewide.
Conservatives here are feeling energized by Trump's second term, which has ushered in a whirlwind of changes they stand by.
'Everybody is 100% behind what is happening,' said Bob Witsenhausen, the former chair of the Republican Party of Santa Fe County. 'This is what we voted for. This is what we wanted.
'The only griping is they are not going far enough in Congress,' he added. 'We've got some Republicans in Congress dragging their feet.'
Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, continue to sound the alarm bells but remain in the minority in both the U.S. House and Senate.
011125 jw roundhouse rally3.jpg (copy)
Jean Palmer, left, Sandy Schwartz and Betsy Lombardi with the Raging Grannies belt out rally songs in January at the Roundhouse during a "freedom rally" organized by Cold War submarine veteran Beach Beauchamp. The event focused on defining a new Democratic approach in the wake of losses in the November and the election of President Donald Trump.
'The only thing Trump has been successful at in his second term is maintaining his hold over cowardly GOP leaders who will sing his praises no matter how bad of a job he does or how much of a cartoonish embarrassment he is to our country and Constitution,' Daniel Garcia, a spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico, said in a statement.
'Progressives went too far'
Santa Fe County is one of the bluest counties in New Mexico, a state where Democrats control both chambers of the Legislature and the Governor's Office, and hold all five congressional seats.
The county reaffirmed its status a Democratic stronghold in November, when 73% of voters favored Kamala Harris over Trump in the presidential race.
While he lost New Mexico, however, Trump picked up votes almost everywhere in the state, doing better in most counties than other recent Republican presidential candidates. He lost New Mexico by just 6 percentage points, compared to 11 points in 2020 — the best showing for a Republican since 2004, when President George W. Bush narrowly won the state.
Public displays of opposition to moves made by the Trump administration have been widespread and routine in Santa Fe, with swarms of protesters gathering in front of the state Capitol in recent months to express outrage and frustration.
Another such event is planned June 14, when Trump plans to roll out a military parade in celebration of the U.S. Army's 250th birthday — as well as his own birthday.
The 'No Kings Day Mass Protest' — a 10 a.m. march from the Roundhouse to the Plaza — is part of a nationwide movement 'in response to the increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption of the Trump administration,' a group of organizers, including the Democratic Party of Santa Fe County, said in a news release last week.
040525 jw trump protest 3.jpg (copy)
Protesters line Paseo de Peralta in April as thousands of people gather at the state Capitol for a 'mass mobilization' against President Donald Trump.
But the City Different's Republican minority have had a different reaction to new developments in the federal government, doubling down in their support of Trump's policy priorities.
Witsenhausen cited lower inflation and Trump's crackdown on immigration as two issues central to his support for the new administration's agenda.
He said he feels the 'Trump effect is real.'
He believes the problem of rising homelessness has improved slightly in the City Different since Trump's election and that folks are reining in progressive policies at the state and local levels.
'I don't know if that's people realizing what's going on, or if deportations are a part of that, or what,' Witsenhausen said. 'But the message is progressives went too far, and now we have to correct course. It's definitely happening.'
'Losing their political power'?
Since Trump was sworn in Jan. 20, New Mexico's all-Democratic congressional delegation has been tearing into the Republican president as he rapidly issues a dizzying series of executive orders and seeks to reshape the federal government.
The state's federal lawmakers have held town halls and news conferences, raising alarms about policies coming out of the Trump administration — most recently concerns about sharp cuts to Medicaid and federal food assistance.
Federal government workers caught in sweeping layoffs and organizations affected by steep federal cuts have decried the impacts. And rally-goers have spoken out repeatedly in Santa Fe.
During a demonstration in February, more than 500 protesters clogged the areas in front of the Old Santa Fe Trail entrance of the Roundhouse to rail against Trump policy directives as well as the role tech billionaire Elon Musk had taken on at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency.
They wielded signs bearing slogans like 'Flush Musk' and 'Stop the Steal of Our Democracy.'
'I truly feel like our democracy is at stake,' said protester Missy Jones, a Santa Fe resident. '… My concern here is for all groups of people — Jewish, [transgender], [racial minorities], women — I just feel like I'm seeing it being picked apart piece by piece by piece.'
The Republican Party of Santa Fe County, meanwhile, took to social media to offer a different viewpoint, writing in a Facebook post there were 'lots of Santa Fe crazies out.'
'Do they know what they are protesting? Serious question,' one person wrote in the comments section of the post.
'Well, it's Santa Fe. It's going to be the last holdout,' Witsenhausen said, referring to progressives in the state. 'They are losing their political power. … They don't really have any right now, except for places like Santa Fe.'
Nonetheless, the Republican Party remains an underdog in the state.
With a gubernatorial election looming in 2026 one GOP candidate — Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull — has entered the race to succeed Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, whose second and last term ends in December 2026. But Democrats are the front-runners, with former Interior Secretary Deb Haaland's campaign raising $3.7 million and Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman raising $1 million.
The last time Republicans won a gubernatorial election in New Mexico was 2014.
'Fat around the middle'
DOGE reforms and the slashing of federal jobs have perhaps been the subject of the most controversy when it comes to protests in Santa Fe. Protesters have directed plenty of ire toward Musk, the Tesla CEO who has recently said he will reduce his political spending and spend less time in Washington, D.C., to focus on his companies.
State Sen. Pat Boone, R-Elida, an Eastern New Mexico rancher, hasn't seen a move he has not agreed with.
He isn't concerned about new work requirements in the House budget bill for many receiving Medicaid coverage, echoing others who have said Trump and Republicans are aiming to make the program more efficient.
'If they are qualified for it, they are going to get it,' Boone said. 'I think there's a lot of hysteria that's unnecessary. … We've been headed off a steep cliff, and I think he's getting us back from falling off that cliff.'
Fears about cuts to Medicaid are looming large in New Mexico, where almost 40% of patients are enrolled in the government-subsidized insurance program — well above the national average. Garcia, the state Democratic Party spokesperson, noted in a statement almost 880,000 patients are enrolled in Medicaid in New Mexico, with 34% of them children and 37% living in a rural area.
'It is no exaggeration to say that these GOP cuts will be deadly in New Mexico,' Garcia said, adding, 'The pain felt by working New Mexicans by these cuts to critical programs would be exacerbated by the soaring consumer and grocery prices caused by Trump's trade policy.'
Boone feels the layoffs of federal workers in New Mexico, and in other states, is another important step in shrinking the federal government. Though local, state and federal governments are large employers in Santa Fe and statewide, in Boone's view, whether there are too many people on the payroll is something that merits a closer look.
'I think it's a streamlining process that really needs to be implemented,' he said. 'I think there's way too much extra fat around the middle of what we do. I'm not sure what the statistics are, but I think there's more workers than there is work.'
'The DOGE reforms are necessary because there's been a lot of fraud and abuse in our government for many years, not just through the Biden administration,' said state Sen. Ant Thornton, R-Sandia Park, who was a guest speaker at the Republican Party of Santa Fe County's May meeting.
Anthony Thornton
Anthony "Ant" Thornton
Among the Trump priorities Thornton espouses is the president's embrace of digital currency. Trump has ordered the establishment of a 'strategic bitcoin reserve' for the federal government.
In the Legislative session that ended earlier this year, Thornton, who recently attended a bitcoin conference in Las Vegas, Nev., sponsored a bill that would have created a bitcoin reserve for New Mexico. The proposed measure did not make it out of a committee.
But Thornton is among the Republicans expressing displeasure with Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' that will now be weighed by the U.S. Senate after its passage in the House. He feels the legislation does not go far enough. In particular, he is concerned about how it would, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, increase federal deficits by $3.8 trillion over the next decade.
'When you have to live within your means, you have to actually stop buying things, or stop paying for things, and that's hard for the government to do because there are so many people who are dependent on it,' Thornton said. 'That's why politicians, I think, have a hard time.'
Speaking of cuts, he said, 'I guess I feel like it's something that has to be done, but I don't see any party willing to make that true sacrifice.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence
Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence

In what's become somewhat customary once an Illinois political titan falls, leaders throughout the state responded with condemnation and called for reforms upon hearing Friday that ex-Speaker Michael Madigan was sentenced to seven and a half years in federal prison and fined $2.5 million on federal corruption charges. House Republican leader Tony McCombie of Savanna and Senate Republican leader John Curran of Downers Grove called for bipartisan ethics reforms in the wake of the sentencing, with Curran specifically requesting committee hearings and votes on potential changes — something that didn't happen this session. Madigan's sentencing was 'a stark and shameful reminder of the corruption that has plagued Illinois government for far too long,' McCombie said in a statement. 'Justice was served — but the damage to public trust runs deep.' But Illinois' last prominent statewide politician who went to federal prison, former Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, held back on the chance to take a swipe at a bitter nemesis when Madigan was sentenced. Though the two were Democrats, they feuded for nearly all six years Blagojevich was in office between 2003 and 2009. 'When that guy, Madigan, was on the top of the mountain, they were all kissing his ass,' Blagojevich said. 'Now they're going to be stomping all over his grave. And it's really, it's really sort of an unappealing side of human nature.' Blagojevich said Madigan's conviction underscores the systemic problems in politics and government in the state Capitol. 'Is the system in Springfield corrupt, in many ways, absolutely,' Blagojevich said in an interview with the Tribune while insisting he didn't break the law. 'It's a system, I've been saying this from the beginning, it all too often works for itself on the backs of the people.' Blagojevich — whose 14-year federal prison sentence for corruption was commuted by President Donald Trump, who ultimately also pardoned Blagojevich — didn't want to celebrate Madigan's prison sentence despite the two's often-tense relationship. 'I just don't think it's right for me to kick a man when he's down,' Blagojevich said. 'What's happening now to him, I know what it's like. And it's really easy for these politicians to get on their high horses and start kicking someone, stomping on someone.' Senate President Don Harmon, a Democrat from Oak Park who is facing a potential fine of nearly $10 million from the Illinois State Board of Elections for improper political fundraising, said Friday's sentence represented 'a solemn reminder' that the duty of public office holders is to serve 'and that there is accountability for those who do not.'

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?
Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk — two epic disrupters of U.S. politics and the automotive industry, respectively and vice versa. Over the past year, they united over the election and efforts to cut government spending. They parted ways amicably … and then started trashing each other. It escalated quickly with Musk suggesting that the president be impeached and that he is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein child-prostitution scandal. Musk later reportedly called the president before posting that he regretted some of his words: 'They went too far.' It was a remarkable breakup — incredible drama between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man, who had been the closest of allies for hundreds of days of campaigning and governing. To the extent that it was a reality TV train wreck, I'd just as soon leave it be. But since the primary business in Musk's remarkable portfolio is nominally an automaker, it actually matters in this industry we cover. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. Love it or hate it, this disruptive era in which we live is providing us all with some real-life experiments in economics — the likes of which we probably thought we would never see. For decades, basically everyone who went to college was taught in an economics or history class that widespread tariffs would do more harm than good. Trump argues for a different approach, and he's pursuing it. Or he's pursuing it to negotiate for something else. In either case, we're now seeing how that works: So far, there's been a lot of paralysis, especially among suppliers and foreign automakers, but also a big investment announced recently by General Motors. His political strategy has been unorthodox, yet he's won two electoral colleges and one popular vote. He's only the 21st president to win two elections. So he's had success, whether some people like it or not. Same for Musk, of course: He approached the auto industry unlike anyone else — with an expensive electric car — had a couple of near-total collapses, and came out as the world's richest man and CEO of the world's most valuable automaker. That success helped propel his rocket business SpaceX and other ventures such as Starlink satellites and Twitter, which he bought and renamed X. But the disruptive move I'm watching was his decision to be an automaker CEO who got personally and financially involved in partisan politics. While new-vehicle sales skew to the affluent, when you sell something in the millions or tens of millions, a brand or model has to connect with a broad swath of people. And while there can be success with, say, a polarizing design, mass-market brands generally try to avoid alienating large chunks of their potential customer base. I've cited here before the story about Michael Jordan saying he didn't speak out on politics because 'Republicans buy sneakers, too.' In retrospect, he said it was just a funny line among friends. But the thing is that he wasn't wrong, and every business school graduate knows it. Musk, however, is not your typical MBA type. So out of his frustration with former President Joe Biden — who habitually sided with the UAW and its automakers against the U.S.-based global leader in EVs, even as he advocated for a carbon-neutral future — Musk threw an estimated quarter of a billion dollars behind the Trump campaign. That's an unbelievable sum of money to many of us, but when Trump won, it looked like the greatest bet ever. From late October to late December, Tesla stock more than doubled and its market cap approached $1.5 trillion. While Musk's political activism may have upset many of his loyal, environmentally motivated customers, there were a lot of reasons to be bullish on Tesla under Trump. It seemed likely that NHTSA and the SEC would take a more sympathetic view of the company's issues. Beyond that, Musk has refocused the company's future on artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and robotaxis. (Tesla said it plans to launch its service in Austin, Texas, on June 22.) A new administration with a deregulatory inclination toward self-driving cars was a significant tailwind. Now, those advantages for Tesla are gone or at least seemingly diminished. Structures that have legacy automakers paying to buy Tesla's credits for selling emission-free, fuel-efficient vehicles could be eliminated. (And let's not forget that Trump hinted at ending federal contracts with other Musk-affiliated companies.) Turning back to the auto business: The conventional wisdom is that Musk has now alienated all but the most apolitical consumers. Environmentally minded liberals might like EVs, but Musk's support of Trump (and the far-right Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany) has them seeking out other brands' offerings. There might have been an opportunity to become the preferred electric brand of the president's Make America Great Again movement — especially the tech-forward, high-income types and those motivated by the president's endorsement of the brand on the White House grounds. But after this month's blowup — with longtime Trump adviser Steve Bannon arguing to deport Musk — that notion seemed ever more remote. No fans on the left, no fans on the right. Is Elon out in deep water in an electric boat surrounded by sharks with no friends to bail him out? Maybe not. There is significant animus against Musk on the EV-inclined left, especially in the wake of his DOGE team's deep and sometimes chaotic cuts to government entities and programs. Certainly, protests at auto retail outlets are rare. The damage to stores is not acceptable, but it shows the intensity of the situation. But I still have to wonder how far consumers will follow those kinds of feelings. Michiganders, for instance, often assume that Americans prefer to buy American cars made by American (union) workers. But I've been to America, and most of them don't care. They want the best car for their money, whether it's American, German, Japanese or Korean. Some are clamoring for cheap Chinese cars: If Xi Jinping wants to pay for half of their EV, they ask, why not let him? So maybe they won't care about Elon's politics. Tesla sales are down a little this year, but some of that might be attributable to production hiccups. If the Model Y — the bestselling model in the world last year — provides a great value, they'll probably buy it regardless of what they think of the CEO. And now we get to find out. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Sign in to access your portfolio

GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output
GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output

General Motors (GM) announced it plans to invest around US$ 4 billion in the next two years to strengthen its US vehicle production operations, in response to the recent import tariff hikes by the Trump-led US government. This new investment plan, which will result in the transfer of some production from Mexico, is in addition to the recently-announced US$ 888 million investment in the company's Tonawanda engine plant in New York State. GM confirmed it plans to increase its annual production capacity in the US to over two million battery-powered and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. The plants that will benefit from the new investment include: Orion, Michigan, which will begin production of a ICE full-size SUVs and light duty pickup trucks in early 2027. The Detroit-Hamtramck plant will become the dedicated assembly location for the Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Sierra EV, Cadillac Escalade IQ, and GMC Hummer EV pickup and SUV. Fairfax, Kansas City, will produce ICE-powered Chevrolet Equinox from mid-2027 in response to strong demand for the recently redesigned model. The plant is also scheduled to produce the new Chevrolet Bolt EV by the end of 2025, with additional 'affordable' EV models set to follow later on. Spring Hill, Tennessee: GM plans to add the ICE-powered Chevrolet Blazer to the plant's line-up from 2027, to be produced alongside the Cadillac Lyriq and Visiq EVs and the Cadillac XT5. GM's CEO, Mary Barra, said in a statement: 'We believe the future of transportation will be driven by American innovation and manufacturing expertise. Today's announcement demonstrates our ongoing commitment to build vehicles in the US and to support American jobs. We're focused on giving customers choice and offering a broad range of vehicles they love.' The company pointed out that it currently has around fifty vehicle and parts manufacturing plants in 19 US states, including eleven vehicle assembly plants, employing a COMBINED one million people directly and indirectly, including at parts suppliers and dealers. GM's capital spending guidance remained unchanged at between US$ 10 billion and US$ 11 billion for 2025, rising slightly to between US$ 10 billion and US$ 12 billion in 2026 and 2027 to 'reflect increased investment in the US, the prioritization of key programs, and efficiency offsets.' "GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store