logo
Trump illegally fired surveillance watchdog agency's Democrats, judge rules

Trump illegally fired surveillance watchdog agency's Democrats, judge rules

Yahoo21-05-2025

President Donald Trump illegally removed two Democratic members of a federal privacy oversight board, a federal judge ruled on Wednesday.
Washington-based U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton ruled that Trump's firings of Travis LeBlanc and Ed Felten, two Democratic members on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board was unlawful, stating that the board's structure was intended to have a restriction on the president's removal power. As a result, Walton ordered that LeBlanc and Felten remain as board members.
"Such unfettered authority would make the Board and its members beholden to the very authority it is supposed to oversee on behalf of Congress and the American people," Walton, a George W. Bush appointee, said in his ruling. "To hold otherwise would be to bless the President's obvious attempt to exercise power beyond that granted to him by the Constitution and shield the Executive Branch's counterterrorism actions from independent oversight, public scrutiny, and bipartisan congressional insight regarding those actions."
The case could have ramifications beyond the board, extending to the rest of the Trump administration's control of independent federal agencies.
'The Constitution gives President Trump the power to remove personnel who exercise his executive authority. The Trump administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in response to the order.
LeBlanc and Felten claimed the Trump administration violated 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent that upheld limits passed by Congress on the president's ability to fire independent agency members.
President Donald Trump has targeted DEI as part of various executive orders, and Carr often echoes the president's complaints in his pledges to end any invidious forms of discrimination in the companies he regulates.
Trump fired all Democrats, including its chair, Sharon Bradford Franklin, from the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board in January, leaving a single Republican member.
Without at least a three-member quorum, PCLOB can't start new projects or issue official board reports, such as its reviews of the EU-US data privacy framework and government surveillance programs. Walton's order Wednesday means the board will have a quorum again.
The board was created in 2007 as an independent executive branch agency to ensure that government surveillance did not curtail civil liberties and privacy rights in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Although it has lacked a quorum for much of its history, the board has also provided key recommendations that led to the U.S. government ending its bulk phone data collection program and creating guardrails for other surveillance tools.
'We will abide by the court order. We understand the Department of Justice intends to appeal,' Alan Silverleib, a spokesperson for PCLOB, said in a statement.
There are similar lawsuits accusing the Trump administration of illegally firing independent agency members at the Federal Trade Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the Merit Systems Protection Board and the National Credit Union Administration.
This decision could potentially have an effect on how those cases are decided.
It comes amid an already unclear legal environment around Trump's firings. Last month, Chief Justice John Roberts granted the White House's request to halt lower court rulings that reinstated two members of other boards whom Trump also tried to fire without offering any justification for the dismissals.
The temporary stay Roberts ordered April 9 remains in place more than 6 weeks later with no further action by the court.
The lack of action has led many court-watchers to infer that the high court intends to let Trump's dismissal of those officials and others stand, at least until the court takes up the question of presidential firing powers in greater depth, perhaps in the fall.
Josh Gerstein contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns
Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Newsweek

time25 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Monday, President Donald Trump was asked about Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom's remarks that his Republican administration wants "civil war on the streets" amid ongoing protests against raids by Los Angeles Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The president was asked by a reporter, "What do you make of the fact that [Newsom] says you want a civil war?" Trump responded, "No, it's the opposite. I don't want a civil war. Civil war would happen if you left it to people like him." REPORTER: Gavin Newsom says you want a Civil War. TRUMP: "It's just the opposite, I don't want a Civil War. Civil War would happen if you left it to people like him." — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 9, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says
Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says

President Trump's ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen on Saturday said that Trump isn't done with tech billionaire Elon Musk yet, after tensions between the two men became incredibly heated in a public social media spat last week. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country, because they can,' Cohen told MSNBC's Ali Velshi. 'And one thing Elon doesn't understand is this political guerilla warfare that they're going to conduct against him,' he added. On Thursday, a fight between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier in the week escalated rapidly on Musk's X platform and Trump's Truth Social platform. The president said the tech billionaire 'just went CRAZY!' and threatened Musk's government contracts. Musk alleged that Trump had ties to convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein on X. The public spat followed the end of Musk's recent service in the Trump administration and an alliance with the president that appeared to start off strong. Musk endorsed Trump in July 2024 in the wake of Trump surviving an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Musk's administration service was marked by intense backlash from those on the left and Democrats over actions taken by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the federal government. 'He doesn't care about Elon Musk,' Cohen said in his MSNBC appearance, talking about Trump. 'He used Elon Musk for what he needed. Initially it was the money, so that he didn't have to lay out any of his own, and also, more importantly, for his access with X.' The Hill has reached out to the White House and X for comment.

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'
Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

San Francisco Chronicle​

time26 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

President Donald Trump on Monday endorsed the idea of arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the state's resistance to federal immigration enforcement efforts in Los Angeles, intensifying a clash that has already drawn legal challenges and fierce rebukes from Democratic leaders. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Tom Homan, his border czar, who over the weekend suggested that state and local officials, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, could face arrest if they interfered with immigration raids. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. Trump's remarks signal a sharp escalation in the administration's crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions and a willingness to target political opponents in unprecedented ways. Newsom responded swiftly, calling Trump's words a chilling attack on American democratic norms. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor,' Newsom wrote on X. 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' Tensions escalated sharply after Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles following days of civil unrest related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The deployment marked the first time a president has federalized a state's National Guard without the governor's consent since 1965. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced plans to sue Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, alleging the deployment was unlawful. 'Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law,' Bonta said at a press conference. 'There is no invasion. There is no rebellion.' Meanwhile, David Huerta, president of SEIU California, was charged with felony conspiracy to impede an officer after his arrest during the L.A. protests. Despite the furor, legal experts note that Homan lacks the authority to arrest elected officials, and his role remains advisory. Still, Trump's rhetoric has raised alarms among critics who view his comments as part of a broader pattern of undermining democratic institutions. 'This is a preview of things to come,' Newsom warned in an interview with Brian Taylor Cohen that he shared on social media. 'This isn't about L.A., per se,' the Democratic governor added. 'It's about us today, it's about you, everyone watching tomorrow. This guy is unhinged. Trump is unhinged right now, and this is just another proof point of that.' At a news conference held by lawmakers in Sacramento to discuss the protests in Los Angeles, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Trump's threat to arrest Newsom is a 'direct assault on democracy and an insult to every Californian.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store