
BBC Bargain Hunt expert jailed over art sales to ‘Hezbollah financier'
Oghenochuko Ojiri, 53, sold artwork worth around £140,000 to Nazem Ahmad, a man designated by US authorities as a suspected financier for the Lebanese organisation.
Ojiri, of Brent, north London, previously pleaded guilty to eight offences under section 21A of the Terrorism Act 2000. He is believed to be the first person to be charged with the specific offence.
The art dealer, who has also appeared on the BBC's Antiques Road Trip, was charged with failing to disclose information about transactions in the regulated art market sector on or before dates between October 2020 and December 2021.
Art dealer Oghenochuko Ojiri, 53. Picture date: Friday May 9, 2025. (Ben Whitley/PA)
US prosecutors say Mr Ahmad was a 'major Hezbollah financial donor' who used high-value art and diamonds to launder money and fund the group.
He is accused of evading terrorism sanctions by using front companies to acquire more than 160 million dollars (£120 million) in artwork and diamond services.
Following the introduction of new money laundering regulations in January 2020 that brought the art market under HMRC supervision, Ojiri is said to have discussed the changes with a colleague, indicating awareness of the rules.
The court previously heard the total value of the artwork sold was around £140,000.
The defendant was, at the relevant time, the owner and operator of Ramp Gallery – latterly Ojiri Gallery, Lyndon Harris, prosecuting, said.
Mr Ahmad is understood to be based in Beirut, the court heard.
Oghenochuko Ojiri has been jailed (Metropolitan Police/PA)
Mr Harris said: 'The defendant engaged in discussions with and sales over a 14-month period with Nazem Ahmad and his associates, selling art to the value of £140,000 over that period.'
The defendant knew Mr Ahmad had been sanctioned in the US, a previous hearing was told.
Ahmad's phone number was saved on Ojiri's phone as 'Moss', the court heard.
'[It] appears to have been a name deliberately chosen to disguise Mr Ahmad as being one of his contacts,' the prosecutor said.
He added that Ojiri was warned by others about his conduct 'but proceeded to engage in dealings with Ahmad in any event'.
Gavin Irwin, defending, said Ojiri was arrested while filming a BBC TV programme.
He said: 'He has lost the work he loves. He was arrested while filming a BBC television programme.
'He has already lost, of course, his good name, he was until recently a man of good character.'
He said the defendant had been 'naive' in relation to his participation in Ahmad's art market, but that he was 'preyed on by more sophisticated others'.
Mr Irwin also said the defendant has lost his business, accepted that he had done wrong and wanted to 'apologise for undermining trust in the industry' and also to 'apologise for the distress that he has caused principally to those who know him, who love him, but also those who have supported him throughout his career'.
Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb sentenced Ojiri to two years and six months in prison at the Old Bailey on Friday, with a further year to be spent on licence.
She told Ojiri he had been involved in a commercial relationship 'for prestige and profit', and that he had been 'seeking the kudos of dealing with an eminent name in the dealing world'.
She added: 'You knew about Ahmad's suspected involvement in financing terrorism and the way the art market can be exploited by someone like him.'
Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said that until these events he was 'someone to be admired' and added 'this is the nadir – there is one direction your life can go and I am confident that you will not be in front of the courts again.'
The judge said the offences were so serious that only a custodial sentence can be justified.
Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Met's Counter Terrorism Command, said: 'The prosecution, using specific Terrorism Act legislation is the first of its kind, and should act as a warning to all art dealers that we can, and will, prosecute those who knowingly do business with people identified as funders of terrorist groups.
'Oghenochuko Ojiri wilfully obscured the fact he knew he was selling artwork to Nazem Ahmad, someone who has been sanctioned by the UK and US Treasury and described as a funder of the proscribed terrorist group Hizballah.
'Financial investigation is a crucial part of the counter terrorism effort. A team of specialist investigators, analysts and researchers in the NTFIU work all year round to prevent money from reaching the hands of terrorists or being used to fund terrorist attacks.'
Bethan David, head of the CPS Counter Terrorism Division, said: 'It is clear that Oghenochuko Ojiri was aware of new money laundering regulations in the art world and that he had knowledge of Nazem Ahmad's background.
'Ojiri engaged in activity designed to conceal the identity of the true purchaser by changing the details on invoices and storing Mr Ahmad's name under a different alias in his mobile phone.
'His motivation appears to be financial along with a broader desire to boost his gallery's reputation within the art market by dealing with such a well-known collector.'
Ojiri has appeared on a number of BBC shows including Bargain Hunt and Antiques Road Trip.
He described himself as 'absolutely obsessed' with collecting contemporary art in a BBC Q&A.
He has previously worked as an auctioneer and is known for championing African and European contemporary art.
Hezbollah is a Shia Islamist political and militant group based in Lebanon, backed by Iran and known for its armed resistance against Israel.
In the UK, the entire organisation – both its military and political wings – has been banned as a terrorist group since 2019.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
34 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'


The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
HMRC scam warning on the tricks might catch you out
Ultimately, HMRC will never ask you for personal or financial info out of the blue. They don't contact people via WhatsApp, and they won't threaten you with arrest. If you receive anything suspicious, forward the message to phishing@ or text 60599 for scam texts. For full peace of mind, always log in directly to your tax account rather than trusting messages or emails. As always, the advice stands that if something looks too good to be true, it usually is, but Rebecca Bebbington, personal finance expert at NetVoucherCodes says there are detailed scams hitting inboxes and phones this summer and, looks at how taxpayers can protect themselves without losing a penny. 1. 'You're Due a Tax Rebate' Text or Email This one's an old favourite because it works unless you're wise to it. You get a message claiming you're owed a tax refund and need to click a link to claim it. That link usually takes you to a fake HMRC website that looks convincing enough to fool most people. From there, you'll be asked for personal info such as bank details, date of birth, and even your NI number, all under the guise of processing your refund. (Image: NetVoucherCodes) If you do get an email about a tax rebate from HMRC, make sure the address ends in If you get one of these, forward it to phishing@ so the authorities can track the scammers. To check if you're owed a refund, log into your personal tax account directly via – never through a link in a message. 2. Robocall Saying 'HMRC Is Filing a Lawsuit Against You' This is one of the nastier ones. You get a robotic call telling you HMRC is taking legal action or that a warrant is out for your arrest unless you press a number and speak to someone. It's designed to frighten you into paying a fake 'fine' or handing over sensitive details. HMRC does not call people this way. They don't send the police round if you miss a letter. If you get one of these calls, hang up immediately. Don't engage, don't press anything, and don't give them the satisfaction of a reply. If you're unsure, call HMRC yourself on 0300 200 3300. 3. 'Confirm Your Self-Assessment Details' Phishing Emails After the end of the self-assessment tax deadline, fraudsters switch tactics. Now it's all about convincing you there's an issue with your tax return and asking you to 'verify' your information to avoid penalties or delays. These emails often look legitimate, they might have the HMRC logo, some official-sounding language, and a link to a login page. But the page is fake, designed purely to capture your login and security answers. Once scammers have that, they can access your real tax account and commit fraud in your name. So don't click. If you're ever unsure whether something is real, go straight to the source: open a new browser tab and go directly to Never trust the links in emails unless you're absolutely certain where they came from. 4. Fake Tax Refund Services on Social Media There's a newer breed of scam doing the rounds and it's targeting people on TikTok, Instagram and even WhatsApp. So-called 'tax experts' or 'refund agents' claim they can unlock hidden rebates from HMRC, promising quick cash in exchange for a fee or a cut of your refund. But they're often unregulated, unqualified, and in some cases, outright fraudsters. Some will ask for your HMRC login details (a huge red flag), while others will file dodgy claims on your behalf, leaving you liable when HMRC comes knocking. Rule of thumb: if someone slides into your DMs offering a miracle refund, it's almost certainly a scam. Stick to registered tax agents listed on the website and never share your login credentials with anyone. 5. Fake Court Summons or Arrest Threats via Email or WhatsApp In this scam, you might get a WhatsApp message or email warning you that legal action has already been taken against you. It often says you've ignored previous notices and now face court, fines or even jail. Some include PDF 'summons' or 'final warnings' with fake HMRC branding to ramp up the pressure. It's pure intimidation. HMRC doesn't threaten legal action via WhatsApp or email, and they certainly don't send out arrest notices. If you're ever worried a message might be genuine, contact HMRC directly using their verified numbers, but don't click on or respond to these messages. Delete and report them. Get your tax return done early and find out sooner if you're owed money. ⏲️ We'll let you know if you've overpaid tax after you file your Self-Assessment tax return and refund you. 💷 File today. 👇 — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) June 3, 2025 6. Fake National Insurance 'Compromise' Calls Here's a nasty one that's been doing the rounds for a while and has seen a resurgence recently. You get a call, sometimes automated, sometimes a real person, claiming your National Insurance number has been compromised and is being used for fraudulent activity. They say unless you act quickly, your assets will be frozen or the police will get involved. What follows is a request for you to 'verify your identity' by giving personal information – NI number, date of birth, full name, even bank details. In some cases, they'll ask you to transfer money to a 'safe account' while they 'investigate.' Don't fall for it. Your NI number can't be 'suspended' or frozen. HMRC doesn't call people to talk about identity fraud like this, and they certainly won't ask you to move money. If you get a call like this, hang up immediately. If you're worried, contact HMRC or the National Insurance helpline directly using numbers from the site. Recommended reading: 7. Bogus 'Tax Overpayment' Letters Through the Post While we usually focus on digital scams, old-school postal scams haven't gone away – and they're starting to look more professional. Some people have reported receiving letters claiming they've overpaid tax and are due a refund. These letters sometimes come with fake HMRC letterheads and a reply form asking for your bank account info or even copies of ID to 'confirm your claim.' Because they arrive in the post and look official, people often trust them more than they should. But HMRC doesn't ask for this level of personal detail through the post, especially not copies of ID or full card details. If you receive something like this, compare it against real correspondence from HMRC. Still unsure? Ring HMRC directly to confirm whether the letter is genuine. And never, ever send bank or ID details to an address you can't verify.