Hamas recruits teenagers by stealing food and controlling supply, some experts say
Article content
Shiri continued to outline how Hamas use media manipulation to wildly exaggerate claims of starvation, which eventually trickles down into them controlling food supplies: 'It's a narrative that they're starving.'
Article content
'If they really cared (about providing for their people and building a country), they would build schools and factories, but they put thousands of billions into constructing tunnels and we have to think why? For 20 years, all they thought about was October 7.
Article content
'We got pictures from inside, you can see the food. So they are not starving, but its good to say you are and show pictures of children in the hospital, because that gives them power.'
Article content
Article content
Another expert, Dr. Nesya Rubinstein- Shemer, who wrote a book on Hamas's ideology and is a professor of Middle Eastern Studies at Bar Ilan University, told TPS-IL that the control of food has been a tactic of terror groups even before Hamas was founded.
Article content
She explained: 'The history of Hamas goes back further than it's establishment in 1987; their roots began as a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 in Egypt.
Article content
'The Muslim Brotherhood was founded on the (Islamic ideological) basis of 'dawah' – the concept of conquering the hearts of the people and reaching for a firm basis in the population, before trying to achieve a role in the state.
Article content
'Muslim Brotherhood belongs to political Islam. The end goal is to gain political power, but they believe that to do that, they first have to gain control over the population.
Article content
'Muslim Brotherhood did this first, because the population had it very hard from a social point of view, so they established social structure to help society and provide places to eat, food for the poor, medical treatment, summer camps for youth – a whole kind of social engagement with the population to gain control and support.
Article content
'The main aim was to achieve ideological support, to achieve help from the population in whatever they need.
Article content
'After eight years, they established 150 branches all over Egypt, because this is what the population needed, so this is how they gained influence.'
Article content
This, she said, is where Hamas garnered it's food-control tactics: 'Hamas did the same in Gaza, before it was established.
Article content
'Ahmed Yassin was the establisher of Hamas, but before they were established in 1987, in 1973, Yassin established another organization El Mujjma El Islami – this organization gained control of the population through the establishment of institutions like mosques, kindergartens, schools, and he offered aid in clothes, and food.
Article content
Article content
'Then came the Hamas movement. Hamas now has perfect control over the population because they control food and humanitarian aid. Many people from Hamas worked in UNWRA.
Article content
'The message put out by Hamas to the people, over time was that 'if you are loyal to Hamas, you can get what you need like fuel, medical supplies, food' – basically everything Israel gave them over the years.'
Article content
She went on to detail how Hamas continue to use food to maintain control: 'Hamas are acting as a gatekeeper to the food supply. Additionally, if you (regular Palestinians) resist Hamas, you will be the last in line (for food).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Alan Kessel: Trump puts an end to American ambivalence
The Middle East has entered a precarious calm. On June 24, a ceasefire brokered by United States President Donald Trump brought a sudden halt to a week of escalating hostilities between the U.S., Israel, and the Islamic Republic of Iran. The missiles have stopped — for now — but the implications of what unfolded are still reverberating across the region, and far beyond it. Article content Article content This was not just a military flare-up. It was a decisive geopolitical moment that revealed a strategic realignment — and the unmistakable reassertion of American power. Article content Article content For Iran's regime, the confrontation exposed its growing vulnerability. For the United States, it marked the end of ambiguity. And for the world, it was the clearest evidence in years that America is not withdrawing from the world — it is re-engaging with purpose. Article content This was not merely an Israeli campaign. It was a moment of joint resolve between Washington and Jerusalem. For the first time, the United States gave explicit operational backing to Israel to strike deep into Iran's strategic core. The long-standing policy of restraint — a combination of caution and geopolitical fatigue — was abruptly discarded. Article content Israel took the operational lead in the opening days of the campaign, targeting Iran's military infrastructure and command-and-control systems with surgical precision. These strikes laid the groundwork for what followed. Once Iranian air defences and key communication nodes were degraded, U.S. B-2 stealth bombers entered the theatre and delivered the coup de grâce: coordinated precision strikes on Iran's three most sensitive nuclear enrichment sites: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. These were not symbolic targets. They were the beating heart of Iran's atomic ambitions. Article content Article content The damage was most acute at Fordo — the most important of the three sites, and once thought untouchable — where early satellite imagery analysis suggests that extensive subterranean infrastructure may have been compromised. The message was unmistakable: the West not only knows where Iran's weapons infrastructure lies, it now has the political will and operational reach to neutralize it. Article content Article content Trump, who had long vowed that Iran would never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, followed the strikes with a televised addres s from the White House. The message was stark: Iran must choose peace or risk further devastation. Three days later, under intense pressure, Tehran accepted a ceasefire. Whether that choice holds is uncertain — but the balance of risk has now shifted. Article content For the Islamic Republic, the week of strikes marked its most dangerous crisis since the revolution of 1979. Already crippled by sanctions, riven by internal dissent, and diplomatically cornered, it now saw its nuclear and missile infrastructure laid bare. Iran's deterrence posture — based on ambiguity, asymmetry, and impunity — cracked under the weight of co-ordinated force.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Iranian government turns to internal crackdown with arrests, executions
Social Sharing Iranian authorities are pivoting from a ceasefire with Israel to intensify an internal security crackdown across the country with mass arrests, executions and military deployments, particularly in the restive Kurdish region, officials and activists say. Within days of Israel's airstrikes beginning on June 13, Iranian security forces started a campaign of widespread arrests accompanied by an intensified street presence based around checkpoints, sources have told CBC and Reuters. One man in Tehran, who responded to a CBC News callout via WhatsApp but did not provide his name, said Wednesday that security officers are stopping people at pop-up checkpoints around the city and asking them to show their phones and open their messaging apps. "It will take you only one tweet or one social network post to be arrested if the content is believed sensitive by the state," he said. Another man told CBC he feels "a deep sense of fear" that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his regime may have secured their survival and will turn their anger inward as they did in the 1980s, with crackdowns on their own people and mass executions. Some in Israel and exiled opposition groups had hoped the military campaign, which targeted Revolutionary Guards and internal security forces as well as nuclear sites, would spark a mass uprising and the overthrow of the Islamic Republic. But Alam Saleh, speaking with CBC from Tehran Wednesday, said he knows many Iranians who were critical of the regime and have changed tone in recent days, now rallying around the flag in the face of what they see as an unprovoked and unjustified war. "What was the point, what Israel and United States has achieved, in bombing Iran for 12 days?" Saleh said. "The only thing that they probably achieved is to make Iran never, never again trust these two countries." WATCH | Canadian-Iranian talks about the war: CBC's Rosemary Barton speaks with Canadian-Iranian Mina Morshed about Israel-Iran war 3 hours ago Duration 3:38 Get the latest on the CBC News App, and CBC News Network for breaking news and analysis. There has been no sign yet of any significant protests against the authorities. However, one senior Iranian security official and two other senior officials briefed on internal security issues said the authorities were focused on the threat of possible internal unrest, particularly in Kurdish areas. Revolutionary Guard and Basij paramilitary units were put on alert and internal security was now the primary focus, said the senior security official. The official said authorities were worried about Israeli agents, ethnic separatists and the People's Mujahideen Organisation of Iran, an exiled opposition group that has previously staged attacks inside Iran. Activists within the country are lying low. "We are being extremely cautious right now because there's a real concern the regime might use this situation as a pretext," a rights activist in Tehran, who was jailed during mass protests in 2022, told Reuters. The activist said he knew dozens of people who had been summoned by authorities and either arrested or warned against any expressions of dissent. Kurdish groups say they're being targeted Iranian rights group HRNA said on Monday it had recorded arrests of 705 people on political or security charges since the start of the war. Many of those arrested have been accused of spying for Israel, HRNA said. Iranian state media reported three were executed on Tuesday in Urmia, near the Turkish border, and the Iranian-Kurdish rights group Hengaw said they were all Kurdish. Iran's Foreign and Interior Ministries did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Israelis, Iranians skeptical of lasting ceasefire 20 hours ago Duration 4:25 One of the officials briefed on security said troops had been deployed to the borders of Pakistan, Iraq and Azerbaijan to stop infiltration by what the official called terrorists. The other official briefed on security acknowledged that hundreds had been arrested. Iran's mostly Sunni Muslim Kurdish and Baluch minorities have long been a source of opposition to the Islamic Republic, chafing against rule from the Persian-speaking, Shia government in Tehran. The three main Iranian Kurdish separatist factions based in Iraqi Kurdistan said some of their activists and fighters had been arrested and described widespread military and security movements by Iranian authorities. Ribaz Khalili from the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (KDPI) said Revolutionary Guards units had deployed in schools in Iran's Kurdish provinces within three days of Israel's strikes beginning and gone house-to-house for suspects and arms. The Guards had taken protective measures too, evacuating an industrial zone near their barracks and closing major roads for their own use in bringing reinforcements to Kermanshah and Sanandaj, two major cities in the Kurdish region. A cadre from the Free Life Party of Kurdistan (PJAK), who gave her nom de guerre of Fatma Ahmed, said the party had counted more than 500 opposition members being detained in Kurdish provinces since the airstrikes began. Ahmed and an official from the Kurdish Komala party, who spoke on condition of anonymity, both described checkpoints being set up across Kurdish areas with physical searches of people as well as checks of their phones and documents.
Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Muslim Brotherhood and Qatar have established extensive network across Canada: report
The Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization that has declared 'jihad against the Jews,' has established a vast network of charities and fundraising across Canada, a new think-tank report finds. 'For decades, organizations affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, of which Hamas is also an adherent, have managed to embed themselves at all levels of Canadian society,' the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) argues. Its latest report, 'We Stand on Guard For Thee? The Growing Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood on Politics, Academia, and Civil Society in America,' was published Wednesday morning. The organization features Canada's former justice minister Irwin Cotler on its board of directors. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Muslim Brotherhood is an Egyptian organization that believes in the establishment of an Islamic caliphate whose leaders have promoted antisemitic conspiracies. Hamas is a Palestinian offshoot of the Brotherhood. 'This report is a wake-up call for all Canadians,' ISGAP board advisor Charles Asher Small told National Post in a written statement. Small called on the federal government to 'designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and 'immediately freeze public funding to suspect organizations.' 'Our report exposes how federal agencies have become complicit in sustaining and legitimizing networks that promote antisemitic and anti-Israel ideologies under the guise of charity and social welfare,' Small wrote. 'These entities are exploiting the very values of tolerance and pluralism that Canada holds dear, weaponizing public institutions against Jewish communities and undermining Canadian democracy itself.' The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, a Florida-based research group, highlighted several Canadian charities that have extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, alleging that they exploit Canadian laws to raise money for Muslim Brotherhood factions in the Middle East. Of particular concern to the think-tank is the Muslim Association of Canada, which describes itself as the 'largest Muslim grassroots Canadian charitable organization.' In 2021, an audit conducted by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) found 'the concept of the Muslim Brotherhood appeared' in the charity's 'governing documents.' The Muslim Association of Canada disputed the characterization of its work, alleging it reflected a 'systemic Islamophobia' bias and appealed the CRA audit. The CRA, in its original investigation, found enough grounds to revoke MAC's charitable status. (The MAC remains a registered charity, according to the federal government's database .) On Wednesday, it dismissed the ISGAP report. 'This report is nothing more than recycled Islamophobic tropes dressed up as 'research,' when in reality it's a biased, unsubstantiated hit piece that relies solely on discredited allegations — allegations that were questioned by the Ontario Superior Court for their apparent bias and ultimately abandoned by the CRA in concluding its audit and reaching a resolution with MAC,' the organization told National Post in a statement on Wednesday. The federal investigation also revealed that 'most prominent members, directors, and officials' of MAC were involved either with International Relief Fund for the Afflicted and Needy (IRFAN-Canada) 'or a network of charities that appear to have been used to propagate and fundraise for Hamas in Canada.' IRFAN-Canada was designated a terror entity in 2014 for transferring nearly $15 million to Hamas, the Palestinian terror group behind the October 7 attacks on Israel. The Canadian government outlined in its decision that IRFAN-Canada exploited its 'status as a charitable organization to fund Hamas.' A decade later, Canada's public safety ministry secured a deportation order against a former female employee of IRFAN-Canada, stating her presence in the country was 'inadmissible on security grounds.' Lorenzo Vidino, a terror finance researcher at George Washington University's Program on Extremism, has spent the last 25 years studying the Muslim Brotherhood. He co-published a report in January 2025, 'The Muslim Brotherhood in the West? Evidence from a Canadian Tax Authority Investigation,' exploring the Muslim Association of Canada and sees as a window into how the Islamist group operates in North America and across Europe. 'I think all Western countries have come to an understanding that the Brotherhood is a problematic group and I think the findings of all other countries apply also to Canada,' Vidino told National Post. 'There's a consensus across security services in general of the threats that the Brotherhood poses and the main one is an issue of social cohesion and integration. The Brotherhood has an ability to push within Muslim communities narratives that are highly divisive, that are polarizing,' he said. 'It promotes values that are antithetical to those of Western constitutions when it comes to democracy, white it comes to women's rights, when it comes to gay rights, when it comes to freedom of religion, when it comes to antisemitism.' Vidiono, author of the 2010 book 'The New Muslim Brotherhood in the West,' said that while it the Islamist group, itself, 'might not be directly engaged in terrorist activities, it promotes a narrative — it mainstreams a narrative — that lays the groundwork for jihadists groups to recruit. It creates this narrative of victimization: the narrative that Muslims are constantly under attack by the West with widespread Islamophobia.' The ISGAP report noted that the leading Canadian Muslim advocacy group, the National Council of Canadian Muslims, also has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The organization, which was originally known as the Council on American-Islamic Relations Canada (CAIR-CAN), was an outgrowth of a similarly-named U.S. group which, the publication alleges, is 'a self-described Muslim Brotherhood front organization.' A 2003 affidavit from the former founder of the group, Sheema Khan, also acknowledged the relationship. 'This report does not serve Canadian interests. It amplifies foreign narratives designed to fuel Islamophobia and division within our society,' the Muslim Association of Canada added in its written statement. 'Canadians should be concerned about foreign influence, particularly the foreign-funded industry of anti-Muslim hate that fuels reports like this. These authors should be ashamed of themselves for trafficking in Islamophobic tropes that endanger Canadian Muslims and undermine social cohesion.' The report also explores efforts by Qatar, a small country in the Arabian Peninsula, to influence Canadian academia and fund local Islamic centres. Qatar offers safe passage and financing to Hamas leaders and has been a principal mediator between the Palestinian terror group and Israel to broker ceasefire talks. Concerns over the Emirati country's foreign influence have gained momentum in America amid reporting that suggests Qatar has been the largest foreign donor to American universities since 1986, contributing more than $6 billion, mostly to elite colleges. The ISGAP paper details how Qatar gave McGill University in Montreal a $1.25 million gift for its Islamic studies program in 2012, and created a collaboration between Qatar Airways and the school's Institute for Air and Space Law. Qatar's financial reach extends beyond academia and into the Canadian charitable realm. The CRA audit of the Muslim Association of Canada found that the organization received more than $1 million from Qatar Charity, which ISGAP describes as a 'state-owned organization,' in 2012. The foreign group gave nearly $2.5 million to help buy land and build the Islamic Community Centre of Ontario, the Canada Revenue Agency found during its investigation. The report argues that the financial power Qatar wields across Canada could influence how university administrators discipline antisemitism on campus and influence the message of religious figures in Muslim communities. The consequences of Canadian inaction, 'due in no small part to a lack of political will,' the report argues, 'has now become a major national security issue that requires serious scrutiny.' National Post sought comment from the Qatari embassy in Ottawa but did not hear back by press time. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
