Centre notifies rules for GST appellate tribunals; provides for mandatory e-filing, hybrid hearing
The government has notified the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, which provide for mandatory e-filing of applications and conducting hearings in a hybrid mode.
The rules also provide that any urgent matter filed by an applicant before 12:00 noon shall be listed before the Appellate Tribunal on the following working day, if the application is complete in all respects.
In exceptional cases, the application may be received after 12:00 noon but before 3:00 p.m. for listing on the following day, with the specific permission of the Appellate Tribunal or President.
The benches of GSTAT, a crucial body for resolving GST-related disputes, would sit from 10:30 a.m. to 01:30 p.m. and from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., subject to any order made by the President.
The administrative offices of the Appellate Tribunal will remain open on all working days from 9:30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m., according to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2025.
In May last year, the government had appointed Justice (Retd) Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as the first President of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT).
Mishra was a former Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court and selected by a Search-cum-Selection Committee headed by the Chief Justice of India.
The GSTAT is the Appellate Authority established under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to hear various appeals under the said Act and the respective State/Union Territories GST Acts against the orders of the first appellate authority.
It consists of a principal bench and various state benches. As per the approval of the GST Council, the government has notified the Principal Bench, to be located in New Delhi, and 31 State benches at various locations across the country. The process for the appointment of judicial members and technical members is already in progress.
The tribunal will ensure swift, fair, judicious and effective resolution to GST disputes, besides significantly reducing the burden on higher courts.
The establishment of the GSTAT would further enhance the effectiveness of the GST system in India and foster a more transparent and efficient tax environment in the country.
Senior Partner at AMRG & Associates, Rajat Mohan, said, with a total of 11 Chapters, 70 Rules, and 4 Statutory Forms, this legal framework covers the full procedural and administrative lifecycle of GSTAT appeals.
"The structural clarity is enhanced through 4 standardised forms: Form GSTAT-01 (Appeal), Form GSTAT-02 (Order Sheet), and CDR-01 & CDR-02 for court management," Mohan said.
EY Tax Partner Saurabh Agarwal said from mandatory e-filing and hybrid hearings to defined timelines, the rules reflect a clear intent to streamline dispute resolution and reduce procedural delays.
"This is a major step forward in strengthening taxpayer confidence and modernising India's indirect tax litigation framework," Agarwal said.
AKM Global Partner-Tax Sandeep Sehgal said in the GSTAT rules, the procedures for discovery, inspection, and production of documents have also been clearly delineated, ensuring procedural clarity and transparency.
"Importantly, the Rules set out the powers, duties, and functions of the Appellate Tribunal, thereby codifying the authority and scope of the GSTAT's operations. The procedural codification is expected to bring uniformity, reduce litigation timelines, and ensure faster resolution of disputes under GST law."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Court directs organisers of Lord Murugan conference to ensure communal harmony
Taking into account that the Madurai City Police have granted permission to the Hindu Munnani to conduct Muruga Bakthargalin Aanmeega Maanadu on June 22 and the extended pre-event with certain conditions, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court modified certain conditions and directed the organisers to ensure communal harmony was maintained. The court was hearing petitions filed by the Hindu Munnani seeking permission for an extended pre-event celebrations ahead of the conference, which included conducting poojas at the miniatures Lord Murugan's six abodes set up temporarily at Amma Thidal near the Vandiyur toll gate. The organisers also challenged the conditions imposed by the police. Impleading petitions opposing the conduct of the event and pre-event were also filed. Justice B. Pugalendhi observed that Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees every person a right to freely profess, practice, and propagate their religion. Therefore, any individual or organisation has the liberty to hold the function based on the religious faith. However, this right is not absolute. There can be restrictions, if it is intended to affect communal harmony. The court observed: 'Our country is a diverse society having people of different faiths. The exercise of religious freedom must be harmonised with a broader objective of maintaining public order, mortality, and communal harmony.' The Supreme Court has empowered law enforcement authorities to issue prohibitory orders whenever they found that persons, speeches, or actions were likely to trigger communal antagonism and hatred that affects communal harmony. In the present case, the State, as well as impleading petitioners, apprehend that in the guise of a religious event, the organisers may antagonise other communities, and there is a possibility of a communal clash, the court observed. The court said The Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act defined a religious institution as any body for the promotion of any religion or persuasion and included any place or premises used as a place of public religious worship. Section 6 of the Act prohibits any ceremony, festival, congregation, procession, or assembly organised or held under its auspices to be used for any political activity. The petitioner organisation, which claims to promote the religious values, can also be included under this definition, it said. With regard to the condition on vehicle passes, the court said there was no reason to interfere with the condition. If any participant applies for the vehicle pass, the police shall issue it in 24 hours. In case of a rejection, the reasons have to be valid. The police will have an idea about the persons and number of vehicles, likely to participate in the conference. There is no need to furnish separate details by the organisers, the court observed. The court observed that the condition imposed to obtain the permission from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department before installing miniatures appeared to have been imposed by the police in a mechanical manner. Similarly, another condition for permission of the Corporation authorities. The court permitted the petitioner to use two drones for covering the events and speakers, if any to be installed, must be within the ambit of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules. The requirement of police permission for conducting the event is to ensure there are no law and order issues, the court said. Crowd management The petitioner said they did not need police assistance to manage the crowd as it already had volunteers. The court, taking into account that the event is to be conducted on a highway, said it should not lead to traffic congestion. Therefore, necessary police personnel may be deployed to ensure the free flow of traffic. If any police personnel were required by the organisers, the same shall be considered by collecting standard charges as per the Government Orders, the court observed. The apprehension of the State and impleading petitioners that the event may disturb communal harmony relied on the incident that took place in Thirupparankundram. The event is being organised as a religious conference for devotees of Lord Murugan. With that being the objective, the organisers of the event must comply strictly with the observations of the Supreme Court and ensure that communal harmony is maintained, the court directed.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Citizen-candidate dialogue aims to address state's burning social & environ issues
Ludhiana: A civic engagement programme was organised by PAC Mattewara, along with various environmental and social organisations from across Punjab, at Leisure Valley here Sunday. Titled "Our Issues, Your Stand", the event aimed to hold political candidates accountable by directly confronting them on pressing public issues just four days before Ludhiana West goes to polls. In a unique format, candidates and representatives moved from stand to stand, each manned by an NGO or civil rights group, responding to pointed questions on critical issues. Only two candidates and a representative of another took part in the event. They were Navneet Kumar Gopi, candidate of Akali Dal Amritsar (Mann group), Parupkar Singh Ghuman, SAD candidate and Gurdeep Singh Gosha, who came on behalf of BJP candidate Jiwan Gupta. The NGOs and rights groups raked up issues like the proposed urban estates on 25,000 acres of agricultural land, chemical-laced wastewater being let out into the Buddha Dariya, the setting up of a new paper mill at Chamkaur Sahib on the banks of the Buddha Dariya and Neelon canal, alleged encroachment of land belonging to schools and colleges, lifting of the ban on plastic bags and single-use plastic items, rampant encroachment of green belts, amendment of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, the unresolved Mattewara land issue, Punjab's looming water crisis, and appointment of outsiders to constitutional, govt, and political posts in Punjab. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Thanking the candidates who could make it to the programme, Amandeep Bains and Jaskirat Singh of PAC (Mattewara) said, "Those who do not have the time or inclination to listen to the issues of the people just four days before polling, what can we expect from them after they win the election?" Activists Kapil Arora and Kuldeep Singh Khaira thanked the teams of Chamkaur Sahib Morcha, Zira Sanjha Morcha, Batala Bachao Morcha, Mattewara Morcha, among others, who came from far-off places, especially for the programme, and asked the right questions. Col JS Gill, Brij Bhushan Goyal, Preet Dhanoa, Gurpreet Plaha, Amrita Mangat, Mohit Saggar from PAC, Karan Kandhola from Chamkaur Sahib Morcha, Gurmel Singh and Roman Brar from Zira Sanjha Morcha, Param Sunil Kaur from Batala Bachao Morcha, and Kashmir Singh from Sekhowal village were present with their team members.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Mind the gap: on India and the Global Gender Gap Index report
India has dropped two points from its position last year in the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Index report, holding at 131 out of 148 countries. The parity score is just 64.1%, making it among one of the lowest-ranked countries in South Asia, according to the report released last week. The Index measures gender parity in a country across four aspects — economic participation and opportunity; educational attainment; health and survival, and political empowerment. While the performance of India in three of the four dimensions is either stable or has marginally improved, the significant lack of achievement in the fourth weighs down the overall result. The report says, in the economic participation and opportunity category, India has improved by +0.9 percentage points. The parity in estimated earned income rises from 28.6% to 29.9%, positively impacting the subindex score, the report said. Scores in labour force participation rate remained the same (45.9%) as last year — India's highest achieved to date. In the educational attainment and health and survival categories, the scores have been driven up by positive shifts. It is in the political empowerment category that India records a drop in parity, since the last evaluation. Female representation in Parliament fell from 14.7% to 13.8% in 2025, lowering the indicator score for the second year in a row below 2023 levels. Also evaluated was the share of women in ministerial roles, which fell from 6.5% to 5.6 %, continuing the sinking trend since 2023. The path ahead is obvious — consolidate and improve on the gains and make efforts to set right the lacunae with policies and political will. India has had a long, shameful tussle on this issue as it toyed with the idea of increasing representation for women in polity. The controversial Women's Reservation Bill was passed in 2023, 27 years after it was first introduced in 1996. The Bill has been visited upon by many charades, was blocked at every turn, and the path to actualisation of the goal was lined with monumental impediments. The present Act reserves one third of the seats for women in Parliament and the State legislatures, but will only be implemented from 2029, after the completion of the Census, and the delimitation exercise. But India climbing up the ranks of a global index should be only secondary to achieving a rounded, applause-worthy, gender parity structure within the country. There is, also, nothing keeping political parties from increasing women's participation in the electoral process, even before the law necessitates it.
