Japanese American museum blasts Trump order as threat to ‘truth and democracy'
Japanese American incarceration during World War II has condemned US President
Donald Trump 's new directive requiring national park sites to flag content deemed critical of the country's history, calling it a dangerous attempt to whitewash past injustices and dismantle democratic values.
Advertisement
The Japanese American National Museum (JANM) said the policy – which it traced to a May executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History' – would suppress uncomfortable truths and erase the legacy of marginalised communities, including the more than 10,000 Japanese Americans imprisoned during World War II at sites such as Manzanar and Minidoka.
'JANM is deeply disturbed by this new directive, especially at historical sites like Manzanar and Minidoka where Japanese Americans were unjustly incarcerated during World War II,' said Ann Burroughs, the museum's president and CEO, in a statement posted to social media on Thursday.
'The widespread dismantling of federal agencies that support our work and the attempts at the wholesale erasure of history will not help us achieve a more just America.'
Burroughs warned the initiative formed part of a broader campaign to 'suppress historical narratives that challenge [the administration's] preferred version of events' and to 'erase the contributions of people of colour, women, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised communities from the American story'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
27 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Degraded Nobel Peace Prize standards could mean Trump deserves one
Given the long-degraded state of the Nobel Peace Prize, I say Donald Trump probably does deserve one, or three. It may also be jointly awarded to the US president's Israeli partner-in-crime, the suspected war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu with an outstanding arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity issued by the International Criminal Court. Eventually, Netanyahu will have to end his war on the Palestinian civilian population, which ought to make him a peacemaker of sorts. Advertisement If Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho could win the Nobel, why not Trump and Netanyahu? Incidentally, Trump has sanctioned the court's chief prosecutor for daring to try to arrest his mate, as well as the chief UN monitor on Palestinian rights for issuing a report on the complicity of multinational corporations in Israel's 'genocide' in the Palestinian Terroritories. But never mind; Pakistan, Ukraine, and now Israel and a group of African leaders have taken turns to nominate Trump for the big prize, which the US president has openly admitted he covets. Imagine that: the US has been arming Ukraine and Israel to the teeth, and they in turn nominate its president for the peace prize. That's the kind of world we live in now. Ok, Ukraine has withdrawn the peace nomination after Washington temporarily halted weapon supplies. You can't say Kyiv wasn't being consistent! But now that the weapon pipelines have been restored, perhaps Kyiv should resume the nomination. Advertisement Remember how Barack Obama won the 2009 peace prize just for being elected president? That was what everyone had suspected at the time, and it was subsequently confirmed in the autobiography of a former Nobel Institute director, in his own words, to 'strengthen the president'. Compared with the just-elected Obama, Trump actually did some things, though critics can't agree on what they are or their implications.
South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-Musk feud: Chinese saying sheds light on who might prevail
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Recently, the world's eyes have been on US President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill , which he signed into law after it was narrowly passed by a vote of 218 to 214 in the US House of Representatives. The new law is not that beautiful, though, as the Congressional Budget Office estimates it will add US$3.3 trillion to the country's debt during the next 10 years and also result in millions of Americans losing health insurance coverage. It is doubtful that this bill becoming law will help move Trump's approval ratings with an eye on the midterm elections. The bill also turned the spotlight on the fight between Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The honeymoon period between them is clearly over, and the next episode in their relationship is proving to be entertaining. The passage of the bill threatens Musk's businesses and, by extension, his personal wealth. As Musk stepped up his attacks on the bill, Trump indicated that he might expel him from the United States. However, Musk is not showing any signs of vulnerability and has hit back, launching a new political party It is hard to predict the outcome of the fight of the century between these two very powerful people. But, in accordance with the Chinese saying, 'The poor should not fight with the rich; the rich should not fight with officials', it seems that Trump should have the upper hand.
South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
As Trump's tariff patience wanes, countries scrambling for deals face hard choice
US trading partners trying to navigate the final weeks of negotiations before President Donald Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs hit are facing a leader who has made clear he has lost patience with talks. Even as negotiators from Brussels to New Delhi are racing to find a way out of the punishing levies he has floated, Trump continued to send letters unilaterally setting rates – while still allowing for a little wiggle room. Early on Saturday, Trump posted letters sent to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, declaring a 30 per cent rate for Mexico and the European Union beginning August 1. He said Mexico had failed to do enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States and complained that the EU's trade deficit with the US was unfair. He suggested both partners could take steps to mitigate the rates – or he could increase them further if he did not like their responses. Efforts by those countries and others to find an escape from the punishing levies are expected to intensify next week ahead of a new August 1 deadline for many of the import taxes to kick in. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is heading to Japan, and EU negotiators are focusing their attention on cars and agricultural tariffs in hopes of securing at least a provisional agreement.
