logo
Secret tension between Fox News's biggest stars revealed in shocking new court documents

Secret tension between Fox News's biggest stars revealed in shocking new court documents

Daily Mail​21 hours ago
Jeanine Pirro slammed fellow Fox News host Sean Hannity as an 'egomaniac' in text messages made public as part of voting technology company Smartmatic's $2.7 billion lawsuit against the network Tuesday.
The documents, obtained by The Washington Post, also show Pirro bragging about her role in Donald Trump 's win over Kamala Harris.
Smartmatic argues Pirro served as a conduit to Trump associates who claimed the previous election was stolen. She went on to peddle such claims on-air.
The company also claims Pirro was committed to supporting Trump despite the network's strict policies barring on-air personalities from doing so.
Pirro, an Upstate New York judge prior to joining Fox, left the network in May to become the United States attorney for the District of Columbia.
The documents provide a painstaking picture of Pirro's time at the network, including some bad blood behind-the-scenes.
'[Hannity stormed] in like he owns the place, throws his papers on the Pres desk and says, you don't mind if I use your private bathroom, and walks into bathroom within Oval and uses it,' she wrote to a friend on October 27, 2020, following one Oval Office meeting with Trump and Hannity.
'Looks at me and says, I got to talk to him … It's all abt him, period. No one else matters.'
'Egomaniac,' she scathed.
In one message sent by Pirro to then RNC chair Ronna McDaniel the month before, the then-Fox host boasted, 'I work so hard for the party across the country,'
'I'm the Number 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party.'
Other conversations included to bolster Smartmatic's claims suggest Pirro and other hosts were motivated to stay on Trump's good side for other reasons as well.
In one sent in 2020, she complained to Trump's son Eric Trump how she was 'upset' that Bernard Kerik, the former New York City police commissioner sentenced to four years in prison for tax fraud in 2010, had received a pardon from Trump and her husband had not.
Pirro's spouse, Albert Pirro, was the last to be pardoned by Trump during his first term after committing a series of tax-related crimes.
Albert Pirro - a onetime influential GOP businessman who deducted $1.2 million of his personal expenses as business write-offs to buy cars, vacation homes, and paintings, prosecutors said - served 17 months.
In months prior, Pirro brushed Kerik off as a 'selfish b***ard', after being told a pardon for Albert was not assured.
Pirro's spouse, Albert Pirro, was the last to be pardoned by Trump during his first term, after a series of tax crimes that saw him sentenced to more than two years. 'I DON'T CARE [ABOUT] ANYONE ELSE,' Pirro told Eric Trump in one message. The couple are seen together in 2000
In one message that mentioned her husband and Kerik, she complained, 'I DON'T CARE [ABOUT] ANYONE ELSE.'
Separately, Smartmatic argued that Pirro served as a conduit to Trump associates who touted the claim the election was stolen, specifically the lawyer Sidney Powell.
'It's Jeanine P.,' she wrote in a November 10, 2020, text message to Powell that mentioned Dominion Voting Systems, the voting machine company Fox settled with in 2023 for $787million over similar claims.
'Got a former CIA chief of station who knows [about] development of Dominion,' Pirro wrote.
'Keep fighting,' she went on to tell Powell.
As this was happening, Pirro's producer, Jerry Andrews, was warning Pirro to stay away from claims of election fraud on-air.
Pirro consequently complained in all-caps, to Hannity: 'I'M TIRED OF THE CENSORSHIP AND I'M EMBARRASSED BY HOW THEY CALLED THIS ELECTION.'
The message was sent just after Joe Biden's win.
Pirro went on to tell Hannity - weeks after criticizing him as a narcissist - that she had made several demands to management after an episode of 'Justice with Judge Jeanine,' then set to air on November 7, 2020, was scrapped.
'Fox News promoting u every 5 seconds. It's hilarious,' Hannity quipped back, which the Post reported.
The contents of Pirro's post-election show remain unknown, aside from the fact it spurred 'internal concerns'.
In a deposition included in Smartmatic's court filing, Pirro conceded that the election was 'fair and free'.
'I believe that there's been no showing that Smartmatic engaged in any problems,' she said of the voting technology company that provided election technology to Los Angeles County.
She also answered 'I do' when asked by Smartmatic's lawyers whether she believed Biden was 'legitimately elected,' after alleging on the air that both Smartmatic and its competitor Dominion had conspired to rig the election against Trump.
The Dominion suit was settled for $787.5million. Fox never corrected its coverage of Smartmatic or acknowledged particular mistakes, Smartmatic pointed out in the more than 400-page suit.
Smartmatic is seeking damages for what it says were falsehoods and conspiracies.
Other hosts named in the filing include Maria Bartiromo and Jesse Watters.
Fox News slammed the suit in a statement, saying, 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on FOX News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech.
'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.'
A Los Angeles Times report Wednesday detailed how federal prosecutors have filed a corruption case against Smartmatic, claiming the company purposely overbilled LA County for extra cash used to bribe government officials.
The suit, viewed by Daily Mail, remains ongoing. In it, Fox News lawyers claimed the county is holding back crucial records.
It alleges that 'the very Smartmatic executives involved in winning the L.A. County contract used similar methods to bribe officials in other jurisdictions.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin prepared to meet Zelenskiy but legitimacy an issue, Lavrov says
Putin prepared to meet Zelenskiy but legitimacy an issue, Lavrov says

Reuters

time8 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Putin prepared to meet Zelenskiy but legitimacy an issue, Lavrov says

MOSCOW, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin is prepared to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy but all issues must be worked through first and there's a question about Zelenskiy's authority to sign a peace deal, Putin's foreign minister said on Thursday. Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump met on Friday in Alaska for the first Russia-U.S. summit in more than four years and the two leaders discussed how to end the deadliest war in Europe since World War Two. After his summit talks in Alaska, Trump said on Monday he had begun arranging, opens new tab a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, to be followed by a trilateral summit with the U.S. president. Asked by reporters if Putin was willing to meet Zelenskiy, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said: "Our president has repeatedly said that he is ready to meet, including with Mr. Zelenskiy". Lavrov, though, added a caveat: "With the understanding that all issues that require consideration at the highest level will be well worked out, and experts and ministers will prepare appropriate recommendations. "And, of course, with the understanding that when and if - hopefully, when - it comes to signing future agreements, the issue of the legitimacy of the person who signs these agreements from the Ukrainian side will be resolved," Lavrov said. Putin has repeatedly raised doubts about Zelenskiy's legitimacy as his term in office was due to expire in May 2024 but the war means no new presidential election has yet been held. Kyiv says Zelenskiy remains the legitimate president. Russian officials say they are worried that if Zelenskiy signs the deal then a future leader of Ukraine could contest it on the basis that Zelenskiy's term had technically expired. Zelenskiy said this week Kyiv would like a "strong reaction" from Washington if Putin were not willing to sit down for a bilateral meeting with him. European leaders say they are sceptical that Putin is really interested in peace, but are searching for a credible way to ensure Ukraine's security as part of a potential peace deal with minimal U.S. involvement. Lavrov said it was clear that neither Ukraine nor European leaders wanted peace. He accused the so-called "coalition of the willing" - which includes major European powers such as Britain, France, Germany and Italy - of trying to undermine the progress made in Alaska. "They are not interested in a sustainable, fair, long-term settlement," Lavrov said of Ukraine. He said the Europeans were interested in achieving the strategic defeat of Russia. "European countries followed Mr. Zelenskiy to Washington and tried to advance their agenda there, which aims to ensure that security guarantees are based on the logic of isolating Russia," Lavrov said, referring to Monday's gathering of Trump, Zelenskiy and the leaders of major European powers at the White House. Lavrov said the best option for a security guarantee for Ukraine would be based on discussions that took place between Moscow and Kyiv in Istanbul in 2022. Under a draft of that document which Reuters has seen, Ukraine was asked to agree to permanent neutrality in return for international security guarantees from the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States. Any attempts to depart from the failed Istanbul discussions would be hopeless, Lavrov said. At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid.

Trump threatens funding for all California schools over transgender policies
Trump threatens funding for all California schools over transgender policies

Reuters

time8 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump threatens funding for all California schools over transgender policies

WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S President Donald Trump on Thursday said any California school district that does not adhere to his administration's transgender policies will not receive federal funding, but gave no other details. Representatives for the White House and the U.S. Department of Education did not immediately respond to requests for detail following Trump's comment, posted to his social media platform. U.S. schools receive the vast majority of their funding through local and state sources, but do receive some money from the federal government. Trump's post is the latest salvo in his fight against transgender rights as well as the state of California, led by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. His administration sued California in July over its policy to allow transgender athletes to compete in girls' school sports, alleging that it was a violation of federal anti-discrimination laws. In February, the Republican president signed a directive to strip federal funding from any school that allows transgender women or girls to compete in female sports. Representatives for Newsom's office could not be immediately reached.

A coal-fired plant in Michigan was to close. But Trump forced it to keep running
A coal-fired plant in Michigan was to close. But Trump forced it to keep running

The Guardian

time8 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

A coal-fired plant in Michigan was to close. But Trump forced it to keep running

Donald Trump has made several unusual moves to elongate the era of coal, such as giving the industry exemptions from pollution rules. But the gambit to keep one Michigan coal-fired power station running has been extraordinary – by forcing it to remain open even against the wishes of its operator. The hulking JH Campbell power plant, which since 1962 has sat a few hundred yards from the sand dunes at the edge of Lake Michigan, was just eight days away from a long-planned closure in May when Trump's Department of Energy issued an emergency order that it remain open for a further 90 days. The move, taken under emergency powers more normally used during wartime or in the wake of disaster, stunned local residents and the plant's operator, Consumers Energy. 'My family had a countdown for it closing, we couldn't wait,' said Mark Oppenhuizen, who has lived in the shadow of the plant for 30 years and suspects its pollution worsened his wife's lung disease. 'I was flabbergasted when the administration said they had stopped it shutting down,' he said. 'Why are they inserting themselves into a decision a company has made? Just because politically you don't like it? It's all so dumb.' The 23 May order, by the US energy secretary, Chris Wright, warns that the regional grid would be strained by the closure of JH Campbell with local homes and businesses at risk of 'curtailments or outages, presenting a risk to public health and safety' without it. But Miso, the grid operator for Michigan and 14 other states, has stressed it has had 'adequate resources to meet peak demand this summer' without JH Campbell and Consumers Energy had already set about making plans for life after its last remaining coal plant. 'What's remarkable is that this is the first time the energy secretary has used these powers without being asked to do so by the market operator or power plant operator,' said Timothy Fox, an energy analyst at ClearView. 'It shows the Trump administration is prepared to take muscular actions to keep its preferred power sources online.' Wright – whose department has bizarrely taken to tweeting pictures of lumps of coal with the words 'She's an icon. She's a legend' – has said the US 'has got to stop closing coal plants' to help boost electricity generation to meet demand that is escalating due to the growth of artificial intelligence. The administration has also issued a separate emergency declaration to keep open a gas plant in Pennsylvania, although it has sought to kill off wind and solar projects, which Trump has called 'ugly' and 'disgusting'. The president, who solicited and received major donations from coal, oil and gas interests during his election campaign, has signed an executive order aimed at reviving what he calls 'beautiful, clean coal' and took the remarkable step of asking fossil fuel companies to email requests to be exempt from pollution laws, again under emergency powers. So far, 71 coal plants, along with dozens of other chemical, copper smelting and other polluting facilities, have received 'pollution passes' from the Trump administration according to a tally by the Environmental Defense Fund, allowing greater emissions of airborne toxins linked to an array of health problems. Coal is, despite Trump's claims, the dirtiest of all fossil fuels and the leading source of planet-heating pollution. Trump has launched a 'political takeover of the electricity grid' to favor fossil fuels, according to Caroline Reiser, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'The result of this will be higher electricity bills, more pollution in our communities and a worsening climate crisis,' she added. In Michigan, the cost of keeping JH Campbell open is set to be steep. Consumers Energy initially estimated its closure would save ratepayers $600m by 2040 as it shifts to cheaper, cleaner energy sources such as solar and wind. Reversing this decision costs $1m a day in operating costs, an imposition that midwest residents will have to meet through their bills. It is understood the company privately told outside groups it fears the administration could keep adding 90-day emergency orders for the entire remainder of Trump's term. 'Consumers Energy continues to comply with the [Department of Energy] order and will do so as long as it is in effect,' a company spokesperson said. 'We are pursuing recovery of the costs of running the Campbell plant in a proceeding currently before [the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]. Timely cost recovery is essential.' Should the Trump administration go further and force all of the US fossil fuel plants set to retire by 2028 to continue operating, it will cost American ratepayers as much as $6bn a year in extra bills, a new report by a coalition of green groups has found. This would almost certainly be met by legal action – Dana Nessel, Michigan's attorney general, has already filed a lawsuit arguing the 'arbitrary and illegal order' to extend JH Campbell's lifespan will unfairly heap costs upon households in the state. Trump's efforts may bear some fruit, with US coal production expected to tick up slightly this year, although the longer-term trend for coal is one of decline amid cheaper gas and renewables. 'The administration may slow the retirement trend although they are unlikely to stop it,' said ClearView's Fox. 'The economics don't change but the administration could be a savior for these plants at least while Donald Trump is in office.' For those living next to and downwind of coal plants, there is a cost to be paid that isn't just monetary. Tiny soot particles from burned coal can bury themselves deep into the lungs, causing potentially deadly respiratory and heart problems. The closure of such plants can lift this burden dramatically – a recent study found that in the month after a coal facility was closed near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 2016, the number of childhood asthma visits to local hospitals declined by 41% and then continued to fall by about 4% each month. The study shows 'the closure of a major industrial pollution source can lead to immediate and lasting improvements in the lung health of the those who live nearby', said Wuyue Yu, research co-author and postdoctoral fellow at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. For those living in the township of Port Sheldon, a mostly bucolic setting on the shore of the vast Lake Michigan, a pollution-free future beckoned once JH Campbell had been scheduled to close, with lofty plans for new parkland, housing and a battery plant touted for the site. Now there is uncertainty. Last week, a few dozen residents and activists held a protest event next to the sprawling plant, which hummed and whirred in the summer heat, one 650ft chimney puncturing the horizon, another, smaller flue striped red and white, like a candy cane. Dozens of train cars full of coal, hastily procured after the plant's supply was used up ahead of a closure that has been scheduled for four years, backed up in the sunshine. When burned in the huge 1.5GW plant, this coal emits about 7.7m tons of carbon dioxide a year. 'Trump is just trying to keep the money coming into coal companies as long as he can, I suppose,' said David Hoekema, who has lived a couple of miles from the plant since 2006 and has had to clean coal dust from his windows. Trump easily won this county, called Ottawa, in last year's election, but Hoekema said even his staunchest conservative neighbors don't want the coal plant. 'I've not met anyone along the lake shore who says, 'Oh yeah, let's keep this open' – even the conservative Republicans are concerned about their health,' he said. 'Republican ideology says local control is best but the Trump administration is saying, 'We don't care what the hell states do, we will impose our order on them.' I know there's a lot of competition, but this would have to be one of their craziest decisions.' The Department of Energy did not respond to questions about its plan for JH Campbell once the emergency order ends on Thursday. The battle over the coal plant's future has taken place to a backdrop of a scorching summer in Michigan, one of its hottest on record, with algal blooms sprouting in its lakes, both symptoms of an unfolding climate crisis. 'The talk in neighborhoods has been how hot it's been this summer – my kid was prepared to be outside every day and it's been so hot so often it's been irresponsible to do that,' said Stephen Wooden, a Democratic state lawmaker who added that Michigan residents are also 'pissed off' about increasing power bills. 'We're seeing the impacts of climate change daily, it is impacting our state,' Wooden said. 'And this is being caused by the continuation of outdated, expensive fossil fuels that Donald Trump wants to prop up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store