logo
For baby strollers, there's no way around China tariffs

For baby strollers, there's no way around China tariffs

Mint25-04-2025

Being an expectant parent has always come with a large helping of anxiety. Now, there is a fresh addition to the list of worries: tariffs on Chinese-made goods that are causing the price of big-ticket baby items such as strollers and cribs to surge.
Rayne Heath, a tech worker in Columbus, Ohio, who is six months pregnant with her first child, planned to wait until after her baby shower to buy a stroller. She was eyeing a Nuna model, with a height-adjustable handle and a car seat. The price: $1,200.
Heath snagged it just before the price rose by almost $200.
'It's a time of a lot of uncertainty, which is definitely scary as a new parent," she said.
President Trump's 145% tariffs on China are raising prices for a range of consumer products. The administration is thinking about cutting those duties to roughly 50% to 65%. That would nonetheless maintain a significant penalty on importers of Chinese goods.
Few products are being hit as hard as baby gear and toys.
Despite nearly a decade of trade tension with Beijing, American companies have struggled to find suppliers outside China that can produce efficiently while complying with the strict baby product safety standards that the U.S. government requires. Today, around 95% of imported strollers come from China, along with three-quarters of toys and infant furniture such as cribs.
That is in contrast with such products as shoes and clothing, which are less regulated and have largely shifted to countries including Vietnam and Bangladesh.
Enelio Ortega, chief executive officer of Bambi Baby, a New Jersey-based retail chain, said baby brands are hiking the minimum price stores can offer for their strollers by around 30% over the coming weeks. If the China tariffs remain at the current levels, he expects prices for many products to rise by at least half compared with before the tariffs.
For fancier stroller brands, with all-wheel suspension for a smooth ride and one-hand folding, that could mean a price increase of $400 or more.
'Baby gear as a whole has shifted to China for 15 years or longer, from low-end to high-end," Ortega said. 'The infrastructure unfortunately cannot be picked up and moved that easily."
Bob Monahan, CEO of Uppababy, started the Massachusetts-based stroller company about two decades ago with his wife, Lauren Monahan, when they were having children but couldn't find an easy-to-use stroller with an elegant design.
Today, Uppababy strollers, which retailed for up to $900 before Trump imposed new tariffs, are popular in parenting circles in places including Manhattan and are prized for features including reclining seats and large storage baskets.
The problem is they are made in China.
Uppababy said this month it would raise prices for most products. The price of its Vista V3 stroller will rise to $1,200 from $900.
The company is delaying product introductions after years of development because it can't afford to import them to the U.S. Executives at the company have told Chinese suppliers to stop shipping their products so Uppababy doesn't have to pay the tariffs, a move that could lead to product shortages.
'There was no way to anticipate or plan for how quickly these tariffs have escalated, with China in particular," Monahan said. 'It's been incredibly difficult to watch products like smartphones and other electronics receive exemptions, while tariffs on juvenile products could put a death sentence on businesses like ours."
Trump has blasted China's manufacturing dominance and accused it of stealing American jobs. But baby-product companies said they have had many reasons for sticking with China.
Chinese manufacturers have decades of experience meeting strict U.S. safety standards. Third-party laboratories that inspect baby gear and certify children's products for sale in the U.S. are clustered in China's production hubs. Countries such as Cambodia or India aren't as equipped to provide such inspections.
A month ago, Michael Wieder, president of Lalo, was on top of the world. His New York City-area company had just launched at Target, a major boost for a six-year-old business known for its minimalist high chairs and play kitchens.
Now, with around 85% of his products made in China, Wieder is thinking about shifting some production out of the Asian country but is uncertain because of frequent changes to tariff rates. Products such as bibs would be simple to move, he said; more-complex ones would be harder.
For now, Wieder is canceling a Memorial Day sale to avoid importing products he would have to pay duties on. With several months of stock, he hopes to avoid raising prices while deciding what to do.
'But at some point, we're going to be faced with making hard decisions," he said.
Baby-product companies said it would take years to restore a large-scale manufacturing ecosystem in the U.S. for products such as strollers.
'Those trusted partnerships, which have been established for decades in China, don't exist here in the U.S.," said Lisa Trofe, executive director of the Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association, an industry group seeking tariff exemptions on baby products. The organization said more than 90% of children's and baby-gear products are manufactured in China.
Child-care products on sale at a wholesale market in eastern China.
Every year, buyers for international baby-product brands converge on northeastern China's Pingxiang County, a onetime bicycle-producing region that has emerged as a mecca for stroller making. In 2023, the county's 4,800 factories churned out 145 million strollers, children's bicycles and electric cars, according to the Chinese government.
Such hubs rely on well-developed supply chains. Manufacturers in Hanchuan, a rival stroller hub in central China's Hubei province, can turn to suppliers for such parts as wide wheels for snowy Russia or specialized brakes that Australian safety standards require.
The toy maker Hasbro, which sells Transformers and Power Rangers action figures, produces around half its products for the U.S. in China.
Hasbro Chief Operating Officer Gina Goetter said on an earnings call Thursday that the company was accelerating efforts to shift U.S. production from China, but that China would remain a manufacturing hub because of specialized capabilities developed over decades.
Molson Hart, a toy entrepreneur in Austin, Texas, is racing to shift production from China to southeastern Asian markets including Vietnam. Hart said he might kill products that would be difficult to move.
'I'm working 12, 13 hours a day, and I can't fix it all," he said.
Write to Jon Emont at jonathan.emont@wsj.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Chinas auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future
Why Chinas auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Why Chinas auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

Key assisted driving equipment costs 20-40% lower in China: study BYD, others offer advanced driver-assistance as standard feature Tesla charges 64,000 yuan for FSD in China BYD's scale seen as advantage in 'training' assisted driving system AUSTIN, Texas June 10 - Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars. BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its 'God's Eye' driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China. 'With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart,' said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' . It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government. BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence. The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world. Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion. Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands. Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis. Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs. BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people. Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say. Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said. Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 — a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology — as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters. Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as 'smart' and 'intelligent' driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology. Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems. Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified. Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model. BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500. According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates. Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said. BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore. MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems. BYD has a 'clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage' over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles. BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year because of 'technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain.' The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final 'knockout round.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Rednote joins wave of Chinese firms releasing open-source AI models
Rednote joins wave of Chinese firms releasing open-source AI models

Indian Express

time31 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Rednote joins wave of Chinese firms releasing open-source AI models

China's Rednote, one of the country's most popular social media platforms, has released an open-source large language model, joining a wave of Chinese tech firms making their artificial intelligence models freely available. The approach contrasts with many U.S. tech giants like OpenAI and Google, which have kept their most advanced models proprietary, though some American firms including Meta have also released open-source models. Open sourcing allows Chinese companies to demonstrate their technological capabilities, build developer communities and spread influence globally at a time when the U.S. has sought to stymie China's tech progress with export restrictions on advanced semiconductors. Rednote's model, called is available for download on developer platform Hugging Face. A company technical paper describing it was uploaded on Friday. In coding tasks, the model performs comparably to Alibaba's Qwen 2.5 series, though it trails more advanced models such as DeepSeek-V3, the technical paper said. RedNote, also known by its Chinese name Xiaohongshu, is an Instagram-like platform where users share photos, videos, text posts and live streams. The platform gained international attention earlier this year when some U.S. users flocked to the app amid concerns over a potential TikTok ban. The company has invested in large language model development since 2023, not long after OpenAI's release of ChatGPT in late 2022. It has accelerated its AI efforts in recent months, launching Diandian, an AI-powered search application that helps users find content on Xiaohongshu's main platform. Other companies that are pursuing an open-source approach include Alibaba which launched Qwen 3, an upgraded version of its model in April. Earlier this year, startup DeepSeek released its low-cost R1 model as open-source software, shaking up the global AI industry due to its competitive performance despite being developed at a fraction of the cost of Western rivals.

Qualcomm strengthens AI portfolio with $2.4 billion Alphawave deal
Qualcomm strengthens AI portfolio with $2.4 billion Alphawave deal

Indian Express

time32 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Qualcomm strengthens AI portfolio with $2.4 billion Alphawave deal

U.S. chipmaker Qualcomm agreed to acquire Alphawave for about $2.4 billion on Monday, as it expands into the booming AI data center market, sending shares of the British semiconductor company surging more than 22%. Alphawave, which designs semiconductor tech for data centers, is the latest British company to be snapped up in a market plagued by low valuations and stunted growth, with U.S. buyers swooping on firms at comparatively low prices and better-performing bourses proving more attractive for share listings. It can help Qualcomm diversify into the data center market, as the biggest provider of smartphone chips looks to reduce its dependence on the industry. Qualcomm, which counts Apple and major android players such as Xiaomi among its customers, has doubled-down on catering to industries such as data centers and personal computers as the iPhone maker increasingly turns to in-house processors. 'The acquisition of Alphawave Semi aims to further accelerate and provide key assets for Qualcomm's expansion into data centers,' the company said. Alphawave shareholders will receive 183 pence per share — a near 96% premium to the March 31 closing price immediately before Qualcomm disclosed its interest. News of the deal sent the stock up more than 22%. Shares of Qualcomm rose about 4%. Qualcomm also made two alternative all-share offers for Alphawave on Monday after multiple deadline extensions from the UK takeover panel. However, Alphawave plans to unanimously recommend the cash offer to its shareholders, deeming it fair and reasonable. Jefferies analysts said they do not expect the deal to meet any material regulatory obstacles, after Alphawave exited its Chinese joint venture, WiseWave. 'Alphawave has developed leading high-speed wired connectivity and compute technologies that are complementary to our power-efficient central processing unit and neural processing unit cores,' Cristiano Amon, president and CEO of Qualcomm, said. The acquisition is expected to close during the first calendar quarter of 2026. SoftBank-owned Arm had also sought to acquire Alphawave but decided not to pursue the takeover, Reuters had reported in April citing sources.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store