70 per cent of businesses support Scottish visa scheme
Only 17% of respondents said they opposed the idea of a Scottish visa, while the remaining 14% were neutral or unsure.
Scotland's rural areas have been disproportionately affected by post-Brexit immigration issues due to a reliance on EU workers in critical sectors like agriculture, care, and hospitality.
READ MORE: Police Scotland investigating national Palestine demo in Edinburgh
In an attempt to address those issues, the SNP Government in 2022 proposed a 'targeted migration solution' in the form of a Rural Visa Pilot. However, immigration is reserved to Westminster.
The Understanding Business Survey, conducted by the Diffley Partnership and 56 Degrees North, also showed that around half believe general economic conditions are worse than a year ago, when Labour came into government.
SNP MSP Stuart McMillan (above) said: 'For years Scottish businesses have suffered as a result of woeful economic mismanagement, Brexit and harmful anti-immigrant rhetoric.
'This began under the Tories but under Labour, the Westminster government is now to the tune of Farage, doubling down on Brexit and presiding over rampant inflation.
'The SNP has always opposed Brexit - the greatest act of economic harm inflicted on Scotland in decades - while calling for a distinct approach to migration here in Scotland.
'We know we face challenges that are different from those facing the UK as a whole. We want to tackle those head on and believe the Scottish Government is best placed to do that.
'I, along with hundreds of Scottish [[business]]es, urge the Labour Government to listen, get out the way of progress and devolve the power to introduce a Scottish visa to Holyrood.'
Mark Diffley, founder and director at Diffley Partnership, said: 'The standout data point this quarter is the significant business support for the introduction of a Scottish visa for workers, backed by seven in 10 business, up to 75% of those with an opinion either way on the issues.
'Combined with other positive views about the impact of migration on the labour force and the economy, this should give political parties food for thought ahead of next year's election.
'Meanwhile, although the business community in Scotland is still rather more pessimistic than optimistic, the gap between the two has closed which gives some hope about the possibility of a more positive outlook ahead after a long, tough period for businesses.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
18 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Hearts seal deal with SPFL side to develop players
Scottish FA system is designed to improve young footballers Sign up to our Hearts newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Hearts have signed a co-operation agreement with Edinburgh neighbours Spartans in an effort to enhance the development of young players. The new Scottish Football Association initiative was launched for the 2025/26 season, allowing anyone aged 16-21 who is eligible for the Scottish national team to move freely between two clubs. Spartans are Hearts' first partners in the new project as the two sides work towards a full collaboration. Tynecastle B team captain Kenzi Nair is the first player to benefit from the arrangement, which will see him play for the William Hill League Two side but also for his parent club this year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Hearts technical development manager Shelley Kerr explained the deal on the club's official website. 'We're delighted to have reached an agreement with The Spartans to enter a co-operation agreement,' she said. 'The system as a whole is an excellent approach that offers invaluable opportunities to our young players at a crucial stage in their development. 'The system is more flexible than the traditional loan structure and is something that is already in operation across Europe, to great success. It aligns with the club's strategy, which centres around recruiting, developing and supporting talented, young players, with the ultimate goal of producing players who are capable of excelling at the highest level. 'The Spartans share our commitment to player development and embrace similar values in nurturing young talent. We already have a strong working relationship with the club, utilising their excellent facilities for our B Team fixtures in the Scottish Lowland League and I'm excited to see the potential benefits of this partnership unfold.' Hibs icon strikes deal with Hearts Mixu Paatelainen appointed former Hibs manager Mixu Paatelainen as their sporting director earlier this year. He is also pleased to link up with Hearts. 'We are delighted to have a co-operation agreement with Heart of Midlothian FC. The opportunity to help young players develop in coming to us to play competitive matches is something that we are excited about,' he stated. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It also gives us a wonderful chance to add to our squad quality, ambitious youngsters who will make our squad stronger and more competitive. It is a win-win situation, which we are thankful for.' Hearts officials are keen to develop younger players in the hope they can break into the first-team squad, which is currently congested. Seven new signings have arrived at Riccarton this summer, with two more to follow in the shape of Pierre Landry Kabore and Tomas Bent Magnusson. The level of competition currently makes it difficult for youth academy graduates to get first-team game time. Teenage striker James Wilson is an established member of the squad, but others like Macaulay Tait have had to leave on loan to play regularly. Tait joined Livingston, who also signed Hearts midfielder Aidan Denholm on a permanent contract. Defender Lewis Neilson is on loan at Scottish Premiership newcomers Falkirk. READ MORE: Hearts transfer target to fly to Scotland
Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'HMRC said I was entitled to tax refund but I was floored by how much I was owed'
Azeez was left totally floored after discovering how much he was owed in a tax refund. He shared the news in a viral video, but he had a pretty big message for HMRC You might be sitting on a tax rebate without even realising it, and there's an easy way to check if you're due a refund. With viral videos circulating online of people claiming back hundreds or even thousands of pounds, one man was over the moon to learn he had some cash coming his way. Azeez, who goes by on TikTok, shared his excitement when HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) notified him that he'd overpaid on his taxes. Anticipating a hefty sum after seeing others pocket substantial refunds, Azeez was eager to find out what he was owed. The buzz around tax rebates has been growing, with many Brits discussing their own windfalls and others uncovering a tax loophole to try and shrink their bills. He recounted his experience, saying: "They said I paid too much tax, I was like 'yes - my time has come.' I was even waiting. I was like let me see how much it is. I hope it's a lot. I'm already planning my next holiday. Then I see how much it is." However, Azeez's high hopes came crashing down when he discovered the refund amount was a mere £12.54, leaving him utterly gobsmacked. He humorously expressed his frustration, admitting he was "so annoyed" that he ended up hiding the amount after flashing it a few times. He remarked: "Me personally, I think there should be a threshold. There should be a certain amount before they can message you telling you you've paid too much tax. "It should be minimum £500. If it's anything below £500, stop messaging me, just give it back to me. Anything under £500 - don't let us know. "Anything over £500, then you can send an email, because why are you going to send me an email to say that you owe me £12.54? You know what, I'm not even claiming it back. It's going to stay there." Azeez expressed his frustration with the trivial sum, suggesting it "wasn't worth" the hassle of claiming. He believes it would be more sensible for them to deduct it from a future bill or add it to his wages, as the notification had raised his expectations a little too much. The clip has since gone viral, racking up over 80,000 views, and has sparked a flurry of comments, with more than 1,000 people weighing in. One user joked: "Don't spend it all at once." Another shared their joy: "I got £1,300. I was buzzing." A third person revealed: "I got nearly £800. Going to book a ticket." A fourth chimed in with: "Every little helps." Another viewer added a humorous touch, saying: "If it makes you feel any better, I got a car tax refund of £11.66. Got it in cheque form too, haha." Claiming a tax refund To find out if you've paid too much tax, you can perform a quick online check. Just head to the official website, follow the prompts and you could soon discover whether you're due a refund. The Government website states: "You may be able to get a tax refund (rebate) if you've paid too much tax." It says you may be entitled to a refund if you've paid too much on: Pay from a job Job expenses such as working from home, fuel, work clothing or tools A pension A Self Assessment tax return A redundancy payment UK income if you live abroad Interest from savings or payment protection insurance (PPI) Income from a life or pension annuity Foreign income UK income earned before leaving the UK Further, the site advises: "If you've paid too much or too little tax by the end of the tax year (April 5), HMRC will send you either: A tax calculation letter (also known as a P800) A Simple Assessment letter "This will tell you how to get a refund or pay tax you owe."
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Recognising Palestine will not solve Labour's electoral woes
In Scottish Labour ranks there used to be a saying: you can't out-nat the Nats. This was usually in response to armchair strategists who expressed the view that if only Labour in Scotland would embrace a more robust form of devolution – the 'full fiscal autonomy' model, or devo max, as it was called – then those who yearned for independence would consider supporting us. Naturally, such self-delusion was almost childishly easy to dismiss: why would nationalists vote for a unionist party that denied them the very thing they wanted? Why settle for 90 per cent of your ambition when an alternative party (the SNP) were promising to deliver 100 per cent? Labour's current troubles over whether to recognise Palestine formally as a nation reeks of the same cynicism and strategic folly. There are other hurdles to navigate before we even get to Labour's (relatively unimportant) internal squabbles: how do you recognise a country that doesn't exist? What is the point of recognising even a hypothetical country when no one can agree what its borders should be, where its capital is and who represents its leader or its government? More importantly, how would recognition by the UK aid the peace process? It is far more likely to do the opposite, since Hamas would (correctly) see it as a reward for the grotesque act of barbarism they inflicted on Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023, which led directly to the calamity now befalling their own people. Labour MPs, already nervous about their chances of re-election in a few years' time, believe that their chances of survival depend upon the recovery of their party's support among Britain's Muslim voters and recognition of Palestine, even though it can have no practical beneficial impact except in terms of propaganda. They are understandably concerned, not only about the imminent emergence of Jeremy Corbyn's latest political party – one that will specifically target voters disillusioned by Labour's current approach to Israel and Palestine and whose formation has been largely motivated by that conflict – but by others on the Left seeking to exploit the current conflict for their own electoral ends, like the Greens. So put yourself in the shoes of a British Muslim voter, one who has traditionally backed Labour, mainly because of its relaxed approach to mass immigration, not least from your ancestral home country. Two things have happened: first, the Conservatives have proved that Labour does not have a monopoly on support for mass immigration without the consent of the indigenous population. In fact, while in office they established that they were more enthusiastic about an open-door immigration policy than even Labour. And second, the conflict in Gaza exposed Labour as fair-weather friends to both Israel and Palestine. If, as Nye Bevan once said, those who cannot ride two horses at the same time shouldn't be in the circus, then the current administration might have to retire from the ring. The government started out supporting Israel in the face of the Islamist threat. Then, once in office, after it recognised the threat to its electoral strongholds from independent pro-Gaza candidates, it pivoted and jumped on the International Criminal Court bandwagon by allowing arrest warrants to be issued for Israel's prime minister for alleged 'war crimes'. Yet still ministers resist calls from shouty middle-class people in our city centres every weekend to boycott, disinvest and sanction Israel. Still they defend Israel's 'right to exist' – a point of principle that few pro-Palestinian protesters would concede. And now numerous Labour MPs actually seem to believe that recognising Palestine will bring all those disillusioned Muslim and far-Left voters home to Labour. But why would they come back? Why return to a party that, however much it has served their purposes in past decades, is now prevaricating over the one conflict in the region they have chosen to feel strongly about? Just as Scottish Labour could only hope to attract the support of nationalists by fully signing up to the fight for independence, so Labour cannot hope to thwart the appeal of Corbyn's new party on this issue – unless it follows Palestinian recognition, from the river to the sea, with a refusal to recognise Israel's right to exist or defend itself. It would also have to ban all Israeli imports and ban British companies from exporting to that country. Even then, would those lost voters return to Labour in big enough numbers? Why support a 'Johnny-come-lately' to the Palestinian cause when Jeremy has a proud record of describing Hezbollah and Hamas terrorists as his 'friends'? Beat that, Keir Starmer! The Prime Minister mustn't even try. You can't beat the far Left at their own game, at least not while hoping to retain the much more centrist and sensible voters who put you in office. The various weirdos, extremists and weekend paper-sellers that will form the activist base of Corbyn's new party have a lifetime's experience in opposing the only liberal democracy in the Middle East and yearn to see it replaced by the kind of Islamist dictatorship that has brought so much misery to ordinary Palestinians. Far better for Starmer to take the side of Israel as our long-term ally in western democracy's fight against worldwide Islamism.
