
Israeli army says body of soldier missing for 43 years found in 'heart of Syria'
JERUSALEM: The Israeli army said Sunday that the body of a soldier missing for 43 years had been found in the "heart of Syria" and repatriated in a special operation with the
Mossad intelligence agency
.
"In a special operation led by the IDF (military) and Mossad, the body of Sgt. First Class
Tzvika Feldman
was found in the heart of Syria and brought back to Israel," the army said in a statement.
Feldman went missing along with two other soldiers in the 1982 battle of Sultan Yacoub that pitted Israeli and Syrian forces against each other in the Bekaa region of eastern Lebanon, near the border with Syria.
In a separate statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the efforts to locate Feldman's body, noting that the search for him and his comrades -- Zachariah Baumel and Yehuda Katz -- had been ongoing for decades.
Operation Sindoor
Amid flare-up hours after thaw, officials say things will settle down with time
Ceasefire on, but pressure stays: Key decisions by India against Pak that still stand
'Will work with India & Pakistan to seek solution on Kashmir': Trump
"Approximately six years ago, we returned for a Jewish burial, Sgt. First Class Zechariah Baumel; today we have returned Tzvika, of blessed memory. We will not cease our efforts to return Sgt. First Class Yehuda Katz, who is also an MIA from the same battle," Netanyahu's statement said, adding that the prime minister had personally notified Feldman's parents.
The army statement said that Feldman's body had been identified by the Genomic Identification Center for Fallen Soldiers of the Military Rabbinate but gave little details of how his remains were located deep inside Syria.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now
Tips and Tricks
Undo
"The return of Sgt. Feldman was made possible through a complex and covert operation, enabled by precise intelligence and the use of operational capabilities that demonstrated ingenuity and courage," the statement said.
"This concludes an extensive intelligence and operational effort that spanned more than four decades, involving close cooperation between the POW/MIA Coordinators in the Prime Minister's Office, intelligence and operational units within the Mossad and IDF Intelligence Directorate, along with the Shin Bet and the IDF Human Resources Directorate," the army said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
EU condemns Israel's killing of journalists in Gaza
The European Union condemned the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an Israeli strike in the Gaza Strip, the bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday. The EU condemned the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an (Israeli military) airstrike outside al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City.(AP) "The EU condemns the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an (Israeli military) airstrike outside al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, including the Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif," she said after EU foreign ministers discussed the war in virtual talks. An Israeli military statement accused Sharif of heading a Hamas "terrorist cell" and being "responsible for advancing rocket attacks" against Israelis. The EU took note of Israel's allegation, Kallas said, "but there is a need in these cases to provide clear evidence, in the respect of the rule of law, to avoid targeting of journalists". The 27-country bloc has struggled to take action over the conflict in Gaza as it is divided between staunch supporters of Israel and those who defend the Palestinians. The EU struck a deal last month to increase aid access to Gaza, but senior officials have said the agreement has been only partially implemented. Kallas called on Israel to allow more aid into the territory. "Whereas there is more aid coming in, the needs are still much greater. We urge Israel to allow more trucks and a better distribution of aid," she said.


Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message
Israel's targeted killing of an Al Jazeera correspondent in Gaza over the weekend was noteworthy even for a conflict remarkably blood-soaked for journalists, leaving some experts to marvel that any news at all emerges from the territory. An Al Jazeera executive said Monday that it won't back down from covering what is going on there and called for news organizations to step up and recruit more journalists. A total of 184 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel in the Gaza war since its start in October 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. That compares to the 18 journalists and media workers killed so far in the Russia-Ukraine war, CPJ said. Aside from rare guided tours, Israel has barred international media from covering the 22-month war in Gaza. News organizations instead rely largely on Palestinian Gaza residents and ingenuity to show the world what is happening there. Israel often questions the affiliations and biases of Palestinian journalists but doesn't permit others in. 'You simply are in awe when stories show up,' said Jane Ferguson, a veteran war correspondent and founder of Noosphere, an independent platform for journalists. She can't recall a conflict that has been more difficult for reporters to cover, and she's reported from South Sudan, Syria and Afghanistan. Correspondent Anas al-Sharif knew he was a target, and left behind a message to be delivered upon his death. He and seven other people — six of them journalists — were killed in an air strike outside of Gaza City's largest hospital complex on Sunday. Israel swiftly claimed responsibility, saying without producing evidence that al-Sharif had led a Hamas cell. It was a claim the news organization and al-Sharif had denied. Agence France-Presse, The Associated Press, BBC News and Reuters are among the organizations regularly reporting from Gaza. An Aug. 7 AP dispatch vividly described the hunger faced by many in Gaza: 'A single bowl of eggplant stewed in watery tomato juice must sustain Sally Muzhed's family of six for the day. She calls it moussaka, but it's a pale echo of the fragrant, lawyered, meat-and-vegetable dish that once filled Gaza's kitchens with its aroma.' Other recent AP reports carried images and text reporting from the aftermath of an Israeli strike on Gaza's only Catholic church, and a profile of an 18-year-old aspiring doctor now trying to survive sheltered in a tent. Journalists from The Washington Post and the Guardian recently accompanied a Jordanian relief mission and took images of Gaza from the air, despite some restrictions from Israel. The Guardian's Lorenzo Tondo wrote: 'Seen from the air, Gaza looks like the ruins of an ancient civilization, brought to light after centuries of darkness.' None of the organizations match the power and immediacy of Al Jazeera, however, in part because their correspondents have been in front of cameras. They've also paid the heaviest price: CPJ estimates that 11 journalists and media workers affiliated with AJ have been killed in the Gaza conflict, more than any other single organization. In a social media post written in June to be sent if he was killed, al-Sharif wrote that 'I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification — so that Allah may bear witness against those who stayed silent.' In another posting on X on Aug. 10, the day that he was killed, al-Sharif wrote of the challenges covering the aftermath of one attack. He said he lost his strength and ability to express himself when he arrived at the scene. 'Body parts and blood were all around us, and corpses were scattered on top of each other,' he wrote. 'Tell me what words and phrases could help any journalist describe this horrific image. When I told you on air that it was an 'indescribable scene,' I was truly helpless in the face of this horrific sight.' Salah Negm, news director at Al Jazeera English, said Monday it is very difficult to get people in to Gaza. But it is full of educated people and those with training in journalism who can help get stories out. He called on other news organizations to step up. 'We get the news from several sources on the ground in Gaza — not only journalists but also doctors, hospitals, civil servants, aid workers,' Negm said. 'A lot of people in Gaza talk to us.' Many of the journalists working in Gaza are facing the same struggles to find food, for themselves and their families, as the people they are covering. Noosphere's Ferguson said she's never before had to ask a reporter whether she had enough food for herself and her child. In an interview in May on 'Democracy Now!,' 22-year-old journalist Abubaker Abed described the difficult decision he made to leave Gaza to pursue his education in Ireland. Not only was he suffering from malnutrition, he said, but his mother was concerned that his work as a journalist would make him and his family targets. 'If I stayed, I would die,' he said. Jodie Ginsberg, CEO of the Committee to Protect Journalists, said she's concerned about the implications for journalists in future conflicts if what is happening in Gaza is allowed to continue without international condemnation that has real teeth. 'They're essentially admitting in public to what amounts to a war crime,' Ginsberg said, 'and they can do that because none of the other attacks on journalists have had any consequences. not in this war and not prior. It's not surprising that it can act with this level of impunity because no international government has really taken it to task.' Given all that they face, 'to me, the most remarkable thing is that journalists are continuing to cover (Gaza) at all,' she said. Laurie Kellman and Danica Kirk in London, Samy Magdy in Cairo and Sam Metz in Jerusalem contributed to this report. David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Respecting voice of farmers': Punjab govt scraps land pooling policy; decision comes after HC interim stay on Aug 7
Chandigarh: The Bhagwant Mann-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) govt in Punjab has withdrawn its contentious Land Pooling Policy, 2025, in the face of significant criticism from farmer groups and opposition parties. The decision, which came on Monday evening, follows the Aug 7 interim stay issued by the Punjab and Haryana high court on the policy that aimed to acquire around 65,500 acres of land and was touted a "farmer-friendly" initiative vital for "planned urban development". The formal decision to scrap the policy, which was notified on May 14 and amended on July 25, was made following internal concerns within the AAP leadership, according to sources. The party was worried that the policy could be politically damaging and undermine the govt's other achievements. Till now, CM Mann and the entire AAP leadership had been vociferously defending the policy. In a statement, the principal secretary, housing and urban development, said, "The govt hereby withdraws the land pooling policy dated May 14, 2025, and its subsequent amendments. Consequently, all actions, like LOIs issued, registration done, or any other action taken thereunder shall be reversed henceforth." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Confirming the decision, AAP spokesperson Neel Garg posted on X, "The Land Pooling Policy was introduced in the interest of farmers. The Aam Aadmi Party always stands with farmers. If farmers do not like this policy, why should we impose it? Therefore, respecting the voice of the farmers—we are withdrawing this policy." The policy's objective was to acquire land in 164 villages for urban development near 27 cities and towns. The govt aimed to acquire around 45,000 acres in the Ludhiana district alone through a phased approach. Despite repeated assurances from CM Mann that no land would be "forcefully acquired," farmers remained sceptical. This opposition was rooted in a deep-seated fear that the policy would lead to the permanent loss of their lands and livelihoods. The protests also led to significant dissent, with farmers in districts like Ludhiana, Hoshiarpur, and Jalandhar putting up "no entry" banners for AAP leaders. While MP Malvinder Kang publicly called for a "meaningful dialogue" with the farming community, the internal disagreement also saw some AAP functionaries resign in protest. Those who stepped down in protest included Harmanjit Singh Brar, chairman of the Moga District Planning Committee, and Gurjeet Singh Kanjhla, the block president of the AAP's unit in CM Mann's own constituency of Dhuri. Under the policy, owners who opted for pooling were to receive a 1,000 sq yd residential plot and a 200 sq yd commercial plot in fully developed land in lieu of one acre. To address farmer concerns, CM Mann announced several amendments to the policy on July 22. These changes included raising the annual livelihood allowance for landowners to Rs 1 lakh per acre until developed plots were handed over, a fivefold increase from the previous Rs 20,000. Farmers who owned as little as one kanal of land were also made eligible to receive a residential plot. Furthermore, landowners could opt for a larger residential plot in place of a commercial one, and a letter of intent (LOI) would be issued within 21 days, which could be used to secure bank loans. In its order staying the Land Pooling Policy, 2025, the high court highlighted several key flaws, stating that the policy appeared to have been notified "in haste". The court criticised the lack of mandatory social impact assessment (SIA) and environmental impact assessment (EIA) studies for the large-scale acquisition of fertile agricultural land. It also noted the absence of a rehabilitation plan for landless labourers and artisans, who would be severely affected, and pointed out the lack of specified timelines for the project and a proper grievance redressal mechanism for those impacted. In its detailed order, released on Saturday, the court noted that the Land Acquisition Act 2013 bars the acquisition of multi-cropped land unless there are exceptional circumstances. "The land which is sought to be acquired is amongst the most fertile land in the state of Punjab, and it is possible that it may impact the social milieu," said the HC division bench. Earlier, the policy received formal cabinet approval on July 2. When announcing the policy, the Punjab govt highlighted its dual objectives: to curb illegal colonies and the land mafia while also ensuring direct profits for farmers. GONE IN LESS THAN 3 MONTHS May 14 & June 6 |The Bhagwant Mann-led AAP govt officially notified the Land Pooling Policy, 2025. July 25 | The policy was subsequently amended. Early Aug | The policy began to face criticism from farmer groups, opposition parties, and even some members of the AAP. Protests, including tractor marches, were held across the state. Aug 7 | The Punjab and Haryana high court issued an interim stay on the policy. The court's decision was in response to a petition that challenged the legality and constitutionality of the policy, citing a lack of mandatory social and environmental impact assessments. Aug 11 | The Punjab govt decided to officially withdraw the contentious policy MSID:: 123239957 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.