&w=3840&q=100)
World has only 3 years left to avert worst impact of climate change: Study
We are living in a world that is warming at the fastest rate since records began. Yet, governments have been slow to act.
The annual global climate change conference of the parties (COP30) is just months away. All of the 197 countries that belong to the United Nations were supposed to have submitted updated national climate plans to the UN by February this year. These plans outline how each country will cut its greenhouse gas emissions in line with the legally binding international Paris Agreement. This agreement commits all signatories to limiting human-caused global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Governments must also bring their newly updated national climate action plans to COP30 and show how they plan to adapt to the impacts that climate change will bring.
But so far, only 25 countries, covering around 20 per cent of global emissions, have submitted their plans, known as Nationally Determined Contributions. In Africa, they are Somalia, Zambia and Zimbabwe. This leaves 172 still to come.
The nationally determined contributions are very important in setting out countries' short- to medium-term commitments on climate change. They also provide a direction of travel that can inform broader policy decisions and investments. Aligning climate plans with development goals could lift 175 million people out of poverty.
But arguably only one of the submitted plans – the UK's – is compatible with the Paris Agreement.
We are climate scientists, and one of us (Piers Forster) leads the global science team that publishes the annual Indicators of Global Climate Change report. This report gives an overview of the state of the climate system. It is based on calculations of the net emissions of greenhouse gases globally, how these are concentrating in the atmosphere, how temperatures are rising on the ground, and how much of this warming has been caused by humans.
The report also looks at how extreme temperatures and rainfall are intensifying, how much the sea levels are rising, and how much carbon dioxide can still be emitted before the planet's temperature exceeds 1.5 degrees Celsius more than it was in pre-industrial times. This is important because staying within 1.5 degrees Celsius is needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
Our report shows that human-caused global warming reached 1.36 degrees Celsius in 2024. This boosted average global temperatures (a combination of human-induced warming and natural variability in the climate system) to 1.52 degrees Celsius. In other words, the world has already reached the level where it has warmed so much that it cannot avoid significant impacts from climate change. There is no doubt we are in dangerous waters.
Our dangerously hot planet
Although last year's global temperatures were very high, they were also alarmingly unexceptional. The data speaks for itself. Continued record high levels of greenhouse gas emissions have led to rising atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide.
The result is rising temperatures that are rapidly eating into the remaining carbon budget (the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted within an agreed time). This will be exhausted in less than three years at current levels of emissions.
We need to face this head on: the window to stay within 1.5 degrees Celsius is essentially shut. Even if we can bring temperatures back down in future, it will be a long and difficult road.
At the same time, climate extremes are intensifying, bringing long-term risks and costs to the global economy but also, importantly, people. The African continent is now facing its deadliest climate crisis in over a decade.
It would be impossible to imagine economies operating without fast access to trusted data. When share prices plummet or growth stalls, politicians and business leaders act decisively. None would tolerate outdated intelligence on sales or the stock market.
But when it comes to climate, the speed of climate change often outpaces the data available. This means fast decisions can't be made. If we treated climate data as we do financial reports, panic would ensue after each dire update. But while governments routinely pivot when faced with an economic downturn, they have been far slower to respond to what key climate indicators – the Earth's vital signs – are telling us.
What needs to happen next
As more countries develop their climate plans, it's time for leaders across the globe to face the hard truths of climate science.
Governments need to have fast access to trusted climate data so that they can develop up-to-date national climate plans. The national climate plans need to take a global perspective too. This is really important for fairness and equity. For example, developed countries must acknowledge that they've emitted more greenhouse gases and take the lead in presenting ambitious mitigation efforts and in providing finance for other countries to decarbonise and adapt.
In Africa, the UN is hosting UNFCCC Climate Week in Addis Ababa in September. As well as making plans for COP30, there will be sessions on accessing climate finance and ensuring that the transition to zero human-caused carbon emissions by 2050 (net zero) is just and equitable. The summit also aims to support countries that are still working on their national climate plans.
If nationally determined contributions are implemented, the pace of climate change will slow down. This is vital not just for the countries – and economies – currently on the frontline against climate change, but for a functioning global society.
Just five of the G20 countries have submitted their 2035 plans: Canada, Brazil, Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom. But the G20 is responsible for around 80 per cent of global emissions. This means that South Africa's current G20 presidency can help to ensure that the world prioritises efforts to help developing countries finance their transition to a low-carbon economy.
Another worrying factor is that just 10 of the updated nationally determined contributions have reaffirmed or strengthened commitments to move away from fossil fuels. This means that national climate plans from the European Union, China and India will be key in testing their climate leadership and keeping the Paris Agreement's 1.5 degrees Celsius temperature goals alive. Many other countries will be scrutinising what these countries commit to before they submit their own national climate plans.
The data in our report helps the world to understand not just what's happened in recent years, but also what to expect further down the track.
Our hope is that these and other countries submit ambitious and credible plans well before COP30. If they do, this will finally close the gap between acknowledging the climate crisis and making decisive efforts to address it. Every tonne of greenhouse gas emissions matters.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran blames US for military aggression, demands compensation in talks
Tehran ruled out direct talks with Washington, accusing it of military aggression alongside Israel during a recent 12-day conflict that derailed nuclear discussions. read more Iran said Monday that any future negotiations would hold the United States responsible for attacks on its nuclear installations, but that direct talks with Washington were out of the question. On June 22, the United States briefly joined Israel's battle against Iran, which had stalled discussions on Tehran's nuclear program. 'In any potential negotiation… the issue of holding the United States accountable and demanding compensation for committing military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities will be one of the topics on the agenda,' foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a press briefing on Monday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Asked whether Iran would engage in direct talks with the United States, Baqaei said: 'No.' During the course of the 12-day battle, Israel began an unprecedented onslaught in mid-June that targeted Iranian military and nuclear installations while also striking civilian areas. US troops joined the attack by attacking nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. The fighting halted negotiations that had begun in April and were the highest-level communication between Tehran and Washington since the US abandoned a major nuclear agreement with Iran in 2018. Following the battle, Tehran stopped cooperation with the UN nuclear inspectors and wanted assurances against military action before restarting discussions. Washington has slammed Tehran's demand for compensation as 'ridiculous'. Baqaei said on Monday that Iran was committed to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, but criticised what he described as the 'politicised and unprofessional approach' of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The foreign ministry spokesman said that the IAEA's deputy chief is expected in Iran 'in less than 10 days'. Last month, Iran said future cooperation with the UN agency would take on a 'new form'. On July 25, Iranian diplomats met with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, in the first meeting since the war with Israel ended. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The three European powers are parties to the 2015 nuclear deal, which unravelled after the US withdrew during Trump's first term. In recent weeks, the trio has threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran failed to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. Iran has repeatedly called reimposing sanctions 'illegal' and insisted on its right to enrich uranium. Israel and Western nations accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied.


News18
22 minutes ago
- News18
Bangladesh Coup: A Year Later, What Has Changed & When Are Elections Due?
What Led To The Fall of Hasina? Protests began on July 1, 2024, with university students demanding reforms to the quota system for public sector jobs. The movement culminated on August 5, 2024, when thousands of protesters stormed Hasina's palace as she escaped by helicopter. During the unrest, demonstrators set fire to police stations and government buildings. Hasina's former official residence is now being converted into a museum as a lasting reminder of her 'autocratic" rule. According to the United Nations, around 1,400 people were killed between July and August 2024 during the protests. Hasina has since been formally indicted for crimes against humanity by the country's International Crimes Tribunal. What Has Changed? After assuming power, the Yunus-led administration formed 11 reform commissions, including a National Consensus Commission, which is working with major political parties to shape future governments and the electoral process. However, bickering political parties have so far failed to reach a consensus on a timetable and procedure for the elections. Mob violence, political attacks on rival groups, and rising hostility towards women's rights and minority communities—especially by religious hardliners—have surged. While some of the repression and fear that marked Hasina's rule, including widespread enforced disappearances, appear to have ended, rights groups allege that the new government is using arbitrary detentions to target perceived political opponents, particularly Hasina's supporters. Many have reportedly been forced into hiding. Hasina's Awami League party, which remains banned, claims that over two dozen of its supporters have died in custody over the past year. In a statement on July 30, Human Rights Watch said the interim government 'is falling short in implementing its challenging human rights agenda." The organisation noted that violations against ethnic and other minority groups have continued in parts of Bangladesh. When Will Elections Be Held? In a national address ahead of Eid al-Adha in June, Yunus announced that Bangladesh's national elections would be held in the first half of April 2026.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Pakistan forcibly expels 1.4 million Afghan refugees despite humanitarian concerns from UNHCR
Pakistan has resumed the forced deportation of 1.4 million Afghan refugees whose legal status expired in June, sparking criticism from the UN refugee agency. Authorities are detaining Afghans lacking valid documentation for repatriation, despite growing humanitarian concerns read more Afghan refugee children play next to trucks loaded with their family's belongings as they wait to return Afghanistan along a highway in Landi Kotal, Pakistan. File image/AP Pakistan resumes forced expulsions of 1.4 million Afghan refugees despite UN concerns Pakistani authorities stated Monday that they had resumed the forcible deportations of Afghan refugees following the federal government's refusal to extend a crucial deadline for their stay. About 1.4 million Afghans with Proof of Registration cards whose legal status expired at the end of June are impacted by the decision. Before going back to Afghanistan, many had hoped for a one-year extension to take care of personal matters like selling property or closing up businesses. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Approximately 800,000 Afghans own Afghan Citizen Cards in addition to PoR cards. According to the police, they are also unlawfully residing in the nation and are being held in the southern Sindh province, southwestern Balochistan, and eastern Punjab before being deported. The UN refugee agency, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, criticised Monday's decision. At least 1.2 million Afghans have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, according to a June UNHCR report. Repatriations on such a massive scale have the potential to destabilize the fragile situation in Afghanistan, where the Taliban government came into power in 2021. A July 31 government notification seen by The Associated Press confirms Pakistan's decision to repatriate all Afghan nationals holding expired PoR cards. It states Afghans without valid passports and Pakistani visas are in the country illegally and must return to their homeland under Pakistani immigration laws. Police across Pakistan are detaining Afghans to transport them to border crossings, according to two government and security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. They said there are no mass arrests and police were told to go to house-to-house and make random checks to detain foreigners living in the country illegally. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Yes, the Afghan refugees living in Pakistan illegally are being sent back in a dignified way,' said Shakeel Khan, commissioner for Afghan refugees in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The latest operation is the most significant step yet under orders from federal government in Islamabad, he said. Rehmat Ullah, 35, an Afghan, said his family migrated to Pakistan's northwestern Peshawar city decades ago and now is preparing to return home. 'I have five children and my concern is that they will miss their education,' he said. 'I was born here, my children were born here and now we are going back,' he said. Millions have fled to Pakistan over the past four decades to escape war, political unrest and economic hardship. The renewed deportation drive follows a nationwide crackdown launched in 2023 targeting foreigners living illegally in Pakistan. The Interior Ministry, which oversees the campaign, did not immediately comment. Qaiser Khan Afridi, a spokesperson for the UN refugee agency, expressed deep concern over the government's recent actions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Sending people back in this manner is tantamount to refoulement and a breach of a state's international obligations,' Afridi said in a statement, urging Pakistan to adopt a 'humane approach to ensure voluntary, gradual, and dignified return of Afghans' and praised the country for hosting millions of Afghan refugees for more than 40 years. 'We call on the government to halt the forcible return and ensure a gradual, voluntary and dignified repatriation process,' Afridi said. 'Such massive and hasty return could jeopardize the lives and freedom of Afghan refugees, while also risking instability not only in Afghanistan but across the region.'