Indiana lawmakers passed the state budget over night. Here are the biggest winners and losers
Show Caption
It was an unusually topsy-turvy road to get there, but Indiana lawmakers finally gave final approval to the next two-year state budget shortly after 1 a.m. Friday morning.
Just a week earlier, a dispiriting revenue forecast sent lawmakers back to the drawing board to find $2 billion to either cut or raise. They ended up finding a combination of both: a smattering of cuts to public health, higher education and public media, a little dip into reserves, and a hike in the cigarette tax.
And, within only the last two days of session, lawmakers inserted new and substantive policy language impacting state universities.
The House passed the budget 66-27; the Senate, 39-11. The bill is now heading to Gov. Mike Braun's desk ― his first budget as governor.
In a budget year that was already predicted to be tight, not many parties will feel like winners. But here's our list of who wins and loses in this 2026-27 budget.
Winners
Indiana Chamber and the American Cancer Society
They've been advocating to raise the cigarette tax for many sessions now, as a means of both raising revenue and discouraging smoking. They've gotten close a few times, with the House putting an increase in their budget proposal but the Senate rejecting it.
It took a $2 billion revenue shortfall, but they got it: lawmakers raised the cigarette tax by $2 a pack.
Wealthy private school attendees
Families of four with an annual income of $220,000 currently qualify for publicly funded vouchers to attend private schools. It was a goal of the House's to eliminate that income limit so wealthier Hoosiers can qualify; the compromise in the final budget is universal school choice kicking in starting with the 2026-27 school year, the second year of the budget.
Longterm care facilities
Since the state transitioned to a "managed care" system for seniors, where three large insurance companies coordinate care for each person needing at-home or facility-based care, those longterm care providers have had issues receiving timely reimbursements from those three companies.
Earlier on in session, a representative for longterm care providers (like nursing homes) said they had, collectively, $100 million in outstanding claims.
This budget gives those managed care entities 21 to 30 days to pay the facilities, depending on how the claim was filed, and institutes a late penalty of $500 per claim per day.
Transparency
There's been lots of chatter about Secretary of State Diego Morales' mystery-funded trips abroad.
Now, Morales, the governor, governor's cabinet and the other statewide elected officials ― comptroller, treasurer, attorney general and lieutenant governor ― will have to file annual reports to the state budget committee detailing where they've traveled, why and with what state funds.
Losers
Public media
The $7.4 million line item for Indiana's 17 public broadcasting TV and radio stations ― local NPR and PBS affiliates ― is now zero.
The state funding cut is on top of threats from the federal level to cut government funding. For some rural stations without deep individual donor pockets, state and federal funding can comprise almost half their budgets.
Local health departments
State lawmakers decided in 2023 to pump a historic investment of $225 million into county public health departments to do preventative health programming, like disease prevention and maternal health care.
This year, lawmakers were prepared to pump another $200 million into this initiative. But since the revenue forecast, they decided to scale it back to $80 million, less than half the original plan.
Secretary of State Diego Morales
In addition to needing to file travel reports, Morales will also have less control over certain funds.
There are a number of dedicated funds that the secretary of state's office administers ― pots of money that come from fines and fees ― that will now route through the General Assembly to decide how that money gets spent.
State universities
The latest version of the budget introduced new language asserting state control over multiple aspects of state universities' governance.
One section gives Gov. Mike Braun the power to appoint all nine members of the Indiana University board of trustees, and to replace any of them.
Another drastically redefines tenure at universities by subjecting tenured faculty to "productivity reviews" and probation, which could lead to firing, if they don't meet certain productivity benchmarks. Another makes faculty governance organizations "advisory" only. Yet another requires all faculty to post their syllabi online.
Women's and Native American commissions
The Indiana Commission for Women and the Native American Indian Affairs Commission, both of which had roughly $100,000 budgets, are gone entirely from this budget.
There's no word on whether that means the commissions themselves will be dissolved ― the governor's office has not responded to requests for comment on that question.
"I think it's done and I really resent it," Sen. Vaneta Becker, R-Evansville, said of the axing of the women's commission.
People on waitlists
More than 11,000 Hoosiers in need of home or community based care are on waitlists for the Medicaid waiver as a result of the $1 billion shortfall discovered in 2023.
In a separate issue also related to a dearth of funding, the Family and Social Services Administration has also brought back the waitlist for child care vouchers for low-income families.
This budget doesn't chip away at either of those waitlists. It does dedicate some money toward the child care vouchers to ensure that all families currently receiving vouchers will not be booted to the waitlist.
Tossup
Gov. Mike Braun
Braun gained some power in this budget over the state's flagship research school, Indiana University.
But a number of his tax credit suggestions didn't make the cut, including tax credits for capital investments in rural areas, employers who provide "upskilling" training for their workforce, and young farmers starting out in the business.
Win some, lose some.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports
At a Senate budget hearing on June 11, Republican senators fiercely criticized U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Trump administration's effort to end the Ukraine war through negotiations involving Russia. The session revealed deep divisions within the GOP on U.S. foreign policy, as lawmakers clashed over the administration's strategic direction, Politico reports. Leading the pushback was Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, one of three Republicans who voted against Hegseth's confirmation, who warned, "America's reputation is on the line." McConnell, now chair of the panel overseeing defense funding, issued some of his strongest public criticism yet, questioning whether the United States would continue defending democratic allies against authoritarian threats. He contrasted his stance — rooted in a Reagan-era commitment to global leadership — with Hegseth's "America First" approach favored by many Trump supporters. "We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses," McConnell said. When asked who the aggressor in the three-year-old war is, Hegseth responded, "Russia is the aggressor." But he avoided directly stating which side the U.S. wants to see win, instead emphasizing that President Trump is committed to achieving peace. Hegseth shifted blame to the Biden and Obama administrations, arguing that slow responses during their terms allowed Putin to seize Crimea and invade Ukraine. "Vladimir Putin knows that President Trump is strong," he said, suggesting a negotiated peace would bolster America's global position. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a prominent Trump ally, questioned whether Putin would stop his territorial ambitions if he gained ground in Ukraine. Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine said he did not believe Putin would stop. Hegseth, however, responded, "It remains to be seen." Graham rebuked that answer, saying, "This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen." Democrats also raised concerns. Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware criticized the administration for omitting Ukraine aid in its 2026 budget request and warned against compromising too much for the sake of peace. 'We cannot abandon Ukraine,' he said. Hegseth defended the administration's strategy, calling a negotiated settlement a show of strength. "The alternative of endless war that is largely funded by the United States and fought by Ukrainians… does not make sense strategically," he said. Read also: America's weak strongman We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.