‘Marriage doesn't grant automatic access to private information' – Chhattisgarh HC dismisses man's petition seeking wife's call records
In his petition before the court, the petitioner claimed that a fortnight after the two married in 2022, his wife's behaviour 'changed drastically' after a visit to her parents' home and that she had 'misbehaved' with his mother and brother.
The man claims that he went to fetch her back in September and October that year but she refused, following which he approached a lower court for restitution of conjugal rights (including the right to live together, companionship, and sexual relations) under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. A week later, the woman filed a police complaint, and subsequently an application in court, accusing the man's parents and brother of domestic violence,
In January 2024, the man approached the police seeking his estranged wife's Call Data Record (CDR) and also filed a similar application in the family court saying he suspected her of having an 'illicit relationship' with her sister's husband and 'call detail records are necessary to substantiate allegations of adultery'.
When the family court dismissed the petition, he approached the high court, which said there was no allegation of adultery in the divorce petition and that accessing her call records would be a violation of the respondent's right to privacy.
'Now coming to the facts of the present case, it is evident that there is no allegation of adultery in the petition filed by the petitioner for the dissolution of marriage. Such allegations have been made for the first time in the written arguments. Moreover, in the application moved by the petitioner seeking call detail records, no allegations were made with regard to adultery,' the court said in its recent order.
Marriage did not grant the husband 'automatic access to the wife's private information, communications and personal belongings'.
'The husband cannot compel the wife to share her passwords of the cell phone or bank account and such an act would amount to a violation of privacy and potentially domestic violence. There should be a balance between marital privacy and the need for transparency and at the same time trust in the relationship,' the court said.
The right to privacy, the Bench said, 'encompasses the preservation of personal intimacies, the sanctity of family life, marriage, procreation, the home, and sexual orientation. Any intrusion into this right would amount to a violation of the fundamental rights of the individual'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Six held for looting retired doctor's house in Odisha inspired by ‘Special 26' movie
KENDRAPARA: Kendrapara police on Wednesday arrested six members of a gang who reportedly posed as Vigilance officers and looted the house of a retired physician at Oldhi village in Derabishi on July 10. Police said the accused were inspired by Akshay Kumar-starrer Bollywood movie Special 26 to loot the house of Dr Jalil Ahmad Khan (80). The gang arrived at Khan's house posing as Vigilance officials. Once inside, they confiscated the mobile phones of all family members. While two accused confined the family in a corner of the house, others broke open three almirahs and looted around 500 gm of gold jewellery worth Rs 50 lakh along with Rs 1.5 lakh cash before fleeing. Derabishi IIC Ambika Prasad Das said a dedicated team of police cracked the case with the help of CCTV footage and call detail record (CDR) analysis. 'During interrogation, the accused admitted that they were inspired by the Bollywood film Special 26 and recreated a similar theft,' he said. Police recovered Rs 50,000 cash, four mobile phones, two motorcycles and several incriminating documents from the accused. All the accused - Saraf Ali (35) and Prafulla Behera (43) of Oldhi, Abhilas Nayak (20), an engineering student of Poila village, Abu Jafar Khan (30) of Garapur, Sk Raju of Ranapada and Jakir Khan (41) of Thakurapatana - were booked under sections 310 and 333 of the BNS and produced in court. Two more accused are absconding, and efforts are underway to nab them, Das added. Dr Khan, a retired doctor from a government medical college in Jamshedpur, resides in his ancestral village and continues to run a private clinic there.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Kerala nuns' arrest: Sessions court in Chhattisgarh declines bail plea, refers case to Bilaspur HC
Raipur/Thiruvananthapuram: In a setback for two Kerala-based nuns currently lodged in Durg jail, a sessions court on Wednesday declined to entertain their bail plea, directing the petitioners to approach the NIA-designated bench at the Chhattisgarh High Court in Bilaspur. The court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the bail application in the matter, which is being probed under the provisions of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act. Despite insistence from the nuns' counsel, the court dismissed the plea. Just before the sessions court began its hearing, a group of Bajarang Dal activists gathered and started shouting slogans against the nuns and the way they were trying to cover up a case that, according to them, involved human trafficking and forced religious conversion. The complainant in the case is Ravi Nigam. A battery of five lawyers represented him in court during the proceedings. Advocate Jaiswal, present in the court, said the sessions court is not competent to hear the case and asked them to approach the High Court. As the news came, the Bajarang Dal activists, waiting outside the court, erupted in celebration. The issue was raised in both houses of Parliament, though it was not taken up for discussion. Earlier, all MPs from Kerala staged a protest outside the parliament. Later, Congress-led UDF MPs called on Union Home Minister Amit Shah and briefed him on the matter. Senior lawmakers, including AICC general secretary K.C. Venugopal, have sought an appointment with Prime Minister Narendra Modi to bring the issue before him. Venugopal, speaking in the Lok Sabha, said this is a burning issue in Kerala. Centre must intervene as the Chhattisgarh Chief Minister is not acting responsibly, he said. "Spoke in Parliament demanding the immediate release of Sister Vandana and Sister Preethi belonging to the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate, who were brutally attacked by Bajrang Dal goons in Durg in Chhattisgarh and later arrested by the police without any reason. Instead of upholding the Constitution, the Chhattisgarh CM is validating the mob narrative that took the law into their own hands for their hateful agenda. The PM and Kerala BJP wax eloquent about their newfound love for Christians, but in reality, have venom in their hearts against minorities," Venugopal posted on X. Earlier in the day, a delegation led by CPI(M) politburo member Brinda Karat and including MPs A.A. Rahim, K. Radhakrishnan, and Jose K. Mani visited the nuns in jail. Karat condemned the arrest, calling it a clear case of fabricated charges. 'The nuns are completely innocent. This is a targeted move against Christians. We demand their immediate release and quashing of the case,' she said. Back in Kerala, both the ruling LDF and the Congress-led UDF launched separate protests. Senior Congress leaders, including KPCC president K. Sudhakaran and Leader of Opposition V.D. Satheesan, marched to the Kerala Raj Bhavan, demanding urgent action. 'This is unacceptable. These nuns are known for their humanitarian work. The Centre must act decisively,' said Satheesan. Later in the evening, Church leaders and members of the Christian community will hold a protest march to the Raj Bhavan. The two nuns -- Sister Preeti Mary and Sister Vandana Francis -- belong to the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate, a congregation under the Syro-Malabar Church in Alappuzha district. They had been working at a hospital in Agra. On July 26, while accompanying three women from Chhattisgarh's Narayanpur district to Agra for jobs as kitchen helpers in a convent, the nuns and a man, Sukhman Mandavi, were stopped at a Chhattisgarh railway station by Bajrang Dal activists and later taken into custody by police. They were produced before a local court and sent to judicial custody. With the sessions court now directing the matter to the High Court, the nuns will remain in jail until further orders.
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
TN 'honour killing: NGO demands CBI probe into murder
THOOTHUKUDI: Nearly 65 honour killing incidents have taken place in Tamil Nadu since 2017, and police secured conviction only in seven cases in the past 30 years, human rights activist Kathir, executive director of the NGO Evidence said on Tuesday. Speaking to TNIE after meeting the parents of C Kavin Selvaganesh, Kathir said the CBI must probe Kavin's death as both parents of the suspect are police personnel and the police department might influence the investigation by local police in their favour. "This is the first time a police parents and their son have been involved in a honour killing incident, which shows how deep rooted casteism is even in the digital era," he said. "As per provisions of SC/ST Act , the deputy commissioner of police and collector must visit the house of the caste-based murder victims. But two days have passed since Kavin's death, none of them has visited the family yet. Police must secure and record all evidence wanted by victim's kin that can lead to rendering justice to them," he said. Referring to documents available with human rights defenders, Kathir said at least 65 caste-killing incidents have taken place in Tamil Nadu since 2017, he said. Even though several high courts in the country have passed judgement in around 72 cases ruling that inter caste marriages are not against Hindu Marriage Act, the Tamil Nadu government is struggling to control caste pride and the honour killings, Kathir added.
