Fewer people falling sick in Kerala, but annual treatment costs rising, says study
While the fall in number of the sick could be a result of the reduced rate of infectious disease outbreaks, the rise in per capita annual medical treatment cost could be due to a rise in lifestyle diseases that require expensive treatment and a high life expectancy, says 'Kerala Studies 2.0' released by the Kerala Sasthra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP) here on Sunday (July 13). The study notes that the cost of treatment per episode did not go up much between 2004 and 2019, probably because of the improved facilities in public health institutions.
'Kerala Studies 2.0' is a detailed survey of the changes that happened in the State's socio-economic and political spheres between 2004 and 2019. It is a sequel to a similar study conducted in 2004 and released in 2006. The participants were divided into extremely poor, poor, lower middle class, and upper middle class categories.
The study was conducted by a team led by K.P. Aravindan, a public health expert and former Head of the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode. A team led by T.P. Kunhikannan, former State president, KSSP, collected the data.
According to the study, Kerala is fast becoming a society dominated by the middle class. There has been a 356.6% increase in the cost of buying consumer durables in the period. Houses with air-conditioners rose from 1% of the population to 10%. The main causes of indebtedness are the wedding expenses of girls and unexpected catastrophic health expenditure. People are found to have been more contented with the performance of local body institutions and State government institutions than Central government institutions. In 2004, more people said that the Central government institutions were better.
Former Finance Minister T.M. Thomas Isaac released the book by handing over a copy to popular science activist K. Sreedharan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UPS posts fall in second-quarter profit and revenue
(Reuters) -United Parcel Service reported a decline in second-quarter profit and revenue on Tuesday, as demand took a hit from new "de minimis" tariffs on low-value Chinese shipments and mounting risks from President Donald Trump's trade policies. The company reported adjusted net income of $1.55 per share for the quarter ended June 30, from $1.79 per share a year earlier. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
William Watson: Government-managed trade is sure to fail again
Those are some trade deals Donald Trump is shaking hands on — but so far not releasing details about. The U.S. gets tariff-free access to other countries while other countries pay stiff across-the-board tariffs going into the U.S. The U.K. pays 10 per cent, the EU and Japan 15 per cent, Indonesia and the Philippines 19 per cent and Vietnam 20 per cent. What China will pay remains to be determined. It typically pushes back more in response to Trump's jibes and jabs. Perhaps President Xi Jinping read the sections of the Art of the Deal about the need to stand up to bullies. Silly question: If a virtue of tariffs is that they're clean and simple, as the U.S. president always says, wouldn't it be a lot easier to have the same across-the-board rate for all countries? And whatever happened to 'reciprocity,' which the White House was big on a couple of months ago? Tariffs of 10-20 per cent for other countries' goods going into the U.S. but zero for American goods entering other countries are hardly 'reciprocal.' Yes, the rates chosen supposedly reflect the amount of procedural protectionism or non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that countries impose on U.S. goods. Except that no systematic study of that in fact much-studied problem has produced numbers that look like the pattern the deals reveal. And of course the U.S. itself is no stranger to NTBs and procedural protectionism. Just ask our softwood lumber industry. What the emerging regime looks like most is affirmative action for American businesses. They evidently can't compete with wily foreigners deploying unfair practices against them. And they're unwilling to abide by the (presumably rigged) decisions of international trade tribunals set up, under U.S. leadership actually, to make sure governments discriminate as little as possible against one another's firms. Even as the Trump administration abolishes affirmative action from U.S. society in general, it imposes it in international trade. Also strange are the commitments by other countries to invest given dollar amounts in the U.S. and to buy given amounts of U.S. goods, especially Boeing aircraft. Japan's going to buy 100 Boeing planes (not clear yet whether doors will be extra) and invest $550 billion in the U.S., with the U.S. somehow getting 90 per cent of the profit on this investment. Details to follow. When we economists teach international trade theory we customarily talk about (to cite the classic example) Portugal selling wine to the U.K. in return for wool. But in the real world, the non-communist parts of it at least, countries generally don't buy and sell goods and services to each other. Rather, people and companies in their millions and billions decide what goods and services to buy and their accumulated choices generate the trade flows we see. That type of trade system accords very well with the traditionally very American view that governments should not run economies, people and businesses should, with the government restricting itself to policing property rights and providing good public services at a reasonable tax price. But now governments, America's included, apparently want to manage the intricate details of the supply chain. In support of the Trump tariffs, some American politicians say it's simply not efficient for car parts to cross the Canada-U.S. or U.S.-Mexico border several times before cars are complete, as sometimes happens. But who are they to say? Since 1965's Canada-U.S. Auto Pact car companies have decided, free of tariffs, how best to put cars together. If it made economic sense to make and assemble all the parts in one location — if that's what maxed out their profits — you can bet that's what they'd do. If they don't do that, it's because that isn't the most efficient way to do things, given costs, technologies and transportation costs. Politicians should stick to matters such as Jeffrey Epstein and let car companies figure out how best to make cars. Why have Americans traditionally resisted government micro-management of the economy? Have a listen to the soundtrack of Hamilton. Because they abhor the concentration of power in a politico-industrial complex. Because not even a stable genius in the White House — not to suggest that's what we have now — would be smart enough to outsmart the combined intelligence and creativity of the entire American population when channelled through price- and efficiency-revealing markets. And, finally, because the invisible hand of competition is the best way to restrain the grasping hand of corruption. Corruption is not unknown in the private sector, of course. Humans are humans everywhere and always prey to temptation. But if you have competition — which in a small country like Canada is often provided by imports and foreign investors — companies or individuals that go astray get punished in the marketplace. And decisions don't get made for political reasons. Donald Trump always says he wants Canadian auto jobs to move to Michigan and Ohio, which, no coincidence, are two battleground states. Every president, not just the transparently venal, will favour places he wants his party to win in the next election, whenever that is. The only way to avoid such corruption is to remove power from politicians and vest it in markets. William Watson: All checks, no balances here in Nastyland William Watson: Our better-funded military will need to be more lethal I do understand such arguments are in disfavour at the moment. I bet the future vindicates them, as it always does. But the process won't be fun. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Video: Inter and Atalanta directors arrive as crucial Lookman talks expected
Inter President Beppe Marotta and Atalanta CEO Luca Percassi have both arrived for a meeting of the Serie A league council on Tuesday, where it is expected that crucial talks for Ademola Lookman will take place. Watch: Inter and Atalanta directors arrive ahead of Lookman talks A customary Lega Serie A meeting is taking place in the city of Milan on Tuesday. The meeting is thought to be of particular interest to Inter and Atalanta, who both have directors in attendance as transfer talks for African player of the year Lookman heat up. ⚫️🔵Beppe Marotta in Lega: la domanda è sempre quella — Daniele Mari July 29, 2025 …e arriva subito dopo Luca Percassi — Daniele Mari July 29, 2025 According to various outlets in Italy, the Nerazzurri are expected to come back in with a new and improved bid for the 27-year-old in the imminent future. BERGAMO, ITALY – MARCH 01: Ademola Lookman of Atalanta is challenged by Hans Nicolussi Caviglia of Venezia during the Serie A match between Atalanta and Venezia at Gewiss Stadium on March 01, 2025 in Bergamo, Italy. (Photo by) Atalanta are reportedly holding out for a price tag of €50m, which means that an offer of €45m plus €5m in bonuses could be enough to strike an agreement. Marotta has already suggested that the matter will be closed 'in two to three days' either way.
