logo
Cascale Spells Out Why Manufacturers Are Critical to Movement on Climate Goals

Cascale Spells Out Why Manufacturers Are Critical to Movement on Climate Goals

Yahoo26-03-2025

When it comes to sustainability, moving the needle on manufacturing is a critical part of making progress—particularly because Scope 3 emissions account for so much of the fashion and apparel industry's footprint.
At Sourcing Journal's Sustainability Summit in New York, Chris Marshall, director of transparency at Cascale, joined Jasmin Malik Chua, Sourcing Journal's sourcing and labor editor, to discuss the organization's future goals, the need for brand investment in greener manufacturing, the importance of making good on climate commitments and more.
More from Sourcing Journal
The EU Omnibus is Here. Where Does It Leave Supply Chain Due Diligence?
Can Cascale Promote Responsible Purchasing Practices at Scale?
Shuffle Board: Birkenstock CFO Steps Down, Luxury Leader Joins Canada Goose
Marshall said Cascale works toward two main goals: combating climate change and fostering and advancing responsible purchasing practices.
To make progress toward each of those goals, Cascale has inked partnerships with other industry organizations charged with tackling climate issues. By doing so, Marshall said, Cascale has been able to focus on what it does best: helping Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers with their footprints and goals.
'We all know that this industry doesn't need another decarbonization program, so we haven't done that,' he said, noting that Cascale has partnered with the Apparel Impact Institute (Aii) and Reset Carbon to advance existing work they're doing around facility-level climate solutions.
'What we want to do at Cascale is, we want to partner that with brand commitment, commitment to these low-carbon sourcing manufacturers so that they can continue to invest…in these climate solutions. They have extremely extensive decarbonization roadmaps, and we just want to make sure that, we as brands, that we're supporting them on their journey,' Marshall said.
That interest in supporting manufacturers has become a core piece of Cascale's mission; in February, the organization acquired the Better Buying Institute (BBI), which helps brands understand how they can make more responsible purchasing decisions to positively impact their suppliers and the workers within those facilities.
'Our visions are aligned, and I think today, it's a great opportunity for us, not only to expand our capabilities…but it's also to signal to the industry that, here at Cascale, we're very serious about representing the manufacturing [industry's] voice and advancing responsible purchasing practices across the consumer goods industry,' he said.
Part of truly supporting manufacturers comes with investing in their progress toward more sustainable outcomes, Marshall said. He further noted that, in conversations with manufacturers, he has determined that happens when brands help their suppliers purchase the necessary equipment to make significant progress.
'I had many conversations with prominent Tier 2 manufacturers—predominantly textile mills. I think the common point across all of these manufacturers is that all of the low-hanging fruit in regards to advancing climate has been picked,' he said. 'If we are going…to make any strides toward our targets, it's going to require huge capex expenditures….I don't think favorable financing terms [are] the answer to us hitting our targets, by any means. These manufacturers are not looking for more debt, at all.'
The industry has long heralded sustainability legislation as a way forward in the fashion and apparel industry. But in some jurisdictions, progress has been slow—and in the United States, President Donald Trump's administration has made it clear that climate is unlikely to be a priority.
But the U.S. isn't the only area that remains top of mind for the industry. Marshall called the 'watering down' of the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) 'a real shame,' but noted that it is unlikely to change the goals of companies truly interested in advancing their sustainability goals.
'I'm a true believer that good businesses out there that are doing good—meaning trying to become more sustainable—need the rules to change in order to level the playing field. But I also believe that those that were doing good will continue to do so, so it's not going to all drop at the change of a hand. These brands and manufacturers have extensive decarbonization roadmaps that they're working against, and that's not going to change drastically.'
Cascale hopes to see the commitments brands and manufacturers make continue—and even increase. Early on in the conversation, Marshall noted that, to walk back on commitments 'could be deemed as being irresponsible.' Instead, he urged, it's the right time to accelerate efforts, even if regulation doesn't demand it.
'My real call to action for the industry is for companies to start to take some of this green transition into their own hands,' he said. 'In the fashion industry, we put a lot of onus on the consumer to drive us through this green transition. But you can see, year after year, they're not spending more on sustainability. It's now the opportunity for us as companies…to really start helping power that transition.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'

Senate Republicans are deeply divided over how to cut the cost of House-passed legislation to enact President Trump's agenda, which Elon Musk has attacked as a 'mountain of disgusting pork' and fiscal conservatives on Capitol Hill say doesn't do enough to cut the deficit. Facing a jittery bond market and scathing criticism from Musk, GOP lawmakers have expanded their search for ways to reduce the deficit by cutting Medicare, the Defense Department and the Federal Reserve — areas of the budget that were considered off limits just a few weeks ago. But each new proposal is creating new divisions. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is warning colleagues to steer clear of cutting Medicare spending, even though proponents of the idea insist it would be targeted only on 'waste, fraud and abuse.' 'I don't like this idea of fiddling with Medicare at all,' Hawley said. 'I think it's a bad idea. We should not do that. I've counseled against it.' 'How about instead we cap the price [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] is paying for prescription drugs? Why touch Medicare?' he asked. Other Republicans want to look at Medicare Advantage plans provided by private insurance companies as an alternative to traditional Medicare. They say that 'fly-by-night' health care providers are abusing the program and bilking the federal government. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said lawmakers are discussing a proposal sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) that could save up to $275 billion by cracking down on insurance companies that over-charge Medicare Advantage. 'No one is more concerned about our national debt than I am. I would like to cut more money on this bill. If it was up to me, we would be going from $7 trillion a year to $6.5 trillion,' Marshall said, proposing a half-trillion dollars in deficit reduction over the next decade. Some Republicans are also calling for a closer look at defense spending, arguing that the Pentagon needs to see its budget shrink along with the rest of government. While the House-passed bill includes $150 billion in new funding for the Defense Department for new programs, such as Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield, fiscal conservatives say there's a lot of bloat in the defense budget that should be eliminated. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says defense hawks have a 'hidden agenda' to use Trump's big, beautiful bill to pump up military spending beyond what the nation could afford. 'It's a frustration for those of us who think it ought to be about fiscal restraint and/or cutting taxes, or both. It ends up becoming a spending bill and the spending is $150 billion on top of [what] they were already increasing the military' in the regular appropriations process, he said. 'If you're fiscally conservative, you have to be fiscally conservative everywhere. You can't be for blowing the budget out on the military,' he argued. Marshall says he would also support military spending cuts. 'I'm one of the few Republicans that thinks that defense has more than enough money,' he said. But cuts to the Pentagon's budget would face strong pushback from Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Defense Appropriations Committee Chair Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who argue that Trump's defense budget is inadequate. Wicker earlier this year called for $175 billion in new defense funding to be included in the reconciliation package but later relented to $150 billion, which he says is the minimum needed. McConnell is expected to press Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Trump's defense appropriations request on Tuesday. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has proposed stopping interest payments to banks that deposit cash at the Federal Reserve, which he says would save $1 trillion over the next decade. But that proposal is already facing a backlash from the banking industry, which has come to depend on the payments as a steady cash flow. Strategists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. are warning that eliminating interest payments would create turmoil in the financial markets and predict the proposal isn't going anywhere, according to Bloomberg News. Proposals in the House-passed bill to cut nearly $800 billion in Medicaid spending and $267 billion in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program spending are running into objections from Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). So are provisions to terminate renewable energy tax breaks that could strand tens of billions of dollars in investments to Republican states, such as West Virginia, where the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub is in danger of losing funds if construction isn't underway before the end of the year. Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Curtis (R-Utah) and Shelley Moore Capito ( are sounding the alarm over the immediate phase-out of clean energy tax breaks, which they warn would disrupt their state economies and cost jobs. On the other side of the argument are conservatives such as Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who say the bill doesn't go far enough to cut off Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants, and Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who wants to immediately repeal the climate-oriented tax breaks enacted by Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. 'We're talking about Medicaid, we're talking about EITC, earned income tax credit, child tax credit, and eligibility for claiming the benefits of dependents for income tax purposes. Those things should be benefits available to citizens and lawful permanent residents and not others, not illegal migrants,' Lee told The Hill. Lee says the House bill doesn't completely shut off federal benefits to illegal migrants and declared 'that's the problem.' Scott, meanwhile, says subsidies for clean energy programs need to be cut off promptly to help reduce the deficit. 'We got a fiscal crisis,' he said. 'We have to balance our budget. 'We should completely eliminate the Green New Deal, that's No. 1,' he declared. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Marshall's tour highlights Sanford businesses, RISE program
Marshall's tour highlights Sanford businesses, RISE program

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Marshall's tour highlights Sanford businesses, RISE program

North Carolina Secretary of State Elaine Marshall spent Wednesday touring area businesses and then participating in a Small Business Roundtable at Central Carolina Community College. Marshall came to town to discuss the Rural RISE NC initiative, which helps put resources into the hands of business creators early on. As she walked downtown, she stopped at several of the businesses to talk about the successes and challenges with their owners. Many of the business owners she spoke with are graduates of the Sanford Area Growth Alliance's RISE program, which is done in partnership with CCCC's Small Business Center. Marshall's entrance to the city was marked with a lunch at Mrs. Lacy's Magnolia House and a chance to meet with owner Faye Shultz. The walking tour included a visit to High Cotton Couture and a short discussion of the business with owner Maggie Cranford, who opened the business after completing the first cohort of the local RISE program. From there, it was on to Family Grounds Coffee and meeting with owner David Heimbecker and a lesson in how to make one of the signature coffees. Marshall's next stop was a brief visit to the Sanford Antique Mall, which is considered the largest in the Sandhills. There she talked with owner/operators Jane Bane and Jenks Youngblood, who told Marshall about the 75 dealer spaces and more than 18,000 square feet of antiques and collectibles at the business. Across the street, Marshall had the chance to visit the historic Sanford Depot and check on the progress of renovations. In 2022, Sanford City Council committed $703,000 from the American Rescue Plan Act to renovate the building. The North Carolina General Assembly then earmarked $500,000 in State Capital Infrastructure Funds, and another $100,000 has been raised through private donations. Marshall also got a chance to see the construction going on at the Pilgrim's Sanford Agricultural Marketplace and then had the chance to tour the Temple Theatre, which is celebrating its 100th anniversary this year. From there, it was on to the Dennis A. Wicker Civic Center, where area business owners and representatives of local government entities had the chance to hear her speak about the Rural RISE NC Initiative and share their experiences and ask questions. Before she spoke, CCCC President Lisa Chapman, Mayor Rebecca Wyhof Salmon and Lee County Commission Chair Kirk Smith spoke briefly. 'I met lots of great people while we were walking around,' Marshall said as she thanked Chapman for hosting the panel. 'We got to see some great businesses earlier today.' Marshall is no stranger to Sanford and Lee County, having represented the area in the North Carolina Legislature. She spoke about the RISE program and the business climate for those who are opening small businesses. 'Since 2020, we've called this the new era of entrepreneurship,' she said. 'Our entrepreneurial spirit is why North Carolina has been ranked best in the country. Not everyone is sharing in that good news across North Carolina.' Marshall said a survey of businesses had more than 4,000 answers and by the end of 2021, had led to the development of a new program. 'We called it Rural RISE,' she said. 'It's not a copycat. This RISE stands for Resources for Innovators, Startups and Entrepreneurs. We started with one county. Our test pilot was in Western North Carolina. We then branched out to 14 counties, and now, we have 93 counties enrolled in this database.' Marshall said all of the 78 counties deemed rural by the state are in the database and have items available to business creators. Marshall said when she became Secretary of State in 1997, there were about 30,000 new businesses created in North Carolina. 'Fast forward to 2021, it was 178,000 new businesses that were formed that year,' Marshall said. 'There has been some moderation over the past three years, but it still equates to 63% growth since 2019. In 2021, new business creation outpaced every other year on record. They have doubled from 2017. In 2024, there were more than 162,000 new business creations in this state.' Marshall noted that all 100 North Carolina counties have noted double-digit growth over the past several years. 'What is really awesome is that some of the most rapid growth came in more economically distressed Tier 1 counties,' she said. 'For example, Scotland County grew by 138%. Berties County grew by 123%. Of the 13 counties that grew by more than 100%, 10 of them were Tier 1 — our poorest counties.' Marshall said that Lee County grew by 68%, which is higher than the statewide average of 63%. Marshall also noted that since taking office in 1997, her agency has filed paperwork for more than 2 million businesses. 'That is 2 million dreams, countless jobs created, expectations for the community and incredible growth for the North Carolina economy of the past couple of decades. These are dreams that build families and communities.' Marshall said that in an effort to get resources to people that needed them, her office launched Rural RISE. She said her offices serves as the primary communications channel to new businesses. 'We're the very first to know,' Marshall said. 'We know the entrepreneur that woke up this morning and said, 'Today's the day I'm going to do it.' Then they want to file today. All of you who have been through the RISE program know that isn't the first step. There's a whole lot of planning and thinking that go into it.' For more about the program, visit

Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time5 hours ago

  • The Hill

Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'

Senate Republicans are deeply divided over how to cut the cost of House-passed legislation to enact President Trump's agenda, which Elon Musk has attacked as a 'mountain of disgusting pork' and fiscal conservatives on Capitol Hill say doesn't do enough to cut the deficit. Facing a jittery bond market and scathing criticism from Musk, GOP lawmakers have expanded their search for ways to reduce the deficit by cutting Medicare, the Defense Department and the Federal Reserve — areas of the budget that were considered off limits just a few weeks ago. But each new proposal is creating new divisions. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is warning colleagues to steer clear of cutting Medicare spending, even though proponents of the idea insist it would be targeted only on 'waste, fraud and abuse.' 'I don't like this idea of fiddling with Medicare at all,' Hawley said. 'I think it's a bad idea. We should not do that. I've counseled against it.' 'How about instead we cap the price [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] is paying for prescription drugs? Why touch Medicare?' he asked. Other Republicans want to look at Medicare Advantage plans provided by private insurance companies as an alternative to traditional Medicare. They say that 'fly-by-night' health care providers are abusing the program and bilking the federal government. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said lawmakers are discussing a proposal sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) that could save up to $275 billion by cracking down on insurance companies that over-charge Medicare Advantage. 'No one is more concerned about our national debt than I am. I would like to cut more money on this bill. If it was up to me, we would be going from $7 trillion a year to $6.5 trillion,' Marshall said, proposing a half-trillion dollars in deficit reduction over the next decade. Some Republicans are also calling for a closer look at defense spending, arguing that the Pentagon needs to see its budget shrink along with the rest of government. While the House-passed bill includes $150 billion in new funding for the Defense Department for new programs, such as Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield, fiscal conservatives say there's a lot of bloat in the defense budget that should be eliminated. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says defense hawks have a 'hidden agenda' to use Trump's big, beautiful bill to pump up military spending beyond what the nation could afford. 'It's a frustration for those of us who think it ought to be about fiscal restraint and/or cutting taxes, or both. It ends up becoming a spending bill and the spending is $150 billion on top of [what] they were already increasing the military' in the regular appropriations process, he said. 'If you're fiscally conservative, you have to be fiscally conservative everywhere. You can't be for blowing the budget out on the military,' he argued. Marshall says he would also support military spending cuts. 'I'm one of the few Republicans that thinks that defense has more than enough money,' he said. But cuts to the Pentagon's budget would face strong pushback from Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Defense Appropriations Committee Chair Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who argue that Trump's defense budget is inadequate. Wicker earlier this year called for $175 billion in new defense funding to be included in the reconciliation package but later relented to $150 billion, which he says is the minimum needed. McConnell is expected to press Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Trump's defense appropriations request on Tuesday. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has proposed stopping interest payments to banks that deposit cash at the Federal Reserve, which he says would save $1 trillion over the next decade. But that proposal is already facing a backlash from the banking industry, which has come to depend on the payments as a steady cash flow. Strategists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. are warning that eliminating interest payments would create turmoil in the financial markets and predict the proposal isn't going anywhere, according to Bloomberg News. Proposals in the House-passed bill to cut nearly $800 billion in Medicaid spending and $267 billion in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program spending are running into objections from Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). So are provisions to terminate renewable energy tax breaks that could strand tens of billions of dollars in investments to Republican states, such as West Virginia, where the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub is in danger of losing funds if construction isn't underway before the end of the year. Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Curtis (R-Utah) and Shelley Moore Capito ( are sounding the alarm over the immediate phase-out of clean energy tax breaks, which they warn would disrupt their state economies and cost jobs. On the other side of the argument are conservatives such as Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who say the bill doesn't go far enough to cut off Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants, and Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who wants to immediately repeal the climate-oriented tax breaks enacted by Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. 'We're talking about Medicaid, we're talking about EITC, earned income tax credit, child tax credit, and eligibility for claiming the benefits of dependents for income tax purposes. Those things should be benefits available to citizens and lawful permanent residents and not others, not illegal migrants,' Lee told The Hill. Lee says the House bill doesn't completely shut off federal benefits to illegal migrants and declared 'that's the problem.' Scott, meanwhile, says subsidies for clean energy programs need to be cut off promptly to help reduce the deficit. 'We got a fiscal crisis,' he said. 'We have to balance our budget. 'We should completely eliminate the Green New Deal, that's No. 1,' he declared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store