logo
Senate lines up major step toward passing stablecoin bill

Senate lines up major step toward passing stablecoin bill

Yahoo11-06-2025
The Senate is poised to hold another key procedural vote on stablecoin legislation Wednesday, clearing the way for the crypto bill after several controversial amendments threatened to complicate its path forward.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) moved to end debate Monday on the updated text of the GENIUS Act, struck as part of a bipartisan agreement after two weeks of frantic negotiations last month between Republicans and crypto-friendly Democrats.
The move appears to end Thune's push to pass the bill via so-called 'regular order,' which would have opened up floor proceedings on the stablecoin legislation to dozens of amendments in a lengthy process that risked derailing final passage.
'I think at this point it's a good thing, because the longer it sat around, the more people picked at it, and it would have died from death by 1000 cuts, if we would have waited longer,' Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) told The Hill on Tuesday.
'And I think that Sen. Thune was seeing that, and so he decided to move forward just with the changes that were made in negotiations with the Democrats,' she continued, noting that she expects the updated text to be the final version of the bill.
A Senate aide said Tuesday that no final decision had been made yet on amendments but underscored that the timeframe was shrinking ahead of Wednesday's vote.
A key point of contention has been the Credit Card Competition Act (CCCA), which Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) offered up as an amendment. However, it seems increasingly unlikely that the bill will get a vote as part of the GENIUS Act.
'There's a couple of GOP Senators who wish to avoid a vote on CCCA at all costs, and an open amendment process on this was a major threat to that end,' a senior GOP staffer familiar with what transpired told The Hill.
'Obviously, Leader Thune ran the calculus, and ultimately decided to toss the process out in order to move on Genius,' they continued. 'There's very little Senator Marshall can do at this point, disappointed as he likely is.'
The CCCA seeks to take aim at credit card swipe fees — the fees charged to retailers every time a customer swipes a credit card. Marshall and his Democratic co-sponsor, Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), have argued Visa and Mastercard have a duopoly over the credit card market, leading to higher swipe fees.
Their proposal would require large financial institutions to provide an option other than Visa or Mastercard to process credit card transactions.
The legislation has been the subject of fierce lobbying. While retailers have embraced the bill, the credit card industry has aggressively opposed the measure, arguing it would enrich major retailers and force credit card companies to do away with popular rewards programs.
'The Credit Card Competition Act has been controversial for a while in D.C.,' said Christopher Niebuhr, a senior research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors.
'The inclusion of the Credit Card Competition Act as an amendment, were it to get an amendment vote, would certainly add a little bit of risk or uncertainty as to the path forward for the GENIUS Act,' he added.
Lummis suggested Tuesday part of the push to include other measures in the stablecoin bill stems from a lack of movement on legislation in the Senate Banking Committee over the years.
'This is the first bill that's been reported out of the Banking Committee in eight years,' she said. 'So, there was a lot of pent-up desire to append other legislation that was financial services related to this bill. Some of that legislation is kind of controversial, so I get it.'
'I get why people are frustrated that they haven't had an opportunity to have their financial service related legislation heard,' she continued. 'But there will be other legislation that will come out of the Banking Committee, so they'll have other chances.'
While some GOP senators may be breathing a sigh of relief, the decision to move forward on the GENIUS Act without an open amendment process is raising questions for some Democrats, including those who initially supported the bill with the hopes of making changes down the line.
'I was glad about some of the bipartisan progress that had been made,' Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) told The Hill. 'It was one of the reasons I voted the bill out of committee in the first place, was with the agreement that there would be amendments.'
Blunt Rochester was one of five Democrats who joined their Republican colleague to vote the legislation out of the Senate Banking Committee in March. She and 15 other Democrats also supported the GENIUS Act in a procedural vote on the Senate floor last month.
However, she noted at the time that she wanted to see further changes to protect consumers and the stability of the financial system, as well as to prevent fraud and address President Trump's growing ties to the crypto industry.
'I was really clear,' Blunt Rochester added Tuesday. 'I hoped that there would be an open amendment process, and that's what I heard Leader Thune say around last month, so I will take a look at this language, and we'll make a decision from there.'
Thune repeatedly emphasized last month that he planned to move the GENIUS Act through the Senate via 'regular order,' allowing for an open amendment process on the floor.
This was central to his criticism of Democrats, who initially blocked the legislation from moving forward on the Senate floor in early May.
When Thune first sought to expedite the stablecoin bill, a contingent of crypto-friendly Democrats pulled their support, alleging Republicans had prematurely cut off negotiations and ultimately voting down a motion to advance the bill.
The Senate majority leader slammed Democrats at the time, arguing they would have a chance to make changes on the floor.
'All they had to do was vote for cloture. Not every bill that comes to the floor is a final bill. Now, that might be how it worked when they were in control, but Republicans are doing it differently,' Thune said in early May.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a fierce crypto critic who has opposed the bill, warned Tuesday that limiting amendments could undermine support for the legislation.
'Sen. Thune has repeatedly promised that he would open up the legislative process for amendments, and this is his first chance to do that, and he's gone back on his promise,' Warren told The Hill.
'It is possible that there will be people who will say that they voted to advance the bill, but without amendments, they can't do that anymore,' she added.
However, lead Democratic negotiators on the GENIUS Act have underscored the wins they secured through discussions Republicans.
'I think we have worked hard to incorporate many of the concerns that we have heard from our colleagues,' Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) told The Hill on Tuesday, adding, 'We had many, many amendments along the way that have been incorporated. Always we would like to have more, but it was a really solidly bipartisan effort.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Treasury Seeking ‘Innovative Methods' to Detect Illicit Crypto Activity
US Treasury Seeking ‘Innovative Methods' to Detect Illicit Crypto Activity

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Treasury Seeking ‘Innovative Methods' to Detect Illicit Crypto Activity

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has called for comment on the use of 'innovative or novel' measures to 'detect and mitigate' the illicit use of cryptocurrencies. Published in the Federal Register, the request for comment expires on October 17 and aims to fulfill the provisions of the recently passed GENIUS Act, especially those pertaining to the management of financial risk and to compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act. The Treasury aims to focus on four main areas: application program interfaces (APIs), AI, digital ID verification, and blockchain monitoring. It's therefore seeking input on how such solutions could enhance the ability of regulated institutions to detect illegal crypto-related activity, as well as on any privacy risks involved in monitoring transactions. The Treasury will use responses to compile a report which it will then send to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and also the House Committee on Financial Services, who will then formulate relevant guidance and legislative proposals. Compliance and privacy Given the focus on detecting and preventing illicit cryptocurrency flows, there's been some concern that proposals could have a negative impact on privacy. But experts working within the industry are optimistic that a compromise between decentralization and compliance can be reached. "Blockchain platforms can implement KYC/AML without undermining user privacy, which is a necessary balance DeFi must strike to mature,' Katie Evans, the Head of Business Development at DeFi infrastructure provider Swarm, told Decrypt. KYC refers to know your customer, or the requirement that banks, traditional financial institutions, and a growing number of crypto firms collect personal information about their customers. AML, or anti-money laundering, refers to safeguards these same institutions use to detect money laundering. Evans added that Swarm has been balancing privacy and transparency for several years now by using a combination of zero-knowledge proofs and smart contracts to conduct compliance checks without 'unnecessary' sharing of data. 'Our tokenized stocks run on public, permissionless blockchains, so users still benefit from decentralization's core promises: transparency, self-custody, and 24/7 access,' she said. 'At the same time, we've built in KYC/AML access controls to ensure eligible participants can issue and redeem these assets.' BitcoinOS Sees 'Renaissance' for Litecoin With Its First Ever ZK Rollup Other experts agree that zero-knowledge proofs will play a key role in maintaining compliance in a way that respects privacy. Harry Halpin, CEO and co-founder of decentralized VPN provider Nym, warned against the collection of 'excessive' KYC and AML data. 'If a platform must do KYC/AML, they should use zero-knowledge proofs like zk-creds from Aleo or anonymous credentials like zk-nyms from Nym,' he told Decrypt. One practice at Nym is to provide users with anonymous credentials when they pay for a NymVPN subscription using a credit card, with such credentials containing no personal data or payment info. 'However, this zero-knowledge KYC tech is still very special-purpose and needs more investment and development work to be broadly applicable across different blockchains and for different use-cases,' he explained. NYM Privacy Token Pumps as UK Demand for VPNs Spikes One thing that most commentators stress is the need to avoid the repeated inputting of personal data, something which can greatly expand the scope for breaches and misuse. 'We'll start by saying that we shouldn't be asking users to upload their government-issued ID to random third party platforms repeatedly,' said Riccardo Spagni and Naveen Jain, the co-founders of privacy-focused cryptocurrency Tari. Given this red line, Spagni and Jain support compliance solutions that would incorporate reusable and selective credentials. 'Make the user KYC once, and then allow them to prove to an unlimited number of platforms that they are over 18, not on a sanctions list, and have valid KYC,' they told Decrypt. Spagni and Jain also advocate for the use of zero-knowledge membership and attestation checks, something which would enable users to become part of a 'verified' set without exposing personal data. They added, 'Then DeFi front-ends can use ZK proofs or tooling like Semaphore to verify that a user is a part of this set while keeping the user pseudonymous.' Encouragingly, Jain and Spagni report that there has been 'significant' progress on privacy‑compatible tracing in recent years, such that authorities will be able to track transactions if necessary without exposing personal data to third parties. They said, 'For example, Tari has programmable confidentiality features that would allow a stablecoin issuer full access to the tx graph for compliance purposes while keeping all txs default confidential on a peer-to-peer basis.' While there is confidence that current blockchain technology is capable of guarding privacy and enabling regulatory oversight, it remains an open question as to what exactly the Department of the Treasury will recommend to Congress. Does Crypto Have a KYC Problem? Coinbase Hack, Solana Founder Doxxing Reopen Debate Despite the possibility of overreach, most industry figures are hopeful that the right balance will ultimately be struck, given that the request for comment will be met primarily by the industry itself. 'We hope that our industry will propose solutions that support reusable KYC, selective disclosure, and require platforms to collect the bare minimum amount of information for compliance purposes,' said Spagni and Jain. 'The goal shouldn't be to create a global panopticon that destroys everyone's freedom.' Similarly, Katie Evans notes that moves to enforce KYC/AML guidelines are 'inevitable' if the industry wants to attract institutional and corporate adoption in a big way. 'Without safeguards like these, DeFi risks remaining a niche,' she said. 'With them, we unlock scale, legitimacy, and adoption and make DeFi usable in the real economy.'

Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis
Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis

The Democratic Party is bleeding registered voters, suffering a 4.5 million swing against it that could take years to recover from, according to a new report. Between the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, Democrats lost about 2.1 million voters across the 30 states that track registration by political party, according to a New York Times analysis of data gathered by the L2 tracking firm. Over the same period, the Republican Party gained 2.4 million registered voters. Officially, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans nationwide, but that number is incomplete because blue states like California and New York allow voters to register by party — as does the District of Columbia — while reliably red states like Texas, Missouri and Ohio do not. Most alarmingly for Democrats, the decline is nationwide, with the US seeing more new voters registering with the GOP in 2024 for the first time in six years. Democrats also saw their registered voter advantage dwindle in four 2024 battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — all of which President Trump carried this past Nov. 5. Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters in the 30 states that track registration by political party. AP Michael Pruser, who tracks voter registration closely as the director of data science for Decision Desk HQ, warned that the numbers not only help explain Trump's victory last year — in which he became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years — but also forecast significant headwinds for Democrats in next year's midterm elections as well as the 2028 presidential vote. 'I don't want to say, 'The death cycle of the Democratic Party,'' Pruser told the Times, 'but there seems to be no end to this.' 'There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year,' he added. In North Carolina, Democrats lost 115,523 voters between the 2020 and 2024 election, with Republicans gaining more than 140,000 members and erasing the Dems' registration advantage, according to the L2 data. More new voters registered to be Republican than Democrat last year, the first time since 2018. Michael Nagle Democrats suffered similar losses in Arizona and Pennsylvania, while in Nevada — a state whose politics were long dominated by the Las Vegas-based Culinary Workers Union — the share of registered Democrats suffered the second-steepest plunge of those states measured between 2020 and 2024. (Only deep-red West Virginia saw more precipitous losses.). Even Democratic bastions like New York and California were not safe from voter erosion, with Dems losing 305,922 registered voters in the Empire State in between the two elections. In California, Democrats lost 680,556 voters between 2020 and 2024. All in all, Democrats went from enjoying an advantage of nearly 11 percentage points over Republicans in registered voter numbers in 2020 to just over six percentage points across the 30 states and DC in 2024, the Times found. Experts believe that the fall of new Democratic registrations can be linked to the growing number of voters choosing to be independents or unaffiliated, a trend that is sapping both parties' rolls. In 2018, more than one-third (34%) of new voter registrations nationwide were Democrats, while registered Republicans made up just 20% of new voters. As of last year, however, Republicans had erased that gap, with party supporters making up 29% of new voters, while Democrats made up 26% of new voters.

Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Ballot Measure Chances of Passing—New Poll
Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Ballot Measure Chances of Passing—New Poll

Newsweek

time13 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Ballot Measure Chances of Passing—New Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting ballot measure has support from a majority of the state's voters, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to Newsom and the California GOP for comment via email. Why It Matters The redistricting arms race between California, Texas and other states could have key implications for the midterms. Texas, with the support of President Donald Trump, first announced plans to redraw its map to become more favorable to Republicans and thwart losses in the midterms, but Newsom has warned California could redraw its map to benefit Democrats in return. California Democrats' ability to do so may hinge on the outcome of a ballot measure Newsom announced last week that would allow a new map drafted by legislators to temporarily replace the boundaries drawn up by the state's independent redistricting committee following the 2020 census. If the ballot measure is successful, it could neutralize efforts from Texas Republicans. But if it fails, Republicans may be able to net several seats in not only Texas, but also other GOP states like Indiana and Missouri. What to Know A new poll from Newsom's pollster, reported by Axios, suggests a majority of voters are prepared to support the ballot measure. The poll, conducted by David Binder, showed that 57 percent of California voters are in support of the proposal. Only 35 percent were opposed to it, while 8 percent remained undecided. Among Democrats, the ballot measure had 84 percent support, while only 13 percent opposed it. Among Republicans, 79 percent were opposed, the poll found, according to Axios. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, poll surveyed 1,000 likely voters from August 10 to August 14, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. California remains a solidly blue state where Democrats handily outnumber Republicans. Former Vice President Kamala Harris carried it by 20 points last November, so Democrats are hopeful this ballot measure will fall on partisan lines. But the state has an independent redistricting community that was passed by voters and remains popular. A Politico poll released last week found that 64 percent of California voters support keeping the commission, while only 36 percent support returning redistricting authority to the state legislature. Newsom, who is viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has cast the ballot measure as a temporary measure, which would no longer be in effect after the 2030 census, which is only in response to Texas' redistricting efforts. It would not go into effect unless Texas or other Republican states first redraw their lines. Republicans, however, have described it as a power grab that violates the will of Californians. What People Are Saying David Binder wrote in the poll, per Axios: "Voter trends on this measure closely mirror the presidential election results of November 2024, in which Kamala Harris defeated Donald Trump in California by 58% to 38%. Poll results indicate that Proposition 50 will fall along similar partisan lines." Representative Kevin Kiley, a California Republican, wrote to X on Tuesday: "Newsom is overthrowing the Redistricting Commission in order to make California 'a whole lot bluer.' To accomplish this, his proposal expressly overrides the entire State Constitution. Partisan gerrymandering will become the supreme law of the land." Governor Newsom wrote to X on Tuesday: "Unlike Texas, we're not following @realDonaldTrump's orders to quietly try to redistrict our way out of losing the next election. In California, we're working transparently to respond if Texas enacts new maps — and we'll give the power to the people to make our final decision." What Happens Next Voters will make their decision about the redistricting plan in November. Both Democrats and Republicans will spend the coming months making their case to voters on whether the ballot measure should pass. Meanwhile, the redistricting war continues across the country, with Trump urging Texas Republicans to pass their plan "ASAP."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store