Minister pledges ‘best start' for young women on International Women's Day
Bridget Phillipson also said that she is 'determined' to make sure that all young women have 'the best start in life' regardless of their background.
Labour has said the Government is working to close the gender pay gap and championing women's rights, as it marked the annual day.
Today, on International Women's Day, we celebrate the incredible achievements of women in Britain and around the world.
This Labour government is committed to closing the gender pay gap, improving workplace protections, championing women's rights and breaking down barriers. pic.twitter.com/Kq0PxdyR9d
— The Labour Party (@UKLabour) March 8, 2025
A statement from Ms Phillipson, who serves as Education Secretary and minister for women and equalities read: 'This International Women's Day, I want every woman and girl to know that this is a government of change.
'I am determined to make sure every young woman, no matter her income, class, or background, has the best start in life and opportunity to succeed.
'Women should not be held back at work by the caring responsibilities that disproportionately affect them, or insecurity after pregnancy or maternity.
'That's why we're tackling the gender pay gap with better protections at work and more free childcare, to get more money in women's pockets and drive up household income.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has also marked IWD, and said that the Government will 'redouble' efforts to open up opportunities for women.
Ms Reeves said: 'International Women's Day is an opportunity to celebrate how far we've come, but also as a Government, and for me personally, as the first ever female Chancellor of the Exchequer, to redouble our efforts to ensure that we have opportunities for women.'
She added that ministers are 'going further and faster on childcare and breakfast clubs to help parents, but particularly women, balance work and family life'.
It comes as Labour grandee Baroness Harriet Harman has been made the new UK special envoy for women and girls.
The Foreign Secretary has appointed @HarrietHarman as Special Envoy for Women and Girls to champion gender equality worldwide and help deliver global economic growth. #InternationalWomensDay2025 #AccelerateAction #IWD2025 pic.twitter.com/GW1Hu8iWm7
— Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (@FCDOGovUK) March 8, 2025
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said that the former minister will 'co-ordinate efforts across the globe' to push for the protection of rights over reproductive health, access to education and freedom from gender-based violence.
However charity ActionAid said the appointment 'risks being more symbol than substance' without funding to 'back it up'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Administration Said to Discuss Taking a 10% Stake in Intel
By , Ryan Gould, and Josh Wingrove Save The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in Intel Corp., according to a White House official and other people familiar with the matter, in a move that could see the US become the beleaguered chipmaker's largest shareholder. The federal government is considering a potential investment in Intel that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the US Chips and Science Act into equity, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military production.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Britain is ‘poster child' for bad decision-making, bond investor claims
Britain has become the 'poster child' for bad decision-making, a leading bond investor has warned. A string of poor policy choices have pushed up government debt costs and left the UK more exposed to 'tantrums' in the market, said Jason Borbora-Sheen, a portfolio manager at Ninety One. Mr Borbora-Sheen pointed to the bond market reaction to Liz Truss's mini-Budget and Donald Trump's tariff onslaught as examples of how Britain's debt had a greater 'magnitude and likelihood' of what he called 'pinch points'. Borrowing costs surged in both cases, bringing down the Truss government and blowing a hole in Rachel Reeves's Budget. 'I'd almost see the UK as the poster child for poor historical monetary and fiscal policymaking,' he said. 'The way the UK is set up leaves it exposed to tantrums occurring more frequently and of the worst magnitude that you would typically feel comfortable with in a developed world sovereign bond market. That's what leaves us thinking that it's not particularly compelling.' Mr Borbora-Sheen said a failure to properly contain inflation, address high public debt and boost growth was to blame for the situation. Borrowing costs climbed earlier this year after a Labour backbench rebellion over reforms to disability benefits meant to cut spending and boost growth. Bond yields also jumped in January amid concerns that the Chancellor had not left herself enough fiscal headroom in her October Budget, despite raising taxes by £40bn. Mr Borbora-Sheen said ministers need to be prepared to make some 'hard choices' if they want to improve Britain's position in international debt markets. 'You would need to have a hit to growth and be willing to accept less politically-favourable policymaking in order to get your financial position back to something more compelling,' said Mr Borbora-Sheen. 'If you don't do that, you do get this quite unattractive cycle occurring of high yields, making decision-making around Budgets difficult, giving you little room to make more strident choices and that becoming re-enforcing. 'You're not getting your fiscal house in order and it's causing problems for your bond market again and again.' Ninety One, which manages £139.7bn in assets, was formed as Investec Asset Management in South Africa in 1991 before demerging and listing on the FTSE 250 in 2020. Long-term UK government borrowing costs have edged towards their highest level since 1997 as Britain grapples with a toxic combination of high inflation, high government spending and narrow fiscal headroom. The yield on 30-year UK gilts has climbed from 5.13pc at the turn of the year to 5.55pc today. Bonds usually become more attractive when yields – the return an issuer promises to a buyer of its debt – rise. Greater investor interest helps to limit or push down borrowing costs. However, Mr Borbora-Sheen said Britain's bond market was unattractive despite the high yields on offer as investors were unsettled by inflation, which rose to 3.6pc in June. He said: 'The reason you have higher rates in the UK is that inflation is sticky. So if you compare the UK's 10-year bond yield to the US's, it's 0.4pc higher. 'It sounds small but in the scheme of things is actually quite meaningful, particularly when you have a high interest rate burden too, as the UK does, with the need to keep financing those bonds. 'So [Britain] is not being given a lot of credit by those fixed-income markets.' Money markets suggest that the Bank of England is unlikely to come to the Chancellor's rescue. Traders on Monday reduced bets on another interest rate cut this year, with no action now seen as the most likely outcome for the rest of the year. The Bank of England cut interest rates to 4pc earlier this month – the fifth reduction in rates since August last year. However, inflation has been creeping up, with the next official data published on Wednesday. Anita Wright, of Ribble Wealth Management, said: 'Markets don't believe the UK has its long-term finances under control. 'Despite four rate cuts in the past year, the 30-year yield hasn't come down. Why? Because investors are worried about two things: inflation sticking around and the Government's addiction to borrowing.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Trump falsely claims US is only country that uses mail-in voting
President Donald Trump made a series of false claims about elections in a Monday social media post in which he pledged to 'lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS' and voting machines – including an inaccurate assertion that states have to run elections in the manner the president tells them to. Here is a fact check of some of Trump's comments. 'We are now the only Country in the World that uses Mail-In Voting. All others gave it up because of the MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD ENCOUNTERED.' False. Dozens of other countries use mail-in voting, as CNN and others have pointed out when Trump has made such claims before. These countries include Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and Switzerland. The specifics of different countries' policies vary, but it's simply not true that every other country has abandoned mail-in voting. 'WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections.' Trump's claim about Democrats is nonsense. There is simply no basis for the assertion of massive cheating. US federal elections are free and fair; there has generally been a tiny quantity of ballot fraud representing a minuscule percentage of votes cast. '…Democrats are virtually Unelectable without using this completely disproven Mail-In SCAM. ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS.' More fiction. Mail-in voting is a legitimate method used by legitimate voters to cast legitimate ballots. Elections experts say the incidence of fraud tends to be marginally higher with mail-in ballots than with in-person ballots – but also that fraud rates in federal elections are tiny even with mail-in ballots. Republican-dominated Utah is among the states where voters are automatically sent mail-in ballots (though it is now phasing out that policy); its elections, like other states', have been free of widespread fraud. And it's worth noting that Trump himself encouraged supporters to vote by mail in 2024. 'Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.' That's not what the Constitution says. Here's what it does say: 'The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.' In other words, states set their own election policies unless Congress passes a law preempting them. The Constitution does not grant the president himself the power to simply tell states what to do, using an executive order or anything else.
