Hong Kong court freezes US$1.8 billion HSBC account linked to Wahaha heiress Kelly Zong
The High Court also granted a disclosure order requiring Zong to provide detailed information about the HSBC account, according to the High Court judgement handed down on Friday (Aug 1).
The 43-year-old head of the beverage company was sued by three plaintiffs identified as her half brothers and half sister. Jacky, Jessie and Jerry Zong are seeking more than US$2 billion in trust assets that they said their late father promised them before he died in February last year.
The dispute among the half siblings could set a legal precedent for wealth succession in China and cast a shadow over the reputation of one of the country's most iconic beverage empires. The case has drawn attention and lit up social media in China since Bloomberg first reported on the proceedings in July.
The three plaintiffs claim the beverage company's founder Zong Qinghou gave 'hand-written instructions' to one of his subordinates in January 2024 to set up three trusts each worth US$700 million, their lawyer said in court on July 11. Kelly's lawyer said the notes weren't directed to her, and she did not know where the funds for a US$300 million shortfall should come from.
The Court has asked Kelly to provide detailed information about the HSBC account, including its latest balance, asset transfers or disposals since two February 2024, and a full account of asset movements.
The Hong Kong case is to help proceedings in a Hangzhou court, which will decide the plaintiffs' rights to the trust assets and the funding source of the shortfall among other matters, according to lawyers from both sides.
The Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court has organised two mediation sessions but Kelly did not attend either of them, the plaintiffs' lawyer said at the July hearing. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
13 minutes ago
- Business Times
India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs
[MUMBAI] Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25 per cent tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the 'most strenuous and obnoxious', in a Truth Social post on Jul 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them 'dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25 per cent tariffs kicked in as at Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath, and not the subject to the very highest rates, but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. 'Blunt-force' message 'Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice-president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai-based financial services firm. The levies 'feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message'. Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal, or the lack of it, was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As the US released rates across the world on Aug 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. 'The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the southern Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. 'We were expecting something in the 15 to 20 per cent range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbours on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being 'very disturbed'. A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40 per cent of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. 'The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for 'months and months', he said that he will have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated US$129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25 per cent, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20 per cent tariff, Vietnam got a 20 per cent levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19 per cent duties. 'We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council. 'We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'my friend' in a Feb 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries 'special'. India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported, citing sources familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. 'It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment, but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi-based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Negotiating tactic Jewellery businesses 'are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favourable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. 'The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing 'seems like a knee-jerk reaction', according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. 'This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay US$243 million in fatal Autopilot crash
[NEW YORK] A Florida jury on Friday (Aug 1) found Tesla liable to pay US$243 million to victims of a 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, a verdict that could encourage more legal action against Elon Musk's electric vehicle (EV) company. The verdict is a rare win for victims of accidents involving Autopilot. Musk has been pushing to rapidly expand Tesla's recently launched robotaxi business based on an advanced version of its driver assistance software. Tesla shares fell 1.8 per cent on Friday, and are down 25 per cent this year. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, US$129 million in compensatory damages plus US$200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla was held liable for 33 per cent of the compensatory damages, or US$42.6 million. Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67 per cent, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added. Tesla said it will appeal. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the company said. The plaintiffs had sought US$345 million of damages. Their lawyers said that the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. Impact on future cases Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said on Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly. 'It's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology.' The verdict could also impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly US$1 trillion market value hinges on Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence. Driver's role The trial concerned an Apr 25, 2019, incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 100 kph through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 23 metres to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. 'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. 'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software,' he added. 'That's a big deal.' Tesla, in its statement, said McGee was entirely at fault. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' the company said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver, from day one, admitted and accepted responsibility.' REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Carvana's 10,000% rally from low deals US$7 billion blow to shorts
[NEW YORK] Carvana's shares notched an all-time high this week, rising more than 10,000 per cent from a low in late 2022, and delivering a blow to investors betting against the online used-car dealer. The jump to record caps a roller-coaster ride for the stock that quickly became an investor darling after a public debut in 2017, but has also been plagued by criticisms ranging from claims that the company was overvalued and allegations of lax business practices. The latest gains came after the company's blockbuster second-quarter results on Wednesday (Jul 30) fuelled expectations that a turnaround is taking hold at the embattled company. As a result of the rally, short investors betting against Carvana have been dealt a US$7.42 billion blow in mark-to-market losses since the end of 2022, according to calculations from S3 Partners. About 10 per cent of the company's free float is currently held short, down from 55 per cent on Dec 27, 2022, when the stock had dropped to its lowest level. 'This rally from the lows has turned Carvana into one of the most spectacular recoveries in modern market history and a brutal reminder of how dangerous shorting stocks like this can be,' said Dave Mazza, CEO at Roundhill Financial. Carvana shares closed 5.7 per cent lower on Friday, retreating from Thursday's record but still ending the week more than 10 per cent higher. Carvana's online platform allows customers to buy a used car without getting up from their couch, a business model that attracted immense interest during the Covid-19 pandemic. The share price quickly skyrocketed, followed by a brutal 99 per cent wipeout during the wider tech sell-off that ensued. But now, as the appetite for riskier stocks and growth assets has come roaring back over the past month, Carvana is in the right spot to benefit. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Before Gamestop, a move like this would have been impossible,' said Mark Hackett, chief strategist at Nationwide Funds Group, referring to the retail-trading-driven mania involving risky stocks that gripped the markets in 2021, and seems to be rearing its head again this year. 'But now it is common.' But it is not just the retail-trading fervour around growth stocks that's helping Carvana's shares, market watchers say. Carvana's online business model helps to differentiate it from other auto dealers, who largely operate brick-and-mortar stores, and that has given the relative upstart a higher valuation multiple. At the same time, the trade policy chaos unleashed by US President Donald Trump's tariff programme has been a boon to used-car sellers, who saw demand rise as consumers try to avoid the steep new levies. On Wednesday, Carvana reported second-quarter results that included record-setting revenue, propelling the stock to a breakout above 2021's prior record high. Nationwide's Hackett said that tariff-driven margin benefit was the main source of growth during the quarter. As Carvana soared from the 2022 low, its more traditional peers, such as CarMax, AutoNation and Lithia Motors, have seen no such surge. CarMax shares have fallen about 7 per cent over the same period as at Friday's close, while AutoNation climbed nearly 80 per cent and Lithia rose 44 per cent. After the latest results, some analysts see more strength ahead for Carvana. 'Investors haven't yet witnessed Carvana's true earnings power,' said Alexander Potter, analyst at Piper Sandler. BLOOMBERG
