logo
Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer

Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer

Reuters20-05-2025
LONDON/FRANKFURT, May 20 (Reuters) - Global retailers including sandal maker Birkenstock (BIRK.N), opens new tab and jeweller Pandora (PNDORA.CO), opens new tab are looking at spreading the cost of U.S. tariffs by raising prices across markets to avoid big hikes in the United States that could hurt sales.
A global presence gives large retailers an advantage to minimise higher tariff costs in the U.S. But it is putting central banks on watch as the strategy could fuel inflation in other markets like the European Union and Britain, where consumer prices have finally started to stabilise.
Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a "low-single-digit" price increase globally would be enough to offset the U.S. tariff impact.
Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik said the Danish company is debating whether to raise prices globally or more in the U.S., its biggest market.
"Companies are really thinking about distributing the tariff," said Markus Goller, partner at consultancy Simon Kucher in Bonn, Germany. "A manufacturer from outside of the U.S. might say, OK, I cannot increase my prices to the U.S. market that much, so I will do a little increase in the U.S., and a little increase in Europe, and in other markets."
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket tariff of 10% on all global imports and is threatening higher so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on its trading partners.
When U.S. behemoth Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, Trump ordered the world's biggest retailer via social media to 'eat the tariffs'.
Announcing price increases in non-U.S. markets could be a way for retailers to avoid a similar backlash from Trump.
"Obviously if your products coming into the U.S. are now subject to tariffs, then math says that you have to raise your prices in the U.S.," said Jean-Pierre Dubé, professor of marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
"But you don't want to be accused by the White House of raising prices purely because of U.S. tariffs, so if you can demonstrate that your prices are going up everywhere then... it's kind of a shield."
Retailers could raise prices on certain products or in certain markets where consumers are less price-sensitive, and use that to subsidise other products or countries where price hikes would hurt sales more, said Jason Miller, professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University.
"Maybe a U.S.-only firm has to raise (U.S.) prices by 12%. But you, as a global firm, raise prices by 8% because you can play with pricing in other markets," he said.
If many multinational retailers do spread the tariff pain, higher inflation could spread even to countries which, like Britain, have already struck trade agreements with the U.S. in a bid to minimise the economic fallout of tariffs.
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey earlier this month raised the issue of "global companies that don't make that distinction [on tariff rates] and just say, we're going to impose a pricing solution which goes right across the world irrespective of those differences."
"I think we do have to watch that carefully," he said.
In the euro zone, inflation was finally gliding towards the European Central Bank's 2% target. European companies surveyed by the European Central Bank (ECB) in late March said price growth in the retail sector was subdued.
But that was before Trump unveiled his tariff policy on April 2, and later hiked tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%.
However, the U.S. tariffs on China - lowered last week to 30% - have allowed some European retailers to source goods more cheaply than before.
Martino Pessina, CEO of Takko Fashion, which sells clothes in 17 European countries, said suppliers in China had offered lower prices as U.S. retailers cancelled orders from factories there, and shipping costs also fell.
"What we don't know is if there's going to be inflation in the U.S. and if that inflation comes to Europe or not," Pessina said.
Some big retailers have in any case ruled out raising prices outside the U.S..
"There is no reason to raise prices outside the U.S. because of the tariffs," Adidas (ADSGn.DE), opens new tab CEO Bjorn Gulden told investors after reporting results late last month. "The discussion we're having on tariffs is only for the U.S.."
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel has said the euro zone's inflation rate may initially dip below the central bank's 2% target, but that tariffs might prove inflationary further down the road.
"In order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs," Schnabel said in a speech earlier this month.
While every company has its own pricing strategy, economists warn some could take advantage of tariffs to raise prices by more than rising costs, boosting their profits similarly to the inflation surge of 2021-2022 during the pandemic.
"It will be very difficult for a firm's customers to know what portion of the product's total costs are subject to the tariff, or even the tariff rate that applies. This information asymmetry creates a ripe environment for exploitation. Just as it did during COVID," said Hal Singer, professor of economics at the University of Utah.
U.S. consumers' 12-month inflation expectations jumped in April to 6.7%, the highest reading since 1981. And in the euro zone, too, consumers are expecting inflation to rise.
"If people are expecting inflation, well then it gives firms a little bit more room to raise prices," said Miller.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump
US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump

Democrats and Republicans don't agree on much, but they share a conviction that the government should help American manufacturers, one way or another. Democratic President Joe Biden handed out subsidies to chipmakers and electric vehicle manufacturers. Republican President Donald Trump is building a wall of import taxes — tariffs — around the U.S. economy to protect domestic industry from foreign competition. Yet American manufacturing has been stuck in a rut for nearly three years. And it remains to be seen whether the trend will reverse itself. The U.S. Labor Department reports that American factories shed 7,000 jobs in June for the second month in a row. Manufacturing employment is on track to drop for the third straight year. The Institute for Supply Management, an association of purchasing managers, reported that manufacturing activity in the United States shrank in June for the fourth straight month. In fact, U.S. factories have been in decline for 30 of the 32 months since October 2022, according to ISM. 'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,'' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a maker of industrial cutting tools in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. 'We didn't get destroyed like we did in the recession of 2008. But we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment.'' Big economic factors contributed to the slowdown: A surge in inflation, arising from the unexpectedly strong economic recovery from COVID-19, raised factory expenses and prompted the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates 11 times in 2022 and 2023. The higher borrowing costs added to the strain. Government policy was meant to help. Biden's tax incentives for semiconductor and clean energy production triggered a factory-building boom – investment in manufacturing facilities more than tripled from April 2021 through October 2024 – that seemed to herald a coming surge in factory production and hiring. Eventually anyway. But the factory investment spree has faded as the incoming Trump administration launched trade wars and, working with Congress, ended Biden's subsidies for green energy. Now, predicts Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline.' 'If production is flat, that suggests manufacturing employment will continue to slide,' Zandi said. 'Manufacturing is likely to suffer a recession in the coming year.'' Meanwhile, Trump is attempting to protect U.S. manufacturers — and to coax factories to relocate and produce in America — by imposing tariffs on goods made overseas. He slapped 50% taxes on steel and aluminum, 25% on autos and auto parts, 10% on many other imports. In some ways, Trump's tariffs can give U.S. factories an edge. Chris Zuzick, vice president at Waukesha Metal Products, said the Sussex, Wisconsin-based manufacturer is facing stiff competition for a big contract in Texas. A foreign company offers much lower prices. But 'when you throw the tariff on, it gets us closer,'' Zuzick said. 'So that's definitely a situation where it's beneficial.'' But American factories import and use foreign products, too – machinery, chemicals, raw materials like steel and aluminum. Taxing those inputs can drive up costs and make U.S producers less competitive in world markets. Consider steel. Trump's tariffs don't just make imported steel more expensive. By putting the foreign competition at a disadvantage, the tariffs allow U.S. steelmakers to raise prices – and they have. U.S.-made steel was priced at $960 per metric ton as of June 23, more than double the world export price of $440 per ton, according to industry monitor SteelBenchmarker. In fact, U.S. steel prices are so high that Pilot Precision Products has continued to buy the steel it needs from suppliers in Austria and France — and pay Trump's tariff. Trump has also created considerable uncertainty by repeatedly tweaking and rescheduling his tariffs. Just before new import taxes were set to take effect on dozens of countries on July 9, for example, the president pushed the deadline back to Aug. 1 to allow more time for negotiation with U.S. trading partners. The flipflops have left factories, suppliers and customers bewildered about where things stand. Manufacturers voiced their complaints in the ISM survey: 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,'' a fabricated metal products company said. 'Tariffs continue to cause confusion and uncertainty for long-term procurement decisions,'' added a computer and electronics firm. 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place.'' Some may argue that things aren't necessarily bad for U.S. manufacturing; they've just returned to normal after a pandemic-related bust and boom. Factories slashed nearly 1.4 million jobs in March and April 2020 when COVID-19 forced many businesses to shut down and Americans to stay home. Then a funny thing happened: American consumers, cooped up and flush with COVID relief checks from the government, went on a spending spree, snapping up manufactured goods like air fryers, patio furniture and exercise machines. Suddenly, factories were scrambling to keep up. They brought back the workers they laid off – and then some. Factories added 379,000 jobs in 2021 — the most since 1994 — and then tacked on another 357,000 in 2022. But in 2023, factory hiring stopped growing and began backtracking as the economy returned to something closer to the pre-pandemic normal. In the end, it was a wash. Factory payrolls last month came to 12.75 million, almost exactly where they stood in February 2020 (12.74 million) just before COVID slammed the economy. 'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,'' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's White House Council of Economic Advisers. Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products said that it will take time to see if Trump's tariffs succeed in bringing factories back to America. 'The fact is that manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime,'' he said. 'It takes time to switch gears.'' Hagopian at Pilot Precision is hopeful that tax breaks in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will help American manufacturing regain momentum. 'There may be light at the end of the tunnel that may not be a locomotive bearing down,'' he said. For now, manufacturers are likely to delay big decisions on investing or bringing on new workers until they see where Trump's tariffs settle and what impact they have on the economy, said Ned Hill, professor emeritus in economic development at Ohio State University. 'With all this uncertainty about what the rest of the year is going to look like,'' he said, 'there's a hesitancy to hire people just to lay them off in the near future.'' 'Everyone,'' said Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal.''

EU's response to US 30% tariffs will be firm, quick and robust
EU's response to US 30% tariffs will be firm, quick and robust

BreakingNews.ie

time43 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

EU's response to US 30% tariffs will be firm, quick and robust

The European Union's response to US President Donald Trump implementing 30 per cent tariffs on European products will be 'firm, quick and robust', Commissioner Michael McGrath has said. Mr Trump threatened the EU and Mexico with a 30% tariffs on imports to the US from August. Advertisement The US president warned he would impose even higher import taxes if either of the US trading partners decided to retaliate. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen responded by saying the EU prefers a negotiated solution on trade with the United States, and that the bloc would extend its suspension of countermeasures to US tariffs until early August. Mr McGrath, European Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection, said that negotiations have been 'particularly intensive' in recent weeks and they are working to the revised deadline. He said that EU negotiators will leave 'no stone unturned' in getting the best deal possible for the bloc. Advertisement 'We remain in a process and we have been negotiating intensively with the US administration for several weeks now, and that was preceded by further discussions, really going on a number of months,' Mc McGrath told RTE Radio 1. 'But they have been particularly intensive in recent weeks, and we believe that progress has been made. 'We are working towards the revised deadline of August 1. We are particularly conscious of the need, insofar as possible, to remove uncertainty for businesses because we know how damaging that is to international trade, to the prospects and the investment decisions of companies, tariffs are ultimately paid for by somebody along the supply chain, most likely by the end consumer. 'We have two and a half weeks left before the new deadline within which we will leave no stone unturned as a European Union to get the best possible deal for our companies.' Advertisement He said that if the 30% tariff is introduced by the US, the EU has measures in place to respond. 'The European response will be firm, it will be quick and it will be robust,' he added. 'We have been preparing for a range of different scenarios for many months, and so the European Union has been keeping all of the member states, including Ireland, regularly informed of developments, there have been ongoing consultations. 'I want to underline the importance of unity. What we have been doing in relation to countermeasures is preparing for different scenarios. Advertisement 'There are two different sets of packages of countermeasures that amount to the imposition of tariffs of exports from the US into the EU of over €90 billion. 'We do not wish for that to come to pass, but in the event that it does, then we will need to respond if the US proceeds unilaterally with the imposition of tariffs of the order that President Trump has flagged in his letter over the weekend. 'But we have a range of instruments and tools.' He also said that the EU was in a 'strong position', and that the importance of US companies accessing the European market should not be understated. Advertisement Describing it as a 'an exceptionally lucrative market' for the US, he said both sides want to have terms of trade that work for everyone. Meanwhile, Europe Minister Thomas Byrne said Ireland wants to see a trade deal between the European Union and the US agreed as soon as possible. Mr Byrne is at a meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council on Trade in Brussels on Monday. Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic is updating ministers in Brussels on the negotiations. Mr Byrne said: 'We want to see a deal between the EU and the US agreed as soon as possible, including, if possible, in advance of the August 1st deadline. 'The Irish Government strongly supports the efforts of trade commissioner Sefcovic. 'We remain cautiously optimistic about reaching agreement in principle on a framework agreement in the coming days.' Other items on the agenda at the summit include a discussion on ongoing bilateral trade negotiations and EU-China trade relations. Mr Byrne said: 'Now, more than ever, we need to expand our trade and diversify our markets. 'An ambitious trade agenda, with new partners around the globe, is in our overall interests. 'But in pursuing this agenda, we must maintain EU standards on food safety, animal and plant health, as well as remain faithful to our European values of supporting better environmental and human rights standards around the world.'

Taxing the wealthy won't solve Rachel Reeves's problems
Taxing the wealthy won't solve Rachel Reeves's problems

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Taxing the wealthy won't solve Rachel Reeves's problems

For a moment, the mask seemed to slip. While repeating Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise taxes on working people, Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, went off-script. 'We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people. We have stuck to that,' she told Trevor Phillips on Sky News. It is the first time modest earners have been singled out. 'When it comes to taxation, fairness will be our guiding principle,' she added. Alexander also failed to deny that ministers had discussed a wealth tax at a Cabinet away day, saying only 'not directly' when asked if it had been mentioned. Her remarks are a signal of what is to come. Rachel Reeves is faced with a fiscal black hole that could be as large as £30bn come the autumn Budget. With gilt markets on edge and attempts by Sir Keir Starmer to curb public spending ending in tears, it can only mean one thing: big tax rises. Alexander's comments suggest it will be the middle class who are targeted. But economists are warning that there are limits to how much Reeves can raise from higher earners. 'We can have bigger state and more tax on average earners. We can have smaller state and real cuts in public services and benefits. That's it. The choice,' Paul Johnson, the former Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) head, warned last week. David Miles, a member of the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) committee that scrutinises the Government's spending plans, was even more outspoken in his warning to the Chancellor. 'If you try and keep increasing the ratio of taxes to GDP, and look for more and more taxes wherever you can find them, it's very likely that at some point you start creating so many disincentives – to save, invest, work – that you start doing some serious damage to the growth potential of the economy, and it backfires on you,' Miles told CNBC on Friday. 'The ratio of taxes to GDP in the UK is now getting to levels that we really haven't seen since the Second World War. The scope to simply just raise more and more tax revenue is definitely limited.' Over the past 15 years, Britain's high earners have seen their taxes rise significantly, while those on low and middle incomes have been granted big cuts. This means that as Britain's tax burden has risen towards a post-war high, those on modest incomes have escaped the direct hit. Average earners – typically on around £35,000 – are taxed less than at any point in the last 50 years, the IFS noted in 2024. Their tax bill was actually £2,000 lower last year than in 2010. They can in part thank George Osborne, the former chancellor, who raised the tax-free allowance from £6,475 in spring 2011, gradually taking it to £11,500 in 2016-17. It has since risen further to £12,500. The gap between how average and higher income workers are treated by the tax system makes the UK stand out internationally. It ranked 32nd for how much middle earners are taxed among 38 mostly rich countries last year, OECD data shows. Meanwhile, high earners have been hit with several blows over the past 15 years. Their wages have barely risen in real terms, while paying much more in taxes than previously. Anyone fortunate enough to make £200,000 last year was taxed £10,000 more than they would have been in 2009, according to the IFS. As a result, the Treasury has come to rely more on its golden geese. At the turn of the millennium, the top 1pc of earners paid just over 21pc of all income tax receipts. This year they're projected to pay almost 27pc, HMRC figures show. In contrast, the bottom half of all workers contribute just 10pc of all income tax receipts – down from 11.6pc. The lack of appetite for spending cuts suggests the UK is poised to become more like continental Europe. This would mean tax rates would have to rise for both middle and high earners. But the jump would be far bigger for those on middle incomes, according to research. While internationally comparative analysis is hard to come by, one paper from 2019 found that the UK already ranked lowest for taxes on average earners when comparing with 10 wealthy European countries. However, when looking at taxes on the very highest earners, the UK ranked sixth – only a nudge below the famously high-tax Denmark. 'Henrys' have 'reached their limit' The fact that the highest earners are yet again being eyed up after welfare about-turns by revenue-hungry officials has not gone unnoticed. One disgruntled so-called 'Henry', an abbreviation for high earners who are not yet rich yet, was quick to ask for recommendations for where to relocate to, declaring on a Reddit forum: 'I've reached my limit for sucking up tax rises.' 'Can't wait for them to spout the 'those with the broadest shoulders' sh--e again, only to wring pensions, Isas, and PAYE. Why is it always working people that get screwed?', another chimed in. Such complaints were foreshadowed by the OBR at the October Budget. The watchdog warned that Reeves was hitting a small group of people with several overlapping policies – such as VAT on school fees, changes to inheritance tax and higher capital gains levies. This makes the behavioural response more difficult to predict, raising the risk of the disincentives that Miles at the OBR warned of. The response to such concerns from many on the Labour Left has been to suggest a wealth tax – ignoring that Britain already taxes wealth in many different ways such as through stamp duty, inheritance tax and capital gains levies. Stuart Adam at the IFS says: 'An annual wealth tax would need to apply broadly to all assets to ensure that it was not easy to avoid. Such a tax could raise significant revenue if it applied to the bulk of the UK's wealth – that would include the homes and pensions of the middle class.' What most people think of when they talk of wealth taxes is probably not their own pension or house. All of this leaves few good options for Reeves. Finding up to £30bn while sparing workers on 'modest' incomes may prove her toughest challenge yet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store