
Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer
A global presence gives large retailers an advantage to minimise higher tariff costs in the U.S. But it is putting central banks on watch as the strategy could fuel inflation in other markets like the European Union and Britain, where consumer prices have finally started to stabilise.
Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a "low-single-digit" price increase globally would be enough to offset the U.S. tariff impact.
Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik said the Danish company is debating whether to raise prices globally or more in the U.S., its biggest market.
"Companies are really thinking about distributing the tariff," said Markus Goller, partner at consultancy Simon Kucher in Bonn, Germany. "A manufacturer from outside of the U.S. might say, OK, I cannot increase my prices to the U.S. market that much, so I will do a little increase in the U.S., and a little increase in Europe, and in other markets."
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket tariff of 10% on all global imports and is threatening higher so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on its trading partners.
When U.S. behemoth Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, Trump ordered the world's biggest retailer via social media to 'eat the tariffs'.
Announcing price increases in non-U.S. markets could be a way for retailers to avoid a similar backlash from Trump.
"Obviously if your products coming into the U.S. are now subject to tariffs, then math says that you have to raise your prices in the U.S.," said Jean-Pierre Dubé, professor of marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
"But you don't want to be accused by the White House of raising prices purely because of U.S. tariffs, so if you can demonstrate that your prices are going up everywhere then... it's kind of a shield."
Retailers could raise prices on certain products or in certain markets where consumers are less price-sensitive, and use that to subsidise other products or countries where price hikes would hurt sales more, said Jason Miller, professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University.
"Maybe a U.S.-only firm has to raise (U.S.) prices by 12%. But you, as a global firm, raise prices by 8% because you can play with pricing in other markets," he said.
If many multinational retailers do spread the tariff pain, higher inflation could spread even to countries which, like Britain, have already struck trade agreements with the U.S. in a bid to minimise the economic fallout of tariffs.
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey earlier this month raised the issue of "global companies that don't make that distinction [on tariff rates] and just say, we're going to impose a pricing solution which goes right across the world irrespective of those differences."
"I think we do have to watch that carefully," he said.
In the euro zone, inflation was finally gliding towards the European Central Bank's 2% target. European companies surveyed by the European Central Bank (ECB) in late March said price growth in the retail sector was subdued.
But that was before Trump unveiled his tariff policy on April 2, and later hiked tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%.
However, the U.S. tariffs on China - lowered last week to 30% - have allowed some European retailers to source goods more cheaply than before.
Martino Pessina, CEO of Takko Fashion, which sells clothes in 17 European countries, said suppliers in China had offered lower prices as U.S. retailers cancelled orders from factories there, and shipping costs also fell.
"What we don't know is if there's going to be inflation in the U.S. and if that inflation comes to Europe or not," Pessina said.
Some big retailers have in any case ruled out raising prices outside the U.S..
"There is no reason to raise prices outside the U.S. because of the tariffs," Adidas (ADSGn.DE), opens new tab CEO Bjorn Gulden told investors after reporting results late last month. "The discussion we're having on tariffs is only for the U.S.."
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel has said the euro zone's inflation rate may initially dip below the central bank's 2% target, but that tariffs might prove inflationary further down the road.
"In order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs," Schnabel said in a speech earlier this month.
While every company has its own pricing strategy, economists warn some could take advantage of tariffs to raise prices by more than rising costs, boosting their profits similarly to the inflation surge of 2021-2022 during the pandemic.
"It will be very difficult for a firm's customers to know what portion of the product's total costs are subject to the tariff, or even the tariff rate that applies. This information asymmetry creates a ripe environment for exploitation. Just as it did during COVID," said Hal Singer, professor of economics at the University of Utah.
U.S. consumers' 12-month inflation expectations jumped in April to 6.7%, the highest reading since 1981. And in the euro zone, too, consumers are expecting inflation to rise.
"If people are expecting inflation, well then it gives firms a little bit more room to raise prices," said Miller.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Indonesia, US eye wider critical minerals partnership after 'positive' meeting, top negotiator says
JAKARTA, July 10 (Reuters) - Indonesia's meeting with United States representatives in Washington on the looming tariffs went "positively", its chief negotiator said on Thursday, with both countries exploring a wider partnership in the critical minerals sector. Southeast Asia's largest economy Indonesia is facing a 32% tariff imposed by the U.S. from August 1, highlighting its strategic importance in global trade to lower it. Chief negotiator and economic minister Airlangga Hartarto told Reuters that he met with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Washington on Wednesday. Airlangga's ministry said on Thursday that the talk covered tariffs, non-tariff barriers and commercial partnerships, adding that both countries will intensify talks over the next three weeks. "We already have a similar understanding with the U.S. regarding the talks. In the future, we will make an effort to wrap up these negotiations on the principle of mutual benefit," Airlangga said in the statement. Indonesia and the United States are eyeing a wider partnership in the former's critical minerals sector, with Airlangga's ministry citing the country's large reserves of nickel, copper and cobalt. G20 economy Indonesia is a major producer of metals such as nickel, tin and copper, and is also the world's biggest exporter of palm oil. In the tariff talks, Indonesia has proposed slashing its duties on American products to near zero and offered to increase U.S. purchases and investment in the country, amounting to a value of about $34 billion. Several Indonesian companies have recently signed initial deals with U.S. counterparts to increase purchases of energy supplies, wheat, corn and cotton, among others.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Asia shares helped by Nvidia high as investors unfazed by Trump's tariff moves
SINGAPORE, July 10 (Reuters) - Asian stocks rose slightly on Thursday, riding on optimism from Nvidia's brief rise to a world-record $4 trillion valuation and as investors largely shrugged off U.S. President Donald Trump's latest tariff salvos. U.S. copper futures widened their premium to the London benchmark overnight after Trump announced plans to impose a 50% tariff on copper. He later said on Wednesday the levies would come into effect on August 1. Trump also turned his trade ire against Brazil on Wednesday as he threatened a punitive 50% tariff on exports to the U.S. and issued tariff notices to seven minor trading partners. The latest moves did little to rattle markets, leaving MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS), opens new tab up 0.2%. The Nikkei (.N225), opens new tab fell 0.56%, while China's CSI300 (.CSI300), opens new tab blue-chip index rose 0.2% and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index (.HSI), opens new tab added 0.1%. EUROSTOXX 50 futures gained 0.18% and FTSE futures advanced 0.33%. Artificial intelligence chip designer Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab on Wednesday became the world's first company to hit a $4 trillion market value, as it solidified its position as one of Wall Street's most favoured stocks. U.S. stock futures eased slightly in Asia on Thursday, with Nasdaq futures and S&P 500 futures both down about 0.2% each, after both indexes closed higher in the cash session overnight. The market reaction to Trump's tariff developments this week has been much less severe than the post "Liberation Day" selloff in April, with Jeff Ng, SMBC's head of Asia macro strategy, saying investors have grown somewhat "numb" to the ever-changing situation. "They know that there is still room for negotiation. A lot of these announcements, they start off with eye-catching numbers, but they are not totally final, and they are still subject to changes. Even if they are implemented, they could also be reversed in the coming few months to year," he said. Also keeping stocks supported were expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts later this year. Minutes released on Wednesday showed "most participants" at the Fed's meeting last month anticipated rate cuts would be appropriate later this year, with any price shock from tariffs expected to be "temporary or modest". "Right now, markets are not pricing in a high chance of a full-blown recession at this stage, given that the labour market continues to be quite resilient, but they know that there's a lot of pressure to push policy rates lower, so that could lower the opportunity cost of holding equities," Ng said. The dollar was on the back foot on Thursday, falling 0.4% against the yen to 145.79 after a sharp rise earlier this week when Trump slapped Japan with 25% tariffs. The euro was up 0.17% to $1.1742 and sterling gained 0.11% to $1.3605. An exception was the Brazilian real , which languished near a one-month low at 5.5826 per dollar owing to Trump's tariff threat on Latin America's largest economy. "Despite the S&P 500's impressive rally, the U.S. dollar continues to retreat, underscoring a shifting global macro narrative," said Julia Wang, global market strategist at J.P. Morgan Private Bank. "We believe the greenback remains 5-15% overvalued and expect continued weakness as cyclical convergence and capital reallocation trends play out." In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin hovered near a record high and was last at $111,234.63, while ether was up 1.3% to $2,775.54. "We're seeing our clients take a more measured approach, making strategic allocations into cryptocurrencies with real utility instead of chasing short-term moves. Bitcoin remains the top pick on our platform," said Gracie Lin, OKX's Singapore CEO. Elsewhere, oil prices fell on Thursday, with Brent crude futures down 0.16% to $70.08 per barrel, while U.S. crude lost 0.22% to $68.23 a barrel. Spot gold rose 0.3% to $3,322.69 an ounce.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Is it time for a wealth tax on the super-rich?
After cuts in Labour's proposed welfare reform bill caused uproar, many of the party's supporters insist it's time for a different approach. Rather than cutting the benefits bill or public spending, why not tax the wealthiest more? It's a question Keir Starmer was asked in PMQs, and he replied by saying it wasn't possible to 'tax our way to growth'. The millionaire Dale Vince disagrees. A former new-age traveller who made his money in green energy and has donated to Just Stop Oil, he is part of the Patriotic Millionaires organisation who think it is high time people like them are asked to increase their contributions. 'There's a whole bunch of us. We're all saying the same thing, that we can afford to pay more tax. Rich people should pay more tax, and we can use that money to reduce inequality in our country.' The tax expert and economics professor Arun Advani explains how a wealth tax could work and what the dangers could be. Would it send millionaires fleeing from the UK – and would that matter? And what other levers are at the government's disposal?