Warning issued for ‘dangerous' social-media challenges trending among Ontario kids
The Toronto Catholic District School Board, along with some emergency responders, are warning parents about 'dangerous' social-media challenges that are trending among students in Ontario schools.
The board said the challenges are recorded on video and shared online to encourage others to participate, but they can pose serious risks to students and the entire school community.
Among them is the so-called 'paper clip challenge' that involves students inserting metal objects such as a paper clip into an electrical outlet and dropping a coin onto the prongs to cause electrical sparks.
The board said the 'Chromebook challenge' involves placing paper clips, pencils or other objects into Chromebook USB ports to deliberately cause them to short-circuit, which can lead to overheating, burns or fire.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
There's also a trend that involves students attempting to 'eliminate' one another using water guns, Nerf-style projectiles, or other replica guns in public areas, known as the 'senior assassin challenge.'
Story continues below advertisement
'These dangerous activities, along with tampering with school issued devices or electrical outlets in school buildings, is strictly prohibited,' the school board said in an emailed letter to parents on Friday.
'Any student found engaging in such behaviours may face disciplinary consequences, including suspension. Parents/guardians may also be held responsible for any damage to school property caused by student misconduct.'
Ontario Association of Fire Educators also warned of the 'Chromebook challenge,' saying it's not a game.
'Tampering with devices can spark fires, release harmful gases, and lead to injuries or suspension,' the association said in a post on social media.
The fire department in Pembroke, Ont., shared a similar warning urging parents, students and educators to be aware of the 'dangerous TikTok trend' in a reference to the Chromebook challenge.
'(It) is putting lives and schools at risk. Students are intentionally short-circuiting their laptops to cause sparks and fires,' the fire department said in a social-media post.
'Never tamper or insert objects into electronic device ports.'
Police and fire services across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area have also issued warnings about participating in such challenges, as have other school boards across North America after injuries and fires were reported elsewhere.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
Calgary police to deploy enhanced security measures during busy street festival season
Calgary Police Service (CPS) say they'll be beefing up security at street festivals this summer. CPS deputy Insp. Jordan Nolan tells Global News the new measures are in response to incidents where vehicles have been used to drive into crowds. 'Given recent events that have happened across the county and in other parts of the world, we are taking measures to ensure things like the Lilac Festival will see enhanced safety measures,' explained Nolan. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Nolan wasn't able to share what those security measures included but says for the 100,000 people who are expected to attend the Lilac Festival on Sunday, he says increased security won't be what people focus on. 'Not only are we ensuring that the event is safe, but also that people can enjoy it without being impeded by those measures,' Nolan said. 'You'll probably see it at most events that are coming up. Just as things change, as events around the world change, and we will adapt and evolve and change our practices as well.'
The Province
a day ago
- The Province
B.C. woman in TikTok posts seeks IP address info from Telus in court
B.C. woman in TikTok posts seeks IP address info from Telus in court The Whitecaps are playing their biggest game since 1979. Shout it from the rooftops This former B.C. Lions quarterback is ready to lead Canada to Olympic flag football glory Canadian man who disappeared after going swimming in Mexico washes up dead B.C. woman in TikTok posts seeks IP address info from Telus in court First unsuccessfully sought identity of posters through TikTok but received IP addresses and now is asking B.C. Supreme Court to order Telus to reveal names of those associated with them Photo by Jason Payne / PNG Article content A woman who has been harassed on TikTok with doctored videos and photos of her to allege she was having an affair is asking the B.C. Supreme Court to order Telus to release the names and email accounts related to 34 IP addresses identified by TikTok as responsible for the online posts, according to a court petition. Advertisement 2 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Sign In or Create an Account Email Address Continue or View more offers Article content Article content tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or B.C. woman in TikTok posts seeks IP address info from Telus in court Back to video tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Play Video Article content In March, Gurvinder Dosanjh received a court ruling to provide user information for the TikTok accounts under what is called a Norwich order. The TikTok disclosure, however, did not provide names of the account holders but did include their IP, or internet protocol, addresses. The majority are assigned to Telus, her latest petition to the court says. Dosanjh is now seeking the identities from Telus of the holders of the IP addresses using the same Norwich order. A Norwich order is a 'type of pre-trial discovery which allows a rights holder to identify wrongdoers,' the petition states. 'They are increasingly used in the online context by plaintiffs who allege they are being anonymously defamed or defrauded and seek orders against internet service providers to disclose the identity of the perpetrator.' Canucks Report Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. There was an error, please provide a valid email address. Sign Up By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Thanks for signing up! A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Canucks Report will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Article content Advertisement 3 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content An individual seeking a Norwich order must prove a bona fide claim against the unknown alleged wrongdoer, direct involvement in the matter under dispute, that the order is for information that can't be obtained otherwise, and that public interests in favour of disclosure outweigh privacy concerns. The seeker of the information also has to pay the information holder for reasonable expenses for providing the details, which Dosanjh has offered to do for Telus. To prove her claim is genuine, Dosanjh has to show that she was defamed, in other words that the posts would tend to lower the person's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person, that she was the one being defamed, and that the words were published, according to the petition. Advertisement 4 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content It also said the TikTok videos are defamatory because they make false allegations that Dosanjh is engaging in 'sexual or romantic relations' with a former fitness trainer and she is cheating on her husband, that she is identifiable in the videos, and that they are posted to TikTok. Telus is involved in the dispute because it has enabled the TikTok account holders to post the defamatory images and comments by providing them with internet access, and it is therefore an 'innocent, but an involved, third party and not (a) mere witness.' The petition says disclosure of the creators of the TikTok videos 'will facilitate rectification of the wrong' by allowing Dosanjh to take action against the authors, including by launching lawsuits against them. Advertisement 5 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content Telus has its own user privacy policies that allow disclosure of personal information in compliance with a court order, it said. Dosanjh said the person behind one of the TikTok account, for instance, posted several videos between Jan. 21 and Feb. 17 on TikTok that contained captions alleging she was cheating on her husband with a personal trainer she had hired for six months in 2022. There were several other similar posts, some with doctored photos, placing an image of her face on someone else's body. She doesn't know the identity of the posters and denies all their allegations. Messages left with Dosanjh's lawyer and Telus were not immediately returned. Read More Woman asks B.C. court to reveal names of TikTok posters who alleged she was having affair with trainer Court awards $118,000 to Lions Bay couple after neighbours defamed them in chat group Article content Share this article in your social network Latest National Stories
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
3 Toronto men guilty of 1st-degree murder of 12-year-old boy struck by stray bullet in 2020
Three men on trial for the first-degree murder of 12-year-old Dante Andreatta, who was killed by a stray bullet while walking on Jane Street near Finch Avenue West on Nov. 7, 2020, have been found guilty. The jury also found Rashawn Chambers, Jahwayne Smart, and Cjay Hobbs guilty of five counts of attempted murder in relation to five occupants of a Honda Accord who were being shot at that day. The jury returned with it's verdict at 1 p.m. on Saturday, on its fifth day of deliberations following the five-week trial that began in April. The fatal shooting shocked the city at the time because it involved an innocent child who was walking home from a McDonald's restaurant with his mother when he was shot. In the Crown's closing arguments, assistant Crown attorney Arian Khader argued Chambers, Smart and Hobbs went to 25 Stong Ct. in a stolen vehicle, wearing masks and gloves, to commit murder. Story continues below advertisement The Crown said the fact that Smart and Chambers fired 36 rounds at the Honda Accord was powerful evidence the three accused went there to carry out a murder and called the defence theory that they were there to do a drug rip off 'far-fetched.' Khader told jurors that without Deshawn Daley's testimony about a gun, the defence would have no case. Daley, who the jury heard is in jail for a series of break and enters, testified he pointed a gun out the passenger side window of the Honda when he saw a man running towards the car. Daley said he didn't know the man but thought he saw a bulge in his sweater. He told the jury that after shots rang out, he pulled the gun in and rolled up the window. The Crown said the video evidence does not support Daley's version of events and argued Daley did not have a gun, given none of the eyewitnesses testified to seeing it. The Crown also said the gun could not have been sticking out of the window, given video surveillance showed the passenger window was fully closed. The Crown told the jury Daley should not be believed because what he said was impossible. Daley testified he is scared of people coming after him in jail, which is why the Crown said Daley gave favourable evidence to the accused, to mitigate his role in a conviction. Story continues below advertisement The Crown also argued Smart and Chambers could not have reacted as quickly as they did, letting off 18 rounds each, telling the jury this was a carefully planned and choreographed hit. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In their closing arguments, Rashawn Chambers' lawyers Monte MacGregor and Amanda Warth argued their client did not commit first-degree murder, nor did he attempt to murder any of the occupants in the silver Honda, calling it a 'chance encounter.' Chambers testified they were drug dealers who went to Stong Court to rip off another drug dealer who believed he was buying a kilogram of cocaine for $60,000. Due to an apparent shortage of cocaine during the COVID-19 pandemic, Chambers said they were planning to give the dealer baking soda packed like a brick of cocaine instead. 'He believed his friend was shot. He believed he was going to be run down as the silver Honda raced towards him. He freaked out and lost control. He shot instinctively, grabbing the gun from his waist and firing. This whole incident lasted for seven seconds,' said MacGregor. MacGregor told the jury if they don't find self-defence applies and Chambers' actions were excessive, he can only be guilty of manslaughter. Richard Posner, Smart's lawyer, argued Smart, who has also admitted to being one of the two shooters, also acted in self-defence when he fired his gun. Posner said Smart was shot at as a 14-year-old child, when he was almost killed lying in bed, and his instinct was to fight not take flight. Story continues below advertisement Smart, also an admitted drug dealer, testified he always carried a handgun and was not carrying a gun with him to kill anyone that day. The shooting was not arbitrary, Posner told the jury, but a reaction to a Glock 26 handgun being pointed towards him. Smart and Chambers testified they got out of the car to prove to Hobbs, who was driving, the occupants of the Honda were not connected to a man named 'KD.' Hobbs had arranged for them to sell the fake cocaine to KD through another friend named Baby, but Hobbs had never met KD before and only knew he was driving a silver Nissan. Smart and Chambers told Hobbs it was the wrong make and model of car and thought the occupants looked like kids. Posner also argued the video evidence was not consistent with a planned ambush. Hobbs' lawyer Craig Zee said his client should be acquitted of all charges, arguing all three were acting in lawful self-defence when Daley pointed a loaded Glock out of the window. Zee called the Crown's theory that it was planned 'purely speculative,' and because the accused did not know the occupants of the Honda, there was no reason to target anyone involved. Zee also urged jurors to believe Daley, who never told police about the gun before because he wanted to clear his conscience. His testimony was corroborated by the three accused. Story continues below advertisement Superior Court Justice Joan Barrett said for Smart and Chambers to be found guilty of first-degree murder, the jury had to be satisfied that the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt the shooting was both planned and deliberate, and they had the state of mind required for murder. Barrett explained for Hobbs, who was driving, to be found guilty of first-degree murder, the Crown had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hobbs knew Smart and Chambers intended to use their firearms, would have perceived bodily harm and drove to 25 Stong Ct. that day to assist in this deliberate act. The Crown must also have proved that he aided them knowing that one or both had the state of mind for murder, The jury did not hear that Smart had a previous conviction for manslaughter from 2013 after a fatal shooting. He was sentenced to 58 days in custody after 672 days of pre-sentence custody and a one-year conditional supervision order. Smart's manslaughter conviction was excluded after the defence successfully argued on a Corbett application. Once Barrett ruled on excluding the manslaughter conviction, Smart testified in his own defence. The jury also did not hear that Hobbs was convicted of second-degree murder for a shooting outside the Bisha Hotel on May 26, 2020. Hobbs was driving the getaway car when Dimarjio Jenkins, also known as the rapper Houdini, was fatally shot. Hobbs was sentenced in March 2024 to a life sentence with a parole ineligibility period of 15 years. Story continues below advertisement The jury also did not hear that roughly 12 hours before Dante Andreatta was shot, there was a shooting outside a motel in Brantford. No one was injured but at the time, but police described the shooting as targeted. Chambers, Smart and Hobbs were charged in relation to that shooting but the charges were later stayed. The Crown in this case did not bring an application to tender evidence of that shooting. A sentencing hearing has been set for July. First-degree murder is a mandatory life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years. The issue a judge must decide on is the sentence for the five counts of attempted murder. Those sentences will run concurrent to the life sentence.
