logo
European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for meeting with Trump

European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for meeting with Trump

Korea Herald3 days ago
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — European and NATO leaders announced Sunday they will join President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington to present a united front in talks with President Donald Trump on ending Russia's war in Ukraine and firming up US security guarantees now on the negotiating table.
Leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland are rallying around the Ukrainian president after his exclusion from Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their pledge to be at Zelenskyy's side at the White House on Monday is an apparent effort to ensure the meeting goes better than the last one in February, when Trump berated Zelenskyy in a heated Oval Office encounter.
'The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelenskyy to the hilt,' said retired French Gen. Dominique Trinquand, a former head of France's military mission at the United Nations.
'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he said.
Putin agreed at his summit in Alaska with Trump that the US and its European allies could offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war, special US envoy Steve Witkoff said in an interview Sunday on CNN's 'State of the Union.' It 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that,' said Witkoff, who called it 'game-changing.' Later, French President Emmanuel Macron said the European delegation will ask Trump to back plans they drafted to beef-up Ukraine's armed forces — already Europe's largest outside of Russia — with more training and equipment to secure any peace.
'We need a credible format for the Ukrainian army, that's the first point, and say — we Europeans and Americans — how we'll train them, equip them, and finance this effort in the long-term,' the French leader said.
The European-drafted plans also envision an allied force in Ukraine away from the front lines to reassure Kyiv that peace will hold and to dissuade another Russian invasion, Macron said. He spoke after a nearly two-hour video call Sunday with nations in Europe and further afield — including Canada, Australia and Japan — that are involved in the so-called 'coalition of the willing.' The 'several thousand men on the ground in Ukraine in the zone of peace' would signal that 'our fates are linked,' Macron said.
'This is what we must discuss with the Americans: Who is ready to do what?' Macron said. 'Otherwise, I think the Ukrainians simply cannot accept commitments that are theoretical.' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said earlier at a news conference in Brussels with Zelenskyy that 'we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. And the 'coalition of the willing' — including the European Union — is ready to do its share.' Macron said the substance of security guarantees will be more important than whether they are given an Article 5-type label.
'A theoretical article isn't enough, the question is one of substance,' he said. 'We must start out by saying that the first of the security guarantees for Ukraine is a strong Ukrainian army.' Along with Von der Leyen and Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb also said they'll will take part in Monday's talks, as will secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte.
The European leaders' support could help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal.
Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute, said European leaders are trying to 'shape this fast-evolving agenda.' After the Alaska summit, the idea of a ceasefire appears all-but-abandoned, with the narrative shifting toward Putin's agenda of ensuring Ukraine does not join NATO or even the EU.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that a possible ceasefire is 'not off the table' but that the best way to end the war would be through a 'full peace deal.' Putin has implied that he sees Europe as a hindrance to negotiations. He has also resisted meeting Zelenskyy in person, saying that such a meeting can only take place once the groundwork for a peace deal has been laid.
Speaking to the press after his meeting with Trump, the Russian leader raised the idea that Kyiv and other European capitals could 'create obstacles' to derail potential progress with 'behind-the-scenes intrigue.' For now, Zelenskyy offers the Europeans the 'only way' to get into the discussions about the future of Ukraine and European security, says RUSI's Melvin.
However, the sheer number of European leaders potentially in attendance means the group will have to be 'mindful' not to give 'contradictory' messages, Melvin said.
'The risk is they look heavy-handed and are ganging up on Trump,' he added. 'Trump won't want to be put in a corner.' Although details remain hazy on what Article 5-like security guarantees from the US and Europe would entail for Ukraine, it could mirror NATO membership terms, in which an attack on one member of the alliance is seen as an attack on all.
Zelenskyy continues to stress the importance of both US and European involvement in any negotiations.
'A security guarantee is a strong army. Only Ukraine can provide that. Only Europe can finance this army, and weapons for this army can be provided by our domestic production and European production. But there are certain things that are in short supply and are only available in the United States,' he said at the press conference Sunday alongside Von der Leyen.
Zelenskyy also pushed back against Trump's assertion — which aligned with Putin's preference — that the two sides should negotiate a complete end to the war, rather than first securing a ceasefire. Zelenskyy said a ceasefire would provide breathing room to review Putin's demands.
'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons,' he said. 'Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US senator says Congress to review shipbuilding reforms after Lee-Trump summit
US senator says Congress to review shipbuilding reforms after Lee-Trump summit

Korea Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

US senator says Congress to review shipbuilding reforms after Lee-Trump summit

A US senator said Wednesday that Congress will review what legislative reforms may be needed to facilitate shipbuilding cooperation with South Korea, based on the outcome of next week's summit between President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump. Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) made the remarks during a press availability in Seoul, days before Lee and Trump are set to hold their first summit in Washington on Monday (US time), following a recent tariff agreement between the two countries. "There might be some reforms that can make it more efficient, speed the process, and we'll look at that appropriately," Kim said when asked about US shipbuilding regulations prohibiting foreign involvement. "I cannot move forward until I have a sense of what comes out from the summit next week. So we'll see how that's structured and how the investment is laid out, and then we'll move with the appropriate level of urgency," he said. With the tariff deal, South Korea has proposed large-scale shipbuilding cooperation projects, dubbed "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again (MASGA)," to held restore the sluggish US shipbuilding industry, including building new shipyards in the United States and partnerships on maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) projects. However, concerns have been raised about how quickly the shipbuilding projects can move forward, as US laws, such as the Jones Act and the Byrnes-Tollefson Amendment, remain as a legal barrier restricting foreign operations in commercial shipping and military shipbuilding. "If there are proposals needed for reforms that make sense to both of our countries, I think it could move fast," Kim said. Kim also addressed the need for the US to be clear about its goals in shipbuilding cooperation with South Korea, such as the number and type of ships it needs to build, saying that any legislative support would start from there. As a New Jersey resident who lives about 15 minutes away from the Philly Shipyard, run by South Korea's Hanwha Ocean, Kim described South Korea as the "best partner" in boosting American shipbuilding capabilities. "We are supportive of President Trump's efforts to continue to increase shipbuilding capabilities, and we're prepared to provide whatever type of legislation as well as resources behind it to be able to make that successful," he said. Regarding the Trump administration's push for "modernizing the alliance," which potentially calls for reorienting the role of US troops in Korea to deter China, Kim said related bilateral discussions should take place in a way that ensures US commitment to deterring North Korean threats, as well as addressing shared regional challenges. "I want to make sure that ... in the Indo-Pacific, (we) are able to address the array of different challenges and threats that we face. We can do that in a way that still protects extended deterrence, protects our interests here on the Korean Peninsula," Kim said. "Any changes that we would see in significant ways to troop presence, we would want to make sure that Congress has a role in oversight," he added. Kim, the first Korean American elected to the Senate, visited South Korea this week with Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Il) for meetings with government officials and business leaders. They also met with President Lee. Kim said Lee's decision to stop in Japan before going to Washington for the summit with Trump was a "brilliant move." "I can think of few opportunities that are more impactful than recommitment to the trilateral process between the United States, South Korea and Japan," he said. (Yonhap)

Samsung, TSMC face subsidy-for-shares dilemma under Trump plan
Samsung, TSMC face subsidy-for-shares dilemma under Trump plan

Korea Herald

time12 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Samsung, TSMC face subsidy-for-shares dilemma under Trump plan

Critics argue Trump's equity demand is no subsidy but an attempt at ownership of private companies Washington is reviewing options to acquire equity stakes in foreign chipmakers such as Samsung Electronics and TSMC in return for the federal subsidies they are receiving to build factories in the US, industry sources said Wednesday. The idea has rattled the industry, with analysts dismissing it as 'unrealistic,' saying it reflects US President Donald Trump's intent to walk back on grants pledged under the former Biden administration. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday openly floated the idea in reference to Intel, as the White House reportedly weighs options such as taking a 10 percent stake in the company. 'We should get an equity stake for our money,' Lutnick told CNBC, referring to Intel. 'So we'll deliver the money, which was already committed under the Biden administration, and we'll get equity in return.' Citing sources familiar with the matter, Reuters reported that Lutnick is exploring applying the same approach to other chipmakers, including Samsung. Lutnick argued that the Biden administration 'literally was giving Intel money for free, and giving TSMC money for free,' underscoring the Trump administration's critical stance on federal grants. The CHIPS and Science Act, legislated under the Biden administration, pledged subsidies to global chipmakers building plants in the US as part of a wider effort to reshore semiconductor manufacturing. 'Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action,'' Lutnick said, adding that any potential arrangement would not give the government governance rights in Intel. Intel has said it finalized a nearly $8 billion grant under the CHIPS and Science Act to build its factories, while TSMC was awarded $6.6 billion to expand chip production at its Arizona facilities. Samsung Electronics, which is building a $37 billion advanced chip plant in Taylor, Texas, secured a $4.75 billion subsidy package under the Biden administration last year. SK hynix is also set to begin construction of a $3.87 billion advanced packaging plant for AI memory in West Lafayette, Indiana, in the second half of this year. 'It's an unreasonable idea. The US government is effectively demanding equity in private companies — not state-run firms or startups, but already well-established foreign businesses like Samsung and TSMC. That is not a subsidy anymore, it is ownership,' said Kim Yang-paeng, a senior researcher at the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade. According to Kim, the plan reflects Trump's long-standing view that subsidies are a 'waste' and should not be handed out. 'What Washington is really saying is it wants equity equal to the subsidies, which means it's no longer a subsidy,' he said. 'US firms might accept that since it is their own government, but Samsung or TSMC will not.' In Intel's case, the Trump administration's plan to acquire a 10 percent stake is seen as roughly equivalent to the $7.86 billion in subsidies the company is set to receive, compared with its market capitalization of $110.8 billion. If applied to Samsung, the approach would translate into about a 1.6 percent stake, based on the $4.75 billion subsidy against its 414 trillion won market capitalization as of Wednesday. As the Korean chip giant is listed on the domestic stock market, Washington may instead target stakes in its US subsidiaries, such as Samsung Semiconductor and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, industry experts said.

Trump eyes air support for Ukraine, no US ground troops
Trump eyes air support for Ukraine, no US ground troops

Korea Herald

time15 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Trump eyes air support for Ukraine, no US ground troops

WASHINGTON/LONDON/KYIV (Reuters) -- President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, but said the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in the country. A day after Trump pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit, the path to peace remained uncertain as the US and allies prepared to work out what military support for Ukraine might include. "When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably ... by air," Trump said in an interview with the Fox News "Fox & Friends" program. Trump did not elaborate. Later, in an interview with radio host Mark Levin, Trump characterized his negotiating style in trying to end the war as "probably instinct more than process." Following Monday's meeting, Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said. The energy ministry said the strikes caused big fires at energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery. Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal after all, saying, "We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks." The nature of US military aid for Ukraine under a peace deal was unclear. Air support could take many forms, such as missile defense systems or fighter jets enforcing a no-fly zone. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that US air support was "an option and a possibility," but, like Trump, she did not provide any details. "The president has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies," she said at a news briefing. Analysts say more than 1 million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hailed the White House talks as a "major step forward" toward ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Putin and Trump. Zelenskyy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in February. Trump discussed Budapest as a venue for a summit involving Zelenskyy and Putin with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Tuesday, a White House official said. Istanbul, where delegations for the two countries have met previously, has also been mentioned, a senior administration official said. Hungary is one of the few European places that Putin could visit without fear of arrest on International Criminal Court charges as Orban maintains close ties with the Russian leader. It was unclear whether Ukraine would accept Hungary as a venue. Neutral Switzerland also said it would be ready to host Putin for any peace talks. "They are in the process of setting it up," Trump told radio host Levin about a Putin/ Zelenskyy meeting. But Trump cast doubt on whether he would attend. "Now I think it would be better if they met without me. ... If necessary, I'll go," he said. Trump, asked by Levin how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, said, "Well, it's probably instinct more than process. I have instincts." Ukraine's allies held talks in the so-called Coalition of the Willing format on Tuesday, discussing additional sanctions to crank up the pressure on Russia. The grouping has also agreed that planning teams will meet US counterparts in the coming days to develop security guarantees for Ukraine. NATO military leaders were expected to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, with US General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told Reuters. Putin has said Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance in Ukraine. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his summit with Trump on Friday in Alaska. Neil Melvin, a director at the International Security at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect US pressure with a protracted peace negotiation. Melvin said both Ukraine and its European allies on one side and Russia on the other were striving "not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process." "They're all tiptoeing around Trump" to avoid any blame, he said, adding that Trump's statements on security guarantees were "so vague it's very hard to take it seriously."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store