CJP stresses cooperation between bench and bar
He made these remarks during a meeting with a delegation of the Sindh High Court Bar Association (SHCBA) at the Supreme Court Branch Registry in Karachi. Justice Afridi was accompanied by Chief Justice of the Sindh High Court Justice Junaid Ghaffar.
The SHCBA delegation was led by its President Barrister Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo, and included Vice President Muhammad Rahib Lakho, Honorary Secretary Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed, and several other members of the managing committee, as well as, former SHCBA President Rehan Aziz Malik.
Welcoming the delegation, Justice Afridi stressed that the delivery of justice cannot be achieved in isolation and depends on the strength of cooperation between the judiciary and the legal fraternity. He reiterated that no external pressure or influence would be allowed to undermine this relationship, which he described as vital and non-negotiable.
The Chief Justice briefed the delegation on the reform agenda currently under way under the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan (LJCP), highlighting measures aimed at the welfare and empowerment of lawyers. He emphasised that the reforms were designed through a consultative process with active input from the Bar, reflecting a shared vision for strengthening the justice sector. Among the initiatives discussed was solarisation of bar premises, establishment of e-libraries to facilitate lawyers in remote areas, and integration of technology to enhance institutional capacity.
Justice Afridi also outlined key decisions taken in recent meetings of the LJCP and the National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee (NJPMC), both of which he chairs. He spoke of efforts to address the issue of enforced disappearances through the creation of a dedicated committee, as well as directives issued to High Courts to safeguard judges from undue external influences.
He detailed structural reforms such as the establishment of Commercial Litigation Corridors and Model Criminal Trial Courts to ensure swift adjudication, and the setting of timelines for the disposal of thirteen categories of cases. Other reforms included piloting a Double-Docket Court Regime to address backlog, institutionalizing court-annexed mediation, and launching a Professional Excellence Index to assess and improve judicial performance. Additionally, the NJPMC has formed a committee to standardize recruitment, training, and service conditions within the district judiciary.
In response, Barrister Metlo thanked the Chief Justice for the reforms and acknowledged the inclusion of the legal community in policy-making processes. He presented the challenges faced by the Bar and proposed the establishment of Model Civil Courts to address the oldest pending civil cases, which he said continue to burden litigants and courts alike.
Justice Afridi appreciated the proposal and assured the delegation that it would be considered seriously by the relevant forums. The meeting concluded with a shared resolve to enhance judicial transparency, efficiency, and public trust in the legal system, underlining the indispensable role of both the Bench and the Bar in ensuring justice for all.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
16 hours ago
- Business Recorder
CJP for steps to implement BVC
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) emphasised on structured institutional support to Bar Councils for the effective implementation of the mandatory Bar Vocational Course (BVC). In line with the inclusive reform implementation strategy envisioned by CJP Yahya Afridi, on Saturday, a meeting was convened at the Federal Judicial Academy (FJA) to deliberate on structuring institutional support to Bar Councils. The meeting was attended by representatives of the Bar Councils, the Director Legal Education and Directors General of the Judicial Academies. Discussions were held in an atmosphere of mutual understanding and shared commitment to strengthening the professional standards of the legal fraternity. Participants expressed unanimity in their resolve to advance this initiative through a structured and coordinated approach, aimed at enhancing the quality of legal education and professional training for aspiring advocates. To prepare a comprehensive and sustainable strategy for the BVC, a sub-committee was constituted comprising the Director Legal Education, a representative of the Bar Councils, and a representative of the FJA. The sub-committee has been tasked with presenting its recommendations at the next meeting, scheduled for October 2025. The meeting concluded on a positive note, with participants reaffirming their collective resolve to work in partnership towards a more just, inclusive, and citizen-centric justice system. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Backlog persists despite new SC hiring
Despite an increase in the number of judges, pendency in the Supreme Court could not be reduced substantively, as the number of pending cases rose since February when six judges were elevated to the apex court, according to data available on the Supreme Court's website on Thursday. The data showed that 57,089 cases were pending as of August 6, despite the fact that seven judges have been appointed in the last six months. Currently, the apex court is not functioning at full strength due to the summer vacation, and pendency is increasing day by day; 56,892 cases were pending just last week. When Chief Justice (CJ) Yahya Afridi assumed office, 59,435 cases were pending in the apex court, which then comprised 16 permanent and two ad hoc judges. Subsequently, six new judges were appointed in February, followed by the elevation of a Lahore High Court judge to the apex court in April. Despite these seven new appointments, pendency has not been substantively reduced. In March, 55,702 cases were pending, which has now increased to over 57,000. However, it is also a fact that 60,507 cases were pending in September last year, showing a slight improvement over time. CJ Afridi has accelerated the disposal of criminal cases, particularly those involving death sentences. A lawyer commented that if pendency is reduced by 3,000 cases each year, then over the next three years, the overall reduction will be substantial. There may be several reasons for the lack of substantial reduction in pendency. One of them is that the Supreme Court has remained visibly divided since the passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment. A full court meeting held on October 28 last year had adopted the Case Management Plan 2023 — the brainchild of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah — to address the growing backlog. However, it is learnt that this plan is no longer being followed. The constitutional benches, created after the 26th Amendment, have consumed much time hearing cases related to the military trials of civilians, the transfer of judges to the Islamabad High Court (IHC), and the allocation of reserved seats. These constitutional benches have yet to issue detailed judgments in these three crucial cases, the outcomes of which have significantly impacted the independence of the judiciary, fundamental rights, and democracy in the country. Two minority judges have issued detailed opinions in the military courts cases, but the detailed majority verdict is still awaited.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Govt defends May 9 convictions in NA
As the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) faces an intensifying wave of disqualifications and arrests, party chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan on Wednesday came down hard on the federal government, accusing it of deepening political repression and bending the rules of democracy. Addressing the National Assembly, Gohar said the government's conduct was "deteriorating with each passing day", citing the disqualification of PTI leaders, including Opposition Leader Omar Ayub, and the arrest of 80-year-old Rehana Dar as the latest in a series of politically motivated actions. "The injustice done to us has drawn widespread public condemnation," he said, pointing out that PTI lawmakers had chosen to stay in Parliament and not boycott its proceedings. "One by one, our lawmakers were disqualified," he added, calling the sequence of events a "systematic targeting" of opposition voices. Raising concern over the case of Sheikh Waqas Akram, Gohar said the move to disqualify him had emerged from within Parliament itself. "It is your responsibility to run this House in accordance with the Constitution and rules," he asserted. On the May 9 riots, Gohar reiterated, "We all condemned the incident. We requested the Chief Justice for a fair trial, those involved should be punished". However, he argued that PTI parliamentarians had only been charged, not proven guilty, and were subjected to trials that violated constitutional norms. "The judiciary treated PTI like a stepchild." In response, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar defended the legal framework under which PTI leaders had been convicted in the May 9 cases. He stressed that the judicial process had run its course and that the government had no hand in the verdicts. "Once a case reached the trial stage, it was the court's domain to conduct proceedings and deliver judgments," the minister said. "This is a lawful process; objections can be raised, but the forum to do so is also the court." Meanwhile, PTI MNA Iqbal Afridi sounded the alarm over ongoing military operations in tribal regions, particularly in Tirah, Bajaur and Waziristan, accusing the state of orchestrating what he called a "genocide" of tribal people. "There was direct firing on civilians in Tirah, killing six people," he claimed. "Shelling was also carried out in Bajaur, resulting in more deaths. This violence continues in Waziristan as well." Afridi further alleged that K-P Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur had not supported the proposed military operation during the recent Apex Committee meeting, implying that the federal government was acting unilaterally. "This entire drama is about access to minerals," he said, claiming that attention to the tribal areas was only revived after PTI's founder blocked a minerals bill. "We are homeless, we are suffering, and now we are being painted as criminals," said Afridi. "You are hell-bent on dividing us, and then you speak of Kashmir?" Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry rejected Afridi's claims, saying that no operation was being conducted against any specific group or region. "These are unfounded and damaging to national unity," he said.
