Famous anti-piracy campaign ‘used pirated font'
A famous anti- piracy campaign from the early 2000s which became a part of pop culture history may have itself have been the product of piracy.
Social media users have discovered the font used for the dramatic 'You wouldn't steal a car' advert was pirated from a typeface created by designer Just van Rossum.
The campaign compared pirating films to stealing items such as handbags and televisions and regularly appeared in cinemas and on DVDs, with dramatic music playing in the background.
The thriller-style advert ended with the warning 'Piracy. It's a crime'.
One Bluesky user extracted the fonts used in one of the campaign's old PDFs and made the discovery that it was actually a pirated version of Mr van Rossum's licensed font FF Confidential.
Sky News reports that there was no evidence to suggest that the campaign's designers were aware that the font was pirated.
At the time, Mr van Rossum's font had been illegally cloned and re-released as the font XBand-Rough, which was widely shared and free to use.
"I had known about the 'illegal clone' of my font before, but I didn't know that that was the one used in the campaign,' Mr van Rossum told Sky News.
"The campaign has always had the wrong tone, which (to me) explains the level of fun that has been had at its expense. The irony of it having used a pirated font is just precious.'
After first appearing in 2004, the advert was discontinued in 2009 but has remained on cassettes and DVDs in people's collection.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
14 hours ago
- Sky News
'Ordering a woman to be sexually exploited is as easy as ordering a takeaway': How trafficking victims are being sold online
*Sarah thought she was going to a job interview to become a waitress. Warning: This story includes graphic descriptions of sexual exploitation and abuse, including rape Instead, she was lured to a strange man's flat and held against her will for six months. "One of the very first things he did was ask for me to hand over my passport to check that I had the right to work," she says. "I remember him asking me kind of odd questions, like, 'do you like sex?' "I remember him taking me into another room within this flat and closing the door behind him, then locking the door. And then I was raped." She says her passport was used to create an online profile to advertise her for sex. She had no control over the adverts, no access to the accounts, and was repeatedly abused by her trafficker and the men who booked her through the website. "My abuser would say: 'This man would like to see you, he's booked you, but he's requested sloppy seconds. Okay? I am going to rape you again so that when you go and see this man, you will take that to that man'," she tells Sky News. Sarah says she was forced to take on different names to match her trafficker's rotating online personas. She ultimately escaped after threatening to scream unless her abuser let her go. "He just glared at me, furious," she recalls. "But he opened the door. That was the moment I had. That was the moment I took. I ran out and never saw him again." Sarah's abuser is now in prison. But the website that he used to facilitate her abuse is still operating. A Sky News investigation has uncovered thousands of potential indicators of sexual exploitation on two of the UK's most prominent adult service websites, raising serious concerns about how traffickers may be using these platforms to advertise and abuse victims like Sarah. Analysis of more than 50,000 adverts on AdultWork and Vivastreet - two of the country's largest escorting platforms - revealed a high concentration of red flags linked to organised exploitation, including repeated use of the same contact numbers, and/or duplicated advert text, across adverts for different women in different geographical locations. These patterns, highlighted by the Sex Trafficking Indication Matrix (STIM), a research tool used to identify signs of trafficking, suggest some profiles may be linked to coercive networks. In one case, the same phone number appeared in eight separate adverts for at least five different women, all listed with identical ages, nearly identical descriptions, but different photographs and spread across multiple UK regions. Neither platform is accused of criminal activity, but experts and campaigners say the scale and nature of these indicators are red flags for potential abuse. Prostitution is legal in England and Wales. But the controlling of prostitution for gain, sometimes called pimping, and the more severe crime of trafficking, are not. "These platforms make it as easy to order a woman to be sexually exploited as it is to order a takeaway," said Kat Banyard, director of campaign group UK Feminista. "There are big questions for national policing to answer about why it is that this important investigation has had to be done by Sky News, and why it wasn't national policing that was launching an investigation to uncover the scale of potential criminality on these sites." Over several months, Sky News used STIM indicators to assess escorting adverts across two platforms. On Vivastreet alone, more than 7,000 were linked to phone numbers that appeared multiple times - more than half the total number of listings at the time. On AdultWork, over 1,000 ads were found to contain duplicated descriptions. In one example on AdultWork, the same wording was used in 357 different listings - a sign that content may have been copied and pasted to cover for multiple individuals under a single operator. The websites told us duplication can reflect legitimate activity, such as touring sex workers using aliases. However, opponents say their structure allows abusers to hide in plain sight. Sky News can also reveal that officials at the Home Office met representatives from escorting websites 25 times between 2017 and 2024, under the previous Conservative government. Critics argue these discussions have failed to lead to meaningful safeguards or regulation. A Home Affairs Committee report in 2023 was highly critical of this kind of engagement. And in parliament, pressure is building to take stronger action. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi has tabled an amendment to the Policing and Crime Bill that would seek to ban such websites altogether. "This is a thriving, multibillion-pound industry, and we're acting like there's nothing to see here," she says. "It's horrific, and I think more people need to be speaking out about it - this gives parliamentarians the opportunity to discuss and debate it on the floor of the house." In a statement, a Vivastreet spokesperson said: "Experts are clear that indicators that may suggest exploitation can have innocent explanations. "For example, it is a fact that many sex workers use different names and personas, and 'touring' - moving for short periods of time to different areas to take bookings - is a well-known practice. "We take safety extremely seriously and deploy industry-leading security measures to detect, report, and remove potentially exploitative content, including new requirements that all adult category advertisers must undergo age and ID verification." AdultWork said: "Sexual exploitation is not tolerated in any form. "We have strict internal policies in place to reinforce this and we are continually updating our internal systems for detecting accounts and requesting additional documents for evidence of legitimacy. "We make it a priority to fully cooperate and comply with all law enforcement requests. Additionally, any indications or reports of trafficking are fully reviewed and if we find them to be suspicious, we proactively contact law enforcement." Whether escorting platforms can be better regulated - or whether they should be outlawed entirely - remains a point of national debate. But with mounting evidence of potential exploitation and growing political scrutiny, campaigners say inaction is no longer an option. "These platforms are so poorly moderated and poorly regulated," Sarah says. "No one can sit behind a screen and know if someone's being coerced or is at the mercy of a predator."
Metro
18 hours ago
- Metro
Bizarre moment plane-spotter filmed man running around on Heathrow runway
A man has been detained after running towards planes on the tarmac at Heathrow Airport. The individual, wearing something around his waist, was running away from four other men in the grounds of Heathrow's Terminal 2. The incident last for about one-and-a-half minutes before the man was apprehended. He eventually stopped running after a van arrived with two people wearing high-visibility clothing. He was then promptly detained and led away. The entire incident was filmed, and a later cut shows him pinned to the ground and being put into the back of a police van. The video, captured on the YouTube channel Big Jet TV. In the background, a plane spotter could be heard saying: 'What's going on here? Why would there be people running across the [tarmac]? 'What's this all about? That is not right. More Trending 'That geezer's running from someone. They are chasing him. 'What are you doing mate? Get on the floor son, give yourself up.' A Heathrow spokesperson told Sky News: 'Working with partners, we have quickly resolved an incident at the airport involving an individual who accessed the airfield taxiway. 'The individual has been removed from the airport. The airport continues to operate as normal and passengers are travelling as planned.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Harry Styles spotted dancing up a storm at London music festival MORE: Map reveals the cheapest London station to live near — where rents are £835 less than average MORE: Body found in search for woman who disappeared after leaving London home
South Wales Guardian
a day ago
- South Wales Guardian
Minister says AI ‘does lie' but defends Government amid copyright row
Peter Kyle acknowledged the technology was 'not flawless' as he insisted the Government would 'never sell downstream' the rights of artists in the UK. He also said he had 'mistakenly' said his preferred option on AI and copyright was requiring rights-holders to 'opt out' of their material being used by tech companies, and had since 'gone back to the drawing board'. Ministers have faced a backlash from major figures in the creative industries over their approach to copyright, with Sir Elton John this week describing the situation as an 'existential issue.' The Government is locked in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has demanded artists to be offered immediate copyright protection as an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill. Peers have attempted to change the legislation by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements aimed at ensuring rights-holders are able to see when their work has been used and by whom. Asked about the risk of AI producing unreliable information, Mr Kyle said 'people need to understand that AI is not flawless, and that AI does lie because it's based on human characteristics'. 'Now it is getting more precise as we move forward. It's getting more powerful as we move forward,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips. 'But as with every single technology that comes into society, you can only safely use it and wisely use it by understanding how it works.' He added: 'We are going to legislate for AI going forward and we're going to balance it with the same legislation that we'll bring in to modernise the copyright legislation as well.' The Government has said it will address copyright issues as a whole after the more than 11,500 responses to its consultation on the impact of AI have been reviewed, rather than in what it has branded 'piecemeal' legislation. Among the proposals had been a suggestion that tech companies could be given free access to British music, films, books in order to train AI models without permission or payment, with artists required to 'opt-out' if they do not want their work to be used. Asked about the prospect of an opt-out clause, Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I always had on the table from the outset an opt-out clause. 'But I mistakenly said this was my preferred option that had more prominence than perhaps some of the creatives wanted it to have, and I've now sort of gone back to the drawing board on that, because I am listening to what people want.' Last month hundreds of stars including Sir Elton, Sir Paul McCartney and Kate Bush signed a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.
