
UK ministers ‘too scared of Donald Trump' to back levy on TV streaming giants
British ministers are 'running scared' of Donald Trump in their refusal to force US streaming services to fund more UK-focused shows, the director of the BBC's Wolf Hall has warned.
Peter Kosminsky said a 'supine and terrified' government was worried about anything that might upset the 'bully in the White House'.
He said programmes that spoke truth to power were needed amid global tensions and political division. However, he said important UK dramas were 'under threat as never before', with the BBC and ITV struggling to fund shows and cautious about productions that did not appeal to audiences outside Britain.
Kosminsky is calling for a 5% levy on streaming companies – to be spent on UK-focused television – and said a similar surcharge had been adopted by 17 other countries.
But he accused UK ministers of being afraid to follow suit because of the US president's threat to impose huge tariffs on films made outside the US.
'We're running scared of Donald Trump and his tariffs,' he said in a speech last week, reproduced in Radio Times.
'The government is so supine and terrified that it's not prepared to run the risk of upsetting Trump and the delicate trading relationship that they've fought so hard – and grovelled so intensely – to achieve.'
Kosminsky said ministers could still be pressured into changing course because they were 'terrified of swings in public support'.
He added: 'If you care about public service broadcasting, if you care about the BBC, ITV and Channel 4, I would beg you – get out there and campaign for the government to stand up to the bully in the White House and protect the 100-year tradition of public service broadcasting in this country, of which we are rightly proud, before it is lost for ever.'
His speech follows warnings from other television figures, including Elisabeth Murdoch, that UK stories could be lost from the small screen as producers and broadcasters turn to shows they can sell internationally, most notably in the US.
Kosminsky said the overall effect had been to ensure shows such as Three Girls, a drama about the Rochdale child sexual abuse scandal, or Mr Bates vs the Post Office, which brought a huge miscarriage of justice to wider public attention, would not be made in today's market.
He said Wolf Hall was turned down by streamers and that senior figures behind the historical drama had voluntarily given up payments.
His demand for a 5% levy on companies such as Netflix and Amazon Prime has split the television industry. Other senior figures are pushing for a significant increase in the tax relief, which they say would ensure more shows are economically viable.
A spokesperson for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said: 'As the creative industries minister, Sir Chris Bryant, told the culture, media and sport select committee in January, the government has no plans to introduce a levy on streaming services.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
16 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Emmerdale's Fred Kettle breaks silence on Dylan's return
Fred Kettle, who played troubled teen Dylan Penders, will head back to the village and has teased 'trouble'. Dylan played a vital role as April Windsor's friend when she ran away from home, and fans were gutted when he left. Speaking to The Mirror, Fred said he couldn't wait to be back on the ITV soap. Dylan Penders is returning to Emmerdale. (Image: ITV) "I am so glad to be back,' he said. 'It is going to be a nice journey for Dylan, given his experiences. But he is going to cause a bit of bother in the village." Fred also shared how happy he was to have the backing of fans, after they enjoyed his debut earlier this year. Dylan was first introduced as a friend of April Windsor, who she met while living on the streets. He later arrived in the village in an attempt to get clean from drugs and was last seen in March, on his way to rehab. In recent weeks, Emmerdale newcomer Joe Absolom, formerly of EastEnders fame, confirmed a "dark storyline" surrounding Dylan's return to Digital Spy. Fred also confirmed that there would be some new characters tied into his return. He said: 'Watch this space. I can't wait for fans to see what happens. It will be interesting to see his return and how the plot develops. 'But we'll just have to watch and find out." Actress Amelia Flanagan, who plays April, also had shared that she was excited to film with Fred once more. Emmerdale boss Laura Shaw had previously told The Mirror what's ahead for Dylan. She said: "The lovely Fred Kettle who played Dylan is coming back to the show. He is going to be bringing his past back to the village with him and that's going to cause huge problems for April and the family there. "We've got a couple of exciting new castings who are going to be joining us for that story, but I can't tell you who they are yet but watch this space. It's very exciting." Fans react to Dylan returning Earlier this year soap fans were quick to take to social media in support of Dylan – even suggesting he could be a long lost Dingle relative. Now, they await his on-screen return. Recommended reading: One person commented on X: 'And lovely Dylan is returning #Emmerdale." 'Dylan seems likeable enough but he's still a stranger to Marlon,' another added in reference to April's father. Others said: 'Dylan actually seems like a decent lad.' 'I notice they're bringing Dylan back next week! Wouldn't it be funny if Dylan ended being a long lost Dingle!'


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Brace yourself for MORE tax rises as Keir Starmer ploughs billions into defence and the NHS and Labour backbenchers rebel over welfare cuts to pay for it
Hard-pressed Brits have been warned to brace themselves for tax rises later this year as Keir Starmer pours money into defence and the NHS and Labour MPs vow to block welfare cuts that would help cover the cost. The PM will join fellow Nato leaders in The Hague today after signing up to the goal of spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence. Another 1.5 per cent will be committed to related measures such as cyber security, under the package demanded by Donald Trump. However, ministers have refused to say where the UK will find the extra money - around £30billion on top of existing plans - with Rachel Reeves already scrambling to balance the books. The announcement today comes after the Chancellor committed tens of billions into trying to improve the NHS in her spending review earlier this month. At the same time, Sir Keir and Ms Reeves are facing a major backbench rebellion over an attempt to claw money back by tightening disability benefit criteria and getting people back into work. Some 108 MPs have signed a 'reasoned' amendment that would effectively kill off the legislation in a Commons vote on July 1. Sir Keir has also already announced a softening of cuts to winter fuel payments that mean many more pensioners will remain eligible, after a major uproar. Economist Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: 'If spending goes only one way then so, inevitably, will tax. 'Historic increases already this decade. Looks like a lot more to come.' The Nato summit comes after Sir Keir's meeting yesterday with Volodymyr Zelensky at No10. The Ukrainian president will also be at the summit. Britain allocated 2.33 per cent of GDP to defence last year, and Keir Starmer has committed to reaching 2.5 per cent by April 2027. There is an 'ambition' of increasing that to 3 per cent at some stage in the next parliament - likely to run to 2034. At the same time the scale of the welfare rebellion - reaching into every corner of the party - could be enough to overturn the government's massive majority. It raises the prospect of Sir Keir being forced into yet another humiliating U-turn - and Ms Reeves having to find a way of covering the £5billion the reforms are meant to save. Just yesterday Ms Reeves was insisting there will be no major concessions. Touring broadcast studios this morning, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden admitted the insurrection was 'very serious' and stressed there would be 'discussions' with MPs. Ministers including Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner have refused to rule out kicking MPs out of the party if they vote against the change, leading some to threaten to form 'Labour 2' if that happens. Some 108 Labour MPs have signed a 'reasoned' amendment that would effectively kill off the legislation in a Commons vote on July 1 The amendment, published on the Commons order paper today, notes there is a 'need for the reform of the social security system'. But it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'. There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said. They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn. Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee. Helen Hayes, the chair of the education committee who was a shadow education minister for three years under Sir Keir in opposition, also signed it. She said: 'Reform of our benefits system is needed, but the cuts to PIP will push some disabled people out of work and increase poverty. 'That's unjustifiable. Ministers must rethink to get this right.' Earlier this month Ms Reeves put a £29 billion-a-year rise in NHS funding at the heart of her spending plans but other Whitehall budgets will be squeezed and experts warned tax rises may be needed later this year. Ms Reeves acknowledged that 'too many people in too many parts of our country' were yet to feel the benefits of the change they voted for when Labour was swept to power last year as she pushed money towards projects outside of London and south-east England. She insisted she would not need to mount another tax raid to pay for her plans but experts warned the money for the NHS might still not be enough even before the decision to increase defence spending.


BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Legislation to ban imports from Israeli settlements brought before Cabinet
Legislation that will ban imports from Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian territories will come before the Cabinet on Tuesday morning. Tánaiste Simon Harris will bring forward the renamed Israeli Settlements (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025. Advertisement It will ban trade with the occupied Palestinian territory. It follows a decision by Government to opt for fresh legislation instead of progressing the Occupied Territories Bill, first tabled in 2018. Speaking on Tuesday morning, Mr Harris said Ireland will become the first country in Europe to bring forward legislation to ban trade with the occupied Palestinian territories. Today Ireland becomes the first country in Europe to bring forward legislation to ban trade with the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Ireland is speaking up and speaking out against the genocidal activity in Gaza. Every country must pull every lever at its disposal. — Simon Harris TD (@SimonHarrisTD) June 24, 2025 'This is an important measure, because we are speaking up and speaking out on behalf of the people of Ireland in relation to this genocidal activity,' he added. Advertisement 'But, of course, I actually think and hope that the real benefit of publishing this legislation today will be that it may inspire other countries to do likewise, because it's important that every country uses every lever at its disposal. 'Our own domestic legislation comes against a backdrop of two important developments in Europe yesterday. 'Firstly, we saw for the very first time a review concluded of the Association Agreement, which told us what we already knew, but stated it very clearly that Israel is in breach of its human rights obligations. 'Secondly, Ireland joined with nine other European countries in calling on the European Commission to now review the EU's obligations under the ICJ advisory opinion. Advertisement 'I don't believe the European Union is in compliance with its obligations under the ICJ advisory opinion. We now want to see Europe legally review whether it's right to have trade in goods or services at an EU level with the occupied Palestinian territories.' Senator Frances Black, who brought forward the original Bill, welcomed the move. She said: 'We urgently need to see action now. I have to be clear on this, the legislation that's agreed by cabinet today, it's still only draft, but the Tánaiste has committed both to me and publicly that the Government are willing to include services in the final Bill if we can get the legal details right. 'I am 100% certain that we can and I'm going to hold him to that promise.' Advertisement