Welsh learners to get a boost after partnership is announced
ACT has linked up with Virtus Tech as part if it's Jobs Growth Wales+ programme.
Virtus Tech, which specialises in virtual reality solutions for training and education, creates immersive, scenario-based environments which echo real-world situations.
Last year, ACT launched its Enrichment Curriculum for Jobs Growth Wales+ learners.
As part of the curriculum, learners engage with Artificial Intelligence in multiple formats, for example using AI tools to generate customised mock interview questions and receive instant, tailored feedback on their answers.
Sam Holland, curriculum development manager and digital learning specialist at ACT said, 'We are empowering young people to take control of their futures in a way that's relevant, engaging, and deeply impactful.
'The enrichment programme has led to a sizeable increase in attendance among JGW+ learners, with staff reporting significant improvements in structure, motivation, and learner engagement.'
Leon Patnett, head of Jobs Growth Wales+, said: 'This enrichment work has been a game changer. It's giving learners the confidence and skills to actively shape their own paths.'
George Bellwood, CEO of Virtus Tech, said: 'This collaboration reflects ACT's forward-thinking approach and commitment to innovation, setting a strong example for how emerging technologies can drive impactful skills development across Wales.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
3 days ago
- Wales Online
Future of Llancaiach Fawr branded scandalous as Grade-I listed manor is mothballed
Future of Llancaiach Fawr branded scandalous as Grade-I listed manor is mothballed Caerphilly County Borough Council has closed Llancaiach Fawr amid ongoing uncertainty over its future, with the venue near Nelson being 'mothballed' and put on the market Llancaiach Fawr (Image: Google/Local Democracy Reporting Service ) The decision to shut down Llancaiach Fawr has been labelled a "retrograde step", amidst ongoing doubts about the future of the heritage site. The Grade-I listed manor, located near Nelson, has been "mothballed" and up for sale since January, following a cost-cutting move by Caerphilly County Borough Council to cease its annual subsidy for the site. The council's Plaid Cymru opposition group has claimed there is "no sign" of the venue reopening "anytime soon". Plaid revealed that a council response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) Act request indicated that while 15 viewings had been scheduled, no offers have been made so far. "The closure was yet another flawed decision by the Labour cabinet, made against the opposition of the public and many councillors," stated Cllr Lindsay Whittle, who heads the Plaid group. Plaid Cymru group leader Lindsay Whittle at Ty Penallta (Image: Plaid Cymru/Local Democracy Reporting Service ) "We want to see Llancaiach Fawr reopened to the public as soon as possible, but given the lack of submissions of interest so far then we might be waiting quite a long time. It really is scandalous that this tourist and historical icon of Caerphilly remains shut." Plaid Senedd Member Delyth Jewell described the venue as "irreplaceable" and "the centre of the community", including for thousands of schoolchildren who visited on trips. Stay informed on Caerphilly news by signing up to our newsletter here Article continues below "Many of us warned that if the council closed its doors, they might never reopen again," Cllr Jewell said. "What a crying shame it will be if that turns out to be the case." Councillor Delyth Jewell (Image: Plaid Cymru/Local Democracy Reporting Service ) Yet, these opinions have been contested by the council's deputy leader, Labour's Jamie Pritchard. He remarked that there has been "a high level of interest from a range of organisations who have submitted business cases to secure a bright new future for Llancaiach Fawr". Cllr Pritchard mentioned that the council "received so much interest, we ran more open days than originally envisaged". Councillor James Pritchard (Image: CCBC/Local Democracy Reporting Service ) He added: "I must say, for leading Plaid politicians to say there has been a lack of submissions tells me they have simply ignored a statement I put out more than two weeks ago," and continued, "This is a very peculiar and totally unproductive way to operate. We are very positive about the future of Llancaiach Fawr, and we look forward to issuing further updates over the coming weeks." Article continues below In response to Plaid's Freedom of Information Act request, the council disclosed it is "now awaiting submissions from those that expressed an interest" in managing Llancaiach Fawr but noted that a definitive timeline "cannot be confirmed at this stage". The council also revealed that 37 staff members had their employment "terminated" at the site, with one individual retained until the end of June "to maintain the open space", and two others successfully redeployed within the council.
North Wales Chronicle
3 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.
Leader Live
3 days ago
- Leader Live
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.
