
Meet Orb: An Internet Speed Test Unlike Any I've Ever Used Before
Speed tests are nothing new in the home internet space, but then again, I've never used a speed test quite like Orb before.
Meet Orb
The creators of the industry's most popular speed test, Ookla, rolled out Orb at the end of April. (Disclaimer: Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.) While I was skeptical about what value Orb could bring to the internet speed testing market, I felt differently after I downloaded the app to my iPhone and personal computer a few weeks ago.
Orb is a sophisticated speed testing application. It doesn't just test your download and upload speeds; it measures the overall health of your home network holistically, using multiple metrics and continuous speed tests.
Orb co-founder and CEO Doug Suttles says Orb isn't really a speed test at all.
Locating local internet providers
'We're not a speed test, that's the best way to put it,' Suttles tells me. 'We have speed testing functionality, but we focus far more on what we call responsiveness.'
What does Orb track?
Orb uses a few different metrics to measure responsiveness. You can see what your best (and worst) lag times look like.
Screenshot/Orb
Responsiveness -- which includes measurements like lag, latency, jitter and packet loss -- is the main metric Orb uses to rate your internet connection. Reliability, or the network's responsiveness over time, and speed are secondary measures that Orb takes into account.
'It's a different side of broadband that we're focusing on,' Suttles says. 'The things that we built at our past company were perfect for the time when we built them, when broadband was in its infancy and you needed to measure throughput first and foremost.'
With data use surging and internet speeds soaring, our lives are more connected than ever -- and speed alone is no longer the only factor in judging a good internet plan.
I see this often while reviewing home internet plans: While most internet shoppers mainly focus on speed and cost, a host of other factors, beyond advertised max speeds, determine whether a connection is reliable or consistent.
Jamie Steven, president and co-founder of Orb, says a reliable internet connection, not just a fast one, is vital for his rurally located home.
'The connection would go down all the time,' Steven says, 'Speed wasn't always or very often was not the issue. The issue was reliability and responsiveness.'
Suttles and Steven compare typical internet speed tests as akin to measuring a car's top speed. Instead of focusing solely on speeds, Orb focuses on whether your internet stalls or how quickly it can accelerate.
Additionally, Steven notes that the top speed of most cars is impractical for everyday use.
'It's not what you're doing day-to-day,' Steven says, referring to max internet speeds. 'For us, it was more about continuous measurement of your internet experience.'
How does Orb work?
Orb measures your internet's current speeds as well as its peak speeds.
Screenshot/Orb
Part of Orb's ingenuity is its ability to run those continuous speed tests, instead of only running speed tests when you're experiencing delays or interruptions. My first thought was that such an approach would put a hit on one's bandwidth. But Suttles assured me that Orb uses a much smaller payload (around 10MB) compared to popular speed test alternatives. For rural internet users like Steven, that lighter payload makes all the difference in keeping his internet connection stable.
If you'd like to give your internet a stress test, Orb does come with a 'peak speed' function to test your network's capacity, but that's not a continuous test.
Every device you connect to your internet acts as an "orb" or "sensor" that tests your internet connection. You can also set up a dedicated device to continuously monitor your network, 24/7.
There is one downside to Orb as it compares to other speed tests: You can't run the tests in a browser. You'll have to download the application to a device (which could be anything from a spare smartphone to a Raspberry Pi). Once you create an account, you can basically download Orb to anything with a hard drive -- and easily diagnose your internet issues in different rooms, simultaneously.
Hands-on with Orb
Screenshot/Orb
Orb is completely free and easy to use. A few weeks ago, I installed it on my phone and personal computer and used it to test my fiber internet connection. Using a scale of 0 to 100, Orb gives your internet a rating that's pretty easy to understand: Red (0 to 49) means poor performance and green (90 to 100) means your internet is performing excellently. My internet connection gets a solid 90 most of the time -- not bad for AT&T's cheapest speed tier.
"We want consumers to use this because these are problems that all of us on the founding team have had at home,' Steven says. 'We want this to be free forever."
'There's more value in building a brand than in trying to monetize consumers for something that, quite frankly, we're so passionate about, we just want to give it away anyway,' Suttles notes.
I used Orb to test the internet connection in my office and the speeds I was getting in the living room where my TV is. Both tests showed results typically consistent with what I'd see using Ookla.
You can add as many devices to your Orb network as you'd like; they'll all play a role in measuring your internet connectivity.
Screenshot Orb
Orb is still in its beginning stages -- while it's an effective tool for understanding how your internet connection works, there are a few features coming to the app that will make it even more user-friendly, like the ability to access historical data (similar to Ookla).
'Orb does record all data locally first…,' Steven notes. 'We just hadn't presented it in the UI, but that was something we were very passionate about. We didn't want to require cloud connectivity to be able to see the past.'
Perhaps most importantly, Orb will eventually start releasing recipes for measuring the connectivity of specific applications or services, like Microsoft Teams or Slack and, eventually, even specific internet services.
'Different web services use different sorts of protocols,' Steven says. 'So Zoom might use this special RTSP protocol -- can my connection open that port to that service? Is it accessible? What's its responsiveness?'
Down the road, Suttles and Steven would like to see Orb used by the community to create different 'recipes' and ways of measuring reachability.
'At its core, Orb is really a recipe engine,' Suttles says. 'Our vision is to release and share new recipes, then have the community start creating them.'
Final thoughts
The internet isn't getting any cheaper, and while it might be tempting to just buy more speed, there are simpler ways of diagnosing and boosting your connection first. While Orb (and the internet) continue to evolve, it's a good idea to have a holistic sense of your network's connectivity, beyond speed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump meets with Intel CEO after demanding he resign
US President Donald Trump on Monday said he had a "very interesting" meeting with the chief of US chip maker Intel, just days after calling for his resignation. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he met with Lip-Bu Tan along with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent. "The meeting was a very interesting one," Trump said in the post. "His success and rise is an amazing story." Trump added that members of his cabinet are going to spend time with Tan and bring the president "suggestions" next week. Intel did not respond to a request for comment. Trump demanded last week that the recently-hired boss of Intel resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem," Trump posted on Truth Social last Thursday. Tan released a statement at the time saying that the company was engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised and ensure officials "have the facts." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In a statement, Tan said there has been "a lot of misinformation circulating" about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at struggling Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. Intel's niche has been chips used in traditional computing processes, which are steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution. gc/bjt Sign in to access your portfolio


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Ford's New Truck Needs To Understand The EV Myths Permating Automaking
Ford promised their announcement of a new 'universal' EV platform, along with a low-cost light pickup truck, would be another 'Model T' moment in automaking history. Ford didn't show us the truck, just teased various attributes, in particular that their electric truck should sell for about $30,000 and be available in 2027, thanks to new design and manufacuring innovations. Nobody's going to be critical of making a decent vehicle for a lower price, and Ford certainly knows the truck market, though they haven't shown the same aplomb in the EV world. Based on what little we know, this is going to be a fairly short range truck, of low utility for towing traditional trailers. Are the choices the right ones? Range The base truck has a battery estimated at around 51kWh. The most efficient pickup today, Rivian's, would get around 125 miles of range on that, with a practical range under 100 miles. That's a customer scaring number, and impactical for road trips out of town, though many working trucks that never leave town could indeed get by on that. Perhaps Ford has found a way to make dramatic aerodynamic improvements--they did not show the shape of the truck--but even so, they will not likely get past 150 miles. On the plus side, that's with an LFP battery pack. LFP batteries are cheaper, used in shorter-range Teslas and many Chinese cars. While most of the battery industry has been on a very expensive quest for denser, longer range battery chemistries, 'good old' LFP has been winning the day. While it's a bit bulkier and heavier, it's cheaper and you can charge it to 100% every day, which makes up a lot for the reduced range. Ford will make a longer range NMC version as well, according to reports. Ford is perhaps betting that people will realize a not well understood truth, that long range is mostly useful for intercity road trips. (And in some cases, for those doing Level 1 charging at home.) While it's a bit less convenient, customers who know they plan to use their truck around town can save a bunch of money buying a smaller battery. Ford presumably hopes the $30K price point will attract a whole new class of buyers. Cost Buyers who don't understand EVs do indeed think they cost too much. The reality is that EVs are already a fair bit cheaper than ICE equivalents in total cost of ownership, when you add in energy and maintenance. Customers just have trouble feeling that--paying $5,000 more up front and saving $1,000/year is a huge win, but a delayed one. Of course, a vehicle that costs the same and still saves, $1,000/year is great, but that involves some compromises, like range. It would be nice if there were a way to get around the psychology of this. A way to sell the car for less but get the owner to pay $500/month more for their electricity (but still less than they paid for gas) so they see themselves saving money every year, not just in the future. It could be that creative accounting is more valuable than good engineering, though both are great. No sign as yet from Ford of another interesting solution for pickup trucks, namely a way to mount a temporary rental battery pack, or rental compact generator in the truckbed. That's much easier to design into a truck than a car. If drivers could stop for 15 minutes at a depot on the way out of town to rent such a range extender, they could get the best of both worlds--a cheap in-town car, and the ability to get extra range on rarer trips out of town. Single Platform It's not new to Ford, but they also plan to switch to a universal platform, on which they can build trucks, sedans, vans and SUVs. The battery pack of this pickup truck is a structural element that makes the bed of the truck. Universal platforms allow better economies of scale over all models, one of the best ways to drive down prices. Where's The Software? Ford spoke a lot about new hardware designs and manufacturing approaches, which is great, but it's 2025, and the vehicles that win will derive more and more of their value from their software, not their hardware. You need both, but without a world-beating software strategy, failure is likely. We didn't hear a lot about this, so Ford had better start laying that out soon. It's not just about making software-defined-vehicles; everybody knows about that, though they had to be dragged, kicking and screaming to do what silicon valley companies do as 2nd nature. It's hard to imagine a new "Model-T moment" without a lot of innovation there. Ford used to have a strong position overseas. It needs to regain that. In the USA, they will have protectionist tariffs to make them complacent, but out in the rest of the world they will be going head to head with China, where the things Ford announced today might generate a yawn, and not many Yuan. Let's hope that real reinvention of the company is coming.


Gizmodo
24 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
What's Going On at Tesla? A Wave of Executives Is Heading for the Exits
What's going on at Tesla? The electric vehicle manufacturer, navigating a challenging business landscape marked by increased competition and evolving consumer sentiment, also appears to be facing a significant internal crisis: a rapid exodus of top talent. Elon Musk's group has now lost its 10th executive this year. The latest departure is Piero Landolfi, who announced his exit on LinkedIn after nearly nine years with the company. 'After 8 3/4 years I have made the difficult decision to leave Tesla,' Landolfi posted. 'It was hard because of the incredibly talented and passionate people that I had the privilege to work, sweat and laugh with as we were accelerating the world to sustainable energy, against all odds and in spite of what used to be the general beliefs about electric cars.' He continued: 'It was hard because of the amazing products we build, the first principle thinking and the getting stuff done mentality that makes Tesla such an exciting place to work at. The post has garnered significant attention, with over 834 likes and nearly 250 comments, largely from individuals who collaborated with him during his tenure at Tesla or in his leadership role. Landolfi cited the familiar desire for a 'new and different adventure' as his reason for leaving. 'However, it is now time for my next adventure. This is the way,' he concluded, echoing a popular phrase from the Star Wars franchise. His next move is to Nimble, an AI robotics and autonomous e-commerce fulfillment technology company, where he has taken on the role of Senior VP of Operations. Notably, Nimble already counts former Tesla veterans among its ranks, suggesting a potential trend of talent migrating from the EV maker to the burgeoning AI and robotics sectors. Landolfi's journey at Tesla began in October 2016 when he joined as Director of Services, Technical Operations. His contributions led to a promotion nearly four years later to Director of Services, North America, a position he held until his departure this month. His exit marks the tenth executive departure from Tesla this year, a cascade of departures that has hit nearly every critical division of the company. The exodus began in February with the exit of David Imai. April saw the departures of David Lau and Mark Westfall. The pace accelerated in May with the loss of Prashant Menon and Vineet Mehta. June witnessed the exits of Omead Afshar, Milan Kovac (Head of Optimus Humanoid Robot Team), and Jenna Ferrua (Director of HR). Last month, Troy Jones, the VP of Sales, Service, and Delivery in North America, left. This month, in addition to Landolfi, Pete Bannon, the VP of Hardware Engineering (Chip Tech and Dojo Supercomputer), also announced his departure. These latest two departures coincide with a period of significant upheaval within Tesla's ambitious AI initiatives, particularly the winding down of Dojo, Tesla's custom-built supercomputer designed to train the neural networks for Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Tesla's humanoid robot, Optimus. The Dojo project, an expensive and technically risky strategy aimed at reducing reliance on Nvidia's GPUs, had already faced internal turbulence and questions about its long-term viability in a market dominated by established chip giants. 'Once it became clear that all paths converged to AI6, I had to shut down Dojo and make some tough personnel choices, as Dojo 2 was now an evolutionary dead end,' Musk explained in an August 10 post on X (formerly Twitter). Once it became clear that all paths converged to AI6, I had to shut down Dojo and make some tough personnel choices, as Dojo 2 was now an evolutionary dead end. Dojo 3 arguably lives on in the form of a large number of AI6 SoCs on a single board. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 10, 2025For any company, losing this many senior leaders in such a short time is a major red flag. It signals potential internal turmoil, a loss of crucial institutional knowledge, and raises serious questions about the company's future direction and the stability of its leadership culture under Musk. Not long ago, Tesla, having successfully scaled mass production of electric vehicles with the Model 3 and Model Y, was considered a magnet for top talent. This year's brain drain suggests the company may have lost some of its allure, potentially exacerbated by its CEO's increasingly vocal and often polarizing political stances, which have alienated some segments of the market and workforce. It's clear now that, in addition to challenges in sustaining its once-unstoppable sales growth in an increasingly competitive EV market, Tesla is facing another significant hurdle: retaining its top leadership. The short-term sales boost anticipated from consumers seeking to take advantage of the $7,500 federal tax credit on new EV purchases before it expires on September 30 may offer a temporary reprieve, but it can't mask the deeper issue. Tesla's biggest challenge is no longer just selling cars; it's convincing its own top talent to stay for the ride.